Abbott, Kenneth W., ‘Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers’ (1989) 14 Yale Journal of International Law 335.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., ‘Strengthening the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change’ (2014) 3 Transnational Environmental Law 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan, ‘International Regulation without International Government: Improving IO Performance through Orchestration’ (2010) 5 The Review of International Organizations 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmed, Dawood I., ‘Defending Weak States against the “Unwilling or Unable” Doctrine of Self-Defense’ (2013) 9 Journal of International Law and International Relations 1.Google Scholar

Albright, Madeleine K. (interview), Interview on NBC-TV ‘The Today Show’ with Matt Lauer (19 February 1998), at www.state.gov/1997-2001-NOPDFS/statements/1998/980219a.html.Google Scholar

Allen, Craig H., ‘Command of the Commons Boasts: An Invitation to Lawfare?’, in Carsten, , Global Legal Challenges: Command of the Commons, Strategic Communications and Natural Disasters (2007), pp. 21–50.Google Scholar

Allen, Craig H., ‘The Limits of Intelligence in Maritime Counterproliferation Operations’ (2007) 60 Naval War College Review 35.Google Scholar

Allen, Craig H., Maritime Counterproliferation Operations and the Rule of Law (Westport: Praeger Security, 2007).Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘The Myopia of the Handmaidens: International Lawyers and Globalization’ (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Philip and Macdonald, Euan (eds.), Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, José E., ‘Do Liberal States Behave Better? A Critique of Slaughter’s Liberal Theory’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, José E., ‘The Move from Institutions: Introductory Remarks’ (2006) 100 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amsterdam, Anthony G. and Bruner, Jerome, Minding the Law: How Courts Rely on Storytelling, and How Their Stories Change the Ways We Understand the Law – And Ourselves (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anghie, Antony, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony and Chimni, B. S., ‘Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts’ (2003) 2 Chinese Journal of International Law 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appelbaum, Yoni, ‘Trump’s Foreign Policy “Adhocracy”’, The Atlantic (27 June 2017), at www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/06/trumps-foreign-policy-adhocracy/531732/.Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Rhetoric (New York, NY: Dover Publications, 2004).Google Scholar

Arms Control Association, Nuclear Security Summit at a Glance (August 2017), at www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/NuclearSecuritySummit.Google Scholar

Ash, Timothy Garton, Free World: America, Europe, and the Surprising Future of the West, reprinted edition with a new postscript (London: Penguin, 2005).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, ‘The Theory and Practice of Informal International Instruments’ (1986) 35 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, third edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Aust, Helmut Philipp, Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Helmut Philipp, Das Recht der globalen Stadt (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Helmut Philipp, Rodiles, Alejandro and Staubach, Peter, ‘Unity or Uniformity? Domestic Courts and Treaty Interpretation’ (2014) 27 Leiden Journal of International Law 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, John L., How to Do Things with Words, second edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Axworthy, Lloyd, ‘Human Security and Global Governance: Putting People First’ (2001) 7 Global Governance 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bai, Matt, ‘Notion Building’, The New York Times Magazine (12 October 2003), at www.nytimes.com/2003/10/12/magazine/notion-building.html?pagewanted=print.Google Scholar

Bai, Matt, The Framing Wars’, The New York Times Magazine (17 July 2005), at www.nytimes.com/2005/07/17/magazine/17DEMOCRATS.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.Google Scholar

Balser, Markus, ‘Frischer Wind in Petersberg’, Süddeutsche Zeitung (15 July 2014).Google Scholar

Bargh, John A., ‘What Have We Been Priming All These Years? On the Development, Mechanisms, and Ecology of Nonconscious Social Behavior’ (2006) 36 European Journal of Social Psychology 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrena Nájera, Guadalupe, Human Rights Indicators in the Field of Criminal Justice and Crime Control. Implications for the Idea of Law in Governance and Governmentality (unpublished PhD Dissertation, Legal Research Institute of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City: October 2017).Google Scholar

Barrett, Scott and Stavins, Robert, ‘Increasing Participation and Compliance in International Climate Change Agreements’ (2003) 3 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Ulrich, Weltrisikogesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2007).Google Scholar

Becker, Michael A., ‘The Shifting Public Order of the Oceans: Freedom of Navigation and the Interdiction of Ships at Sea’ (2005) 46 Harvard International Law Journal 131.Google Scholar

Belcher, Emma, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: Lessons for Using Nonbinding Agreements’, Council on Foreign Relations, Working Paper (July 2011) 1.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, ‘Zur Kritik der Gewalt’, in Benjamin, W. (ed.), Angelus Novus, volume 2 (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1988).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘Coalitions of the Willing and the Evolution of Informal International Law’, in Calliess, Nolte, and Stoll, (eds.), Coalitions of the Willing: Avantgarde or Threat? (2007), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘The Conception of International Law as a Legal System’ (2007) 50 German Yearbook of International Law 393.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘Towards a Typology of Informal International Lawmaking Mechanisms and their Distinct Accountability Gaps’, in Wessel, and Wouters, (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders’ (2013) 107 The American Journal of International Law 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, The Law of Global Governance (Pocketbooks of The Hague Academy of International Law, 2015).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal and Downs, George W., ‘The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law’ (2007) 60 Stanford Law Review 595.Google Scholar

Berman, Harold J., ‘Is Conflict-of-Laws Becoming Passe? An Historical Response’, in Rasmussen-Bonne, Hans E. et al. (eds.), Balancing of Interests: Liber Americorum Peter Hay zum 70. Geburtstag (Frankfurt: Recht und Wirtschaft, 2005), p. 43.Google Scholar

Besier, Gerhard and Lindemann, Gerhard, Im Namen der Freiheit: Die amerikanische Mission (Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006).Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Textual Interpretation and (International) Law Reading: The Myth of (In)Determinacy and the Genealogy of Meaning’, in Bekker, Pieter H.F., Dolzer, Rudolf and Waibel, Michael (eds.), Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy, Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Reflexive Butterfly Catching: Insights from a Situated Catcher’, in Pauwelyn, , Wessel, , and Wouters, (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, Kenneth S., ‘The FATF and Its Institutional Partners: Improving the Effectiveness and Accountability of Transgovernmental Networks’ (2008) 22 Temple International Law and Comparative Law Journal 1.Google Scholar

