Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:21:22.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Grasping and Perceiving Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2010

Pierre Jacob
Affiliation:
Professor of Philosophy and Director, Jean Nicod Institute, Paris
Andrew Brook
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa
Kathleen Akins
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There is today, or so I will argue in this chapter, a vast array of empirical evidence in favor of the ‘two visual systems’ model of human vision. Human beings are so visually endowed that they can see a wide variety of things. Some of the things that they can see are objects that they can also reach, grasp and manipulate with their hands. Many of the things that they can see, however, are not objects that they can reach and grasp. As J. Austin (1962) pointed out, humans can see, for example, mountains, lakes, liquids, gases, clouds, flames, movies, shadows, holes, stars, planets, comets and events. Among events, humans can see behaviours or actions, some of which are performed by conspecifics. Some visible human actions are directed towards inanimate objects (e.g., actions of reaching and grasping an object or a tool). Others are directed towards animate objects, including animals and conspecifics. In P. Jacob and M. Jeannerod (2003), we argue that there is evidence for the view that the human brain contains two complementary networks that respond to the perception of respectively object-oriented actions and actions directed towards conspecifics.

In this chapter, I will restrict myself to the visual processing of objects that can be both perceived and grasped with a human hand. My goal will be to try to formulate an adequate version of the two visual systems model of human vision, which ought, I think, to be properly restricted to seeing objects that can be reached and grasped.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cognition and the Brain
The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement
, pp. 241 - 283
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agliotti, S., Goodale, M., and Desouza, J. (1995) Size contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. (1957) Intention. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. (1962) Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bermudez, J. (1998) The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Block, N. (2001) Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. In Dehaene, S., and Naccache, L. (eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonatti, L., Frot, E., Zangl, R., and Mehler, J. (2002) The human first hypothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objects in the young infant. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 388–426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boussaoud, D., Ungerleider, L., and Desimone, R. (1990) Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal sulcus and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 296, 462–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgeman, B. (2002) Attention and visually guided behavior in distinct systems. In Prinz, W., and Hommel, B. (eds), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., and Nagle, M. (1979) Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692–700Google ScholarPubMed
Carey, D. P., Harvey, M., and Milner, A. D. (1996) Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 34, 329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1995) Continuity and discontinuity in cognitive development. In Osherson, D. (ed.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Thinking, vol. 3. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (2001) Visual experience and motor action: Are the bonds too tight? Philosophical Review, 110, 495–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S. (1997) The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. (2001) Are we explaining consciousness yet? In Dehaene, S., and Naccache, L. (eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dretske, F. (1969) Seeing and Knowing. Chicago: Chicago University PressGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1978) Simple seeing. In Dretske, F. (2000), Perception, Knowledge and Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1981) Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Driver, J., and Vuilleumier, P. (2001) Perceptual awareness and its loss to unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition, 79, 39–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, G. (1982) The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Farah, M. J. (1990) Visual agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us About Normal Vision. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Franz, V. H., Fahle, M., Bülthoff, H. H., and Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2001) Effects of visual illusion on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1124–1144Google ScholarPubMed
Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H., and Fahle, M. (2000) Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallese, V., Murata, A., Kaseda, M., Niki, N., and Sakata, H. (1994) Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex. Neuroreport, 5, 1525–1529CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Deprati, E., Saetti, M. C., and Toni, I. (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia, 34, 5, 369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Goodale, M. A. (1995) The cortical organization of visual perception and visuomotor control. In Osherson, D. (ed.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Visual Cognition, vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Goodale, M., and Humphrey, G. K. (1998) The objects of action and perception. Cognition, 67, 191–207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, M. A., and Milner, A. D. (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., Milner, A. D., Perrett, D. I., Benson, P. J., and Hietanen, J. K. (1994) The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, I. S., and Carey, D. P. (1991) A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, M. A., Pélisson, D., and Prablanc, C. (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748–750CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haffenden, A. M., and Goodale, M. (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1, 122–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffenden, A. M., Schiff, K. C., and Goodale, M. A. (2001) The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Non-illusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology, 11, 177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingle, D. J. (1973) Two visual systems in the frog. Science, 181, 1053–1055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, P., and Jeannerod, M. (2003) Ways of seeing. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1986) The formation of finger grip during prehension: A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behavioural Brain Research, 19, 99–116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M. (1994) The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1997) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Jeannerod, M., Decety, J., and Michel, F. (1994) Impairment of grasping movements following bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia, 32, 369–380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanwischer, N. (2001) Neural events and perceptual awareness. In Dehaene, S., and Naccache, L. (eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., and Scholl, B. J. (1998) Indexing and the object concept: Developing ‘What’ and ‘Where’ systems. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 1, 10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J., and Halligan, P. W. (1994) The yin and yang of visuospatial neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1037–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. (1994) Mind and the World. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1996) Pushmi-pullyu representations. In Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 9. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview PublishingGoogle Scholar
