5 - Views and Policies of the Anglophone West Toward the Sino- Indian Frontier, 1950–1962
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2024
Summary
Abstract
Chapter 5 considers how Western countries engaged with the Sino-Indian frontier leading up to 1962. The first two sections describe Britain's Far East policy and its perspectives on the “Tibet problem.” Section three shows that Australia and New Zealand did not aid Tibetan rebels because they accepted Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Section four describes the United States’ using Tibet to antagonize Beijing not only by aiding Tibetan rebels, but also by referring to it as a “an autonomous country.” The next two sections deal with British and U.S. assessments of the Himalayan kingdoms and their role in Sino-Indian relations. The last sections trace the relationships that the Commonwealth and the United States had with Burma during the 1950s and 1960s.
Keywords: Tibet problem, Sino-Indian relations, Far East policy, Commonwealth
It was not only India and China that engaged with their shared frontier prior to 1962. Although far from their main concern, English-speaking Western countries analyzed developments in that region and at times offered support to India, Tibetans, the Himalayan kingdoms, and Burma. The West's historical relations with political entities along the Sino-Indian frontier informed Cold War policies. The United Kingdom's relations with Tibet date back to the eighteenth century when British officials viewed it as both a curiosity and a potential trading partner. These views evolved during the nineteenth century as Britain came to regard Tibet as an important pawn in the Great Game. Britain specifically promoted Tibetan suzerainty to establish it as a buffer zone, as first exemplified by the 1907 Anglo-Russian Treaty. International relations scholar Dibyesh Anand argues that Britain used the ambiguous terms “Chinese suzerainty” and “Tibetan autonomy” to “deal with Tibet as a de facto independent buffer state without having to offend China and other Western powers.” By the mid-1940s, this need evaporated and Britain in practice recognized Chinese sovereignty over Tibet—thereby revealing its desire to strengthen Sino-British relations.
Britain's interest in Nepal stemmed from its enlistment of Gurkhas (i.e., Nepalese soldiers for hire), who served throughout the British Empire since the nineteenth century.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cold War in the HimalayasMultinational Perspectives on the Sino-Indian Border Conflict, 1950-1970, pp. 181 - 198Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2024