Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General Introduction
- Editorial Foreword
- Preface
- 1 THE STATE OF OPINION
- 2 FROM THE RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES TO THE SECOND ULTIMATUM OF LONDON
- 3 THE BURDEN OF THE LONDON SETTLEMENT
- 4 THE REPARATION BILL
- 5 THE LEGALITY OF THE CLAIM FOR PENSIONS
- 6 REPARATION, INTER-ALLY DEBT, AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE
- 7 THE REVISION OF THE TREATY AND THE SETTLEMENT OF EUROPE
- APPENDIX OF DOCUMENTS
- Index
5 - THE LEGALITY OF THE CLAIM FOR PENSIONS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General Introduction
- Editorial Foreword
- Preface
- 1 THE STATE OF OPINION
- 2 FROM THE RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES TO THE SECOND ULTIMATUM OF LONDON
- 3 THE BURDEN OF THE LONDON SETTLEMENT
- 4 THE REPARATION BILL
- 5 THE LEGALITY OF THE CLAIM FOR PENSIONS
- 6 REPARATION, INTER-ALLY DEBT, AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE
- 7 THE REVISION OF THE TREATY AND THE SETTLEMENT OF EUROPE
- APPENDIX OF DOCUMENTS
- Index
Summary
The application of morals to international politics is more a thing to be desired than a thing which has been in operation. Also, when I am made a participant in crime along with many millions of other people, I more or less shrug my shoulders.-Letter from a friendly critic to the author of The Economic Consequences of the Peace.
We have seen in the preceding chapter that the claim for pensions and allowances is nearly double that for devastation, so that its inclusion in the Allies' demands nearly trebles the bill. It makes the difference between a demand which can be met and a demand which cannot be met. Therefore it is important.
In The Economic Consequences of the Peace I gave reasons for the opinion that this claim was contrary to our engagements and an act of international immorality. A good deal has been written about it since then, but I cannot admit that my conclusion has been seriously disputed. Most American writers accept it; most French writers ignore it; and most English writers try to show, not that the balance of evidence is against me, but that there are a few just plausible, or just not-negligible, observations to be made on the other side. Their contention is that of the Jesuit professors of probabilism in the seventeenth century, namely, that the Allies are justified unless it is absolutely certain that they are wrong, and that any probability in their favour, however small, is enough to save them from mortal sin.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes , pp. 93 - 104Publisher: Royal Economic SocietyPrint publication year: 1978