Book contents
- Complex Words
- Complex Words
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction: Advances in Morphology
- Part I Lexico-Semantic Aspects of Complex Words
- 1 Formal Semantics and the Problem of Nominalizations
- 2 Semantically Subtractive Morphology
- 3 -less and -free
- 4 Instrument Nouns in -one in Latin and Romance
- 5 Prominence in Noun-to-Verb Conversion
- 6 On Spanish Dvandva and Its Restrictions
- Part II Structure of Complex Words
- Part III Corpus-Based Case Studies
- Index
- References
4 - Instrument Nouns in -one in Latin and Romance
from Part I - Lexico-Semantic Aspects of Complex Words
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
By
Book contents
- Complex Words
- Complex Words
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction: Advances in Morphology
- Part I Lexico-Semantic Aspects of Complex Words
- 1 Formal Semantics and the Problem of Nominalizations
- 2 Semantically Subtractive Morphology
- 3 -less and -free
- 4 Instrument Nouns in -one in Latin and Romance
- 5 Prominence in Noun-to-Verb Conversion
- 6 On Spanish Dvandva and Its Restrictions
- Part II Structure of Complex Words
- Part III Corpus-Based Case Studies
- Index
- References
Summary
Meyer-Lübke and his followers attributed the instrumental function of Romance deverbal nouns in -one to the metaphorical extension of corresponding agent nouns. In the present contribution, I argue that no such extension has ever taken place. Rather, the instrumental function has been inherited from Latin and extended analogically in a small number of semantic niches. Reanalysis of denominal nouns in -one relatable to verbal bases may also have been at stake in some instances.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complex WordsAdvances in Morphology, pp. 65 - 81Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alibert, L. (1966). Dictionnaire occitan-français, d’après les parlers languedociens, Toulouse: Institut d’Études Occitanes.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J.-C. (2013). El sufijo -ón en español contemporáneo: Morfología y prototipos. Oralia, 16, 11−32.Google Scholar
Bahder, K. von (1880). Die Verbalabstracta in den germanischen Sprachen ihrer Bildung nach dargestellt, Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. and Pérez Fernández, M. (1987). Diccionario inverso de la lengua española, Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Canello, U. A. (1878). Gli allótropi italiani. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 3, 285−419.Google Scholar
Croatto, E. (2005–2006). I suffissi sostantivali, aggettivali e verbali nel dialetto ladinocadorino di Cortina d’Ampezzo. (Belluno). Archivio per l’Alto Adige, 99/100, 123−38.Google Scholar
Dardano, M. (1978). La formazione delle parole nell’italiano di oggi: Primi materiali e proposte, Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
DCat = Coromines, J. (1995). Diccionari etimològic i complementari de la llengua catalana, 9 vols., Barcelona: Curial.Google Scholar
DCECH = Corominas, J. and Pascual, J. A. (1990–1991). Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico, 6 vols., Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
DEI = Battisti, C. and Alessio, G. (1950–1957). Dizionario Etimologico Italiano, 5 vols., Firenze: Barbèra.Google Scholar
DELI = Cortelazzo, M. and Zolli, P. (1999). Dizionario Etimologico della Lingua Italiana, 2nd ed., Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
DIEC = Institut d’Estudis Catalans (2019). Diccionari de la llengua catalana, 2nd ed. http://mdlc.iec.cat/Google Scholar
DISC = Sabatini, F. and Coletti, V. (1997). Dizionario Italiano Sabatini Coletti, Firenze: Giunti.Google Scholar
EWD = Kramer, J. (1988–1996). Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Dolomitenladinischen, 7 vols., Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
EWFS = Gamillscheg, E. (1969). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der französischen Sprache, 2nd ed., Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Faitelson-Weiser, S. (1980). Les suffixes quantificateurs de l’espagnol, Paris: Éditions Hispaniques.Google Scholar
FEW = von Wartburg, W. (1928). Französisches etymologisches Wörterbuch: Eine Darstellung des galloromanischen Sprachschatzes, 24 vols., Basel: Zbinden, etc.Google Scholar
Fisch, R. (1890). Die lateinischen nomina personalia auf „o, onis“: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Vulgärlateins, Berlin: Gaertner.Google Scholar
Gaide, F. (2002). Les substantifs masculins latins en -(i)ō, -(i)ōnis: Étude synchronique. In Kircher-Durand, Ch., ed., Grammaire fondamentale du latin, vol. 9: Création lexicale: la formation des mots par dérivation suffixale, Louvain: Peeters, pp. 307−336.Google Scholar
GDLI = Battaglia, S. and Barberi Squarotti, G., eds. (1961–2002). Grande Dizionario della Lingua Italiana, 21 vols., Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Genasci, D. (2011). La formazione delle parole nel dialetto di Airolo, Magisterarbeit: Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
González Fernández, I. (1978). Sufijos nominales en el gallego actual, Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Hajek, J. (1988). Survival of the suffix -unz(a) in Northern Italian and Romantsch. Vox Romanica, 47, 103−8.Google Scholar
Heinemann, S. (2002). Zur funktional-semantischen Heterogenität von ital. -one unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Adverbbildung. In Heinemann, S., Bernhard, G. and Kattenbusch, D., eds., Roma et Romania: Festschrift für Gerhard Ernst zum 65. Geburtstag, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 135−50.Google Scholar
