Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building A New Sourcebook for Rigorous Social Science Researchers
Book contents
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Case Study Research
- Chapter 2 Building Blocks of Case Study Research
- Chapter 3 Of Talking Pigs and Black Swans
- Chapter 4 Do It Again
- Chapter 5 The Natural Experiment, a.k.a. the Single Embedded Design
- Chapter 6 Do It Again (and Again)
- Chapter 7 Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 8 More on Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 9 A Parting Note, on an Optimistic Note
- Index
- References
Chapter 3 - Of Talking Pigs and Black Swans
Single Holistic Case Study Design
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2023
Book contents
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Case Study Research
- Chapter 2 Building Blocks of Case Study Research
- Chapter 3 Of Talking Pigs and Black Swans
- Chapter 4 Do It Again
- Chapter 5 The Natural Experiment, a.k.a. the Single Embedded Design
- Chapter 6 Do It Again (and Again)
- Chapter 7 Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 8 More on Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 9 A Parting Note, on an Optimistic Note
- Index
- References
Summary
We introduce and define the single holistic case study design in this chapter. The strengths of the design are discussed in detail, with examples. In particular, we discuss the potential of single holistic design in providing a detailed explanation of processes. Single holistic case studies also explore the theorizing potential of unique cases which hold the potential to reveal new dimensions of a phenomenon or falsify/refute an existing theory. Relatively high data access, construct validity, potential to include an unlimited number of variables, etc., are some other strengths that we discuss. The weaknesses of the design (i.e. low internal and external validity) are discussed afterwards. The chapter also addresses some common (mis)conceptions regarding single holistic designs and their external validity.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory BuildingA New Sourcebook for Rigorous Social Science Researchers, pp. 31 - 49Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Blatter, J. & Blume, T. (2008). In search of co‐variance, causal mechanisms or congruence? Towards a plural understanding of case studies. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(2), 315–356.Google Scholar
Blatter, J. & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P. & Sherer, P. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. In: Cummings, L. & Staw, B. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich: JAI Press, 55–110.Google Scholar
Cloutier, C. & Langley, A. (2020). What makes a process theoretical contribution? Organization Theory, 1(1), 2631787720902473.Google Scholar
Crosina, E. & Pratt, M. G. (2019). Toward a model of organizational mourning: The case of former Lehman Brothers bankers. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 66–98.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E. & Sonenshein, S. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.Google Scholar
Geddes, B. (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis, 2, 131–150.Google Scholar
George, A. L. & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbert, M. & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The “what” and “how” of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 710–737.Google Scholar
Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W. & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.Google Scholar
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.Google Scholar
Lüscher, L. S. & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
Lynd, R. S. & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown; a Study in Contemporary American Culture. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Lynd, R. S. & Lynd, H. M. (1937). Middletown in Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflicts. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Michailova, S. (2011). Contextualizing in international business research: Why do we need more of it and how can we be better at it? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 129–139.Google Scholar
Nair, L. B. (2021). From “Whodunit” to “How”: Detective stories and auditability in qualitative business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(2), 195–209.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D. L., Von Glinow, M. A. & Xiao, Z. (2007). Toward polycontextually sensitive research methods. Management and Organization Review, 3(1), 129–152.Google Scholar
Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.Google Scholar
Tsang, E. W. (2014). Generalizing from research findings: The merits of case studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 369–383.Google Scholar