Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T22:19:53.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2025

Jennifer Rowsell
With contributions by
Samuel Sandor
Jennifer Rowsell
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Samuel Sandor
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Comfort of Screens
Literacy in Postdigital Times
 , pp. 176 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abrams, S. S. (2015). Integrating Virtual and Traditional Learning in 6–12 Classrooms: A Layered Literacies Approach to Multimodal Meaning Making. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Abrams, S. S. & Rowsell, J. (2019). Immateriality redux: Tacit modalities and meaning across timescales. In Pyles, D., Rish, R., Pleasants, H. & Warner, J., eds., Negotiating Place and Space in Digital Literacies: Research and Practice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 241–259.Google Scholar
Adichie, C. N. (2009). ‘The danger of a single story.’ TED Talk. https://tinyurl.com/45fy53ad.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2012). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Educational Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2023). The Feminist Killjoy Handbook. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Aierbe-Barandiaran, A. & Oregui-González, E. (2016). Values and emotions in children’s audiovisual fictional narratives. Communication, Civil Society, and Social Change, 24(47), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.3916/C47-2016-07.Google Scholar
Amos, J. (2024). Anthropocene unit of geological time is rejected. BBC News article. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68632086.Google Scholar
Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: An Introduction to Supermodernity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (2021). Researching Virtual Play Experiences: Visual Methods in Education Research. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, M. (2020). Learning on the move toward just, sustainable, and culturally thriving futures. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1777999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2012). On touching – the inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 23(3), 206–223.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2017). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, Re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formations, 92, 56–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartsch, A., Vorderer, P., Mangold, R. & Viehoff, R. (2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beavis, C. & O’Mara, J. (2010). Computer games: Pushing at the boundaries of literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrendt, R.-P. (2011). Consciousness, memory, and hallucinations. In Blom, J. & Sommer, I., eds., Hallucinations. New York: Springer, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race After Technology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2001). The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings and Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant Matter: The Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1910). Time and Free Will. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1911). Matter and Memory. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1934/2007). The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. M. L. Andison. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. (2008). The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bezemer, J. & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25, 166–195.Google Scholar
Bhatt, I. (2023). Postdigital literacies. In Jandrić, P., ed., Encyclopedia of Postdigital Science and Education. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_15-1.Google Scholar
Bloome, D. & Green, J. (2015). The social and linguistic turns in studying language and literacy. In Rowsell, J. & Pahl, K., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
Bobillot, J. P. & Olivier, C. (2008). ‘Trois leçons de poésie: du bru(i)t dans la pointCom.’ Online video clips. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylcxSz33c2w; www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwxjgXwALn4&feature=related.Google Scholar
Boldt, G. (2020). Theorizing vitality in the literacy classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldt, G. & Leander, K. (2020). Affect theory in reading research: Imagining the radical difference. Reading Psychology, 41(6), 515–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boler, M. (1999). Feeling Power: Emotions and Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994). The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
boyd, d. m. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, D. (2015). The Rise of Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, D. & Clinton, K. (2002). Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(3), 337–356.Google Scholar
Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, C., Davies, J., Merchant, G. & Rowsell, J. (2014). New Literacies Around the Globe. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (2018). Affective encounters: Enchantment and the possibility of reading for pleasure. Literacy, 52(2), 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (2019). Stacking stories as method: Research in early childhood settings. In Kucirkova, N., Rowsell, J. & Falloon, G, eds., The Routledge International Handbook of Learning with Technology in Early Childhood. London: Routledge, pp. 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (2020). Undoing the Digital: Sociomaterialism and Literacy Education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carr, N. (2011). The Shallows: How the Internet Is Changing the Way We Think, Read, and Remember. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Carrington, V. (2018). The changing landscape of literacies: Big data and algorithms. Digital Culture & Education, 10(1), 67–76.Google Scholar
