Complex Problem Solving and Intelligence: Empirical Relation and Causal Direction

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511607073.010

9 - Complex Problem Solving and Intelligence: Empirical Relation and Causal Direction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 November 2009

Dorit Wenke ,

Peter A. Frensch and

Joachim Funke

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg and

Jean E. Pretz

Show author details

Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Jean E. Pretz: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The breadth of human problem solving is truly striking. On the one hand, human problem solving makes possible the most wondrous achievements, such as “an 800-seat airliner with wings that blend smoothly into the fuselage instead of protruding from its sides that is scheduled to be in the air by 2006” (AP news from February 9, 2001). Yet, on the other hand, errors in problem solving can lead to catastrophic and near-catastrophic disasters, such as, for instance, the nuclear reactor accident at Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania, in 1979. Whatever “problem solving” is, and scientists disagree vehemently on the proper meaning of the term, there can be little doubt that it has shaped human culture to an extent that is almost unrivaled by any other human ability.

From the inception of the concept of “intelligence,” the ability to solve problems has featured prominently in virtually every definition of human intelligence (e.g., Sternberg & Berg, 1986). In addition, intelligence has often been viewed as one of the best predictors of problem-solving ability (e.g., Putz-Osterloh, 1981; Putz-Osterloh & Lüer, 1981). Thus, whatever the causal relation between the two concepts, prevailing theoretical positions strongly suggest that intelligence and problem solving are related. In this chapter we concentrate on complex rather than on simple problem solving. Our main goal is to review the extent to which the ability to solve complex problems is indeed tied, empirically, to intelligence and to discuss which causal direction holds between the two concepts.

Type: Chapter
Information: Cognition and Intelligence
Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind
, pp. 160 - 187

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607073.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducel, A. (1973). Intelligence Structure Test (IST 70). Göttingen: Hogrefe

Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. B., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228, 456–462CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Anderson, M. (1998). Individual differences in intelligence. In K. Kirsner, C. Speelman, M. Maybery, A. O'Brien-Malone, M. Anderson, & C. MacLeod (Eds.), Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 171–185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Anzai, K., & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124–140CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Beckmann. (1995). Lernen und komplexes Problemlösen. Ein Beitrag zur Validierung von Lerntests [Learning and problem solving. A contribution to validate learning potential tests]. Bonn: Holos

Beckmann, J. F., & Guthke, J. (1995). Complex problem solving, intelligence, and learning ability. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving. The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 209–231CrossRef Google Scholar

Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1987). The combination of explicit and implicit learning processes in task control. Psychological research, 49, 7–15CrossRef Google Scholar

Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Interactive tasks and the implicit–explicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 251–272CrossRef Google Scholar

Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1995). Implicit learning in the control of complex systems. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving. The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Bhaskar, R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Problem solving in semantically rich domains: An example from engineering thermodynamics. Cognitive Science, 1, 193–215CrossRef Google Scholar

Broadbent, D. E. (1977). Levels, hierarchies, and the locus of control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 181–201CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchner, A. (1995). Basic topics and approaches to the study of complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving. The European perspective (pp. 27–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Buchner, A. (1999). Komplexes Problemlösen vor dem Hintergrund der Theorie finiter Automaten [Complex problem solving viewed from the theory of finite state automata]. Psychologische Rundschau, 50, 206–212CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchner, A., Funke, J., & Berry, D. (1995). Negative correlations between control performance and verbalizable knowledge: Indicators for implicit learning in process control tasks? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 166–187CrossRef Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B., & Weiss, R. H. (1980). Culture Fair Intelligence Test, Scale 3 (CFT3). Göttingen: Hogrefe

Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. K. (1986a). A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 255–266CrossRef Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. K. (1986b). Academic and nonacademic intelligence: An experimental separation. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. K. (1988). Stalking the IQ–expertise relation: When critics go fishing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 96–100CrossRef Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J., & Ruiz, A. (1992). The role of general ability in cognitive complexity: A case study of expertise. In R. R. Hoffmann (Ed.), The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI (pp. 218–230). New York: SpringerCrossRef

Ceci, S. J., & Ruiz, A. (1993). Transfer, abstractness, and intelligence. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 168–191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152CrossRef Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K., & Spry, K. M. (1988). Is it smart to play the horses? Comment on “A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity” (Ceci & Liker, 1986). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 91–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Dienes, Z., & Fahey, R. (1995). The role of specific instances in controlling a dynamic system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 848–862Google Scholar

Dienes, Z., & Fahey, R. (1998). The role of implicit memory in controlling a dynamic system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 593–614CrossRef Google Scholar

Dörner, D. (1975). Wie Menschen eine Welt verbessern wollten [How people wanted to improve a world]. Bild der Wissenschaft, 12, 48–53Google Scholar

Dörner, D. (1980). On the difficulty people have in dealing with complexity. Simulation & Games, 11, 87–106CrossRef Google Scholar

