Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T05:59:55.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Complexity of Greek Verbal Morphology

The Case of Prefixed Verbs

from Part II - Structure of Complex Words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Artemis Alexiadou
Edited by
Lívia Körtvélyessy  and
Pavol Štekauer
Lívia Körtvélyessy
Affiliation:
P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia
Pavol Štekauer
Affiliation:
P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia
Get access

Summary

This paper examines the distribution of non-active Voice morphology on intransitive variants of prefixed verbs in Greek. It is shown that such verbs bear internal prefixes and are causative and transitive. Their intransitive variants bear non-active morphology obligatorily undergoing a process of detransitivization. It is further shown that this holds also for reflexive marking in Romance (Catalan and French). This is due to a reanalysis of the particle system of the languages under discussion, according to which internal prefixes have been reanalyzed and cannot be morphophonologically separated from the verbal stem. This suggests that all three languages changed from a more lexeme-like type of prefix system (Bauer 2003) to a system where prefixes are void of spatial semantic content and seem to function as transitivity markers.

Keywords

internal vs. external prefixestelicitytransitivitytransitivity alternationsVoice morphologyGreek
Type
Chapter
Information
Complex Words
Advances in Morphology
 , pp. 192 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acedo Matellán, V. (2006). Prefixes in Latin and Romance and the satellite vs. verb framed distinction. In Actes Del VII Congrés de Lingüìstica General (CDROM), Barcelona: Publicacions I Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Acedo Matellán, V. (2016). The Morphosyntax of Transitions: A Case Study in Latin and Other Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A. (2013). Where is non-active morphology? In Müller, S., ed., Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 244–262.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. (2019). A form-meaning mismatch? The case of Greek deponents. In Brown, J., Schmidt, A. and Wierzba, M., eds., Of Trees and Birds: A Festschrift for Gisbert Fanselow, Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1999). Non active morphology and the direction of transitivity alternations. Proceedings of NELS, 29 (papers from the poster session), 27–40.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (2004). Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative Alternation: evidence for a non unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. and Everaert, M., eds., The Unaccusativity Puzzle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (2013). Manner vs. result complementarity in verbal alternations: a view from the clear alternation. Proceedings of NELS, 42, 39–52.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. and Schäfer, F. (2006). The properties of anticausatives cross-linguistically. In Frascarelli, M., ed., Phases of Interpretation, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 187–212.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. and Schäfer, F. (2015). External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. and Doron, E. (2012). The syntactic construction of two non-active Voices: passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics, 48, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A. and Schäfer, F. (2013). Towards a non-uniform analysis of naturally reflexive verbs. Proceedings of WCCFL, 31. www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/31/paper3001.pdf.Google Scholar
Arad, M. (2005). Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-Syntax, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Asyllogistou, A. (2018). Result in the Diachrony of Greek, PhD dissertation, Belfast: University of Ulster.Google Scholar
Bortone, P. (2010). Greek Prepositions. From Antiquity to the Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L. (2003). English prefixation. A typological shift? Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 50, 33–40.Google Scholar
Bertocci, D. (2017). Intensive verbal prefixes in Archaic Latin. In Benacchio, R., Muro, A. and Slavkova, S., eds., The Role of Prefixes in the Formation of Aspectuality. Issues in Grammaticalization, Firenze, Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici: University Press, pp. 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A. M. (1997). Prefixed-verbs and adjunct identification. In Di Sciullo, A. M., ed., Projections and Interface Conditions, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–73.Google Scholar
Doron, E. (2003). Agency and voice: the semantics of Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics, 11, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doron, E. and Labelle, M. (2011). An ergative analysis of French valency alternation. In Herschensohn, J., ed., Romance Linguistics 2010: Selected Papers from the 40th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word, Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Time in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Efthymiou, A. (2015). Modern Greek parasynthetic verbs. A hierarchical relationship between prefixes and suffixes? In. Manova, S., ed., Affix Ordering Across Languages and Frameworks, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efthymiou, A. (2017). Intensification and deintensification of Modern Greek verbs. Lexis, 10. http://lexis.revues.org/1089.Google Scholar
Embick, D. (1998). Voice systems and the syntax/morphology interface. Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect, 32, 41–72.Google Scholar
