Abbott, A. 1995. Things of boundaries, Social Research, 62(4), 857–82.Google Scholar

Abbott, A. (2005). The Historicity of Individuals, Social Science History, 29(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, K., Green, J. F. and Keohane, R. O.. (2016). Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance, International Organization, 70(2), 247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrahamsen, R. and Williams, M. C.. (2011). Security beyond the State: Private Security in International Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism, International Organization, 58(2), 239–75.Google Scholar

Acuto, M. (2014). Everyday International Relations: Garbage, Grand Designs, and Mundane Matters, International Political Sociology, 8(4), 345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acuto, M. and Curtis, S., eds. (2013). Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and International Relations, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: Towards an Understanding of Contemporary Identity? Sociology, 40(3), 511–28.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (1991). Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress. In Adler, E. and Crawford, B., eds., Progress in Postwar International Relations, Columbia University Press, 43–88.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (1992). The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control, International Organization, 46(1), 101–45.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics, European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319–63.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (2005). Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations, Routledge.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation, European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (2019). World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Bernstein, S.. (2005). Knowledge in Power: The Epistemic Construction of Global Governance. In Barnet, M. and Duvall, R., eds., Power in Global Governance, Cambridge University Press, 294–318.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Crawford, B., eds. (1991). Progress in Postwar International Relations, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Drieschova, A.. (2021). The Epistemological Challenge of Truth-Subversion to the Liberal International Order, International Organization, 75(2), 359–86.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Greve, P.. (2009). When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance, Review of International Studies, 35(S1), 59–84.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Haas, P. M.. (1992). Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program, International Organization, 46(1), 367–90.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Pouliot, V.. (2011a). International Practices, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Pouliot, V.. (2011b). International Practices, International Theory, 3(1), 1–36.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Pouliot, V.. (2011c). International Practices: Introduction and Framework. In Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., eds., International Practices, Cambridge University Press, 3–35.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Pouliot, V.. (2015). Fulfilling the Promises of Practice Theory in IR, International Studies Quarterly Online, www.isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/4956/Fulfilling-The-Promises-of-Practice-Theory-in-IR.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R., ed. (2012). Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, Routledge.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. (2013a). Sovereignty. In Adler-Nissen, R., ed., Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, Routledge, 179–92.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. ed. (2013b). Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, Routledge.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. (2014a). Opting Out of the European Union: Diplomacy, Sovereignty and European Integration, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. (2014b). Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms and Order in International Society, International Organization, 68(1), 143–76.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. (2014c). Symbolic Power in European Diplomacy: The Struggle between National Foreign Services and the EU’s External Action Service, Review of International Studies, 40(4), 657–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. (2016). Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies: The Everyday of European Integration, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1), 87–103.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. and Drieschova, A.. (2019). Track-Change Diplomacy: Technology, Affordances, and the Practice of International Negotiations, International Studies Quarterly, 63(3), 531–45.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. and Pouliot, V.. (2014). Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya, European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 889–911.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. and Tsinovoi, A.. (2019). International Misrecognition: The Politics of Humour and National Identity in Israel’s Public Diplomacy, European Journal of International Relations, 25(1), 3–29.Google Scholar

Aelst, P. V. et al. (2017). Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment: A Challenge for Democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Ahamed, L. (2009). Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World, Penguin.Google Scholar

Akrich, M. (2010). From Communities of Practice to Epistemic Communities: Health Mobilizations on the Internet, Sociological Research Online, 15(2), 1–17.Google Scholar

Aldrich, N. W. (1910). An Address by Senator Nelson W. Aldrich before the Economic Club of New York, 29 November 1909, on the Work of the National Monetary Commission. Archives: Library of Congress, Collection Nelson W. Aldrich Papers.Google Scholar

Allan, B. (2017). Producing the Climate: States, Scientists, and the Constitution of Global Governance Objects, International Organization, 71(1), 131–62.Google Scholar

Allan, B. (2018). From Subjects to Objects: Knowledge in International Relations Theory, European Journal of International Relations, 24(4), 841–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amin, A. and Cohendet, P.. (2004). Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, M. S. and Neumann, I. B.. (2012). Practices as Models: A Methodology with an Illustration Concerning Wampum Diplomacy, Millennium, 40(3), 457–81.Google Scholar

Antoniades, A. (2003). Epistemic Communities, Epistemes and the Construction of (World) Politics, Global Society, 17(1), 21–38.Google Scholar

Arbatov, A. (2016). Saving Nuclear Arms Control, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 72(3), 165–70.Google Scholar

Archer, M. (1988). Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (2006). Between Past and Future, Penguin.Google Scholar

Aristotle. (1975). Nicomachean Ethics, translated by Rackham, H., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ashley, R. (1989). Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism and War. In Der Derian, J. and Shapiro, M., eds., International/Intertextual Relations, Lexington Books, 259–323.Google Scholar

Ashley, R. and Walker, R. B. J.. (1990). Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies, International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 259–68.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (2016). Torture and the Material-Semiotic Networks of Violence Across Borders, International Political Sociology, 10(1), 3–21.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (2017a). Small Worlds of Violence: A Global Grammar for Torture, Graduate Institute Geneva.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (2017b). We Have Never Been Civilized: Torture and the Materiality of World Political Binaries, European Journal of International Relations, 23(1), 49–73.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (2019). Security Compositions, European Journal of International Security, 4(3), 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (2020a). The Departed Militant: A Portrait of Joy, Violence, and Political Evil. Security Dialogue, 51(6), 537–56.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (2020b). The Poetry of Moans and Sighs: Designs for and against Violence, Frame: Journal of Literary Studies, 33(2), 13–31.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., Bellanova, R. and Kaufmann, M.. (2019). Doing and Mediating Critique: An Invitation to Practice Companionship, Security Dialogue, 50(1), 3–19.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. and Leander, A.. (2021). Designing-With/In World Politics: Manifestos for an International Political Design, Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences (PARISS), 2(1), 83–154.Google Scholar

Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M. and Sell, S. K., eds. (2010). Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Baert, P. and Da Silva, F. C.. (2010). One Hundred Years of French Social Theory: Form Structuralism to Pragmatism. In Baert, P. and Da Silva, F. C., eds., Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond, Polity, 12–51.Google Scholar

Bagehot, W. (1873). Lombard Street, a Description of the Money Market, Smith.Google Scholar

Bain, W. (2003). Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, A. (2006). The Group of Seven: Finance Ministries, Central Banks and Global Financial Governance, Routledge.Google Scholar

Barbato, M. (2013). Pilgrimage, Politics and International Relations: Religious Semantics for World Politics, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Barker, R. (1982). Conscience, Government, and War: Conscientious Objection in Great Britain, 1939–45, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Barnes, B. (2001). Practice as Collective Action. In Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E., eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, 25–36.Google Scholar

