Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:14:14.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Teachers Unions in the Nordic Countries: Solidarity and the Politics of Self- Interest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2016

Susanne Wiborg
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Education
Terry M. Moe
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Susanne Wiborg
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Teacher unions in the Scandinavian countries (Denmark, Norway and Sweden) were once exceptionally powerful, a situation facilitated by the corporatist political system and the social democrats – the largest political party. However, corporatist governance and social democracy have weakened over the last three decades, which has reduced teacher unions’ influence on national policy formulation and diminished their bargaining power. Nevertheless, teacher unions have proved resilient as they have found new allies and avenues, especially at local level, to exercise their power. The diminution of teacher union power across the Scandinavian states has varied considerably – the Swedish teacher unions have experienced greater reduction of power than their counterparts in Norway and Denmark. In striking contrast to Scandinavia, the single teacher union in Finland has remained immensely influential and therefore is a bit of an outlier.

Research on teacher unions in the Nordic countries is sparse, particularly in Finland, and tends to be conducted by researchers commissioned by teacher unions. There are no studies on how the teacher unions as political actors have exercised power through a corporatist tradition that makes the unions part of the political system and the civil administration. The close involvement of organised interests in public policy-making – which makes such interests an integral part of the political structure of the Nordic countries – is evidenced in numerous studies that place Scandinavia, but not Finland, at the upper end of scales measuring the degree of interest integration (Lijphart and Crepaz 1991; Rommetvedt 2003: 134). The corporate system affords teacher unions a number of opportunities to exercise influence over policy initiatives, legislative decision-making and policy implementation. In order to understand the extent to which teacher unions are enabled to influence policy, it is crucial to investigate this system of corporatism and how it has changed in recent years. Corporatism can be understood as an ‘institutional arrangement whereby important political-economic decisions are reached via negotiations between or in consultation with peak-level representation of employees and employers (or other interest groups and the state)’ (Kenworthy 2003: 11).

The first part of the chapter will analyse how and why corporatism and social democracy were propitious for the rise of teacher union power, and in which ways the unions’ interests played out in education politics and collective bargaining from the interwar period until the 1980s.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Comparative Politics of Education
Teachers Unions and Education Systems around the World
, pp. 144 - 191
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahonen, S. (2002) From an industrial to a post-industrial society: Changing conceptions of equality in education. Educational Review 54(2): 173–81.Google Scholar
Ahonen, S. (2010) Bounded Rationality in Finnish Education Policy. In Jacobi, A.P, Martens, K., and Wolf, K.D., eds, Education in Political Science. Discovering a Neglected Field. New York: Routledge.
Åmark, K. (1989) Öppna karteller och sociale inhägnader. In Selander, S., ed., Kampen om yrkesutövning, status och kunskap: professionaliseringens sociala grunder. Lund: Studentlitteratu.
Andersen, J. (2006) Between Growth and Security: Swedish Social Democracy From a Strong Society to a Third Way. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Anthonsen, M., and Lindvall, J. (2009) Party competition and the resilience of corporatism. Government and Opposition 44(2): 167–87.Google Scholar
Anthonsen, M., Lindvall, J., and Schmidt-Hansen, U. (2010) Social democrats, unions and corporatism: Denmark and Sweden compared. Party Politics 17(1): 118–34.Google Scholar
Arreman, I.E. (2011) Privatisation of public education? The emergence of independent upper secondary schools in Sweden. Journal of Education Policy 26(2): 225–43.Google Scholar
Arter, D. (1999) Party system change in Scandinavia since 1970: ‘Restricted change’ or ‘general change’? West European Politics 22(3): 139–58.Google Scholar
Arter, D. (2007) The end of the social democratic hegemony? The March 2007 Finnish general election. West European Politics 30: 1148–57.Google Scholar
Arter, D. (2009) From a contingent party system to party system convergence? Mapping party system change in postwar Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies 32(2): 221–39.Google Scholar
Bäck, H. (2003) Party politics and the common good in Swedish local government. Scandinavian Political Studies 26(2): 93–123.Google Scholar
Bietenback, J. (2014) Teacher practices and cognitive skills. Labour Economics 30: 143–53.Google Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J. (2000) Still corporatism in Scandinavia? A survey of recent empirical findings. Scandinavian Political Studies 23(2): 157–81.Google Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J. (2001) Organized interest and the state: A disintegrating relationship? Evidence from Denmark. European Journal of Political Research 39(3): 391–416.Google Scholar
Bregnsbo, H. (1971) Kampen om skolelovene af 1958. En studie i interesseorganisationers politiske aktivitet. Odense University Press.