Blokker, Niels, ‘Is the Authorization Authorized? Powers and Practice of the UN Security Council to Authorize the Use of Force by “Coalitions of the Able and Willing”’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, ‘Entstehung und Wandel des Rechtsstaatsbegriffs’ in Böckenförde, E. W., Recht, Staat, Freiheit (Frankfurt a.M.: Surkamp, 2006).Google Scholar

Bolton, John, Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations and Abroad (New York: Threshold Editions, 2008).Google Scholar

Bolton, John R., ‘Beyond the Axis of Evil: Additional Threats to Weapons of Mass Destruction’, The Heritage Foundation, Lecture No. 743 on Missile Defense (6 May 2002), at www.heritage.org/research/lecture/beyond-the-axis-of-evil.Google Scholar

Bolton, John R., ‘An All-Out War on Proliferation’, Financial Times (7 September 2004), at http://2001-2009.state.gov/t/us/rm/36035.htm.Google Scholar

Bond, Richard, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: Targeting Iran and North Korea?’, British American Security Information Council (BASIC), Paper No. 53 (January 2007).Google Scholar

Bowett, Derek W., Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Bowman, Gregory W., ‘Thinking Outside the Border: Homeland Security and the Forward Deployment of the U.S. Border’ (2007) 44 Houston Law Review 189.Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan, ‘Reflections on the Treaty as a Law-making Instrument’, in Orakhelashvili, Alexander and Williams, Sarah, 40 Years of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2010), pp. 9–28.Google Scholar

Brummer, Chris, Minilateralism: How Trade Alliances, Soft Law and Financial Engineering Are Redefining Economic Statecraft (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunn, Matthew et al., Advancing Nuclear Security: Evaluating Progress and Setting New Goals (Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, March 2014).Google Scholar

Bush, George H. W., Address before a Joint Session of Congress (11 September 1990), at http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=18820.Google Scholar

Bush, George H. W., Address to the Nation on the Invasion of Iraq (16 January 1991), at http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/ghwbushiraqinvasion.htm.Google Scholar

Bush, George W., President Delivers State of Union Address (29 January 2002), at http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html.Google Scholar

Bush, George W., President’s Statement on the Proliferation Security Initiative (31 March 2005), at http://2001-2009.state.gov/t/isn/rls/prsrl/47260.htm.Google Scholar

Bush, George W. and Blair, Tony, ‘Effective Multilateralism to Build a Better World: Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair, November 20, 2003’, reprinted in US Government Printing Office, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, vol. 39, issue 47 (2003).Google Scholar

Byers, Michael (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Byers, Michael ‘Policing the High Seas: The Proliferation Security Initiative’ (2004) 98 The American Journal of International Law 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, Michael and Nolte, Georg (eds.), United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, Michael and Nolte, Georg ‘Preface’, in Byers, and Nolte, (eds.), United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. xv–xvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calliess, Christian, Nolte, Georg, and Stoll, Peter-Tobias (eds.), Coalitions of the Willing: Avantgarde or Threat? (Germany: Carl Heymanns, 2007).Google Scholar

Cann, Michelle, Davenport, Kelsey, and Williams, Sarah, The Nuclear Security Summit: Assessment of Joint Statements (Arms Control Association/Partnership for Global Security, March 2014).Google Scholar

Carsten, Michael D. (ed.), Global Legal Challenges: Command of the Commons, Strategic Communications and Natural Disasters, International Law Studies vol. 83 (Newport: Naval War College, 2007).Google Scholar

Castañeda, Jorge, Legal Effects of United Nations Resolutions (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh, ‘Charlemagne: Coalitions for the Willing: “Multi-Speed Europe” Is Making a Comeback, along with the Constitution’, The Economist (1 February 2007).Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh, ‘Charlemagne: A Crisis? Call the F-Team’, The Economist (4 November 2011).Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, reissue with a new preface by the author (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Ronald and Hanson, Jon, ‘Categorically Biased: The Influence of Knowledge Structures on Law and Legal Theory’ (2004) 77 Southern California Law Review 1103.Google Scholar

Chesterman, Simon, Just War or Just Peace? Humanitarian Intervention and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Chilton, Paul and Lakoff, George, ‘Foreign Policy by Metaphor’, in Schäffner, Christina and Wenden, Anita L. (eds.), Language & Peace (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1995), pp. 37–60.Google Scholar

Chimni, B.S., ‘Legitimating the International Rule of Law’, in Crawford, and Koskenniemi, (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 290–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chinkin, Christine, ‘The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law’ (1989) 38 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchill, R. R. and Lowe, A-V., The Law of the Sea, third edition, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Clinton, Hillary R., Hard Choices. A Memoir (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014).Google Scholar

Clinton, William J. (interview), Interview of the President by Sam Donaldson, ABC (5 June 1994), at www.ibiblio.org/pub/archives/whitehouse-papers/1994/Jun/1994-06-05-Presidents-ABC-Interview-on-USS-George-Washington.Google Scholar

Cowell, Alan, ‘Syria, Baking Coalition, Is Still Insistent on Golan’, The New York Times (15 February 1991).Google Scholar

Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James and Koskenniemi, Martti (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Argent, Pierre, ‘Coalitions of the Willing: Why, How and What?’, in Calliess, Nolte, and Stoll, (eds.), Coalitions of the Willing: Avantgarde or Threat? (2007), pp. 25–32.Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, Jean, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Daase, Christopher, ‘Die Informalisierung internationaler Politik: Beobachtungen zum Stand der internationalen Organisation’, in Dingwerth, Klaus, Kerwer, Dieter and Nölke, Andreas (eds.), Die Organisierte Welt. Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009), pp. 290–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daase, Christopher, ‘The ILC and Informalization’, in Nolte, Georg (ed.), Peace through International Law: The Role of the International Law Commission (Heidelberg: Springer, 2009), pp. 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daase, Christopher, ‘Coercion and the Informalization of Arms Control’, in Meier, Oliver and Daase, Christopher (eds.), Arms Control in the 21st Century: Between Coercion and Cooperation (New York: Routledge, 2013), pp. 67–76.Google Scholar

