Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:26:46.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Role of Working Memory in Higher-Level Cognition: Domain-Specific versus Domain-General Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Jean E. Pretz
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The idea that short-term memory is an important component of intelligence is not new. For example, over a century ago, James (1890) wrote, “All the intellectual value for us of a state of mind depends on our after memory of it. Only then is it combined in a system and knowingly made to contribute to a result. Only then does it count for us.” Around the same time, Binet (1905) included a test of short-term memory in a test battery designed to identify learning disabled children in the Paris school system. And more recently, short-term memory has been conceptualized as a fundamental component of human cognition. For example, Miller (1956) famously proposed that the capacity of short-term memory is limited to 7 ± 2 bits of information. Later, Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) incorporated this idea of a central bottleneck in information processing into their “modal” model of memory.

Nevertheless, the extent to which short-term memory plays an important role in higher-level cognition — intelligence manifested in complex cognitive activities like reasoning and learning — has been a topic of considerable debate in cognitive psychology. Consider, for example, the results of a series of experiments by Baddeley and Hitch (1974). The surprising finding in these experiments was that a secondary task designed to tax short-term memory had little or no effect on a variety of reasoning, comprehension, and memory primary tasks.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cognition and Intelligence
Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind
, pp. 104 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of learning and motivation research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic pressCrossRef
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. London/New York: Oxford University press
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic pressCrossRef
Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Permagon
Binet, A. (1905). New methods for the diagnosis of the intellectual level of sub-normals. L'Année Psychologique, 12, 191–244Google Scholar
Blieszner, R., Willis, S. L., & Baltes, P. B. (1981). Training research in aging on the fluid ability of inductive reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, C. E. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 331–335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denney, N. W., & Heidrich, S. M. (1990). Training effects on Raven's Progressive Matrices in young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 144–145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, J. (1990). Goal weighting and the choice of behavior in a complex world. Ergonomics, 33, 1265–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 972–992Google ScholarPubMed
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999a). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York: Cambridge University Press
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999b). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2002). Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: An investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 339–384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (in press). Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: GeneralGoogle Scholar
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 333–358Google ScholarPubMed
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klauer, K. J., Willmes, K., & Phye, G. D. (2002). Inducing inductive reasoning: Does it transfer to fluid intelligence? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K., & Fiss, W. H. (1999). The reliability and stability of the Turner and Engle working memory task. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 429–432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyllonen, P. C. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman's g? In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 49–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C., & Stephens, D. L. (1990). Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 129–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory and Cognition, 29, 10–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621–640CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, M. R. (1966). The axioms and principal results of classical test theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberauer, K. (1993). Die Koordination kognitiver Operationen. Eine Studie zum Zusammenhang von ‘working memory’ und Intelligenz [The coordination of cognitive operations. A study of the relationship of working memory and intelligence]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 57–84Google Scholar
Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrock, C., & Engle, R. W. (in preparation). Working memory capacity and behavioral inhibition
Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1999). Models of working memory: An introduction. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 1–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: MacMillan
Swanson, H. L., & Howell, M. (2001). Working memory, short-term memory, and speech rate as predictors of children's reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 720–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turley-Ames, K. J., & Whitfield, M. M. (2003). Strategy training and working memory task performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 446–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, M. C., Satterlee-Cartmell, T., & Stine, M. (1999). Towers of Hanoi and London: Contribution of working memory and inhibition to performance. Brain & Cognition, 41, 231–242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittmann, W. W., & Süß, H. (1999). Investigating the paths between working memory, intelligence, and complex problem-solving performances via Brunswik Symmetry. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 77–110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×