Barnett, M. and Duvall, R.. (2005). Power in Global Governance. In Barnett, M. and Duvall, R., eds., Power and Global Governance, Cambridge University Press, 1–32.Google Scholar

Barnett, M. N. and Finnemore, M.. (1999). The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations, International Organization, 53(4), 699–732.Google Scholar

Barnett, M. N. and Finnemore, M.. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Barry, A. (1999). Demonstrations: Sites and Sights of Direct Action, Economy & Society, 28, 75–94.Google Scholar

Barry, A. (2004). Ethical Capitalism. In Larner, W. and Walters, W., eds., Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces, Routledge, 195–211.Google Scholar

Bartelson, J. (1995). A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barth, K-H. (1998). Science and Political in Early Nuclear Test Ban Negotiations, Physics Today, 51(3), 34–9.Google Scholar

Barth, K-H. (2006). Catalysts of Change: Scientists as Transnational Arms Control Advocates in the 1980s, Osiris, 21(1), 182–206.Google Scholar

Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research while You’re Doing It, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bellamy, A. J., Williams, P. and Griffin, S.. (2010). Understanding Peacekeeping, 2nd ed., Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. (1999). A Tale of Two Sociologies: The Critical and Pragmatic Stance in Contemporary French Sociology, European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 379–96.Google Scholar

Benner, T. and Rotmann, P.. (2008). Learning to Learn? UN Peacebuilding and the Challenges of Building a Learning Organization, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2(1), 43–62.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, London: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Berling, T. V. (2015). The International Political Sociology of Security: Rethinking Theory and Practice, Routledge.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J., ed. (1985). Habermas and Modernity, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. (2000). Ideas, Social Structure, and the Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism, European Journal of International Relations, 6(4), 464–512.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. (2013). Global Environmental Norms. In Falkner, R., ed., The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 127–45.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. (2014). The Publicness of Private Global Environmental and Social Governance. In Best, J. and Gheciu, A., eds., The Return of the Public in Global Governance, Cambridge University Press, 120–48.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. and van der Ven, H.. (2017). Best Practices in Global Governance, Review of International Studies, 43(3), 534–56.Google Scholar

Berthoin Antal, A., Hutter, M. and Stark, D., eds. (2015). Moments of Valuation. Exploring Sites of Dissonance, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bertram, G. W. (2019). Art as Human Practice: An Aesthetics, Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Best, J. and Gheciu, A.. (2014a). The Return of the Public in Global Governance, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, J. and Gheciu, A.. (2014b). Theorizing the Public as Practices: Transformations of the Public in Historical Context. In Best, J. and Gheciu, A., eds., The Return of the Public in Global Governance, Cambridge University Press, 15–44.Google Scholar

Betts, A. and Orchard, P.. (2014). Conclusions. In Betts, A. and Orchard, P., eds., Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice, Oxford University Press, 270–85.Google Scholar

Bially Mattern, J. (2011). A Practice Theory of Emotion for International Relations. In Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., eds., International Practices, Cambridge University Press, 63–86.Google Scholar

Bially Mattern, J. and Zarakol, A.. (2016). Hierarchies in World Politics, International Organization, 70(3), 623–54.Google Scholar

Bigo, D. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices, Practices of Power, International Political Sociology, 5(3), 225–58.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and Social Imagery, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. (2001). Wittgenstein and the Priority of Practice. In Schatzki, T., et al., eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, 103–14.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1954). What Is Wrong with Social Theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1986). What Is Wrong with Social Theory? In ibid.: Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method, University of California Press, 140–52.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique. A Sociology of Emancipation, Polity Press.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L.. (2006). On Justification. Economies of Worth, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bonditti, P., Bigo, D. and Gros, F., eds. (2017). Foucault and the Modern International, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bordo, M. D. and Schwartz, A. J., eds. (1984). A Retrospective on the Classical Gold Standard, 1821–1931, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bourbeau, P. (2017). The Practice Approach in Global Politics, Journal of Global Security Studies, 2(2), 170–82.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, translated by Nice, R., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1985). The Genesis of the Concepts of Habitus and of Field, Sociocriticism, 2(2), 11–24.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2000 [1972]). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, Seuil.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2001). Langage et pouvoir symbolique, Seuil.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Masculine Domination, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. D.. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bratman, M. (2014). Shared Agency, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brighenti, A. M. (2007). Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences, Current Sociology, 55(3), 323–42.Google Scholar

Brighenti, A. M. (2008). Visual, Visible, Ethnographic, Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 1(1), 91–114.Google Scholar

Brighenti, A. M. (2010). Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Brown, C. (2012). The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory? Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(3), 439–56.Google Scholar

Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P.. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation, Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.Google Scholar

Brumann, C. and Berliner, D., eds. (2016). World Heritage On The Ground. Ethnographic Perspectives, Berghahn.Google Scholar

Bruner, R. F. and Carr, S. D.. (2007). Lessons from the Financial Crisis of 1907, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(4), 115–24.Google Scholar

Brunnée, J. and Toope, S. J.. (2010). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brunnée, J. and Toope, S. J.. (2011). Interactional International Law and the Practice of Legality. In Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., eds., International Practices, Cambridge University Press, 108–35.Google Scholar

Brunnée, J. and Toope, S. J.. (2019). Norm Robustness and Contestation in International Law: Self-Defence against Non-State Actors, Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 73–87.Google Scholar

Bryant, L. R. (2011). A Logic of Multiplicities: Deleuze, Immanence, and Onticology, Analecta Hermeneutica, 3, 1–20.Google Scholar

Bucher, B. (2014). Acting Abstractions: Metaphors, Narrative Structures, and the Eclipse of Agency, European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 742–65.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. (2011). Communities of Practice in World Politics – Theory or Technology? 52nd Annual International Studies Association conference, 16–19 March.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. (2013). Pathways to Practice: Praxiography and International Politics, European Political Science Review, 6(3), 383–406.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. (2014). From Expert Communities to Epistemic Arrangements: Situating Expertise in International Relations. In Mayer, M., Carpes, M. and Knoblich, R., eds., The Global Politics of Science and Technology, Vol. I, Springer-Verlag, 40–54.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. (2015). Making Things Known: Epistemic Practice, the United Nations and the Translation of Piracy, International Political Sociology, 9(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bueger, C. (2017a). Let’s Count Beyond Three: Understanding the Conceptual and Methodological Terrain of International Practice Theory, International Studies Quarterly, 2. Available at: www.isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/5478/Lets-count-beyond-three-Understanding-the-conceptual-and-methodological-terrain-of-international-practice-theories. (Accessed 13 November 2021).Google Scholar