Dal, Bart, Herbach, Jonathan, and Luongo, Kenneth N., The Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation Initiative: Evolution, Status and Next Steps (NSGEG, October 2015).Google Scholar

Dann, Philipp and Von Engelhardt, Marie, ‘Legal Approaches to Global Governance and Accountability: Informal Lawmaking, International Public Authority, and Global Administrative Law Compared’, in Pauwelyn, , Wessel, , and Wouters, , Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Kevin and Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Obligation Overload: Adjusting the Obligations of Fragile or Failed States’, preliminary, unpublished paper, New York University, School of Law (2010), at www.iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Davis-et-al-Obligation-Overload-2010.pdf.Google Scholar

De Sousa Santos, Boaventura, ‘Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law’ (1987) 14 Journal of Law and Society 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Wet, Erika, The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council (Oxford/Portland: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar

Deeks, Ashley S., ‘“Unwilling or Unable”: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’ (2012) 52 Virginia Journal of International Law 483.Google Scholar

Deere, Carolyn, The Implementation Game: The TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Deibel, Terry L., Foreign Affairs Strategy: Logic for American Statecraft (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, ‘The Paradigm of the War on Crime: Legitimating Inhumane Treatment?’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doolin, Joel, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: Cornerstone of a New International Norm’ (2006) 59 Naval War College Review 29.Google Scholar

Downer, Alexander, The Threat of Proliferation: Global Resolve and Australian Action [Speech] (23 February 2004), at www.foreignminister.gov.au/speeches/2004/040223_lowy.html.Google Scholar

Doyle, Todd, ‘Cleaning Up Anti-Money Laundering Strategies: Current FATF Tactics Needlessly Violate International Law’ (2002) 24 Houston Journal of International Law 279.Google Scholar

Drezner, Daniel W., All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Drezner, Daniel W., ‘The New New World Order’ (March/April 2007) Foreign Affairs 36.Google Scholar

Dunne, Aaron, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: Legal Considerations and Operation Realities’, SIPRI Policy Paper 36 (May 2013).Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., ‘A New Approach to Regime Interaction’, in Young, (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 136–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., ‘From Interdisciplinarity to Counterdisciplinarity: Is there Madness in Martti’s Method?’ (2013) 27 Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 309.Google Scholar

Durkalec, Jacek, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: Evolution and Future Prospects’, EU Non-Proliferation Consortium, Non-Proliferation Papers No. 16 (June 2012), at www.sipri.org/research/disarmament/eu-consortium/publications/nonproliferation-paper-16.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, ‘Coalitions of the Willing and Responsibilities to Protect: Informal Associations, Enhanced Capacities, and Shared Moral Burdens’ (2014) 28 Ethics and International Affairs 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘What Future for the UN Charter System of War Prevention?’ (2003) 97 The American Journal of International Law 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farley, Robert, ‘Managing the United States’ Global Naval Partnerships: The U.S. Navy Has Decisions to Make on Cooperation with Other Global Navies. Will It Make the Right Ones?’, The Diplomat (10 July 2014), at http://thediplomat.com/2014/07/managing-the-united-states-global-naval-partnerships/?allpages=yes&print=yesGoogle Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo, ‘Review Essay: Quis judicabit? The Security Council, Its Powers and Its Legal Control’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feinberg, Richard, ‘Institutionalized Summitry’, in Cooper, Andrew F., Heine, Jorge, and Thakur, Ramish (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 303–318.Google Scholar

Feinstein, Lee and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘A Duty to Prevent’, (January/February 2004) Foreign Affairs 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Niall, The Square and the Tower - Networks of Power, from the Freemasons to Facebook (New York: Penguin Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, Regime-Kollisionen. Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 2006).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, in Bouchard, Donald F. (ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), pp. 139–164.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish – The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage Books, 1997).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas, ‘The United Nations as Guarantor of International Peace and Security: Past, Present and Future’, in Tomuschat, Christian (ed.), The United Nations at Age Fifty: A Legal Perspective (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1995), pp. 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., ‘When, If Ever, May States Deploy Military Force without Prior Security Council Authorization?’ (2001) 5 Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 51.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., Recourse to Force: State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, Thomas M. and Patel, Faiza, ‘UN Police Action in Lieu of War: “The Old Order Changeth”’ (1991) 85 The American Journal of International Law 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederking, Brian, The United States and the Security Council: Collective Security since the Cold War (London/New York: Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Thomas L., ‘Running the Gulf Coalition Is Tricky Business’, The New York Times (23 September 1990).Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, ‘The Paradox of International Action’, The American Interest (1 March 2006), at www.the-american-interest.com/2006/03/01/the-paradox-of-international-action/.Google Scholar

Gallie, W. B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ (1955–1956) 56 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 193.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience (New York: Harper Colophon, 1974).Google Scholar

Goodman, Ryan, ‘International Law on International Airstrikes against ISIS in Syria’, blog contribution, Just Security (28 August 2014), at http://justsecurity.org/14414/international-law-airstrikes-isis-syria/.Google Scholar

Goodman, Ryan and Knuckey, Sarah, ‘Remarkable Statement by UN Secretary General on US Airstrikes in Syria’, blog contribution, Just Security (23 September 2014), at http://justsecurity.org/15456/remarkable-statement-secretary-general-airstrikes-syria/).Google Scholar

Gougelet, David-Olivier and Feder, Ellen K., ‘Genealogies of Race and Gender’, in Falzon, Christopher, O’Leary, Timothy and Sawicki, Jana (eds.), A Companion to Foucault (Chichester: Willey-Blackwell, 2013), pp. 472–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force, third edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Gray, Christine, ‘The Charter Limitations on the Use of Force: Theory and Practice’, in Lowe, et al. (eds.), The United Nations Security Council and War: The Evolution of Thought and Practice since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 89–98.Google Scholar