Bröcher, K. et al. (1974) Lærerne og folkeskolen gennem 100 år. København: Danmarks Lærerforening.
Christensen, D.Ch. (1966) Lærerinteresser of læreruddannelse. Aarbog for dansk skolehistorie. Copenhagen: Selskabet for Skole- og Uddannelseshistorie.
Christensen, J.G. (1998) Institutioner, politikere og brugere. In Blom-Hansen, , ed., Offentligt og effektivt? Institutionelle valg i den offentlige sektor. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Christensen, J.G. (2000) Governance and Devolution in the Danish School System. In Arnott, M.A., and Raab, C.D., eds, The Governance of Schooling: comparative studies of devolved management. London: Routledge.
Christiansen, P.M., and Rommetvedt, H. (1999) From corporatism to lobbyism? Parliaments, executives, and organized interests in Denmark and Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies 22.Google Scholar
Christiansen, P.M., and Togeby, L. (2006) Power and democracy in Denmark: Still a viable democracy? Scandinavian Political Studies 29(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Daun, H., and Siminou, P. (2005) State, market, and civil forces in the governance of education: The case of Sweden, France, Germany, the Czech Republic. European Education 37(1): 26–45.Google Scholar
Denessen, E., Sleegers, P., and Smit, P. (2001) Reasons for school choice in the Netherlands and in Finland. Occational Paper No. 24. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Dobbins, M. (2014) Explaining change and inertia in Swedish and French education: A tale of two corporatisms? Policy Studies 35(3): 282–302.Google Scholar
Due, J., and Madsen, J.S. (1987) Fra Lokalkreds til fagforening. De lokale fagforeningers tilblivelsesproces i Danmarks lærerforening. Første rapport i forskningsprojektet fremtidens skole/fremtidens lærerforening. København: Institut for Kultursociologi.
Dunphy, R. (2007) In search of an identity: Finland's Left Alliance and the experience of coalition government. Contemporary Politics 13(1): 37–55.Google Scholar
Elovaino, P. (1983) The nation-building process and the development of the secondary school system in Finland, Norway and Sweden at the end of the 19th century. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 27(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Elvander, N. (2002) The new Swedish regime for collective bargaining and conflict resolution: A comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations 8(2): 197–216.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985) Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Galgóczi, B. and Glassner, V. (2008) Comparative Study of Teachers’ Pay in Europe. Brussels: EI/ETUCE joint research project.
Green-Pedersen, C. (1999) The Danish welfare state under bourgeois reign. The dilemma of popular entrenchment and economic constraints. Scandinavian Political Studies 22(3): 243–60.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, (2002) New management reforms of the Danish and Swedish welfare states: The role of different social democratic responses. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 15(2): 271–94.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C., and Thomsen, L.H. (2005) Bloc politics vs. broad cooperation? The functioning of Danish minority parliamentarism. Journal of Legislative Studies 11(2): 153–69.Google Scholar
Helgøy, I., and Homme, A. (2007) Towards a new professionalism in school? A comparative study of teacher autonomy in Norway and Sweden. European Educational Research Journal 6(3): 232–48.Google Scholar
Holm-Larsen, S. (2006) Uddannelserne i årets løb. Folketingsåret 2005–2006. Uddannelseshistorie. København: Selskabet for Skole-og Uddannelseshistorie.
