Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General Introduction
- Editorial Foreword
- Preface
- Introduction to New Edition
- Notes on Further Reading
- Corrections to this Edition
- I THE TREATY OF PEACE
- II INFLATION AND DEFLATION
- III THE RETURN TO THE GOLD STANDARD
- IV POLITICS
- 1 A SHORT VIEW OF RUSSIA (1925)
- 2 THE END OF LAISSEZ-FAIRE (1926)
- 3 AM I A LIBERAL? (1925)
- 4 LIBERALISM AND LABOUR (1926)
- V THE FUTURE
- VI LATER ESSAYS
- Index
4 - LIBERALISM AND LABOUR (1926)
from IV - POLITICS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General Introduction
- Editorial Foreword
- Preface
- Introduction to New Edition
- Notes on Further Reading
- Corrections to this Edition
- I THE TREATY OF PEACE
- II INFLATION AND DEFLATION
- III THE RETURN TO THE GOLD STANDARD
- IV POLITICS
- 1 A SHORT VIEW OF RUSSIA (1925)
- 2 THE END OF LAISSEZ-FAIRE (1926)
- 3 AM I A LIBERAL? (1925)
- 4 LIBERALISM AND LABOUR (1926)
- V THE FUTURE
- VI LATER ESSAYS
- Index
Summary
This essay originated as a speech given at the Manchester Reform Club, 9 February 1926, at a time when the numbers of the three parties in the House of Commons caused speculation as to a possible combination of Liberals and Labour against the Conservatives. The address was published as an article entitled ‘Liberalism and Labour’ in the Nation and Athenaeum, 20 February 1926.
§A series of articles by the editor of the Nation has brought to the forefront of politics during recent weeks the future relations between the Liberal Party and the Labour Party. So far as the leaders are concerned on either side, we are not yet much enlightened. Nevertheless, Mr Lloyd George has produced the impression that, on terms, he would not decline a working arrangement between the two parties. And Mr Snowden that he, also on terms, would welcome it. Lord Oxford—perhaps wisely—has avoided the issue for the present by occupying his speech with perfervid declarations that no conversations have occurred as yet.
Lord Oxford may be right to suppose that there is no hurry. No hurry, that is, to decide. But nothing is more necessary than that those of us who have no responsibility should speak our minds. It is the urgent subject for discussion wherever Liberals are gathered together. §
I do not wish to live under a Conservative government for the next twenty years. I believe that the progressive forces of the country are hopelessly divided between the Liberal Party and the Labour Party.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes , pp. 307 - 312Publisher: Royal Economic SocietyPrint publication year: 1978
- 1
- Cited by