Greenert, Admiral Jonathan and Foggo III, Rear Admiral James M. (US Navy), ‘Forging a Global Network of Navies’ (2014) 140 Proceedings 335.Google Scholar

Guilfoyle, Douglas, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: Interdicting Vessels in International Waters to Prevent the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction?’ (2005) 29 Melbourne University Law Review 733.Google Scholar

Guilfoyle, Douglas, ‘Maritime Interdiction of Weapons of Mass Destruction’ (2007) 12 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilfoyle, Douglas, Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haass, Richard N., The Reluctant Sheriff. The United States after the Cold War (New York: Council on Foreign Relations/Brookings Institution Press, 1997), p. 95.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N., ‘From Reluctant to Resolute: American Foreign Policy after September 11’, Remarks to the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (26 June 2002), at http://2001-2009.state.gov/s/p/rem/11445.htm.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N., ‘Planning Policy in Today’s World’, Remarks at the Kennan Institute Annual Dinner (22 May 2003), at http://2001-2009.state.gov/s/p/rem/2003/20910.htm.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N., The Opportunity: America’s Moment to Alter History’s Course (New York: Public Affairs, 2005).Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N., ‘The Age of Nonpolarity. What Will Follow U.S. Dominance’ (May/June 2008) Foreign Affairs 44.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N., [Interview], ‘The New Informal Multilateral Era’ (24 September 2009), at www.cfr.org/international-organizations-and-alliances/new-informal-multilateral-era/p20275.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N., War of Necessity, War of Choice: A Memoir of Two Iraq Wars (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009).Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N., ‘The Unraveling. How to Respond to a Disordered World’ (November/December 2014) Foreign Affairs 70.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N., A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order (New York: Penguin Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Hanson, Jon D. and Yeboah, Mark, ‘The Policy IAT’, in Hanson, Jon D. (ed.), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 265–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Empire (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, second edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Hautecouverture, Benjamin, ‘The Container Security Initiative’, ONP. 83, Centre d’Etudes de Sécurité Internationale et des Maîtrise des armements (CESIM) (2012).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. F. W., Phänomenologie des Geistes (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, second edition, 1989).Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking’ (2004) 29 Yale Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin Jon, ‘Ashley Deeks’ Problematic Defense of the “Unwilling or Unable” Test’, blog contribution, Opinio Juris (15 December 2011), at http://opiniojuris.org/2011/12/15/ashley-deeks-failure-to-defend-the-unwilling-or-unable-test/.Google Scholar

Heng, Yee-Kuang and McDonagh, Kenneth, Risk, Global Governance and Security (London/New York: Routledge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Process, International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honecker, P., ‘Vorreformatorische Schlagwörter, Spiegel politischer, religiöser und sozialer Konflikte in der frühen Neuzeit’, PhD thesis, University of Trier (2002), at http://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/volltexte/2004/149/pdf/20021212.pdf.Google Scholar

Hookway, Christopher, ‘Pragmatism’, in Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/pragmatism/.Google Scholar

Howorth, Jolyon, ‘From Alliances to Coalitions of the Willing: The New Regional Dynamics of Transatlantic Relations’, paper delivered to the Annual Conference of International Studies Association (ISA) (Hawaii, March 2005) (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Humphreys, Stephen, Theatre of the Rule of Law: Transnational Legal Intervention in Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P., ‘Transnational Organizations in World Politics’ (1973) 25 World Politics 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew, ‘International Law 1989–2010: A Performance Appraisal’, in Crawford, James and Nouwen, Sarah (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law: Third Volume, International Law 1989–2010: A Performance Appraisal (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012), pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Forging a World of Liberty under Law: U.S. National Security in the 21st Century (Final Paper of the Princeton Project on National Security) (Princeton: The Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, 27 September 2006).Google Scholar

Johns, Fleur, Non-Legality in International Law – Unruly Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bruce, Still Ours to Lead: America, Rising Powers, and the Tension between Rivalry and Restraint (Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Joyner, Daniel H., ‘The Security Council as Legal Hegemon’ (2012) 43 Georgetown Journal of International Law 225.Google Scholar

Joyner, Daniel H., International Law and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joyner, Daniel H., ‘Fundamental Rights of States in International Law and the Right to Peaceful Nuclear Energy’ (2014) 4 Cambridge International Law Journal 661.Google Scholar

Ke, Xu, ‘Myth and Reality: The Rise and Fall of Contemporary Maritime Piracy in the South China Sea’, in Wu, Shicun and Zou, Keyuan (eds.), Maritime Security in the South China Sea: Regional Implications and International Cooperation (Burlington: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 81–98.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, ‘Collective Security and Collective Self-Defense under the Charter of the United Nations’ (1948) 42 The American Journal of International Law 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, ‘Is the North Atlantic Treaty a Regional Arrangement?’ (1951) 45 The American Journal of International Law 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre, second edition (1960) (Vienna: Österreichische Staatsdruckerei, 1992).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Was ist Gerechtigkeit? (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2000).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, The Law of the United Nations. A Critical Analysis of its Fundamental Problems (Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, LTD., 1950, eighth reprint, 2009).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The Move to Institutions’ (1987) 8 Cardozo Law Review 841.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Lawfare and Warfare’, in Crawford, and Koskenniemi, (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 158–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, ‘A Left Phenomenological Alternative to the Hart/Kelsen Theory of Legal Interpretation’, in Kennedy, Duncan (ed.), Legal Reasoning: Collected Essays (Aurora: The Davies Group Publishers, 2008), pp. 154–173.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Random House, 1987).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., ‘Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations’ (1974) 27 World Politics 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., ‘Between Centralization and Fragmentation: The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy’, KSG Working Paper No. 01–004 (February 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Sovereignty and Inequality’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 15.Google Scholar