Castañeda, L. & Williamson, B. (2021). Assembling new toolboxes of methods and theories for innovative critical research on educational technology. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, G. & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2017). Giving a new makeover to STEAM: Establishing YouTube beauty gurus as digital literacy educators through messages and effect on viewers. Computers in Human Behaviour, 7, 80–91.Google Scholar
Collier, D. R. (2018). Doodling, borrowing, and remixing: Students inquiring across digitized spaces. The Reading Teacher, 72(1), 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton-Lilly, C. (2012). Reading Time: The Literate Lives of Urban Secondary Students and Their Families. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game. New Media and Society, 21(4), 895–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. (2012). Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers & Education, 59(1), 19–29.Google Scholar
Davies, J. (2016). Trainee hairdressers’ uses of Facebook as a community of gendered literacy practice. In Paechter, C., George, R. & McRobbie, A., eds., Pedagogical Responses to the Changing Position of Girls and Young Women. London: Routledge, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Decuypere, M., Grimaldi, E. & Landri, P. (2021). Introduction: Critical studies of digital education platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delagrange, S. H. (2011). Technologies of Wonder: Rhetorical Practice in a Digital World. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
de Roock, R. (2021). On the material consequences of (digital) literacy: Digital writing with, for, and against racial capitalism. Theory into Practice, 60(2), 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezuanni, M. (2020). Peer Pedagogies on Digital Platforms: Learning with Minecraft Let’s Play Videos. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döveling, K., Harju, A. & Sommer, D. (2018). From mediatized emotion to digital affect cultures: New technologies and global flows of emotion. Social Media & Society, 4(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Dowdall, C. (2018). Ben and his army scenes: A consideration of one child’s out-of-school text production. English in Education, 40(3), 39–54.Google Scholar
Dowdall, C. (2009). Impressions, improvisations and compositions: Reframing children’s text production in social network sites. Literacy, 43(2), 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunmore, H. (2017). Birdcage Walk. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Ehret, C. (2018). Moments of teaching and learning in a children’s hospital: Affects, textures, and temporalities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 49(1), 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehret, C. (2024). Critical literacies in algorithmic cultures. Literacy, 58(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehret, C., Mannard, E. & Curwood, J. S. (2022). How young adult videogames materialize senses of self through ludonarrative affects: Understanding identity and embodiment through sociomaterial analysis. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(3), 341–354.Google Scholar
Ehret, C. & Rowsell, J., eds. (2021). Literacy, affect, and uncontrollability. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (2004). The Complete Poems & Plays. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Enriquez, G., Johnson, E., Kontovourki, S. & Mallozi, C. (2017). Literacies, Learning, and the Body: Putting Theory and Research into Pedagogical Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2017). Digital’s cleaving power and its consequences. Philosophy & Technology, 30, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach us About Learning and Literacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2010). How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gillen, J. (2014). Digital Literacies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourlay, L. (2023). Postdigital/More-Than-Digital: Ephemerality, Seclusion, Copresence in the University. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Grant, L. J. (2022). Reconfiguring education through data: How data practices reconfigure teacher professionalism and curriculum. In Hepp, A., Jarke, J. & Kramp, L., eds., New Perspectives in Critical Data Studies: The Ambivalences of Data Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. & Bloome, D. (1983). Ethnography and reading: Issues, approaches, criteria and findings. Thirty-Second Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
Green, H. & Hannon, C. (2007). Their Space. Education for a Digital Generation. London: Demos.Google Scholar
Grocott, L. (2022). Design for Transformative Learning: A Practical Approach to Memory-Making and Perspective-Shifting. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, K. D. & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, J. & Sundin, O. (2022). Information literacy as a site for anticipation: Temporal tactics for infrastructural meaning-making and algo-rhythm awareness. Journal of Documentation, 78(1), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, H., Rowsell, J. & Shillitoe, M. (2022). Alone-together: Intergenerational mapping of digital and analogue spaces of self. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(3), 310–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargittai, E., ed. (2021). Handbook of Digital Inequality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 5–29.Google Scholar
Hayles, K. (2007). Hyper and deep attention: The generational divide in cognitive modes. Profession, 2007, 187–199.Google Scholar
