Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Series editors' preface
- Preface
- SECTION I THEORETICAL ISSUES
- SECTION II COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION
- 7 Cognition and tasks
- 8 Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form
- 9 Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: a reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity
- 10 Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA
- 11 Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design
- 12 Cognition, instruction and protocol analysis
- References
- Index
12 - Cognition, instruction and protocol analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Series editors' preface
- Preface
- SECTION I THEORETICAL ISSUES
- SECTION II COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION
- 7 Cognition and tasks
- 8 Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form
- 9 Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: a reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity
- 10 Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA
- 11 Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design
- 12 Cognition, instruction and protocol analysis
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
If we desire to better understand the processes involved in second language (L2) learning and to make claims regarding learners' attention to and processing of different types of linguistic input, it is important to examine the cognitive processes of interest to us as directly as possible. One method of data collection which allows researchers to do this is protocol analysis, in which verbal reports are collected from the language learner.
While this method has been used for over a century in the field of psychology in order to investigate problem-solving and memory skills, it is only within the past few decades that SLA researchers have begun to use protocols to observe the cognitive processes utilized in language behaviours and tasks. As Schmidt has pointed out, ‘The problem in applied linguistics has not been over reliance on first-person reports and data, but an almost total neglect of them’ (1994c: 22).
The goal of this paper is to address this situation by examining the strengths of protocol analysis as a method for looking at a variety of cognitive processes of interest to second language acquisition (SLA) researchers. The methods involved in the collection and analysis of protocols will be addressed, followed by a discussion of various linguistic studies which have utilized protocols and how the information gained from such research can inform SLA theory. Finally, both the limitations and benefits of this method of data collection for language acquisition research will be considered.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cognition and Second Language Instruction , pp. 354 - 376Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001
- 47
- Cited by