Kirgis, Frederic L., ‘Cruise Missile Strikes in Afghanistan and Sudan’, ASIL Insight (18 August 1998), at www.asil.org/insights/volume/3/issue/11/cruise-missile-strikes-afghanistan-and-sudan.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’ (1996) 65 Nordic Journal of International Law 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’ (2001) 70 Nordic Journal of International Law 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘The Relative Autonomy of International Law or the Forgotten Politics of Interdisciplinarity’ (2004–2005) 1 Journal of International Law and International Relations 35.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘International Courts and Informal International Law’, in Pauwelyn, , Wessel, , and Wouters, , (eds.) Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Towards a Culture of Formalism? Martti Koskenniemi and the Virtues’ (2013) 27 Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 417.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, International Law, second edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Klein, Natalie, Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, Harold H., ‘The Obama Administration and International Law’ (keynote address) (2010) 104 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Carls Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations’, in Byers, (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 17–34.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Global Governance and Public International Law’ (2004) 37 Kritische Justiz 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations – The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization’ (2007) 8 Theoretical Inquires in Law 9.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Case for Comparative International Law’ (2009) 20 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 1.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’ (2009) 15 European Journal of International Relations 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counterdisciplinarity’ (2011) 26 International Relations 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Hegemonic Regimes’, in Young, (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti and Leino, Päivi, ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltan, Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, second edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Krahmann, Elke, ‘American Hegemony or Global Governance? Competing Visions of International Security’ (2002) 7 International Studies Review 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’ (1982) 36 International Organization 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauthammer, Charles, ‘The Unipolar Moment’ (1990) 70 Foreign Affairs 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreps, Sarah E., Coalitions of Convenience: United States Interventions after the Cold War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krieger, Heike, ‘Coalitions of the Willing – A Résumé from the General Public International Law Point of View’, in Calliess, Nolte, and Stoll (eds.), Coalitions of the Willing: Avantgarde or Threat? (2007), pp. 43–50.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘Unilateral Enforcement of the Collective Will: Kosovo, Iraq and the Security Council’ (1999) 3 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, Nico, Selbstverteidigung und kollektive Sicherheit (Heidelberg: Springer, 2001).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘Article 43’, in Simma, , Khan, , Nolte, and Paulus, (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations, A Commentary, third edition, vol. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) p. 1351.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods’ (2014) 108 The American Journal of International Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘Liquid Authority in Global Governance’ (2017) 9 International Theory 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulovesi, Kati, ‘Addressing Sectoral Emissions outside the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: What Roles for Multilateralism, Minilateralism and Unilateralism?’ (2012) 21 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, Vinod, India and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: The Perennial Outlier (New Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kupchan, Charles A., No One’s World: The West, The Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwakwa, Edward, ‘The International Community, International Law, and the United States: Three in One, Two against One, Or One and the Same’, in Byers, and Nolte, (eds.), United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George, Moral Politics. What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don’t, second edition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate (Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, Thinking Points, Communicating Our American Values and Vision (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006).Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, Whose Freedom: The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea (New York: Picador/Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006).Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, ‘The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System’ (1980) 4 Cognitive Science 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, Metaphors We Live By, second edition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsen, Kjetil Mujezinović, ‘Attribution of Conduct in Peace Operations: The “Ultimate Authority and Control” Test’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Grotian Tradition in International Law’ (1946) 23 The British Yearbook of International Law 1.Google Scholar

Liu, Lydia H., The Clash of Empires: The Invention of China in Modern World Making (Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorca, Arnulf Becker, ‘Rules for the “Global War on Terror”: Implying Consent and Presuming Conditions for Intervention’ (2012) 45 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 1.Google Scholar

Lorca, Arnulf Becker, Mestizo International Law – A Global Intellectual History 1842–1993 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, ‘The Politics of Law-Making: Are the Method and Character of Norm Creation Changing?’, in Byers, (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 207–226.Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan et al. (eds.), The United Nations Security Council and War: The Evolution of Thought and Practice since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, Timothy J. and Singh, Robert S., After Bush: The Case for Continuity in American Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malirsch, Maximiliam and Prill, Florian, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative and the 2005 Protocol to the SUA Convention’ (2007) 67 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 229.Google Scholar

Malone, David M. (ed.), The UN Security Council, from the Cold War to the 21st Century (Colorado: International Peace Academy/Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen, ‘Concepts’, in Zalta, (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/concepts/.Google Scholar

Marquis, Christopher, ‘US Declares “Rogue Nations” are now “States of Concern”’, The New York Times (20 June 2000), at www.nytimes.com/2000/06/20/world/us-declares-rogue-nations-are-now-states-of-concern.html.Google Scholar

Matz-Lück, Nele, ‘Norm Interpretation across International Regimes: Competence and Legitimacy’, in Young, (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazower, Mark, No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S. and Feliciano, Florentino P., Law and Minimum World Public Order: The Legal Regulation of International Coercion (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Mcgee Jeffrey, Scott, ‘Exclusive Minilateralism: An Emerging Discourse within International Climate Change Governance?’ (2011) 8 Portal Journal of Multidisciplinary International 1.Google Scholar

Miles, Alex, US Foreign Policy and the Rogue State Doctrine (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Morgan, Rhiannon, Transforming Law and Institution: Indigenous Peoples, the United Nations and Human Rights (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011).Google Scholar

Moroney, Jennifer D. P. et al., Building Partner Capabilities for Coalition Operations (Pittsburgh: RAND Corporation, 2007).Google Scholar

Morse, Julia C. and Keohane, Robert O., ‘Contested Multilateralism’ (2014) 9 The Review of International Organizations 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mullen, Admiral Mike, Remarks As Delivered for the 17th International Seapower Symposium (21 September 2005), at www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/mullen/speeches/mullen050921.txt.Google Scholar

Münkler, Herfried, Imperien. Die Logik der Weltherrschaft – Vom alten Rom bis zu den Vereinigten Staaten (Berlin: Rowohlt, 2005).Google Scholar

N’Zatioula Grovogui, Siba, Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns and Africans (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Naím, Moisés, ‘Minilateralism: The Magic Number to Get Real International Action’, (July/August 2009) Foreign Policy 136.Google Scholar

Neto, Ibrahim Abdul Hak, Armas de Destruição em Massa no Século XXI: Novas Regras para um Velho Jogo. O Paradigma da Iniciativa de Segurança contra a Proliferação (Brasilia: FUNAG, 2011).Google Scholar