Hayles, K. (2017). Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Unconscious. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, D. (2002). Reading lives: Working-class children and literacy and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. (2020). Mind Over Media: Propaganda Education for a Digital Age. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hollett, T., Peng, X & Land, S. (2022). Learning with and beyond the body: The production of mobile architectures in a ballet variations class. Journal of Learning Sciences, 31(1), 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollett, T. & Ehret, C. (2014) ‘Bean’s World’: (Mine) Crafting affective atmospheres of gameplay, learning, and care in a children’s hospital. New Media & Society, 17(11), 1849–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollett, T. & Ehret, C. (2017). Civic rhythms in an informal, media-rich learning program. Learning, Media, and Technology, 42(4), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollett, T. & Ehret, C. (2019). The idiocultural sensibilities of spothunting in action sports culture: Affect, desire, change. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, M., Horst, H. A., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Stephenson, B. H., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J. & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project in the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jandrić, P. (2018). The postdigital challenge of critical media literacy. The International Journal of Critical Media Literacy, 1(1), 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J. & Hayes, S. (2019). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C., Chubinidze, D., Price, S., Yiannoutsou, N. & Barker, N. (2021). Making sense of digitally remediated touch in virtual reality experiences. Discourse, Context & Media, 41, 100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100483.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C., Leder Mackley, K. & Price, S. (2020). Digital touch for remote personal communication: An emergent sociotechnical imaginary. New Media & Society, 23(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, C., Price, S., Atkinson, D. & Golmohammadi, L. (2022). Editorial. Multimodality & Society, 2(3), 203–212.Google Scholar
Karakas, F. & Manisaligal, A. (2012). Reorienting self-directed learning for the creative digital era. European Journal of Industrial Training, 36(7), 712–731.Google Scholar
Kearns, M. & Roth, A. (2020). Ethical algorithm design should guide technology regulation. Brookings Institution, United States of America. https://tinyurl.com/2n8hav3d.Google Scholar
Keune, A. (2022). Material syntonicity: Examining computational performance and its materiality through weaving and sewing crafts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(4–5), 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J. (2019). What does the ‘postdigital’ mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 357–370.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (1997). Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2010a). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2010b). Literacy in the New Media Age, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kruskopf, M., Hakkarainen, K., Shupin, L. & Lonka, K. (2021). Lessons learned on student engagement from the nature of pervasive socio-digital interests and related network participation of adolescents. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuby, C. R. (2019). (Re)thinking, (re)imagining, and (re)defining social with a more-than-human ontology given the limits of (re)(con)straining language. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 19(2), 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuby, C. R., & Gutshall Rucker, T. (2020). (Re)Thinking children as fully (in)human and literacies as otherwise through (re)etymologizing intervene and inequality. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(1), 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuby, C. & Rowsell, J., eds. (2017). Early literacy and the posthuman: Pedagogies and methodologies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 285–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuby, C. & Rowsell, J. (2021). Magic(al)ing in a time of Covid-19: Becoming literacies and new inquiry practices. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 31(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.1966826.Google Scholar
Kucirkova, N. & Cremin, T. (2020). Children Reading for Pleasure in the Digital Age: Mapping Reader Engagement. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan Lo, C. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13, 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410Google Scholar
Laakso, N., Korhonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2021). Developing students’ digital competences through collaborative game design. Computers & Education, 17(3), 104308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2011). New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Social Learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larson, J. & Moses, G. H. (2018). Community Literacies as Shared Resources for Transformation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leander, K. M. & Boldt, G. M. (2013). Rereading ‘a pedagogy of multiliteracies’: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, K. & Burriss, S. K. (2020). Critical literacy for a posthuman world: When people read, and become, with machines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1262–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, K. & Ehret, C., eds. (2019). Affect in Literacy Teaching and Learning: Pedagogies, Policies, and Coming to Know. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1974). The Production of Space, 1st ed., trans D. Nicholson-Smith. Hoboken, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K. & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Report to the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. https://tinyurl.com/4p2k63um.Google Scholar
