Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:55:57.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Mind, intelligence and development: a cognitive, differential and developmental theory of intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Andreas Demetriou
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychology and Dean of the School of Social Sciences and Sciences of Education, University of Cyprus
Andreas Demetriou
Affiliation:
University of Cyprus
Athanassios Raftopoulos
Affiliation:
University of Cyprus
Get access

Summary

Since the end of the nineteenth century, three fields of psychology have attempted to understand the human mind: cognitive, differential and developmental psychology. Each of these fields was and still is driven by different epistemological assumptions regarding the nature of the human mind, has adopted different priorities in regard to the aspects of the mind to be studied, and has used different methods for the investigation of the phenomena of interest.

Specifically, cognitive psychology focused primarily on the more dynamic aspects of mental functioning to explain how information from the environment is recorded, represented, stored and processed for the purpose of understanding, problem solving and decision making in real time. Thus, the primary aim of research and theory in this field was to model the flow and processing of information in the mind. In general, according to this tradition, the human mind is an information processing system operating under limited representational and processing resources. Therefore, three aspects of the mind are of utmost importance in this tradition: representational capacity, control of processing and efficiency. Change in the information processing tradition is conceived as increasing automatization of performance on a given task. This is equivalent to saying that, with experience and practice, the control of performance shifts from the monitoring and regulation of central control processes to the forces underlying the dynamic organization of task-specific performance and the inter-connection of the components involved in this performance with the task-relevant environmental stimuli (Broadbent 1971; Logan and Gordon 2001; Posner and Boies 1971).