Bueger, C. (2017b). Practices, Norms and the Theory of Contestation, Polity, 49(1), 126–31.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. and Bethke, F.. (2013). Actor-Networking the ‘Failed State’ – An Enquiry into the Life of Concepts, Journal of International Relations and Development, 17(1), 30–60.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. and Gadinger, F.. (2007). Reassembling and Dissecting: International Relations Practice from a Science Studies Perspective, International Studies Perspectives, 8(1), 90–110.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. and Gadinger, F.. (2014). International Practice Theory: New Perspectives, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. and Gadinger, F.. (2015). The Play of International Practice, International Studies Quarterly, 59(3), 449–60.Google Scholar

Bueger, C. and Gadinger, F.. (2018). International Practice Theory, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bull, H. (1966). International Theory: The Case of a Classical Approach, World Politics, 15(3), 361–77.Google Scholar

Bull, H. (2012). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Palgrave.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech. A Politics of the Performative, Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge.Google Scholar

Buzan, B. and Waever, O.. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Byrne, A. (2017). Hungary’s Orban Vows to Defend Poland from EU Sanctions. Financial Times, 22 July. Available from: www.ft.com/content/b1bd2424-6ed7-11e7-93ff-99f383b09ff9.Google Scholar

Cadman, L. (2010). How (not) to Be Governed: Foucault, Critique, and the Political, Environment and Planning D, 28(3), 539–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, M. (1986). Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J., ed., Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge, 196–233.Google Scholar

Carlsnaes, W. (1992). The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis, International Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 245–70.Google Scholar

Carr, E. H. (1964). The Twenty Years Crisis, Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar

Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell.Google Scholar

Clark, E. and Black, C.. (2016). The appearance of disappearance: The CIA’s secret black sites, The Financial Times, 17 March.Google Scholar

Clough, P. (2009). The New Empiricism: Affect and Sociological Method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.Google Scholar

Coe, N. M. and Brunell, T. G.. (2003). Spatializing Knowledge Communities: Towards a Conceptualization of Transnational Innovation Networks, Global Networks, 3(4), 437–56.Google Scholar

Cohen, M., March, J. and Olsen, J.. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Cohendet, P., Creplet, F. and Dupouët, O.. (2001). Communities of Practice and Epistemic Communities: A Renewed Approach of Organisational Learning within the Firm. Retrieved from ResearchGate: www.researchgate.net/publication/228587324_Communities_of_Practice_and_Epistemic_Communities_A_Renewed_Approach_of_Organizational_Learning_within_the_Firm.Google Scholar

Coleman, W. D. and Bernstein, S. F.. (2009). Unsettled Legitimacy, Political Community, Power, and Authority in a Global Era, Globalization and Autonomy, University of British Colombia Press.Google Scholar

Collier, S. (2009). Topologies of Power: Foucault’s Analysis of Political Government beyond “Governmentality”, Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 78–108.Google Scholar

Conlisk, J. (1996). Why Bounded Rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 669–90.Google Scholar

Connolly, W. (1983). The Terms of Political Discourse, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. (2003). Thinking Rationally about Hierarchy and Global Governance, Review of International Political Economy, 10(4), 627–84.Google Scholar

Cornut, J. (2018). Diplomacy, Agency, and the Logic of Improvisation and Virtuosity in Practice, European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 712–36.Google Scholar

Cortell, A. P. and Davis, J. W.. (1996). How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms, International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 451–78.Google Scholar

Cottrell, P. (1995). The Bank of England in Its International Setting, 1918–1972. In Roberts, R. and Kynaston, D., eds., The Bank of England: Money, Power, and Influence 1694–1994, Clarendon Press, 83–139.Google Scholar

Créplet, F., Dupouët, O. and Vaast, E.. (2003). Episteme or Practice? Differentiated Communitarian Structures in a Biology Laboratory. Retrieved from Research Gate: www.researchgate.net/publication/228720203_Episteme_or_practice_Differentiated_Communitarian_Structures_in_a_Biology_Laboratory.Google Scholar

Crone, M. (2014). Religion and Violence: Governing Muslim Militancy through Aesthetic Assemblages, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(1), 291–307.Google Scholar

Cruikshank, B. (1996). Revolutions within: Self-Government and Self-Esteem. In Andrew, B., Thomas, O. and Nikolas, R., eds., Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, University of Chicago Press, 231–52.Google Scholar

D’Aoust, A.-M. (2014). Ties that Bind? Engaging Emotions, Governmentality and Neoliberalism: Introduction to the Special Issue, Global Society, 28(3), 267–76.Google Scholar

Davidson, A. (2011). In Praise of Counter-Conduct, History of the Human Sciences, 24(4), 25–41.Google Scholar

Davis Cross, M. K. (2013). Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later, Review of International Studies, 39(1), 137–60.Google Scholar

Davis, J. (2005). Terms of Inquiry: On the Theory and Practice of Political Science, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, J. and Daase, C., eds. (2015). Clausewitz on Small Wars, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Genova, N. (2013). Spectacles of Migrant “Illegality”: The Scene of Exclusion, the Obscene of Inclusion, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(7), 1180–98.Google Scholar

Dean, M. (1994). Critical and Effective Histories, Routledge.Google Scholar

Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd ed., Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Death, C. (2010). Counter-Conducts: A Foucauldian Analytics of Protest, Social Movement Studies, 9(3), 235–51.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1991). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? Éditions de minuit.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F.. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F.. (2004). A Thousand Plateaus, Continuum.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc., Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Dessler, D. (1989). What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate? International Organization, 43(3), 441–73.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education, The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct, Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1984). The Early Works of John Dewey, 1882–1953, Vol. IV of The Quest for Certainty, Boydston, J. A., ed. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1988). The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, Vol. XII of Reconstruction in Philosophy and Essays, Boydston, J. A., ed., Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Doty, R. L. (1993). Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines, International Studies Quarterly, 37(3), 297–320.Google Scholar

Doty, R. L. (1996). Imperial Encounters, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Doty, R. L. (1997). Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent – Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory, European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 365–92.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think, Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy Transfer as Learning: Capturing Variation in What Decision-Makers Learn From Epistemic Communities, Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311.Google Scholar

Dunn, F. S. (1929). The Practice and Procedure of International Conferences, Literary Licensing.Google Scholar

Dunne, T. (1998). Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Duvall, R. D. and Chowdhury, A.. (2011). Practices of Theory. In Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., eds., International Practices, Cambridge University Press, 335–54.Google Scholar

Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2013). Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eikeland, O. and Nicolini, D.. (2011). Turning Practically: Broadening the Horizon, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(2), 164–74.Google Scholar

Einzig, P. (1932). Montagu Norman: A Study in Financial Statesmanship, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & co., ltd.Google Scholar