Lewis, C., & Crampton, A. (2016). Emotion as mediated action in doing research on learning. In Zembylas, M. & Schutz, P., eds., Methodological Advances in Research on Emotion and Education New York: Springer, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. & Tierney, J. (2013). Mobilizing emotion in an urban classroom: Producing identities and transforming signs in a race-related discussion. Linguistics and Education, 23, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis Ellison, T. (2023). Normalizing Black students/youth and their families’ digital and STEAM literacies. The Reading Teacher, 76(5), 594–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S. & Pothong, K. (2022). Beyond screen time: Rethinking children’s play in a digital world. Journal of Health Visiting, 10(1), 32–38.Google Scholar
Ma, J. Y. (2016a). Designing disruptions for productive hybridity: The case of walking scale geometry. Journal of Learning Sciences, 25, 335–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J. Y. (2016b). Ensemble learning and knowing: Developing a walking scale geometry dilation strategy. In diSessa, A. A., Levin, M. & Brown, N. J. S., eds., Knowing and Learning in Interaction: A Synthetic Agenda for the Learning Sciences. New York: Routledge, pp. 292–310.Google Scholar
Ma, J. Y. (2017). Multi-party, whole body interactions as resources for mathematical activity. Cognition and Instruction, 35, 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, J. R. (2024). A groundbreaking study shows kids learn better on paper, not screens. Now what? The Guardian. https://tinyurl.com/bdhu33ta.Google Scholar
Macgilchrist, F. (2021). Theories of postdigital heterogeneity: Implications for research on education and datafication. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 660–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, A., Headrick-Taylor, K., Rydal Shapiro, B. & Hall, R. (2020). Why learning on the move: Intersecting research pathways for mobility, learning, and teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariett Olsson, L. (2023). Becoming Pedagogue: Bergson and the Aesthetics, Ethics and Politics of Early Childhood Education and Care. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, J. (2011). Young children’s literacy practices in a virtual world: Establishing an online interaction order. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(2), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, J. (2014). Purposes for literacy in children’s use of the online virtual world ‘Club Penguin’. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(2), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, J. (2024). Anime is going digital. Fans are wary. The Japan Times. www.japantimes.co.jp/culture/2024/01/05/film/anime-digital-animation/.Google Scholar
Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. (1987). Foreword. In Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F., eds., A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minnesota, MI: University of Minnesota Press, pp. ix–xvi.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. (2007). Potential politics and the primacy of preemption. Theory & Event, 10(2), 40–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, C. A. (2020). The shallows? The nature and properties of digital/screen reading. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 535–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, C. A. (2024). Making an influence: Gender and Caribbean influencer literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(3), 228–256.Google Scholar
McLean, C. A. & Rowsell, J. (2019). Digital literacies in Canada. In Lacina, J. & Griffith, R., eds., Preparing Globally Minded Literacy Teachers: Knowledge, Practices, and Case Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, C. A. & Rowsell, J., eds. (2021). Maker Literacies and Maker Identities in the Digital Age: Learning and Playing Through Modes and Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merchant, G. H. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 8–20.Google Scholar
Merchant, G. H. (2010). 3D virtual worlds as environments for literacy learning. Educational Research, 52(2), 135–150. http://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2010.482739.Google Scholar
Merchant, G. (2023). Why Writing Still Matters: Written Communication in Changing Times. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micciche, L. (2007). Doing Emotion: Rhetoric, Writing, Teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mihailitis, P. (2018). Civic media literacies: Re-imagining engagement for civic intentionality. Learning, Media, and Technology, 43(2), 152–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2008). The Comfort of Things. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2010). Stuff. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mills, K. & Comber, B. (2015). Socio-spatial approaches to literacy studies: Re-thinking the social constitution and politics of space. In Rowsell, J. & Pahl, K., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 91–103.Google Scholar
Moller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N. & van Es, B. (2018). Do not blame it on the algorithm. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 959–977.Google Scholar
Morrell, E. (2008). Critical Literacy and Urban Youth: Pedagogies of Access, Dissent, and Liberation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nichols, P. & Garcia, A. (2025). Literacies in the Platform Society: Histories, Pedagogies, Possibilities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nichols, P. & LeBlanc, R. J. (2020). Beyond apps: Digital literacies in a platform society. The Reading Teacher, 74(1), 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Pahl, K. & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual Literacies: Every Object Tells a Story. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Pahl, K. & Rowsell, J. with Collier, D., Pool, S., Rasool, Z. & Trzecak, T. (2020). Living Literacies: Literacy for Social Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangrazio, L. & Cardozo-Gaibisso, L. (2021). ‘Your data can go to anyone’: The challenges of developing critical data literacies in children. In Avila, J., ed., Critical Digital Literacies: Boundary-Crossing Practices. Boston: Brill, pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