Houaiss, A. (2001). Dicionário Houaiss da lingua portuguesa, Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.Google Scholar
Institutul de Lingvistică din Bucureşti. (1957). Dicţionar invers, Bucureşti: Ed. Academiei Republicii Populare Romîne.Google Scholar
Kluge, F. (1886). Nominale Stammbildungslehre der altgermanischen Dialecte, Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kremer, R. (1996). Die Werkzeugbezeichnungen im Italienischen, Bonn: Romanistischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Lo Duca, M. G. (2004). Nomi di strumento. In Grossmann, M. and Rainer, F., eds., La formazione delle parole in italiano, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 364−74.Google Scholar
Luschützky, H. C. and Rainer, F. (2013). Instrument and place nouns: a typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistics, 51(6), 1301−59.Google Scholar
Lutz, F. and Strehle, D. (1988). Rückläufiges Wörterbuch des Surselvischen / Diziunari invers dil romontsch sursilvan, Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Machado, J. P. (1967–1973). Dicionário etimológico da lingua portuguesa, 2nd ed., Lisboa: Confluência.Google Scholar
Mascaró, J. and Rafel, J. (1990). Diccionari català invers amb informació morfològica, Barcelona: Publicancions de l’Abadia de Monserrat.Google Scholar
Melcher, F. (1924). Furmaziun nominala nel idiom d’Engadin’Ota. Annalas da la Societad Retorumantscha, 38, 119−79.Google Scholar
Meyer, W. (1888). Das lateinische Suffix ō, ōnis. Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik, 5, 223−33.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1894). Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen, vol. 2: Formenlehre, Leipzig: Fues.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1921). Historische Grammatik der französischen Sprache, vol. 2: Wortbildungslehre, Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Nyrop, K. (1908). Grammaire historique de la langue française, vol. 3: Formation des mots, Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Pena, J. (1980). La derivación en español: Verbos derivados y sustantivos verbales, Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Piel, J.-M. (1989 [1940]). A formação dos nomes de lugares e de instrumentos em Português. In id. Estudos de linguística histórica galego-portuguesa, Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda, pp. 201−11. (First published in Boletim de Filologia, 7, 31−47.)Google Scholar
Popescu-Marin, M., ed. (2007). Formarea cuvintelor în limba română din secolele al XVI-lea − al XVIII-lea, Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Pupier, P. (1999). Le morphème est plus une unité de forme qu’une unité de signification: Le cas de -on en français. Cahiers de Lexicologie, 74(1), 53−60.Google Scholar
Rainer, F. (2011). The agent-instrument-place “polysemy” of the suffix -tor in Romance. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 64(1), 8−32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REW = Meyer-Lübke, W. (1935). Romanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch, 3rd ed., Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Rio-Torto, G. M. (1993). Formação de palavras em português: Aspectos da construção de avaliativos, PhD thesis, Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra.Google Scholar
Rio-Torto, G., ed. (2016). Gramática derivacional do português, 2nd ed., Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G. (1931). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Pyrenäenmundarten. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 7, 119−69.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G. (1969). Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. 3: Sintassi e formazione delle parole, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Ronjat, J. (1937). Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. 3, Montpellier: Société des langues romanes.Google Scholar
Seidl, R. (1937). Die Nomina agentis und die denominalen Ableitungen auf -one im Galloromanischen, Dissertation, Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Siller-Runggaldier, H. (1989). Grödnerische Wortbildung, Innsbruck: Institut für Romanistik.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. (1921). Das Suffix -one im Romanischen. In Gamillscheg, E. and Spitzer, L. eds., Beiträge zur romanischen Wortbildungslehre, Genf: Olschki, pp. 183–205.Google Scholar
Tekavčić, P. (1984). La formazione delle parole nell’istroromanzo rovignese contemporaneo. L’Italia Dialettale, 47, 111−82.Google Scholar
TL = Tobler, A. and Lommatzsch, E. (1925–2002). Altfranzösisches Wörterbuch, 11 vols., Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
TLFi = Trésor de la langue française informatisé. http://atilf.atilf.fr/Google Scholar
Tollemache, F. (1959). Derivati in -one, -ino e -ío di deverbali della lingua italiana. L’Italia Dialettale, 23, 55−74, 192−200.Google Scholar
Urdiales, M. (1979). Sobre las voces españolas masculinas terminadas en -ón. In Estudios ofrecidos a E. Alarcos Llorach (con motivo de sus XXV años de docencia en la Universidad de Oviedo), vol. 4, Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo, pp. 181−208.Google Scholar
Videsott, P. and Plangg, G. A. (1998). Ennebergisches Wörterbuch / Vocabular mareo, Innsbruck: Wagner.Google Scholar
Vieli, R. and Decurtins, A. (1962). Vocabulari romontsch: Sursilvan-tudestg, Cuera: Ligia Romontscha.Google Scholar
Walker, D. C. (1982). Dictionnaire inverse de l’ancien français, Ottawa: Éditions de l’Université d’Ottawa.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. (1904). Die lateinischen Personennamen auf -o, -onis. Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik, 13, 225−52, 415−26, 475−501.Google Scholar