Holm-Larsen, S. (2010) Hvorfra – hvorhen? Tendenser og lovændringer mv. i dansk uddannelsespolitik 1998–2010. Uddannelseshistorie. København: Selskabet for Skole-og Uddannelseshistorie.
Holm-Larsen, S. (2013) Lærerlockout, lektiecafeer og lavere SU – uddannelserne i folketingsåret 2012–2013. Uddannelseshistorie. København: Selskabet for Skole-og Uddannelseshistorie.
Ibsen, Ch.L., Larsen, T.P., Madsen, J.S., and J. Due (2011) Challenging Scandinavian employment relations: The effects of new public management reforms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 22(11): 2295–310.Google Scholar
Kansanen, P. (1990) Education as a discipline in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 34(4): 271–84.Google Scholar
Kansanen, P. (2003) Teacher Education in Finland: Current Models and New Developments. In Moon, B., L. Vlasceanau, and L.C. Barrows, eds, Institutional Approaches to Teacher Education within Higher Education in Europe. Bucharest: UNESCO Studies on Higher Education.
Kenworthy, L. (2003) Quantitative indicators of corporatism. International Journal of Sociology 33(3): 10–44.Google Scholar
Kettunen, P. (2001) The Nordic welfare state in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of History 26(3): 225–47.Google Scholar
Kirby, D. (2006) A Concise History of Finland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kivinen, O., and Rinne, R. (1990) The university, the state and the professional interest groups: A Finnish lesson in university development policy. Higher Education Policy 3(3): 15–18.Google Scholar
Kivinen, O., and Rinne, R. (1994) The thirst for learning, or protecting one's niche? The shaping of teacher training in Finland during the 19th and 20th centuries. British Journal of Sociology of Education 15(4): 515–27.Google Scholar
Kleven, T., Floris, T.S., Granberg, M., Montin, S, Rieper, O., and S.I. Valo (2000) Renewal of local government in Scandinavia: Effects for local politicians. Local Government Studies 26(2): 93–116.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, M.B. (2007) Why are they doing it? Social democracy and market-oriented welfare state reforms. West European Politics 30(1): 172–94.Google Scholar
Kvavik, R.B. (1976) Interest Groups in Norwegian Politics. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Lakomaa, E. (2009) The Municipal Takeover of the School System. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration No. 2011: 2.
Laukkanen, R. (2008) Finnish Strategy for High-Level Education for All. In Soguel, N.C. and Jaccard, P., eds, Governance and Performance of Education Systems: 305–24. Springer.
Lidström, A. (1999) Local school choice policies in Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies 22: 137–156.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A., and M.M.L. Crepaz (1991) Corporatism and consensus democracy in eighteen countries. British Journal of Political Science. 21(1): 235–46.Google Scholar
Lindblad, S., Lundahl, L., Lindgren, , and Gunilla, Z. (2002) Educating for the New Sweden? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 46(3): 283–303.Google Scholar
Lindvall, J., and Sebring, J. (2005) Policy reform and the decline of corporatism in Sweden. West European Politics 28(5): 1057–74.Google Scholar
Lundahl, L. Lundahl, L. (2002) Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets – and then what? Journal of Education Policy 17(6): 687–97.Google Scholar
Lundahl, L. (2006) Education politics and teachers: Sweden and some comparisons with Great Britain. Hitotsubshi Journal of Social Studies 38 (1): 63–78.Google Scholar
Lundahl, L., Arreman, I.E., Lundström, U., and Rönnberg, L. (2010) Setting things right? Swedish upper secondary school reform in a 40-year perspective. Journal of Education 45(1): 46–59.Google Scholar
Machin, S., and McNally, S. (2008) The literacy hour. Journal of Public Economics 92(5–6): 1441–62.Google Scholar
Matilla, M., and Raunio, T. (2002) Government formation in the Nordic countries: The electoral connection. Scandinavian Political Studies 25(3): 259–80.Google Scholar
Mausethagen, S., and Granlund, L. (2012) Contested discourses of teacher professionalism: Current tensions between education policy and teachers unions. Journal of Education Policy 27(6): 815–33.Google Scholar
Nygård, M. (2006) Welfare-ideological change in Scandinavia: A comparative analysis of partisan welfare state positions in four Nordic countries, 1970–2003. Scandinavian Political Studies 29(4): 356–85.Google Scholar
Öberg, P.O., Svensson, T., Christiansen, P.M., Nørgaard, S., Rommetvedt, H., and Thesen, G. (2011) Disrupted exchange and declining corporatism: Government authority and interest group capability in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition. 46(3): 365–91.Google Scholar
OECD (1994) Quality in Teaching. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development): Paris.