Pangrazio, L. & Selwyn, N. (2023). Critical Data Literacies: Rethinking Data and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Peppler, K., Sedas, R. M. & Dahn, M. (2020). Making at home: Interest-driven practices and supportive relationships in minoritized homes. Education Sciences, 10(5), 143, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. (2023). Pluriversal Literacies: Towards a Literacy Education that Can Sustain the World. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persohn, L. (2024). A conversation with Brad Robinson. In Classroom Caffeine Podcast series (Season 4, No. 8). Audio podcast. https://doi.org/10.5240/1974-7A05-2E9B-7B45-C029-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersen, K. & Ehret, E. (2024). Refrains of friendship in young children’s postdigital play. Journal of Literacy Research, 56(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X241226479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, S., Rowsell, J. & Sun, Y. (2023). Towards literacies of immanence: Getting closer to sensory multimodal perspectives on research. Multimodality & Society, 3(2), 130–149.Google Scholar
Poore, M. (2011). Digital literacy: Human flourishing and collective intelligence in a knowledge society. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 19(2), 20–26.Google Scholar
Potter, J. (2012). Digital Media and Learner Identity: The New Curatorship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. (2019). The mediations of data. In Curran, J. & Hesmondhalgh, D., eds., Media and Society. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 176–192.Google Scholar
Prinsloo, M. (2005). The new literacies as placed resources. Perspectives in Education, 23(4), 87–98.Google Scholar
Prinsloo, M. & Rowsell, J. (2012). Digital literacies as placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education, 26(4), 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyles, D. (2023). Literacy and Identity Through Streaming Media: Kids, Teens, and Representation on Netflix. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riikonen, S., Kangas, K., Kokko, S., Korhonen, T., Hakkarainen, K., & Seitamaa Hakkarainen, P. (2020). The development of pedagogical infrastructures in three cycles of maker-centered learning projects. Design and Technology: An International Journal, 2(25), 29–49.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. & Hollett, T. (2024). Literacy in the Age of AI. Reading Research Quarterly Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, T. (2024). What happens when a school bans smartphones? A complete transformation. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2024/jan/17/cellphone-smartphone-bans-schools.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. (2021). The Uncontrollability of the World. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (2010) Doing Family Photography: The Domestic, the Public and the Politics of Sentiment. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with Multimodality: Rethinking Literacy in a Digital Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rowsell, J. (2015). What professionals can teach us about education: A call for change. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowsell, J. (2024). Affecting photos: Photographs as shared, affective ethnographic spaces. Qualitative Research. OnlineFirst, https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241246173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowsell, J. & Wohlwend, K. E. (2016). Free play or tight spaces? Mapping participatory literacies in apps. The Reading Teacher, 70(2), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowsell, J., Maués, F., Moukperian, S. & Colquhoun, C. (2017). Apps and autodidacts: Wayfaring and emplaced thinking on iPads. In Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Simpson, A. & Walsh, M., eds., The Case of the iPad: Mobile Literacies in Education. New York: Springer, pp. 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowsell, J. & Shillitoe, M. (2019). The craftivists: Pushing for affective, materially informed pedagogy. The British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1544–1559.Google Scholar
Rowsell, J. (2019). How we live now: Striving for resilient repertoires of literacy. In Woods, A. & Exley, B., eds., Literacies in Early Childhood: Foundations for Equity and Quality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowsell, J. (2020). ‘How emotional do I make it?’: Making a stance in multimodal compositions. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(6), 627–637.Google Scholar
Rowsell, J. & Abrams, S. S. (2021). Artifacts with feeling/feeling artifacts: Toward a notion of tacit modalities to support and propel anthropological research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 53(3), 280–297.Google Scholar
Rowsell, J., Arnseth, H. C. & Cabello, P. R. (2023). From boundaries to entangled storied lines: Untangling young people’s material and immaterial storied practices. Learning, Media, and Technology, 48(4), 632–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowsell, J., Keune, A., Buxton, A. & Peppler, K. (2024). Beyond words: Making and mattering into learning to disrupt normative practices. Reading Research Quarterly.Google Scholar
Rowsell, J. (2024). Affecting photos: Photographs as shared, affective ethnographic spaces. Qualitative Research. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14687941241246173.Google Scholar
