Reasoning Abilities

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511607073.013

12 - Reasoning Abilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 November 2009

David F. Lohman

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg and

Jean E. Pretz

Show author details

Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Jean E. Pretz: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The topic of human intelligence exceeds the span of any one discipline or method of inquiry. Different aspects of intelligence are best understood from disciplines as diverse as evolutionary biology, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, anthropology, and education. At its core, however, intelligence is defined by differences between individuals or species. To say that one individual is more intelligent than another is to make a value judgment. Theories of human intelligence must therefore be able to explain those behaviors or accomplishments that societies value as indicants of intelligence (Sternberg, 1985). Such explanations may, at one extreme, invoke the action of neural mechanisms (Garlick, 2002) or, at the other extreme, the importance of social processes (Vygotsky, 1978). Ultimately, however, the theory must explain individual differences in those complex human behaviors that are most commonly understood as indicants of intelligence. Thus, the central facts to be explained by a theory of intelligence must go beyond faster or more efficient processing of elementary tasks, for example, or the efficiency of biological processes and inherited structures, or the influence of schools, environments, or even cultures. Rather, a theory of intelligence must explain the writing of novels, the solving of complex mathematical problems, the designing of skyscrapers and microchips, and the myriad other forms of complex cognition valued by society. In short, an understanding of how individuals solve complex tasks and an explanation of why they differ so markedly in their ability to do so are central facts for any theory of intelligence.

Type: Chapter
Information: Cognition and Intelligence
Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind
, pp. 225 - 250

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607073.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: A theory of cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 299–329Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alderton, D. L., & Larson, G. E. (1994). Cross-task consistency in strategy use and the relationship with intelligence. Intelligence, 18, 47–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Bethell-Fox, C. E., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1984). Adaptive reasoning: Componential and eye movement analysis of geometric analogy performance. Intelligence, 8, 205–238CrossRef Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M. (1995). The interface between intelligence and personality as determinants of classroom learning. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 161–183). New York: Plenum PressCrossRef

Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence. San Diego: Academic Press

Bruner, J. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In J. S. Bruner (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41–69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Carlstedt, B., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Ullstadius, E. (2000). Item sequencing effects on the measurement of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28, 145–160CrossRef Google Scholar

Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Schell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–431CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Chastain, R. L. (1992). Adaptive processing in complex learning and cognitive performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183CrossRef Google Scholar

Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Lohman, D. F., Kupermintz, H., & Talbert, J. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Crawford, J. (1988). Intelligence, task complexity and tests of sustained attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam

Deary, I. J., & Stough, C. (1996). Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects, and problems. American Psychologist, 51, 599–608CrossRef Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (1986). Human intelligence is a complex system of separate processes. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), What is intelligence? (pp. 57–61). Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Elshout, J. J. (1985). Problem solving and education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, June 1985

Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Estes, W. K. (1974). Learning theory and intelligence. American Psychologist, 29, 740–749CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press

Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelli-gence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7, 237–241CrossRef Google Scholar

Garlick, D. (2002). Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: The role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism. Psychological Review, 109, 116–136CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goldman, S. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1984). Deductions about induction: Analyses of developmental and individual differences. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 149–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Greeno, J. G. (1978). A study of problem solving. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 13–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Gustafsson, J.-E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 35–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242.) New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan

Holzman, T. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1982). Cognitive dimensions of numerical rule induction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 360–373CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunt, E. B., Frost, N., & Lunneborg, C. (1973). Individual differences in cognition: A new approach to intelligence. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7, pp. 87–122). New York: Academic PressCrossRef

Hunt, E., & Lansman, M. (1982). Individual differences in attention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human abilities (Vol. 1, pp. 207–254). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3/4, 447–472CrossRef Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1982). The chronometry of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 255–310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Deductive reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 109–135CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!Intelligence, 14, 389–433CrossRef Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F., & Woltz, D. J. (1984). Componential modeling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1325–1345CrossRef Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 181–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Lohman, D. F. (1994). Component scores as residual variation (or why the intercept correlates best). Intelligence, 19, 1–11CrossRef Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F. (2000). Complex information processing and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 285–340). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Lohman, D. F. (2004). Aptitude for college: The importance of reasoning tests for minority admissions. In R. Zwick (Ed.), Rethinking the SAT: The future of standardized testing in university admissions (pp. 41–56). New York: Routledge Falmer. Web site: http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman/

Lohman, D. F., & Hagen, E. (2001a). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6): Interpretive guide for teachers and counselors. Itasca, IL: Riverside

Lohman, D. F., & Hagen, E. (2001b). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6): Interpretive guide for school administrators. Itasca, IL: Riverside

Lohman, D. F., & Hagen, E. (2002). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6): Research handbook. Itasca, IL: Riverside

Markman, A. B., & Genter, D. (2001). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 223–247CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 107–128CrossRef Google Scholar

Martinez, M. E. (2000). Education as the cultivation of intelligence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Pellegrino, J. W. (1985). Inductive reasoning ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp. 195–225). New York: W.H. Freeman

Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1980). Components of inductive reasoning. In R. E. Snow, P.-A. Federico, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 1. Cognitive process analyses of aptitude (pp. 177–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Primi, R. (2001). Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 41–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Raaheim, K. (1988). Intelligence and task novelty. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 73–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1977). Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. New York: Psychological Corporation

Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L. (1999). Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Toward a taxonomic model. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 1–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A., Babcock, R. L, Mitchell, D. R. D., Palmon, R., & Skovronek, E. (1990). Sources of individual differences in spatial visualization ability. Intelligence, 14, 187–230CrossRef Google Scholar

Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude and achievement. New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 5, 39–59Google Scholar

Snow, R. E. (1994). Abilities in academic tasks. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 3–37). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Snow, R. E. (1996). Aptitude development and education. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 536–560CrossRef Google Scholar

Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 263–331). New York: Macmillan

Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson, D., III. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243–310). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan

Snow, R. E., Kyllonen, P. C., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of ability and learning correlations. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 47–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man. London: Macmillan

Spilsbury, G. (1992). Complexity as a reflection of the dimensionality of a task. Intelligence, 16, 31–45CrossRef Google Scholar

Stankov, L. (1988). Single tests, competing tasks and their relationship to broad factors of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 25–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Toward a unified theory of human reasoning. Intelligence, 10, 281–314CrossRef Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Gardner, M. K. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 80–116CrossRef Google Scholar

Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working memory capacity explains reasoning ability — and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288CrossRef Google Scholar

Swiney, J. F. (1985). A study of executive processes in intelligence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (2nd ed). New York: Macmillan

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Yanng, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Mental models and logical reasoning problems in the GRE. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(4), 308–316Google Scholar

Zimmerman, W. S. (1954). The influence of item complexity upon the factor composition of a spatial visualization test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 106–119CrossRef Google Scholar