Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2022
Chapter aims
This chapter aims to:
• explore the contested nature of refugee community organisations;
• increase knowledge of the complex nature of migrant organising over time;
• focus on how migrant associations experience and respond to the challenges of immigration policies through identifying informal non-regulated activities;
• examine the effects of diversity within diversity and processes of change on migrant associations.
Introduction
Immigration to Scotland since the early 1990s has been characterised by the multiplicity of immigrants’ countries of origin. Most of these immigrants are new to Scotland, and come from countries with no specific historical or colonial links with Britain. Like a number of UK cities, Glasgow has experienced a dramatic increase in immigration particularly since the introduction of dispersal with the 1999 Immigration and Asylum Act. The city was, and remains, the largest dispersal site in the UK. Since the introduction of dispersal policy, although designed to disrupt social networks, considered by politicians to act as a ‘pull’ to further asylum migration, a number of informal and formal associations and networks have nonetheless emerged in dispersal areas across the UK. This chapter explores processes of change and development within African migrant, asylum-seeker and refugee-led associations in Glasgow from 2004 onwards, presenting new findings from the Scottish context.
Much research into associational practices among people claiming asylum, refugees and migrants generally draws on the concept of social capital (Putnam, 1995, 2002; Home Office 2004, 2009; Ager and Strang, 2008; Scottish Government, 2013). This concept is contested, not least for its lack of attention to power and conflict, its over-positive view of social networks and its conceptual fuzziness, which will be discussed in what follows (but see also Fine, 2002; Griffiths et al, 2005; Hynes and Sales, 2010). Nonetheless the idea of social capital has retained its popularity in policy debates, with varying degrees of rigorous evidence presented on the ways in which bonds, bridges and links enable service users to access a wide range of resources. Conversely, the widely cited literature on bridging and bonding social capital (Putnam, 2002; Cantle, 2004) argues that contact with predominantly co-ethnic, national or religious groups and non-contact with out-groups is harmful to integration, potentially leading to further social fragmentation (Putnam, 2002).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.