Paloheimo, H. (2002) Divided Government in Finland. From a Semi-Presidential to a Parliamentary Democracy. In Elgie, R., ed., Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pekkarinen, T., Uusitalo, R., and Pekkala, S (2006) Education Policy and Intergenerational Income Mobility: Evidence from the Finnish Comprehensive School Reform. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2204. http://ssrn.com/abstract=920645
Persson, S. (2008) Lärayrkets uppkomst och förändring: en sociologisk studie av lärares villkor, organisering och yrkesprojekt inom den grunläggende utbildningen i Sverige ca. 1800-2000. Akademisk avhandling. Göteborg: Sociologiska institutionen, universitetet.
Räisänen, M. (2014). Counter from the Catheda. Democratic School Workers Association redefining teachers’ political agency in Finland, 1973–1989. Pedagogica Historica 50(4): 533–53.Google Scholar
Rangvid, B.S. (2008). Private school diversity in Denmark's national voucher system. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52(4): 331–54.Google Scholar
Rautalin, M., and Alasuutari, P. (2007) The curse of success: The impact of the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment on the discourses of the teaching profession in Finland. European Educational Research Journal 6: 438–63.Google Scholar
Rautalin, M., and Alasuutari, P. (2009) The uses of the national PISA results by Finnish officials in central government. Journal of Education Policy. 24(5): 539–56.Google Scholar
Rinne, R. (1988) The Formation and Professionalization of the Popular Teachers in Finland in the 20th Century. In Iisalo, T., and Rinne, R., eds, Läraren i 1900-talets kultur och samhälle. Turun yliopiston kasvatustieteiden tiedekunnan julkaisuja, B26: 106–48.
Rinne, R. (2000) The globalisation of education: Finnish education at the doorstep of the new millennium. Educational Review. 52(2): 131–42.Google Scholar
Rinne, R., Kvirauma, J., and Simola, H. (2002) Shoots of revisionist education policy or just slow readjustment? The Finnish case of educational reconstruction. Journal of educational policy 17(6): 643–58.Google Scholar
Rommetvedt, H. (2003) The Rise of the Norwegian Parliament. London: Frank Cass.
Rommetvedt, H. (2005) Norway: Resources count, but votes decide? From neo-corporatist representation to neo-pluralist parliamentarism. West European Politics. 28(4): 740–63.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. Rothstein, B. (1992a) Den korporative staten: intresseorganisationer och statsförvaltning i svensk politik. Stockholm: Nordstedts juridik: Allmänna förlaget.
Rothstein, B. (1992b) Explaining Swedish corporatism: The formative moment. Scandinavian Political Studies. 15(3): 173–91.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. (1997) Den svenska modellens institutionella arv. In: Johansson, A.L., ed., Fackliga organisationsstrategier. Solna: Arbetslivsinstitutet. Stockholm: TCO.
Rovde, O. (2004) Vegar til samling. Norsk lærarlags historie 1966–2006. [Roads to unification. The history of Norwegian teacher unions 1966–2006]. Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.
Sahlgreen, G.H. (2011) Schooling for money: Swedish education reforms and the role of the profit motive. Economic Affairs (October). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sahlgreen, G.H. (2015) Real Finnish Lessons. The True Story of an Education Superpower. Surrey: Centre for Policy Studies.