Dörner, D. (1986). Diagnostik der operativen Intelligenz [Assessment of operative intelligence]. Diagnostica, 32, 290–308Google Scholar

Dörner, D., & Kreuzig, H. W. (1983). Problemlösefähigkeit und Intelligenz [Problem solving and intelligence]. Psychologische Rundschau, 34, 185–192Google Scholar

Dörner, D., & Wearing, A. (1995). Complex problem solving: Toward a (computer simulated) theory. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 65–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F., & Stäudel, T. (1983). Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität [Lohhausen. On dealing with uncertainty and complexity]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber

Duncker, K. (1935/1974). Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens [On productive thinking]. Berlin: Julius Springer

Ellis, N. R., & Allison, P. (1988). Memory for frequency of occurrence in retarded and nonretarded persons. Intelligence, 12, 61–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Ellis, N. R., Katz, E., & Williams, J. E. (1987). Developmental aspects of memory for spatial location. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44, 401–412CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ewert, P. H., & Lambert, J. F. (1932). The effect of verbal instructions upon the formation of a concept. Journal of General Psychology, 6, 400–413CrossRef Google Scholar

Fletcher, J., Maybery, M. T., & Bennett, S. (2000). Implicit learning differences: A question of developmental level? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 246–252Google Scholar PubMed

Frensch, P. A. (1998). One concept, multiple meanings. On how to define the concept of implicit learning. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage

Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving. The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Frensch, P. A., & Rünger, D. (2003). Implicit learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 13–18CrossRef Google Scholar

Funke, J. (1983). Einige Bermerkungen zu Problemen der Problemlöseforschung oder: Ist Testintelligenz doch ein Prädiktor [Some remarks on the problems of problem solving research or: Does test intelligence predict control performance?]. Diagnostica, 29, 283–302Google Scholar

Funke, J. (1984). Diagnose der westdeutschen Problemlöseforschung in Form einiger Thesen [Assessment of West German problem solving research]. Sprache & Kognition, 3, 159–172Google Scholar

Funke, J. (1991). Solving complex problems: Exploration and control of complex systems. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 185–222). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Funke, J. (1995). Experimental research on complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 243–268). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Funke, J. (2001). Dynamic systems as tools for analysing human judgement. Thinking and Reasoning, 7, 69–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Geddes, B. W., & Stevenson, R. J. (1997). Explicit learning of a dynamic system with a non-salient pattern. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 742–765CrossRef Google Scholar

Green, R. E., & Shanks, D. R. (1993). On the existence of independent explicit and implicit learning systems: An examination of some evidence. Memory & Cognition, 21, 304–317CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Greve, W. (2001). Traps and gaps in action explanation. Theoretical problems of a psychology of human action. Psychological Review, 108, 435–451CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Guthke, J., Jäger, C., & Schmidt, I. (1983). LTS: Learning Test Battery “Reasoning”. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Psychologie

Hayes, N. A., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Two modes of learning for interactive tasks. Cognition, 28, 249–276CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hesse, F. W. (1982). Effekte des semantischen Kontexts auf die Bearbeitung komplexer Probleme [Effects of semantic context on problem solving]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 29, 62–91Google Scholar

Hörmann, J. J., & Thomas, M. (1989). Zum Zusammenhang zwischen Intelligenz und komplesem Problemlösen [On the relationship between intelligence and complex problem solving]. Sprache & Kognition, 8, 23–31Google Scholar

Howe, M. J. (1988). Intelligence as an explanation. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 349–360CrossRef Google Scholar

Howe, M. J. A. (1996). Concepts of ability. In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities. Their nature and their measurement (pp. 39–48). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Hussy, W. (1989). Intelligenz und komplexes Problemlösen [Intelligence and complex problem solving]. Diagnostica, 35, 1–16Google Scholar

Hussy, W. (1991). Problemlösen und Verarbeitungskapazität [Complex problem solving and processing capacity]. Sprache & Kognition, 10, 208–220Google Scholar

Jäger, A. O. (1982). Mehrmodale Klassifikation von Intelligenzleistungen [Multimodal classification of intelligent performance]. Diagnostica, 28, 195–225Google Scholar

Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstrukturtest. BIS-Test, Form 4 [Berlin Intelligence Structure Test, Manual]. Göttingen: Hogrefe

Kersting, M. (1999). Diagnostik und Personalauswahl mit computergestützten Problemlöseszenarien? Zur Kriteriumsvalidität von Problemlöseszenarien und Intelligenztests [Assessment and personnel selection with computer simulated problem-solving scenarios? On the validity of problem-solving scenarios and intelligence tests]. Göttingen: Hogrefe