Embick, D. (2010). Localism and Globalism in Morphology and Phonology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folli, R. and Harley, H. (2016). Against deficiency-based typologies: manner alternation parameters in Italian and English. In Carrilho, E., Fiéis, A. and Pereira, S., eds., Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ 28, Lisbon, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junker, M. O. (1987). Transitive, intransitive and reflexive uses of adjectival verbs in French. In Montreuil, J. P., ed., Advances in Romance Linguistics, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1993). More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Comrie, B. and Polinsky, M., eds., Causatives and Transitivity, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haveling, G. (2003). On prefixes and actionality in Classical and Late Latin. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 50, 113–135.Google Scholar
Hopperdietzel, J. (2019). Marked causatives as Voice-driven contextual allomorphy. Poster presented at GLOW 42, Oslo.Google Scholar
Klaiman, M. H. (1991). Grammatical Voice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In Rooryck, J., and Zaring, L., eds., Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, I. (2001). Medium: Eine Studie zur Verbsemantik, Habilitationsschrift: University of Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. (1993). The Middle Voice, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavidas, N. (2009). Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony: Changes in Argument Structure and Voice Morphology, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Laskaratou, C. and Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1984). Lexical vs transformational passives in Modern Greek. Glossologia, 2−3, 99–109.Google Scholar
Lekakou, M. (2005). In the Middle, Somewhat Elevated. The Semantics of Middles and its Crosslinguistic Realization, PhD dissertation, London: University of London.Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1999). Objecthood: an event structure perspective. In Proceedings of CLS 35, Volume 1: The Main Session, Chicago Linguistic Society: University of Chicago, pp. 223–247.Google Scholar
Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manney, L. J. (2000). Middle Voice in Modern Greek: Meaning and Function of an Inflectional Category, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Manzini, R, Roussou, A. and Savoia, L. (2016). Middle-passive Voice in Albanian and Greek. Journal of Linguistics, 52, 111–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez-Dosuna, J. (1997). Fusion, fission and relevance in language change: De-univerbation in Greek verb morphology. Studies in Language, 21(3), 577–612.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G. (2008). Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralli, A. (2003). Preverbs in Greek: the case of ksana, kse-, para-. In Di Sciullo, A. M., ed., Asymmetry in Grammar: Morphology, Phonology and Language Acquisition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 37–65.Google Scholar
Ralli, A. (2004). Stem-based versus word-based morphological configurations: the case of Modern Greek preverbs. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2004(2), 241–275.Google Scholar
Schäfer, F. (2008). The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives. External Arguments in Change-of-State Contexts, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, F. (2009). The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(2), 641–681.Google Scholar
Sioupi, Athina (1998). Middle Constructions: A Comparative Study in Greek and German (Domes Mesis Diathesis: mia sygritiki meleti ellinikis-germanikis), PhD dissertation, Athens: University of Athens.Google Scholar
Smirniotopoulos, J. (1992). Lexical Passives in Modern Greek, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Spathas, G., Alexiadou, A. and Schäfer, F. (2015). Middle Voice and reflexive interpretations: afto-prefixation in Greek. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(4), 1293–1350.Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (2004). Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd, 32. https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/68Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (2007). Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. In Reuland, E., Bhattacharya, T. and Spathas, G., eds., Argument Structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 65–103.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Typology and Process in Concept Structuring, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, D. (2000). -O/-me alternations in MG patient oriented constructions: anticausatives and passives. In The Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Dept. of the University of Thessaloniki, 146–157.Google Scholar
Troberg, M. and Burnett, H. (2017). From Latin to Modern French: a punctuated shift. In Mathieu, E. and Truswell, R., eds., From Micro-Change to Macro-Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 104–124.Google Scholar
Tsakou, E. (2010). Derivative Verbs of Modern Greek without Correspondence between Form and Meaning. The Case of Prefixed Verbs Ending in -ízo, ‑iázo and -óno, MA thesis, Greece: Democritus University of Thrace [in Greek].Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. (1989). On the properties of the passive affix in Modern Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 235–260.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. (2006). The acquisition of voice and transitivity alternations in Greek as native and second language. In Unsworth, S., Parodi, T., Sorace, A. an Young-Scholten, M., eds., Paths of Development in L1 and L2 Acquisition: In Honor of Bonnie D. Schwartz, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 15–55.Google Scholar
Wood, J. (2014). Reflexive -st verbs in Icelandic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 1387–1425.Google Scholar
Zombolou, K. (2004). Verbal Alternations in Greek: A Semantic Approach, PhD dissertation, Reading: University of Reading.Google Scholar
Zombolou, K. and Alexiadou, A. (2014). The canonical function of deponent verbs. In Rainer, F., Gardani, F., Luschützky, H. C. and Dressler, W., eds., Morphology and Meaning, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×