Enderlein, H., Wälti, S. and Zürn, M., eds. (2010). Handbook on Multi-Level Governance, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Engelkamp, S. and Glaab, K.. (2015). Writing Norms. Constructivist Norm Research and the Politics of Ambiguity, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 40(3–4), 201–18.Google Scholar

Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Enloe, C. (2016). Flick of the Skirt: A Feminist Challenge to IR’s Coherent Narrative, International Political Sociology, 10(4), 320–31.Google Scholar

Epstein, C. (2011). Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics, European Journal of International Relations, 17(2), 327–50.Google Scholar

Epstein, C. (2012). Stop Telling Us How to Behave, Socialization or Infantilization? International Studies Perspectives, 13(2), 135–45.Google Scholar

Epstein, C. (2013). Norms. In Adler-Nissen, R., ed., Bourdieu in International Relations, Routledge, 165–78.Google Scholar

Ezrahi, Y. (2012). Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fassin, D. (2009). Another politics of life is possible, Theory, Culture & Society, 26(5), 44–60.Google Scholar

Fekete, L., Webber, F. and Edmond-Petit, A.. (2017). Humanitarianism: The Unacceptable Face of Solidarity, Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar

Fierke, K. (2002). Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations, International Studies Quarterly, 46(3), 331–54.Google Scholar

Fierke, K. (2010). Constructivism. In Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S., eds., International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford University Press, 161–78.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1995). On Ideas Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnemore, M. (1996). Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention. In Katzenstein, P., ed., The Culture of National Security, Columbia University Press, 153–85.Google Scholar

Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K.. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change, International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.Google Scholar

Fischer, D. (1997). History of the International Atomic Energy Agency: The First Forty Years, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar

Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D.. (2011). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields, Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Florini, A. (1996). The Evolution of International Norms, International Studies Quarterly, 40(3), 363–89.Google Scholar

Forsberg, T. (2012). Vincent Pouliot, International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, Europe-Asia Studies, 64(1), 169–71.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1971). The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, Pantheon.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison, Routledge.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In Martin, L. H., Gutman, L. H. and Hutton, P. H., eds., Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, University of Massachusetts Press, 16–49.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality, Volume One, Vintage.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2000). The Subject and Power. In James, F., ed., Michel Foucault: Power, The New Press, 326–48.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2005). The Hermeneutics of the Subject. Lectures at the College de France 1981–1982, Picador.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2010). The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982–1983, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2011). The Courage of Truth (The Government of Self and Others II): Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983–1984, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2014). Wrong-Doing and Truth-Telling: The Function of Avowal in Justice, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Franck, T. (1990). The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, R., Griggs, S. and Boaz, A.. (2011). The Practice of Policy Making, Evidence & Policy, 7(2), 127–36.Google Scholar

Frega, R. (2014). The Normative Creature: Toward a Practice-Based Account of Normativity, Social Theory and Practice, 40(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, J. (2004). European Approaches to International Relations Theory, Routledge.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, J. and Kratochwil, F.. (2009). On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology, International Organization, 63(4), 701–31.Google Scholar

Frost, M. and Lechner, S.. (2016a). Two Conceptions of International Practice: Aristotelian Praxis or Wittgensteinian Language Games? Review of International Studies, 42(2), 334–50.Google Scholar

Frost, M. and Lechner, S.. (2016b). Understanding International Practices from the Internal Point of View, Journal of International Political Theory, 12(3), 299–319.Google Scholar

Fuller, L. (1958). Positivism and Fidelity to the Law – A Reply to Prof. Hart, Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 630–72.Google Scholar

Fuller, L. (1969). The Morality of Law, revised edition, Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Furedi, F. (2013). Authority: A Sociological History, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gadinger, F. (2016). On Justification and Critique: Luc Boltanski’s Pragmatic Sociology and International Relations, International Political Sociology, 10(3), 187–205.Google Scholar

Garcia, T. (2014). Form and Object: A Treatise on Things, translated by Ohm, M. A. and Cogburn, J., Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Garnham, N. and Williams, R.. (1980). Pierre Bourdieu and the Sociology of Culture: An Introduction, Media, Culture and Society, 2(3), 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gherardi, S. (2016). To Start Practice Theorizing Anew: The Contribution of the Concepts of Agencement and Formativeness, Organization, 23(5), 680–98.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1987). Structuralism, Post-Structuralism and the Production of Culture. In Giddens, A. and Turner, J. H., eds., Social Theory Today, Stanford University Press, 195–223.Google Scholar

Gielen, P. (2005). Art and Social Value Regimes, Current Sociology, 53(5), 789–806.Google Scholar

Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Lin, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gilady, L. and Hoffman, M. J.. (2013). Darwin’s Finches or Lamarck’s Giraffe, Does International Relations Get Evolution Wrong? International Studies Review, 15, 307–27.Google Scholar

Go, J. (2008). Global Fields and Imperial Forms: Field Theory and the British and American Empires, Sociological Theory, 26(3), 201–29.Google Scholar

Gogol, N. V. (2006). Diary of a Madman and other Stories, Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Goldstein, J. (2001). War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Golsorkhi, S., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E., eds. (2010). Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P., eds., The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, University of Chicago Press, 1–52.Google Scholar

Grande, E. and Pauly, L. W., eds. (2005). Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Grimmel, A. and Hellmann, G.. (2019). Theory Must Not Go on Holiday. Wittgenstein, the Pragmatists, and the Idea of Social Science, International Political Sociology, 13(2), 198–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gronow, A. (2011). From Habits to Social Structures: Pragmatism and Contemporary Social Theory, Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross Stein, J. (2011). Background Knowledge in the Foreground: Conversations about Competent Practice in “Sacred Space”. In Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., eds., International Practices, Cambridge University Press, 87–107.Google Scholar

Gumbrecht, H. U. and Pfeiffer, K. L., eds. (1988). Materialities of Communication, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Guzman, G. (2013). The Grey Textures of Practice and Knowledge: Review and Framework, European Business Review, 25(5), 429–52.Google Scholar

Guzzini, S. (2000). A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147–82.Google Scholar

Guzzini, S. (2005). The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis, Millennium, 33(3), 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzzini, S. (2013). The Ends of International Relations Theory: Stages of Reflexivity and Modes of Theorizing, European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 521–41.Google Scholar

Haak, S. (2006). Pragmatism, Old and New: Selected Writings, Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Haas, E. B. (1997). Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress: The Rise and Decline of Nationalism, Vol. 1, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Haas, E. B. (2000). Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress: The Dismal Fate of New Nations, Vol. II, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M. (2004). Addressing the Global Governance Deficit, Global Environmental Politics, 4(4), 1–15.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1968). Erkenntnis und Interesse, Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1993). Faktizitaet und Geltung, Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (2002). Historical Ontology, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hafemeister, D. (2016). Nuclear Proliferation and Terrorism in the Post-9/11 World, Springer.Google Scholar

Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The Scientific Community, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void, Policy Sciences, 36(2), 175–95.Google Scholar

Håkanson, L. (2010). The Firm as an Epistemic Community: The Knowledge-Based View Revisited, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1801–28.Google Scholar

Hall, R. B. (2008). Central Banking as Global Governance: Constructing Financial Credibility, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, R. B. and Biersteker, T. J., eds. (2002). The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, T. (2015). Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hamburg, D. A. (2015). A Model of Prevention: Life Lessons, Routledge.Google Scholar

Hammarskjöld, D. (1957). Regulations for the United Nations Emergency Force, United Nations.Google Scholar

Hanrieder, T. (2016). Orders of Worth and the Moral Conceptions of Health in Global Politics, International Theory, 8(3), 390–421.Google Scholar

Hansen, L. (2006). Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, Routledge.Google Scholar

Hansen, L. (2011). Performing Practices: A Poststructuralist Analysis of the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis. In Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., eds., International practices, Cambridge University Press, 280–309.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. (1997). Not Thus, after All, Would Life Be Given: Technesis, Technology, and the Parody of Romantic Poetics in Frankenstein, Studies in Romanticism, 36(4), 575–609.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. (2000). Embodying Technesis: Technology Beyond Writing, The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, T. A. (2015). Scientific Communities of Practice for Learning – Lessons From Ethnographic Fieldwork. Retrieved from Research Gate: www.researchgate.net/publication/281625987_Scientific_communities_of_practice_for_learning_-_lessons_from_ethnographic_fieldwork.Google Scholar

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective, Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–99.Google Scholar

Hardt, M. and Negri, A.. (2000). Empire, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 593–629.Google Scholar

Hausman, C. R. (1993). Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, D., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L. and Tierney, M. J.. (2006). Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, G. (2011). Packaging Water: Plastic Bottles as Market and Public Devices, Economy & Society, 40, 534–52.Google Scholar

Hecker, S. S., ed. (2016). Doomed to Cooperate: How American and Russian Scientists Joined Forces to Avert Some of the Greatest Post-Cold War Nuclear Dangers, Vol. I, Bathtub Row Press.Google Scholar

Heinich, N. (1991). La Gloire de Van Gogh. Essai d’anthropologie de l’admiration, Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Heinich, N. (2001). La sociologie de l’art, La Découverte.Google Scholar

Heinich, N. (2012). De la visibilité, Gallimard.Google Scholar

Hellmann, G. (2009). Beliefs as Rules for Action: Pragmatism as a Theory of Thought and Action, International Studies Review, 11(3), 638–62.Google Scholar

Hellmann, G. (2017). Interpreting International Relations. In Hellmann, G. and Valbjorn, M., eds., The Forum: Problematizing Global Challenges: Recalibrating the “Inter” in IR-Theory, International Studies Review, 19, 296–300.Google Scholar

Hennessy, E. (1992). A Domestic History of the Bank of England, 1930–1960, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hillebrandt, F. (2014). Soziologische Praxistheorien. Eine Einführung, Springer VS.Google Scholar

Hirschauer, St. (2008). Die Empiriegeladenheit von Theorien und der Erfindungsreichtum der Praxis. In Kalthoff, H., Hirschauer, St. and Lindemann, G., eds., Theoretische Empirie. Zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung, Suhrkamp, 165–87.Google Scholar

Hofius, M. (2016). Community at the Border or the Boundaries of Community? The Case of EU Field Diplomats. Review of International Studies, 42(5), 939–67.Google Scholar

Holmes, M. and Traven, D.. (2015). Acting Rationally without Really Thinking: The Logic of Rational Intuitionism for International Relations Theory, International Studies Review, 17(3), 414–40.Google Scholar

Hooper, C. (2001). Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory, International Security, 23(1), 171–200.Google Scholar

Hopf, T. (2010). The Logic of Habit in International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 539–61.Google Scholar

Hopf, T. (2011). International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy. By Vincent Pouliot. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, Perspectives on Politics, 9(3), 772–3.Google Scholar

Hopf, T. (2018). Change in International Practices, European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 687–711.Google Scholar

Hui, A., Schatzki, Th. R. and Shove, E., eds. (2017). The Nexus of Practices. Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, Routledge.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1875). On Essay Writing in Essays, Literary, Moral and Political, In Green, T. H. and Grose, T. H., eds., Longmans, Green and Co, 367–71.Google Scholar

Hurrell, A. (2007). On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchison, E. and Bleiker, R.. (2014). Theorizing Emotions in World Politics, International Theory, 6(3), 491–514.Google Scholar

ICJ. (2004). Advisory Opinion on the ‘Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Territory of Palestine, ICJ, 9 July 2004.Google Scholar

International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect, International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty.Google Scholar

Jabri, V. (2014). Disarming Norms. Postcolonial Agency and the Constitution of the International, International Theory, 6(2), 372–90.Google Scholar

Jackson, P. (2011). H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable Review of Vincent Pouliot. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, 14–21. Available at: https://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-Roundtable-2-5.pdf. (Accessed March 2018).Google Scholar

Jackson, P. and Nexon, D. H.. (1999). Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics, European Journal of International Relations, 5(3), 291–332.Google Scholar

Jackson, P. and Nexon, D. H.. (2013). International Theory in a Post-paradigmatic Era: From Substantive Wagers to Scientific Ontologies, European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 543–65.Google Scholar

Jackson, R. (2000). The Global Covenant, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Jervis, R. (2011). H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable Review of Vincent Pouliot. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, 22–9. Available at: https://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-Roundtable-2-5.pdf. (Accessed March 2018).Google Scholar

Jessop, B. (2011). Constituting another Foucault Effect: Foucault on States and Statecraft. In Bröckling, U., Krassmann, S. and Lemke, T., eds., Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, Routledge, 56–73.Google Scholar

Joas, H. (1996). The Creativity of Action, Polity Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. (2016). Priests of Prosperity: How Central Bankers Transformed the Postcommunist World, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, J. (2010). The Limits of Governmentality: Social Theory and the International, European Journal of International Relations, 16, 223–46.Google Scholar

Joseph, J. and Kurki, M.. (2018). The Limits of Practice: Why Realism Can Complement IR’s Practice Turn, International Theory, 10(1), 71–97.Google Scholar

Joshi, M., Lee, S. Y. and Mac Ginty, R.. (2014). Just How Liberal Is the Liberal Peace? International Peacekeeping, 21(3), 364–89.Google Scholar

