Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2022
Chapter aims
Whereas Chapter Four reflected on key changes in policy towards communities and community groups, this chapter, which draws on 85 interviews and six focus groups conducted in 2010, 2012 and 2015, asks the following questions:
• How have these groups responded to change over the past six years?
• What was the impact of policy shifts and, in particular, what was the effect of central and local government budget cuts below the radar?
• What are the challenges for both communities and government itself in delivering the agendas of localism, ‘social action’ and open public services?
Introduction
Participants in the research that informs this chapter were recruited at a number of levels, and comprise representatives from national community network organisations and from regional and local infrastructure agencies, staff in small community-based voluntary organisations, and unpaid activists in volunteer-led organisations. Care was taken to involve a wide range of groups and perspectives, those active in communities of interest as well as at a neighbourhood level, ‘single-cause’ groups, such as black and minority ethnic (BME) and women's organisations, and advocacy organisations as well as service providers.
Resource constraints meant that interviews were undertaken in three regions in England – West Midlands (35), London and the South East (30) and the North West (20) – rather than offering national coverage. The relative decline in the number of organisations involved between 2010 and 2015 reflects a wider trend of groups either closing or lacking the capacity to participate (for example, because of losing paid workers and being staffed only by volunteers).
At each stage of the research, reference groups consisting of practitioners, policymakers, activists and academics reviewed the findings to reflect on their accuracy in terms of lived experience below the radar and their applicability. All those organisations and individuals involved have been anonymised to comply with ethical requirements.
Background: austerity in policy context
For all the talk of ‘community engagement’ over the past decade or so, in practice, it has tended to mean little more than consultation with the community. The term ‘community’ has tended to be adopted in an uncritical fashion and assumed to relate to a coherent set of individuals or groups who share common goals, interests or geographies. Community activists in the study who had previous experience of Area Based Initiatives reported that far too often ‘engagement’ has felt like a tick-box exercise, a gesture towards dialogue rather than a genuine attempt to listen and change.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.