Kersting, M., & Süß, H.-M. (1995). Kontentvalide Wissensdiagnostik und Problemlösen: Zur Entwicklung, testtheoretischen Begründung und empirischen Bewährung eines problemspezifischen Diagnoseverfahrens [Content-validity of knowledge assessment and problem-solving: Development, psychometric foundation, and empirical assessment of a problem-specific assessment instrument]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 9, 83–93Google Scholar

Kluwe, R. H., Misiak, C., & Haider, H. (1991a). Systems and performance in intelligence tests. In H. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement (pp. 227–244). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Kluwe, R. H., Schilde, A., Fischer, C., & Oellerer, N. (1991b). Problemlöseleistungen beim Umgang mit komplexen Systemen und Intelligenz [Problem solving performance when interacting with complex systems and intelligence]. Diagnostica, 37, 291–313Google Scholar

Kray, J., & Frensch, P. A. (2001). A view from cognitive psychology: “g” — (G)host in the correlation matrix? In R. J. Sternberg & E. E. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: Fact or fiction? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Maybery, M., Taylor, M., & O'Brien-Malone, A. (1995). Implicit learning: Sensitive to age but not IQ. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 8–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. Second ed. New York: Freeman

McGeorge, P., Crawford, J. R., & Kelly, S. W. (1997). The relationships between psychometric intelligence and learning in an explicit and an implicit task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 239–245Google Scholar

Müller, H. (1993). Komplexes Problemlösen: Reliabilität und Wissen [Complex problem solving: Reliability and knowledge]. Bonn: Holos

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human information processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Putz-Osterloh, W. (1981). Über die Beziehung zwischen Testintelligenz und Problemlöseerfolg [On the relationship between test intelligence and success in problem solving]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 189, 79–100Google Scholar

Putz-Osterloh, W. (1993). Strategies for knowledge acquisition and transfer of knowledge in dynamic tasks. In G. Strube & K. F. Wender (Eds.), The cognitive psychology of knowledge (pp. 331–350). Amsterdam: ElsevierCrossRef

Putz-Osterloh, W., & Haupts, I. (1989). Zur Reliabilität und Validität computergestützter Diagnostik komplexer Organisations-und Entscheidungsstrategien [On the reliability and validity of computer-based assessment of complex organizational and decision strategies]. Untersuchungen des Psychologischen Dienstes der Bundeswehr, 24, 5–48Google Scholar

Putz-Osterloh, W., & Lüer, G. (1981). Über die Vorhersagbarkeit komplexer Problemlöseleistungen durch Ergebnisse in einem Intelligenztest [On the predictability of complex problem solving performance by intelligence test scores]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 28, 309–334Google Scholar

Raven, J. C., Court, J. & Raven, J., Jr. (1980). Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM). Weinheim: Beltz

Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 77, 317–327Google Scholar

Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 115–119CrossRef Google Scholar

Reber, A. S. (1976). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 88–94Google Scholar

Reber, A. S., Walkenfield, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 888–896CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stanley, W. B., Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., & Kotler-Cope, S. (1989). Insight without awareness: On the interaction of verbalization, instruction, and practice in a simulated process control task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 553–577CrossRef Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Reasoning, problem solving, and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 225–307). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Expertise in complex problem solving: A comparison of alternative conceptions. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 295–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Sternberg, R. J., & Berg, C. A. (1986). Quantitative integration: Definitions of intelligence: A comparison of the 1921 and 1986 symposia. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition (pp. 155–162). Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Sternberg, R. J., & Frensch, P. A. (Eds.). (1991). Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, C., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29, 401–418CrossRef Google Scholar

Strohschneider, S. (1986). Zur Stabilität und Validität von Handeln in komplexen Realitätsbereichen [On the stability and validity of complex problem-solving behavior]. Sprache & Kognition, 5, 42–48Google Scholar

Strohschneider, S. (1991). Problemlösen und Intelligenz: Über die Effekte der Konkretisierung komplexer Probleme [Complex problem solving and intelligence: On the effects of problem concreteness]. Diagnostica, 37, 353–371Google Scholar

Süß, H. M., Kersting, M., & Oberauer, K. (1991). Intelligenz und Wissen als Prädiktoren für Leistungen bei computersimulierten komplexen Problemen [Intelligence and knowledge as predictors of performance in solving complex computer-simulated problems]. Diagnostica, 37, 334–352Google Scholar

Süß, H.-M., Kersting, M., & Oberauer, K. (1993). Zur Vorhersage von Steuerungsleistungen an computersimulierten Systemen durch Wissen und Intelligenz [Predicting control performance in computer-simulated systems by means of knowledge and intelligence]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 14, 189–203Google Scholar

Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B. D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure. Cognitive Science, 20, 75–100CrossRef Google Scholar

Wenke, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2003). Is success or failure at solving complex problems related to intellectual ability?. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of problem solving (pp. 87–126). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Sanft, H. (1982). Automatic encoding of event frequency: Further findings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 106–116Google Scholar