Joyce, P. (1994), Democratic Subjects: The Self and the Social in Nineteenth-century England, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kalaycioglu, E. (2020). Governing Culture ‘Credibly’: Contestation in the World Heritage Regime. In Phillips, A. and Reus-Smit, C., eds., Culture and Order in World Politics, Cambridge University Press, 294–316.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1991). Kant: Political Writings, Reiss, H. S., ed., 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 61–92.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of the Power of Judgment, translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, A. W., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (2011). Perpetual Peace in Kant: Political Writings, Reiss, H. S., ed., 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kapstein, E. B. (1994). Governing the Global Economy: International Finance and the State, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Karlsrud, J. (2013). Special Representatives of the Secretary-General as Norm Arbitrators? Understanding Bottom-up Authority in UN Peacekeeping, Global Governance, 19(4), 525–44.Google Scholar

Karlsrud, J. (2015). The UN at War: Examining the Consequences of Peace-Enforcement Mandates for the UN Peacekeeping Operations in the CAR, the DRC and Mali, Third World Quarterly, 36(1), 40–54.Google Scholar

Kassianova, A. (2016). U.S.-Russia Nuclear Lab-to-Lab Cooperation: Looking Back On a Quarter Century of Constructive Relations, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, (425), 1–6.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, P. (1996). Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security. In Katzenstein, P., ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, Columbia University Press, 1–32.Google Scholar

Keller, R. (2011). The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD), Human Studies, 34(1), 43–65.Google Scholar

Kemp, S. R. (2014). The Nonproliferation Emperor Has no Clothes: The Gas Centrifuge, Supply-Side Controls, and the Future of Nuclear Proliferation, International Security, 38(4), 39–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. and Nye, J. S.. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Little.Google Scholar

Kersbergen, K. and Verbeek, B.. (2007). The Politics of International Norms: Subsidiarity and the Imperfect Competence Regime of the European Union, European Journal of International Relations, 13(2), 217–38.Google Scholar

Kessler, O. (2016). The Contingency of Constructivism: On Norms, the Social, and the Third, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 45(1), 43–63.Google Scholar

Kilminster, R. (1982). Theory and Practice in Marx and Marxism, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series, 14, 157–76.Google Scholar

King, G., Keohane, R. and Verba, S.. (1996). Designing Social Inquiry, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Knight, J. (1994). Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (1981a). Introduction: The Microsociological Challenge of Macro-Sociology: Towards a Reconstruction of Social Theory and Methodology. In Knorr Cetina, K. and Cicourel, A. V., eds., Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies, Routledge, 1–47.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (1981b). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual Practice. In Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and Von Savigny, E., eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, 184–97.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (2009). The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World, Symbolic Interaction, 32(1), 61–87.Google Scholar

Koremenos, B., Lipson, C. and Snidal, D.. (2001). The Rational Design of International Institutions, International Organization, 55(4), 761–99.Google Scholar

Koslowski, R. and Kratochwil, F. V.. (1994). Understanding Change in International Politics: The Soviet Empire’s Demise and the International System, International Organization, 48(2), 215–47.Google Scholar

Krämer, B. (2017). Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism, Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293–1309.Google Scholar

Krasner, S. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F. (2000). Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s ‘Social Theory of International Politics’ and the Constructivist Challenge, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 29(1), 73–101.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F. (2011). Making Sense of “International Practices”. In Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., eds., International Practices, Cambridge University Press, 36–60.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F. (2014). The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krook, M. L. and True, J.. (2010). Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality, European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 103–27.Google Scholar

Krygier, M. (1986). Law as Tradition, Law and Philosophy, 5(2), 237–62.Google Scholar

Ku, A. (1998). Boundary Politics in the Public Sphere: Openness, Secrecy, and Leak, Sociological Theory, 16(2), 172–92.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Kustermans, J. (2016). Parsing the Practice Turn: Practice, Practical Knowledge, Practices, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(2), 175–96.Google Scholar

Lahire, B. (2003). From the Habitus to an Individual Heritage of Dispositions. Towards a Sociology at the Level of the Individual, Poetics, 31(5–6), 329–55.Google Scholar

Lahire, B. (2004). La culture des individus. Dissonances culturelles et distinction de soi, La Découverte.Google Scholar

Lake, D. A. (2009). Hierarchy in International Relations, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lake, D. A. (2010). Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance, International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 587–613.Google Scholar

Lake, D. A. (2013). Legitimating Power: The Domestic Politics of U.S. International Hierarchy, International Security, 28(2), 74–111.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lamont, C. and Skeppström, E.. (2013). The United Nations at War in the DRC? Legal Aspects of the Intervention Brigade, Swedish Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar

Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation, Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 201–21.Google Scholar

Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Relations Theory in a Post-Positivist Era, International Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 235–54.Google Scholar

Lapid, Y. and Kratochwil, F., eds. (1996). The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Lash, S. (1993). Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural Economy and Social Change. In Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E. and Postone, M., eds., Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, University of Chicago Press, 193–211.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1992). Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In Bijker, W. and Law, J., eds., Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, 225–58.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2010). An Attempt at a “Compositionist Manifesto”, New Literary History, 41, 471–90.Google Scholar

Laurence, M. (2019). An ‘Impartial’ Force? Normative Ambiguity and Practice Change in UN Peace Operations, International Peacekeeping, 26(3), 256–80.Google Scholar

Lave, J. and Wenger, E.. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology, The Sociological Review, 47, 1.Google Scholar

Law, J. (2004). And if the Global were Small and Noncoherent? Method, Complexity, and the Baroque, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 13–27.Google Scholar

Law, J. and Mol, A.. (2001). Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatialities, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(5), 601–21.Google Scholar

Le Chiffon Rouge. (2016). “Mon inaction me rendrait complice”, s’est défendu Cédric Herrou à son procès. 5 January. www.le-chiffon-rouge-morlaix.fr/2017/01/mon-inaction-me-rendrait-complice-s-est-defendu-cedric-herrou-a-son-proces-mediapart-5-janvier-2016.html.Google Scholar

Leander, A. (2010). Practices (Re)producing Orders Understanding the Role of Business in Global Security Governance. In Leander, A. and Ougaard, M., eds., Business and Global Governance, Routledge, 57–78.Google Scholar

Leander, A. (2011). The Promises, Problems, and Potentials of a Bourdieu-Inspired Staging of International Relations, International Political Sociology, 5(3), 294–313.Google Scholar

Leander, A. (2013). Technological Agency in the Co-Constitution of Legal Expertise and the US Drone Program, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26(4), 811–31.Google Scholar

Leander, A. (2016). The Politics of Whitelisting: Regulatory Work and Topologies in Commercial Security, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(1), 48–66.Google Scholar

Leander, A. (2017). Digital/Commercial (in)visibility: The Politics of DAESH Recruitment Videos, European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3), 348–72.Google Scholar

Leander, A. (2020). Composing Collaborationist Collages about Commercial Security, Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences, 1(1), 73–109.Google Scholar