Type
Chapter
Information
Cognitive Developmental Change
Theories, Models and Measurement
, pp. 21 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Andrews, G., Halford, G. S., Bunch, K. M., Bowden, D. and Jones, T. (2003). Theory of mind and relational complexity. Child Development, 74, 1476–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory or working attention? In A. D. Baddeley and L. Weiskrantz (eds.) Attention, selection, awareness, and control. A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 152–70). Oxford: Clarendon Press
Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. H. (2000). Development of working memory: should the Pascual-Leone and the Baddeley and Hitch models be merged? Journal of Experimental and Child Psychology, 77, 128–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Band, G. P. H., Molen, M. W., Overtoom, C. C. E. and Verbaten, M. N. (2000). The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: Separate developmental trends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 263–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjorklund, D. F. and Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). The evolution of inhibition mechanisms and their role in human cognition and behavior. In F. N. Dempster and C. J. Brainerd (eds.) Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 141–73). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Braine, M. D. S. (1990). The ‘natural logic’ approach to reasoning. In W. F. Overton (ed.) Reasoning, necessity, and logic: developmental perspectives (pp. 133–57). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. New York: Academic Press
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press
Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development. Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press
Case, R. (1992). The mind's staircase: exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children's thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Case, R. (1992). The role of the frontal lobes in the regulation of cognitive development. Brain and Cognition, 20, 51–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Case, R., Demetriou, A., Platsidou, M. and Kazi, S. (2001). Integrating concepts and tests of intelligence from the differential and the developmental traditions. Intelligence, 29, 307–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Chi, M. T. H. (1976). Short-term memory limitations in children: capacity or processing deficits? Memory and Cognition, 23, 266–81Google Scholar
Commons, M. L., Trudeau, E. J., Stein, S. A., Richards, F. A. and Krause, S. R. (1998). Hierarchical complexity of tasks shows the existence of developmental stages. Developmental Review, 18, 237–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake and P. Shah (eds.) Models of working memory: mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Dawson, T. L., Xie, Y. Y. and Wilson, M. (2003). Domain-general and domain-specific developmental assessments: do they measure the same thing? Cognitive Development, 18, 61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deary, I. J. (2000a). Looking down on human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Deary, I. J. (2000b). Simple information processing and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of intelligence (pp. 267–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., Lemmon, H., Starr, J. S. and Crawford, J. R. (2000). The stability of individual differences in mental ability from childhood to old age: follow-up of the Scottish Mental Survey. Intelligence, 28, 49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Loache, J. S., Miller, K. F. and Pierroutsakos, S. L. (1998). Reasoning and problem solving. In D. Kuhn and R. Siegler (eds.) W. Damon (series ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology (5th ed.): Vol. 2: Cognition, perception and language (pp. 801–50). New York: Wiley
Demetriou, A. (1998a). Nooplasis: 10 + 1 postulates about the formation of mind. Learning and Instruction. The Journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 8, 271–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A. (1998b). Cognitive development. In A. Demetriou, W. Doise, K. F. M. van Lieshout (eds.) Life-span developmental psychology (pp. 179–269). London: Wiley
Demetriou, A. (2000). Organization and development of self-understanding and self-regulation: toward a general theory. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 209–51). Academic PressCrossRef
Demetriou, A. (2003). Self-formations: toward a life-span model of the developing mind and self. Journal of Adult Development, 17, 151–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A. (in press). Unity and modularity in the mind and the self. Towards a general theory. In Chandler, M., Lalonde, C. and Lightfoot, C. (eds.) Changing conceptions of psychological life. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates
Demetriou, A., Christou, C., Spanoudis, G. and Platsidou, M. (2002). The development of mental processing: efficiency, working memory, and thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67 (serial no. 268)
Demetriou, A. and Efklides, A. (1985). Structure and sequence of formal and postformal thought: general patterns and individual differences. Child Development, 56, 1062–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A. and Efklides, A. (1989). The person's conception of the structures of developing intellect: early adolescence to middle age. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 115, 371–423Google ScholarPubMed
Demetriou, A., Efklides, A. and Platsidou, M. (1993). The architecture and dynamics of developing mind: Experiential structuralism as a frame for unifying cognitive developmental theories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (5–6, serial no. 234)CrossRef
Demetriou, A., Efklides, A., Papadaki, M., Papantoniou, A. and Economou, A. (1993). The structure and development of causal-experimental thought. Developmental Psychology, 29, 480–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A. and Kazi, S. (2001). Unity and modularity in the mind and the self: studies on the relationships between self-awareness, personality, and intellectual development from childhood to adolescence. London: Routledge
Demetriou, A. and Kyriakides, L. (in press). A Rasch-measurement model analysis of cognitive developmental sequences: validating a comprehensive theory of cognitive development. British Journal of Educational Psychology
Demetriou, A., Kyriakides, L. and Avraamidou, C. (2003). The missing link in the relations between intelligence and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 547–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A., Pachaury, A., Metallidou, Y. and Kazi, S. (1996). Universals and specificities in the structure and development of quantitative-relational thought: a cross-cultural study in Greece and India. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 255–90Google Scholar
Demetriou, A., Platsidou, M., Efklides, A., Metallidou, Y. and Shayer, M. (1991). Structure and sequence of the quantitative-relational abilities and processing potential from childhood and adolescence. Learning and Instruction: The Journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 1, 19–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A. and Raftopoulos, A. (1999). Modeling the developing mind: from structure to change. Developmental Review, 19, 319–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A., Raftopoulos, A. and Kargopoulos, P. (1999). Interactions, computations, and experience: interleaved springboards of cognitive emergence, Developmental Review, 19, 389–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, F. N. (1991). Inhibitory processes: a neglected dimension of intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 157–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efklides, A., Demetriou, A. and Metallidou, A. (1994). The structure and development of propositional reasoning ability. In A. Demetriou and A. Efklides (eds.) Mind, intelligence, and reasoning: structure and development (pp. 151–72). Amsterdam: Elsevier
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L. and Flavell, E. R. (1986). Development of knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51 (1, serial no. 212)CrossRef
Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L. and Flavell, E. R. (1995). Young children's knowledge about thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60 (1, serial no. 243)CrossRef
Fry, A. F. and Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7, 237–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D. and Burack, J. A. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control: I. Theory of mind in typical and atypical development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 116–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books
Gelman, R. and Gallistel, R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Gustafsson, J. E. and Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In D. C. Berliner, and R. C. Calfee (eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). New York: Macmillan
Hale, S. and Fry, A. F. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children, Biological Psychology, 54, 1–34Google Scholar
Halford, G. S. (1993). Children's understanding: the development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: theories, definitions, and research evidence. In F. N. Dempster and C. J. Brainerd (eds.) Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 175–204). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Harris, P. L. and Nunez, M. (1996). Understanding permission rules by preschool children. Child Development, 67, 1572–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, K. M. (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11–16. London: John Murray
Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. London: Routledge
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The G factor: the science of mental ability. New York: Praeger
Kail, R. (1991). Developmental functions for speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kail, R. and Park, Y. (1994). Processing time, articulation time and memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 281–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kail, R. and Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86, 199–225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kargopoulos, P. and Demetriou, A. (1998). What, why, and whence logic? A response to the commentators. New Ideas in Psychology, 16, 125–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazi, S. (2002). ‘Structure and development of hypercognitive abilities from 3 to 8 years of age’. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University Press (PhD Thesis)
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kyllonen, P. and Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D. and Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohman, D. F. (2000). Complex information processing and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 285–340). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Miller, L. T. and Vernon, P. A. (1992). The general factor in short-term memory, intelligence, and reaction time, Intelligence, 16, 5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1988). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development. In A. Demetriou (ed.) The neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: toward an integration (pp. 25–64). Amsterdam: North-Holland
Perner, J. and Lang, B. (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 337–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perner, J., Lang, B., and Kloo, D. (2002). Theory of mind and self-control: More than a common problem of implication. Child Development, 73, 752–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (ed.) Carmichael's handbook of child development (pp. 703–32). New York: Wiley
Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. London: Psychology Press
Posner, M. I. and Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review 78, 391–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Resnick, L. B., Bill, V. and Lesgold, S. (1992). Developing thinking abilities in arithmetic class. In A. Demetriou, M. Shayer, and A. Efklides (eds.) Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development (pp. 210–30). London: Routledge
Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof: deductive reasoning in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W. (2002). Memory development in childhood. In U. Goswami (ed.) Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 236–56). London: BlackwellCrossRef
Shah, P. and Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shayer, M., Demetriou, A. and Pervez, M. (1988). The structure and scaling of concrete operational thought: three studies in four countries. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 114, 307–76Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904). ‘General intelligence’ objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankov, L. and Roberts, R. (1997). Mental speed is not the ‘basic’ process of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ. A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press
Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of perception and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 99, 395–417Google Scholar
van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems development: change between complexity and chaos. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf
Vurpilot, E. (1998). The development of scanning strategies and their relation to visual differentiation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, 632–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, H. M. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D. and Tannock, R. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 35, 205–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M. (1989). Saltus: a psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive development. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (2), 276–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. R. (1998). McGraw and the development of unaided walking. Developmental Review, 18, 449–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. R. and Frye, D. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control: II. The development of executive function in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 121–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×