Milner, A. D., and Goodale, M. A. (1995) The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Milner, A. D., Harvey, M., Roberts, R. C., and Forster, S. V. (1993) Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distorsion. Neuropsychologia, 31, 39–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, A. D., Paulignan, Y., Dijkerman, H. C., Michel, F., and Jeannerod, M. (1999) A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: New evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 266, 2225–2229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, A. D., Perrett, D. I., Johnston, R. S., Benson, P. J., Jordan, T. R., Heeley, D. W., Bettucci, D., Mortara, F., Mutani, R., Terazzi, E., and Davidson, D. L. W. (1991) Perception and action in ‘visual form agnosia’. Brain, 114, 405–428CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., and Acuna, C. (1975) Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: Command functions for operations within extra-personal space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 38, 871–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., and Sakata, H. (2000) Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 2580–2601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, A. (2001) Object recognition and object segregation in 4.5-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 3–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noë, A. (2002) Is the visual world a grand illusion? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9, 5/6, 1–12Google Scholar
O'Regan, J. K., and Noe, A. (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Shaughnessy, B. (1980) The Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, B. (1992) The diversity and unity of action and perception. In Crane, T. (ed.), The Contents of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 216–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavani, F., Boscagli, I., Benvenuti, F., Rabufetti, M., and Farne, A. (1999) Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 127, 1, 95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. (1992) A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. (1998) Nonconceptual content defended. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58, 381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. (2001) Does perception have nonconceptual content? Journal of Philosophy, 98, 239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.) (1980) Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Pisella, L., Gréa, H., Tilikete, C., Vighetto, A., Desmurget, M., Rode, G., Boisson, D., and Rossetti, Y. (2000) An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: Toward a reinterpretion of optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 7, 729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. (2000a) Situating vision in the world. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 5, 197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. (2000b) Visual indexes, preconceptual objects and situated vision. Cognition, 80, 127–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossetti, Y., and Pisella, L. (2002) Several ‘vision for action’ systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions (tutorial). In Prinz, W., and Hommel, B. (eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Sakata, H., Taira, M., Murata, A., and Mine, S. (1995) Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cerebral Cortex, 5, 429–438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, G. E. (1967) Contrasting visuomotor functions of tectum and cortex in the golden hamster. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 52–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, J. R. (1983) Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, K. (1993) Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science, 262, 685–688CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, K., Saito, H., Fukada, Y., and Moriya, M. (1991) Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 66, 170–189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teuber, H. L. (1960) Perception. In Field, J., Magoun, H. W., and Hall, V. E. (eds.), Handbook of Physiology: Section I, Neurophysiology. Washington, D.C.: American Physiological Society, 89–121Google Scholar
Tye, M. (1995) Ten Problems of Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Ungerleider, L., and Mishkin, M. (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In Ingle, D. J., Goodale, M. A., and Mansfield, R. J. W. (eds.), Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 549–586Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. (1997) Consciousness Lost and Found: A Neuropsychological Exploration. Oxford and New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wynn, K. (1992a) Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, K. (1992b) Evidence against empiricist accounts of the origins of numerical knowledge. Mind and Language, 7, 4, 315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, F., and Carey, S. (1996) Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. (1993) A Vision of the Brain. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Grasping and Perceiving Objects
    • By Pierre Jacob, Professor of Philosophy and Director, Jean Nicod Institute, Paris
  • Edited by Andrew Brook, Carleton University, Ottawa, Kathleen Akins, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
  • Book: Cognition and the Brain
  • Online publication: 02 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610608.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Grasping and Perceiving Objects
    • By Pierre Jacob, Professor of Philosophy and Director, Jean Nicod Institute, Paris
  • Edited by Andrew Brook, Carleton University, Ottawa, Kathleen Akins, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
  • Book: Cognition and the Brain
  • Online publication: 02 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610608.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Grasping and Perceiving Objects
    • By Pierre Jacob, Professor of Philosophy and Director, Jean Nicod Institute, Paris
  • Edited by Andrew Brook, Carleton University, Ottawa, Kathleen Akins, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
  • Book: Cognition and the Brain
  • Online publication: 02 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610608.008
Available formats
×