Lechner, S. and Frost, M.. (2018). Practice Theory and International Relations, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leiulfsrud, H. and Sohlberg, P., eds. (2017). Concepts in Action. Conceptual Constructionism, Haymarket Books.Google Scholar

Lemke, T. (2007). An Indigestible Meal? Foucault, Governmentality and State Theory, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15, 43–65.Google Scholar

Lesch, M. (2017a). Norms, Law and Deviance. Doubts About Doubts About the Prohibition of Torture. Paper presented at the conference of the German Political Science Association (International Relations), October 2017, Bremen.Google Scholar

Lesch, M. (2017b). Praxistheorien und Normenforschung: Zum Beitrag der pragmatischen Soziologie, Zeitschrift Diskurs, 2, 1–23.Google Scholar

L’Humanité. (2017). C’est l’état qui est dans l’illégalité, pas moi. 4 January. Available at: www.humanite.fr/cedric-herrou-cest-letat-qui-est-dans-lillegalite-pas-moi-629732. (Accessed 13 November 2021).Google Scholar

Liberman, K. (2013). More Studies in Ethnomethodology, State University of New York.Google Scholar

Liese, A. (2009). Exceptional Necessity: How Liberal Democracies Contest the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatment When Countering Terrorism, Journal of International Law and International Relations, 5(1), 17–47.Google Scholar

Lindahl, H. (2018). Authority and the Globalization of Inclusion and Exclusion, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Linklater, A. (2011). The Problem of Harm in International Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lipson, M. (2007). Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy? European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 5–34.Google Scholar

Livingstone, D. (1984). Hume’s Philosophy of Common Life, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lukes, S. (2005). Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds, Millennium, 33(3), 477–93.Google Scholar

Macmillan Committee. (1931). Report of Committee on Finance and Industry. The National Archives: [On line]. Available at: http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C1851842. (Accessed December 2017).Google Scholar

March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P.. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, The Free Press.Google Scholar

March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P.. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders, International Organization, 52(4), 943–69.Google Scholar

Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.Google Scholar

Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through Thick and Thin, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Marks, L. (2004). Haptic Visuality: Touching with the Eyes, Framework: The Finish Art Review, 2, 79–82.Google Scholar

Marx, K. and Engels, F.. (1976). Collected Works, Vol. 6, Lawrence & Wishart, 487.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (2010). International Security in Practice: The politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy, International Affairs, 86(6), 1417–18.Google Scholar

Martin-Mazé, M. (2017). Returning Struggles to the Practice Turn: How Were Bourdieu and Boltanski Lost in (Some) Translations and What to Do about It? International Political Sociology, 11(2), 203–20.Google Scholar

Martin, L. (1992). Interests, Power, and Multilateralism, International Organization, 46(4), 765–92.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (1950). Les techniques du corps. In Gurvitch, P., ed., Marcel Mauss: Sociologie et Anthropologie, Quadriage PUF, 365–86.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (1966). The Gift. Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, Routledge.Google Scholar

McCourt, D. (2012). What is at Stake in the Historical Turn: Theory, Practice and Phronesis in International Relations, Millennium, 41(1), 23–41.Google Scholar

McCourt, D. (2016). Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism, International Studies Quarterly, 60(3), 475–85.Google Scholar

McCoy, A. (2012). Torture and Impunity, University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

McKeown, R. (2009). Norm Regress: U.S. Revisionism and the Slow Death of the Torture Norm, International Relations, 23(1), 5–25.Google Scholar

McNamara, K. (2015). The Politics of Everyday Europe: Constructing Authority in the European Union, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Menand, L. (1997). Pragmatism: A Reader, Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Menand, L. (2001). The Metaphysical Club, Macmillan.Google Scholar

Merlingen, M. (2006). Foucault and World Politics: Promises and Challenges of Extending Governmentality Theory to the European and Beyond, Millennium, 35(1), 181–96.Google Scholar

Mérand, F. (2008). European Defence Policy beyond the Nation State, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mérand, F. (2010). Pierre Bourdieu and the Birth of European Defense, Security Studies, 19(2), 342–74.Google Scholar

Meyer, M. (2010). Caring for Weak Ties – the Natural History Museum as a Place of Encounter Between Amateur and Professional Science, Sociological Research Online, 15(2), 1–14.Google Scholar

Meyer, M. and Molyneux-Hodgson, S.. (2010). Introduction: The Dynamics of Epistemic Communities, Sociological Research Online, 15(2), 1–7.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D. and Yanow, D.. (2009). Re-Turn to Practice: An Introductory Essay, Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309–27.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R. and Virkkunen, J.. (2005). Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change, Organization, 12(3), 437–56.Google Scholar

Milbank, D. (2018). Trump’s ‘Fake News’ Mantra Becomes an Effective Weapon – against America, The Washington Post, 16 April. Available at: www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-bulldozed-truth--and-not-just-in-washington/2018/04/16/0f65718c-41b2-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html?utm_term=.24b3a2eedc01.Google Scholar

Miller, C. A. (2006). ‘An Effective Instrument of Peace’: Scientific Cooperation as an Instrument of U.S. Foreign Policy, 1938–1950, Osiris, 21(1), 133–60.Google Scholar

Milliken, J. (1999). The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods, European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–54.Google Scholar

Misak, C. J. (1999). Pragmatism, University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. (1991). The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics, The American Political Science Review, 85(1), 77–96.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political style, and Representation, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Mol, A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 50(1), 253–69.Google Scholar

Moon, K. (1997). Sex Among Allies: Military Prostitution in U.S.-Korea Relations, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist, Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–63.Google Scholar

Muirhead, B. (1999). Against the Odds: The Public Life and Times of Louis Rasminsky, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Nair, D. (2019). Sociability in International Politics: Golf and ASEAN’s Cold War Diplomacy, International Political Sociology, 14(2), 196–214.Google Scholar

Nair, D. (2020). Emotional Labor and the Power of International Bureaucrats, International Studies Quarterly, 64(3), 573–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Navari, C. (2011). The Concept of Practice in the English School, European Journal of International Relations, 17(4), 611–30.Google Scholar

Neumann, I. (2002). Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(3), 627–51.Google Scholar

Neumann, I. (2012). At Home with the Diplomats. Inside a European Foreign Ministry, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Neumann, I. and Pouliot, V.. (2011). Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian-Western Relations over the Past Millennium, Security Studies, 20(1), 105–37.Google Scholar

Neumann, I. and Sending, O. J.. (2010). Governing the Global Polity. Practice, Mentality, Rationality, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Neumann Basberg, C. and Neumann, I.. (2015). Uses of the Self: Two Ways of Thinking about Scholarly Situatedness and Method, Millennium, 43(3), 798–819.Google Scholar