Nikitin, Mary Beth, ‘Proliferation Security Initiative’, Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress (Washington D.C., 15 July 2012).Google Scholar

Nino, Carlos S., Introducción al Análisis del Derecho, second edition, twelfth reprint (Buenos Aires: Astrea, 2013).Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, ‘Die “neuen Aufgaben” von NATO und WEU: Völker- und verfassungsrechtliche Fragen’ (1994) 54 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 95.Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, ‘Die USA und das Völkerrecht’ (2003) 78 Die Friedens-Warte 119.Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, ‘Kosovo und Konstitutionalisierung: Zur humanitären Intervention der NATO-Staaten’ (1999) 59 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 941.Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, ‘Treaties over Time in Particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice’, in Yearbook of the International Law Commission (2008), Volumen 2, Part II (New York and Geneva, 2015).Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S., The Future of Power (New York: Public Affairs, 2011).Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. Jr., ‘Will the Liberal Order Survive?’ (January/February 2017) Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar

Obama, Barack H., Remarks by President Barack Obama, Hradcany Square Prague, Czech Republic (4 April 2009), at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-barack-obama-prague-delivered.Google Scholar

Obama, Barack H., Remarks by the President at the United States Military Academy Commencement Ceremony (28 May 2014), at: www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/05/28/remarks-president-united-states-military-academy-commencement-ceremony.Google Scholar

Oberthür, Sebastian, ‘Regime-Interplay Management – Lessons from Environmental Policy and Law’ in Blome, Kerstin, Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, Franzki, Hannah, Markard, Nora, and Oeter, Stefan (eds.), Contested Regime Collisions – Norm Fragmentation in World Socidety (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 88–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahuja, Sundhya, Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patrick, Stewart, ‘“The Mission Determines the Coalition”: The United States and Multilateral Cooperation after 9/11’, in Jones, Bruce D., Forman, Shepard and Gowan, Richard (eds.), Cooperating for Peace and Security: Evolving Institutions and Arrangements in a Context of Changing U.S. Security Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 20–44.Google Scholar

Patrick, Stewart, ‘The Unruled World: The Case for Good Enough Global Governance’ (January/February 2014) Foreign Affairs 58.Google Scholar

Patrick, Stewart and Forman, Shepard (eds.), Multilateralism & U.S. Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement (London/Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Dennis, ‘Fashionable Nonsense’ (2003) 81 Texas Law Review 841.Google Scholar

Paulus, Andreas, ‘The War against Iraq and the Future of International Law: Hegemony or Pluralism?’ (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 691.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Informal International Lawmaking: Framing the Concept’, in Pauwelyn, , Wessel, , and Wouters, , Informal International Lawmaking, p. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A., and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penttilä, Risto E. J., The Role of the G8 in International Peace and Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press/International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2003).Google Scholar

Pernice, Ingolf, ‘Coalitions of the Willing and European Integration: Different Speed? A Core Europe?’, in Calliess, Nolte, and Stoll, (eds.), Coalitions of the Willing: Avantgarde or Threat? (2007), pp. 89–98.Google Scholar

Perry, Timothy C., ‘Blurring the Oceans Zones: The Effect of the Proliferation Security Initiative on the Customary International Law of the Sea’ (2006) 37 Ocean Development & International Law 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeil, Julia, ‘Völkerrechtliche Praxis der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in den Jahren 2000 bis 2002 (3. Teil Friedenssicherung)’ (2004) 64 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1105.Google Scholar

Phillips, John and Tan, Chrissie, ‘Langue and Parole’, in The Literary Encyclopedia, at www.litencyc.com/php/stopics.php?rec=true&UID=662.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven, ‘Block That Metaphor!’, The New Republic Online (6 October 2006), at https://newrepublic.com/article/77730/block-metaphor-steven-pinker-whose-freedom-george-lakoff.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven, The Stuff of Thought. Language as a Window into Human Nature (New York: Penguin Books, 2008).Google Scholar

Posner, Eric, ‘Obama’s Drone Dilemma’, Slate (8 October 2012), at www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2012/10/obama_s_drone_war_is_probably_illegal_will_it_stop_.html.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A., Catastrophe: Risk and Response (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, Colin (interview), Frontline (7 June, 2002), at www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/campaign/interviews/powell.html.Google Scholar

Powell, Colin L., ‘A Strategy of Partnerships’ (January/February 2004) Foreign Affairs 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prantl, Jochen, The UN Security Council and Informal Groups of States: Complementing or Competing for Governance? (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Structural Paradigms of International Law’, in Broude, Tomer and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity, Essays in Honour of Professor Ruth Lapidoth (Oxford: Hart, 2008), pp. 51–78.Google Scholar

Quigley, John, ‘The “Privatization” of Security Council Enforcement Action: A Threat to Multilateralism’ (1996) 17 Michigan Journal of International Law 249.Google Scholar

Rademaker, Steve, ‘International Coalitions of the Willing, Introduction’ (2005) 99 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 243.Google Scholar

Rahman, Chris, ‘The Global Maritime Partnership Initiative: Implications for the Royal Australian Navy’, Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs No. 24 (Canberra: Sea Power Centre Australia, 2008).Google Scholar

Randelzhofer, Albrecht and Nolte, Georg, ‘Article 51’, in Simma, , Khan, , Nolte, and Paulus, (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations, A Commentary, third edition, vol. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 1397.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, ‘The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law’ (2002) 43 Virginia Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar

Reinold, Theresa, ‘State Weakness, Irregular Warfare, and the Right to Self-Defense Post 9/11’ (2011) 105 The American Journal of International Law 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Risse, Thomas, ‘The Crisis of the Transatlantic Security Community’, in Bourantonis, Dimitris, Ifantis, Kostas and Tsakonas, Panayotis (eds.), Multilateralism and Security Institutions in an Era of Globalization (New York: Routledge, 2008), pp. 78–100.Google Scholar

