Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:14:36.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology: An Introduction and a Brief Tutorial to Research Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2010

Randall W. Engle
Affiliation:
Professor and Chair in the School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology
Grzegorz Sedek
Affiliation:
Director of the Institute of Social Psychology, Warsaw School of Social Psychology in Poland and professor at the Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences
Ulrich von Hecker
Affiliation:
Lecturer, School of Psychology at Cardiff University
Daniel N. McIntosh
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Denver
Randall W. Engle
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Grzegorz Sedek
Affiliation:
Warsaw School of Social Psychology and Polish Academy of Sciences
Ulrich von Hecker
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Daniel N. McIntosh
Affiliation:
University of Denver
Get access

Summary

After a brief presentation of this book's structure and the questions that served to organize the material, we describe the basic research paradigms used in the research from the various chapters. The essence of the theoretical models and the value of empirical evidence is best articulated by the authors of thematic chapters, so we do not summarize them here. However, we do not want arcane terminology or a lack of knowledge of the specific methods on the reader's part to prevent researchers outside of the area from understanding the ideas presented here. Therefore, to make the material more accessible to students and to researchers outside mainstream cognitive psychology, we offer a brief tutorial on the various methods.

At the outset of this project, we tried to preserve an integrative approach by explicitly asking each author to address the same questions. The following set of issues and questions was proposed to be addressed by all authors:

Question 1: Which cognitive functions are the focus of your research? In response to this question, authors either provided a description of their own original models of working memory or executive functions, or they elaborated on more specialized executive functions or processes such as inhibition, attention control, or reasoning that they investigated. Authors were asked to review in the general introduction of their chapter the most important theoretical approaches related to their own field before presenting their approach in detail.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In Umilta, C. & Moscovitch, M. (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Awh, E., Jonides, J., Smith, E., Schumacher, E., Koeppe, R., & Katz, S. (1996). Dissociation of storage and rehearsal in verbal working memory: Evidence from PET. Psychological Science, 7, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A., Logie, R., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1985). Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, A. T., Kiehl, K. A., Laurens, K., & Liddle, P. F. (2002). Error-related negativity and correct response negativity in schizophrenia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1454–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (1989). Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. In H. L. Roediger III & F. L. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in memory of Endel Tulving (pp. 309–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cantor, J., Engle, R. W., & Hamilton, G. (1991). Short-term memory, working memory, and verbal abilities: How do they relate?Intelligence, 15, 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, R., Kurland, M. D., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. D., Perlstein, W. M., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Noll, D.C., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (1997). Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature, 386, 604–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J., & Engle, R. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1042–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., Engle, R. W. (in press). Working Memory Span Tasks: A Methodological Review and User's Guide. Behavior Research Methods.
Dalgleish, T., Mathews, A., & Wood, J. (1999). Inhibition processes in cognition and emotion: A special case? In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 243–265). Chichester: Wiley.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 561–583.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 75, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 14, 81.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., Engle, R. W. (2004). The domain generality of working-memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pointe, L. B., & Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 1118–1133.Google Scholar
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In Dagenbach, D. & Carr, T. H. (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189–239). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navon, D., & Margalit, B. (1983). Allocation of attention according to informativeness in visual recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitman, W., Malin, J. T., Bjork, R. A., & Higman, B. (1973). Strategy control and directed forgetting. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 124, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychological Software Tools.
Sedek, G., & Hecker, U. (2004). Effects of subclinical depression and aging on generative reasoning about linear orders: Same or different processing limitations?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. H., & Foos, P. W. (1975). Effect of presentation order on the construction of linear orders. Memory and Cognition, 3, 614–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. J. (1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 5–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming of ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1986). Working memory capacity. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 30, 1273–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. M. G., Matthews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. M. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×