Schwerdt, G., and Wuppermann, A.C. (2011) Is traditional teaching all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review. 30(2): 365–79.Google Scholar
Sejersted, F. (2006) The Age of Social Democracy. Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Semi, R. (2013) Common ground on class size. American Educator. Spring.Google Scholar
Simola, H. (1993) Educational Science, the State, and Teachers. Forming the Corporate Regulation of Teacher Education in Finland. In Popkewitz, T.S., ed., Changing Pattern of Power, Self Regulation and Teacher Education Reform. New York: State University of New York.
Simola, H. (1998) Decontextulizing teachers’ knowedge: Finnish didactics and teacher education curricula during the 1980s and 1990s. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 42(4): 325–38.Google Scholar
Simola, H. (2005) The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education 41(4): 455–70.Google Scholar
Simola, H., Kivinen, O., and Rinne, R. (1997) Didactics closure: Professionalization and pedagogic knowledge in Finnish teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 13(8): 887–91.Google Scholar
Simola, H., Rinne, R., and Kivirauma, J. (2002) Abdication of the education state or just shifting responsibilities? The appearance of a new system of reason in constructing educational governance and social exclusion/inclusion in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 46(3): 247–64.Google Scholar
Simola, H., Rinne, R., Varjo, J., Pitkänen, H., and Kauko, J. (2009) Quality assurance and evaluation (QAE) in Finnish compulsory schooling: A national model or just unintended effects of radical decentralisation? Journal of Education Policy 42(2): 163–78.Google Scholar
Söderström, M. (2010) Wage scales and centralized bargaining: A binding constraint on the wage-setting? Applied Economics Letters 17(3): 247–50.Google Scholar
Søreide, G.E. (2006) Teacher union and teacher identity. Nordisk Pedagogik 28: 193–203.Google Scholar
Stokke, T.A. (2002) Conflict resolution in the Nordic countries. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 8: 670–87.Google Scholar
Strath, A. (2004) Teacher Policy Reforms in Sweden: The Case of Individualised Pay. International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.
Svensson, T., and Öberg, P.-O. (2002) Labour market organisations’ participation in Swedish public policy-making. Scandinavian Political Studies 25(4): 295–315.Google Scholar
Telhaug, A.O. (1993) Et typisk Hernes-år. In Skolen 1993–1994. Årbok for norsk utdanninghistorie. Selskapet for norsk skolehistorie.
Telhaug, A.O. (2005) Kunnskapsløftet – Ny eller gammel skole. Beskrivelse og analyse av Kristin Clemets reformer i grunnoplæringen. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
Telhaug, A.O., Mediås, O.A., and Aasen, P (2004) From collectivism to individualism? Education as nation building in a Scandinavian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 48(2): 141–58.Google Scholar
Vabo, S.I. (2000) New organisational solutions in Norwegian local councils: Leaving a puzzling role for local politicians? Scandinavian Political Studies 23(4): 343–72.Google Scholar
Vlachos, J. (2011) Friskölor i förandring. In J. Hartman, ed., Konkurrencens konsekvenser. Vad händer med svensk velfärd. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
Volckmar, N. (2008). Knowledge and solidarity: The Norwegian social-democratic school project in a period of change, 1945–2000. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
West, A., and Ylönen, A. (2010) Market-oriented school reform in England and Finland: School choice, finance and governance. Educational Studies 36(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2009) Education and Social Integration. The Development of Comprehensive Schooling in Europe. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Wiborg, S. (2013) Neo-liberalism and universal state education: The cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden 1980–2011. Comparative Education 48(2): 407–23.Google Scholar
Wiborg, S. (2015) Privatizing education: Free school policy in Sweden and England. Comparative Education Review 59(3): 473–97.Google Scholar
Wiborg, S., and Larsen, K.R. (2017) Why school choice reforms in Denmark fail: The blocking power of the teacher union. European Journal of Education.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×