Roach, Ashley, ‘Container and Port Security: A Bilateral Perspective’ (2003) 18 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, ‘Legality vs Legitimacy: Can Uses of Force be Illegal but Justified?’, in Alston, and Macdonald, (eds.), Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, Is International Law International? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, Stephen, Paul B., Verdier, Pierre-Hughes and Versteeg, Mila (eds.), Comparative International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘Coalitions of the Willing: Coyuntura, Contexto y Propiedades. Un Primer Esbozo’ (2007) 7 Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 675.Google Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘After TPP is Before TPP: Mexican Politics for Economic Globalization and the Lost Chance for Reflection’, in Benedict Kingsbury et al. (eds.), Megaregulation Contested: Global Economic Ordering After TPP (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘La Fragmentación del Derecho Internacional. ¿Riesgos u Oportunidades para México?’ (2009) 9 Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 373.Google Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘Non-Permanent Members of the United Nations Security Council and the Promotion of the International Rule of Law’ (2013) 5 Goettingen Journal of International Law 333.Google Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘La Guerra contra el Estado Islámico y el Legado Bush’, blog contribution, Nexos (2 October 2014), at http://eljuegodelacorte.nexos.com.mx/?p=4111.Google Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘Law and Violence in the Global South: The Legal Framing of Mexico’s “NARCO WAR”’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law (2018, forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘El Acuerdo de París: un empujoncito hacia la justicia climática’, blog contribution, Nexos (25 February 2015), at https://eljuegodelacorte.nexos.com.mx/?p=5680.Google Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘The Design of UN Sanctions through the Interplay with Informal Arrangements’, in van den Herik, Larissa (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law (Cheltenham /Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 2017), pp. 177–193.Google Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘The Great Promise of Comparative Public Law for Latin America – Toward Ius Commune Americanum?’, in Roberts, , Stephen, , Verdier, and Versteeg, (eds.), Comparative International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 501–522.Google Scholar

Rodiles, Alejandro, ‘The Tensions Between Local Resilience-Building and Transnational Action – US-Mexican Cooperation in Crime Affected Communities in Northern Mexico, And What This Tells About Global Urban Governance’, in Helmut P. Aust and Anél du Plessis (eds.), The Globalisation of Urban Governance - Legal Perspectives on Sustainable Development Goal 11 (Routledge, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Roele, Isobel, ‘Disciplinary Power and the UN Security Council Counter Terrorism Committee’ (2014) 19 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roessler, Frieder, ‘Law, De Facto Agreements and Declarations of Principle in International Economic Relations’ (1978) 21 German Yearbook of International Law 27.Google Scholar

Rogers, Peter, ‘The Etymology and Genealogy of a Contested Concept’, in Chandler, David and Coaffee, Jon (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience (Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2017), pp. 13–25.Google Scholar

Romero, Jessica, ‘Prevention of Maritime Terrorism: The Container Security Initiative’ (2003) 4 Chicago Journal of International Law 597.Google Scholar

Rosand, Eric, ‘The UN-Led Multilateral Institutional Response to Jihadist Terrorism: Is a Global Counterterrorism Body Needed?’ (2006) 11 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenau, James N., ‘Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics’, in Rosenau, James N. and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (eds.), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenau, James N., ‘Governing the Ungovernable: The Challenge of a Global Disaggregation of Authority’ (2007) 88 Regulation & Governance 1.Google Scholar

Ross, Alf, ‘On Self-Reference and a Puzzle in Constitutional Law’ (1969) 78 Mind 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rostow, Eugene V., ‘Until What? Enforcement Action or Collective Self-Defense?’ (1991) 85 The American Journal of International Law 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Brad R., ‘Coalitions of the Willing and the International Rule of Law’, in Calliess, , Nolte, , and Stoll, (eds.), Coalitions of the Willing: Avantgarde or Threat? (Germany: Carl Heymanns, 2007), pp. 33–42.Google Scholar

Rudolf, Peter and Wilzewski, Jürgen, ‘Beharrung und Alleingang: Das außenpolitische Vermächtnis William Jefferson Clintons’ (2000) 44 Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte x.Google Scholar

Rumsfeld, Donald A., ‘Transforming the Military’ (May/June 2002) Foreign Affairs 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruys, Tom and Verhoeven, Sten, ‘Attacks by Private Actors and the Right of Self-Defence’ (2005) 10 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabel, Charles F. and Victor, David G., ‘Making the Paris Process more Effective: A New Approach to Policy Coordination on Global Climate Change’, Policy Analysis Brief (The Stanley Foundation, February 2016).Google Scholar

Sanger, David E., ‘Bush Will Continue to Oppose Kyoto Pact on Global Warming’, The New York Times (12 June 2001).Google Scholar

Sarooshi, Danesh, The United Nations and the Development of Collective Security: The Delegation by the UN Security Council of its Chapter VII Powers (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Savaresi, Annalisa, ‘The Paris Agreement: A Rejoinder’, blog contribution, EJIL Talk! (16 February 2016), at www.ejiltalk.org/the-paris-agreement-a-rejoinder/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements’ (1977) 71 The American Journal of International Law 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, Oscar, ‘United Nations Law in the Gulf Conflict’ (1991) 85 The American Journal of International Law 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheinin, Martin, ‘Back to post 9/11 panic? Security Council Resolution on Foreign Terrorist Fighters’, blog contribution, Just Security (23 September 2014), at http://justsecurity.org/15407/post-911-panic-security-council-resolution-foreign-terrorist-fighters-scheinin/.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum, second edition (Berlin: Dunker & Humboldt, 1974).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Eric and Shanker, Thom, ‘Washington Recasts Terror War as “Struggle”’, The New York Times (27 July 2007), at www.nytimes.com/2005/07/26/world/americas/26iht-terror.html.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, ‘International Law and Global Public Goods in a Legal Pluralist World’ (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shanker, Thom, ‘White House Says the U.S. Is Not a Loner, Just Choosy’, The New York Times (31 July 2001), at www.nytimes.com/2001/07/31/world/white-house-says-the-us-is-not-a-loner-just-choosy.html?src=pm&pagewanted=2.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, ‘Fragmentation in a Positive Light’ (2003–2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 845.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte, Georg and Paulus, Andreas (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations, A Commentary, third edition, vol. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Simpson, Gerry, Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda’ (1993) 87 The American Journal of International Law 205.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Governing the Global Economy through Government Networks’, in Byers, (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 177–206.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Agencies on the Loose? Holding Government Networks Accountable’, in Bermann, George A., Herdegen, Matthias and Lindseth, Peter L. (eds.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Legal Problems and Political Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 521–546.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘America’s Edge: Power in the Networked Century’ (January/February 2009) Foreign Affairs 94.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: Twenty Years Later’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 613–625.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘The Paris Approach to Global Governance’, Project Syndicate (28 December 2015), at www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/paris-agreement-model-for-global-governance-by-anne-marie-slaughter-2015-12?barrier=accessreg.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, The Chessboard & the Web – Strategies of Connection in a Networked World (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Song, Yann-huei, ‘Security in the Strait of Malacca and the Regional Maritime Security Initiative: Responses to the US Proposal’, in Carsten, (ed.), Global Legal Challenges: Command of the Commons, Strategic Communications and Natural Disasters, vol. 83 (Newport: Naval War College, 2007) pp. 97–156.Google Scholar