Sakr, M. (2021). ‘She’s nice company and a good friend’: Thinking with Haraway to reconceptualise children’s playful interactions with Alexa in the family home. In Mikats, J., Kink-Hampersberger, S. & Oates-Indruchova, L., eds., Creative Families: Gender and Technologies of Everyday Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–78.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? London: Polity.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. & Gašević, D. (2020). The datafication of higher education: Discussing the promises and problems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillitoe, M., Hand, H., Shepherd, S., Squire, W. & Rowsell, J. (2023). Alone-together: Exploring children’s material/digital/analogue engagements through intergenerational research. In Sakr, M., Rowsell, J., & Sherbine, K., eds., Postdevelopmental Approaches to Pedagogical Observation in Childhood. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Shin, D. (2022). How do people judge the credibility of algorithmic sources? AI & Society, 37(3), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01158-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in)tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriprakash, A., Rudolph, S. & Gerrard, J. (2022). Learning Whiteness: Education and the Settler Colonial State. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, K. (2010). Atmospheric attunements. Rubric Issue, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
Stornaiuolo, A. (2020). Authoring data stories in a media makerspace: Adolescents developing critical data literacies. Journal of Learning Sciences, 29(1), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Street, B. (1995). Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography, and Education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Street, B. (1997). The implications of the ‘New Literacy Studies’ for literacy education. English in Education, 31(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1997.tb00133.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, L. (2015). Only you, your doctor, and many others may know. Technology Science, 2015092903. https://techscience.org/a/2015092903/.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2003) Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Guardian (2023). Switching off: Sweden says back-to-basics schooling works on paper. https://tinyurl.com/yc7jss22.Google Scholar
Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial Formations. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, S. (2019). SF! Haraway’s situated feminisms and speculative fabulations in English class. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 38, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Turkle, S., ed. (2007). Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2023). Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? Global Education Monitoring Report. https://tinyurl.com/48w6yeds.Google Scholar
van Audenhove, L., Broeck, V. W. & Mariën, I. (2020). Data literacy and education: Introduction and challenges for our field. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(3), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wargo, J. M. (2017). Rhythmic rituals and emergent listening: Intra-activity, sonic sounds and digital composing with young children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and discourse – What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity. 6(4), 349–368.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2014). Trends in turning to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society, 21(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14539020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society, 21(2), 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weubben, D. (2016). Getting likes, going viral, and the intersections between popularity metrics and digital composition. Computers and Composition, 42, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. In Winnicott, D. W., ed., The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
Wohlwend, K. (2009). Damsels in discourse: Girls consuming and producing gendered identity texts through Disney princess play. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlwend, K. (2020). Literacies that Move and Matter: Nexus for Contemporary Childhoods. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wohlwend, K. & Rowsell, J. (2017). App maps: Evaluating children’s iPad software for 21st century literacy learning. In Kucirkova, N. & Falloon, G., eds., Apps, Technology, and Younger Learners: International Evidence for Teaching. New York: Routledge, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. (1941) Between the Acts. Kermode, F., ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford World’s Classics edition 1992).Google Scholar
Woolf, V. (1922). Jacob’s Room. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. (1915). The Voyage Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. (1927). To the Lighthouse. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, S. (2020). Material Methods: Researching and Thinking with Things. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Worms, F. (2010). Consciousness or life? Bergson between phenomenology and metaphysics. In Kelly, M. R., ed., Bergson and Phenomenology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Jennifer Rowsell, University of Sheffield
  • With contributions by Samuel Sandor
  • Book: The Comfort of Screens
  • Online publication: 10 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009480345.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Jennifer Rowsell, University of Sheffield
  • With contributions by Samuel Sandor
  • Book: The Comfort of Screens
  • Online publication: 10 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009480345.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Jennifer Rowsell, University of Sheffield
  • With contributions by Samuel Sandor
  • Book: The Comfort of Screens
  • Online publication: 10 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009480345.011
Available formats
×