New York Times. (2016). A French underground railroad, moving African migrants’, 4 October.Google Scholar

New York Times. (2017). Farmer on trial defends smuggling migrants: “I am a Frenchman.” 5 January. www.nytimes.com/2017/01/…/cedric-herrou-migrant-smuggler-trial-france.html.Google Scholar

Nexon, D. H. and Neumann, I.. (2018). Hegemonic Order Theory: A Field Theoretic Account, European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 662–86.Google Scholar

Nexon, D. H. and Pouliot, V.. (2013). ‘Things of Networks’: Situating ANT in International Relations, International Political Sociology, 7(3), 342–5.Google Scholar

Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice Theory, Work & Organization, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nicolini, D. (2017). Practice Theory as a Package of Theory, Method and Vocabulary: Affordances and Limitations. In Jonas, M., Littig, B. and Wroblewski, A., eds., Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, Springer, 19–34.Google Scholar

Niedner-Kalthoff, U. (2015). Producing Cultural Diversity. Hegemonic Knowledge in Global Governance Projects, Campus Verlag.Google Scholar

Niemann, H. and Schillinger, H.. (2016). Contestation ‘all the way down’? The Grammar of Contestation in Norm Research, Review of International Studies, 43(1), 29–49.Google Scholar

Niezen, R. and Sapignoli, M., eds. (2017). Palaces of Hope. The Anthropology of Global Organizations, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nordstrom, C. (2004). Shadows of War: Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in the 21st Century, University of California Press.Google Scholar

Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means To Success in World Politics, Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, M. (1962). Rationalism in Politics, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, M. (1975). On Human Conduct, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Odysseos, L., Death, C. and Malmvig, H.. (2016). Interrogating Michel Foucault’s Counter-Conduct: Theorising the Subjects and Practices of Resistance in Global Politics, Global Society, 30(2), 151–6.Google Scholar

Oliver, J. E. and Rahn, W. M.. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206.Google Scholar

Ong, A. and Collier, S.. (2005). Global Assemblages, Anthropological Problems. In Ong, A. and Collier, S., eds., Global Assemblages, Blackwell, 3–21.Google Scholar

Onuf, N. (1989). World of Our Making. Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Onuf, N. (1997). How Things Get Normative, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar

Onuf, N. (2002). Institutions, Intentions and International Relations, Review of International Studies, 28(2), 211–28.Google Scholar

Onuf, N. (2010). Rules in Practice. In Kessler, O., et al., eds., On Rules, Politics and Knowledge: Friedrich Kratochwil, International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Palgrave Macmillan, 115–26.Google Scholar

Orford, A. (2012). In Praise of Description, Leiden Journal of International Law, 25(3), 609–25.Google Scholar

Ortner, Sh. B. (1984). Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126–66.Google Scholar

Osborne, T. (1994). Sociology, Liberalism and the Historicity of Conduct, Economy & Society, 23, 484–501.Google Scholar

Paddon Rhoads, E. (2016). Taking Sides in Peacekeeping: Impartiality and the Future of the United Nations, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Panel on United Nations Peace Operations. (2000). Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations, United Nations.Google Scholar

Panke, D. and Petersohn, U.. (2012). Why Some International Norms Disappear, European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), 719–42.Google Scholar

Paret, P. (1986). Clausewitz. In Paret, P., ed., Makers of Modern Strategy, Princeton University Press, 186–216.Google Scholar

Paris, R. (2004). At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, C. (2015). Before Eclecticism: Competing Alternatives in Constructivist Research, International Theory, 7(3), 501–38.Google Scholar

Pauly, L. (1997). Who Elected the Bankers?: Surveillance and Control in the World Economy, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A. and Wouters, J.. (2014). When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking, European Journal of International Law, 25(3), 733–63.Google Scholar

Pech, L. and Scheppele, K. L.. (2017). Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 3–47.Google Scholar

Peter, M. (2015). Between Doctrine and Practice: The UN Peacekeeping Dilemma, Global Governance, 21(3), 351–70.Google Scholar

Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Pifre, S. (2017). The Future of U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Control, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1898(020001), 1–11.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. (2008). The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities, International Organization, 62(02), 257–88.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. (2010). International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. (2016a). Hierarchy in Practice: Multilateral Diplomacy and the Governance of International Security, European Journal of International Security, 1(1), 5–26.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. (2016b). International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. (2020a). Historical Institutionalism Meets Practice Theory: Renewing the Selection Process of the United Nations Secretary-General, International Organization, 74(4), 742–72.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. (2020b). The Gray Area of Institutional Change: How the Security Council Transforms Its Practices on the Fly, Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(3), 1–18.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. and Mérand, F.. (2013). Bourdieu’s Concepts: Political Sociology in International Relations. In Adler-Nissen, R., ed., Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, Routledge, 24–44.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. and Thérien, J.-P.. (2015). The Politics of Inclusion: Changing Patterns in the Global Governance of International Security, Review of International Studies, 41(2), 211–37.Google Scholar

Pratt, S. F. (2020). From Norms to Normative Configurations: A Pragmatist and Relational Approach to Theorizing Normativity in IR, International Theory, 12(1), 59–82.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1995). Pragmatism: An Open Question, Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rabinow, P. (2003). Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ralph, J. and Gifkins, J.. (2017). The Purpose of the United Nations Security Council Practice: Contesting Competence Claims in the Normative Context Created by the Responsibility to Protect, European Journal of International Relations, 23(3), 630–53.Google Scholar

Rancière, J. (1998). The Cause of the Other, Parallax, 4(2), 25–33.Google Scholar

Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Rancière, J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible, Continuum.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Raymond, M. and DeNardis, L.. (2015). Multistakeholderism: Anatomy of an Inchoate Global Institution, International Theory, 7(3), 572–616.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–63.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective Spaces. A Praxeological Outlook, Rethinking History, 16(2), 241–58.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2014). Die Materialisierung der Kultur, Praxeologie, De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, C. (2007). International Crises of Legitimacy, International Politics, 44(2–3), 157–74.Google Scholar

Richards, R. (1987). Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Riles, A. (1998). Infinity within the Brackets, American Ethnologist, 25(3), 378–98.Google Scholar

Riles, A. (2000). The Network Inside Out, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Ringmar, E. (2014). The Search for Dialogue as a Hindrance to Understanding: Practices as Inter-paradigmatic Research Program, International Theory, 6(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Rolf, E. (2013). Inferentielle Pragmatik, Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar

Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E. O., eds. (1992). Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, G. (2013). Statement of Ambassador Gert Rosenthal, Permanent Representative of Guatemala to the United Nations, Wrap-up Session of the Work of the Security Council During the Current Month. Available at: www.guatemalaun.org/bin/documents/SCUN-wrap-upsession-30april2013.pdf.Google Scholar