Spring, Baker, ‘Harnessing the Power of Nations for Arms Control: The Proliferation Security Initiative and Coalitions of the Willing’, The Heritage Foundation, Backgrounder # 1737 (18 March 2004), at www.heritage.org/research/reports/2004/03/harnessing-the-power-of-nations-for-arms-control-the-proliferation-security-initiative-and-coalitions-of-the-willing.Google Scholar

Squassoni, Sharon, ‘Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI)’, CRS, Report for Congress (Washington D.C., 14 September 2006).Google Scholar

Staubach, Peter, The Rule of Unwritten International Law – Customary Law, General Principles, and World Order (London: Routledge, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Richard, ‘The Global Regulatory Challenge to US Administrative Law’ (2005) 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 695.Google Scholar

Su, Jinyuan, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative and the Interdiction at Sea: A Chinese Perspective’ (2012) 43 Ocean Development and International Law 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, Gavin, ‘Transnational Legal Assemblages and Global Security Law: Topologies and Temporalities of the List’ (2014) 5 Transnational Legal Theory 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism (New Haven/London: Yale University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Székely, Alberto, ‘Non-Binding Commitments: A Commentary on the Softening of International Law Evidenced in the Environmental Field’, in ILC (ed.), International Law on the Eve of the Twenty-First Century. Views from the International Law Commission (New York: United Nations Press, 1997), pp. 173–199.Google Scholar

Talbott, Strobe, The Great Experiment: The History of Ancient Empires, Modern States, and the Quest for a Global Nation (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008).Google Scholar

Talmon, Stefan, ‘The Statements by the President of the Security Council’ (2003) 2 Chinese Journal of International Law 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tams, Christian J., ‘The Use of Force against Terrorists’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanaka, Yoshifumi, The International Law of the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tharoor, Shashi, ‘Saving Humanity from Hell’, in Newman, Edward, Thakur, Ramesh and Tirman, John (eds.), Multilateralism under Challenge? Power, International Order, and Structural Change (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2002), pp. 21–33.Google Scholar

Toope, Stephen J., ‘Emergent Patterns of Governance and International Law’, in Byers, (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 91–108.Google Scholar

Triepel, Heinrich, Delegation und Mandat im Öffentlichen Recht. Eine Kritische Studie (Berlin/Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag, 1942).Google Scholar

Valencia, Mark, ‘Is the PSI Really a Cornerstone of a New International Norm?’ (2006) 59 Naval War College Review 123.Google Scholar

Valverde, Mariana, Chronotopes of Law – Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance (Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vihma, Antto, ‘Friendly Neighbor or Trojan Horse? Assessing the Interaction of Soft Law Initiatives and the UN Climate Regime’ (2009) 9 International Environmental Agreements 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viñuales, Jorge E., ‘The Paris Agreement: An Initial Examination (Part II of III)’, blog contribution, EJIL Talk! (8 Febraury 2016), at www.ejiltalk.org/the-paris-climate-agreement-an-initial-examination-part-ii-of-iii/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waismann, Friedrich, ‘Verifiability’ (1945) sup. vol. XIX Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)?’ (2002) 21 Law and Philosophy 137.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil, Intimations of Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walsh, Nick Paton and Labott, Elise, ‘Security Council Oks Syria Resolution, Warns of Consequences’, CNN (28 September 2013), at http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/27/world/meast/un-syria-resolution/.Google Scholar

Weber, Max, Economy and Society, Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus (eds.), volume one, (Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Weil, Prosper, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’ (1977) 77 The American Journal of International Law 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Edith Brown, ‘International Law in a Kaleidoscopic Word’ (2011) 1 Asian Journal of International Law 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weston, Burns H., ‘Security Council Resolution 678 and Persian Gulf Decision Making: Precarious Legitimacy’ (1991) 85 The American Journal of International Law 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, N. D. and Ülgen, Özlem, ‘The Security Council and the Decentralized Military Option: Constitutionality and Function’ (1997) 44 Netherlands International Law Review 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Gary, ‘The Legal, Military and Political Consequences of the “Coalition of the Willing” Approach to UN Military Enforcement Action’ (2007) 12 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winter, Steven L., A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life and Mind (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Freedom of Navigation: New Challenges (2008), at www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/statements_of_president/wolfrum/freedom_navigation_080108_eng.pdf.Google Scholar

Wood, Michael C., ‘The Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions’, in Frowein, Jochen A. and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, volume 2 (1998), p. 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Michael, ‘The Law on the Use of Force: Current Challenges’ (2007) 11 Singapore Year Book of International Law 1.Google Scholar

Yoo, John and Sulmasy, Glen, ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: A Model for International Cooperation’ (2006) 35 Hofstra Law Review 405.Google Scholar

Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zagaris, Bruce, ‘The Merging of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financial Enforcement Regimes after September 11, 2001’ (2004) 22 Berkeley Journal of International Law 123.Google Scholar

Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at https://plato.stanford.edu/.Google Scholar