Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r8w4l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T22:51:46.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 55 - Physiological MR of the spine

from Section 9 - The spine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

By
Claudia Wheeler-Kingshott  and
Olga Ciccarelli
Edited by
Jonathan H. Gillard ,
Adam D. Waldman  and
Peter B. Barker
Jonathan H. Gillard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Adam D. Waldman
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Peter B. Barker
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The spinal cord is a common site of involvement in neurological disorders, including tumors, trauma, degeneration, and demyelinating diseases. Disease in the spinal cord greatly contributes to a patient’s disability, causing motor, sensory, and sphincter dysfunction. However, imaging of the spinal cord is more challenging than that of the brain, and several technical limitations need to be overcome, including the small size of the cord, artifacts induced by susceptibility changes between tissue and bone, artifacts related to the chemical shift between water and fat, and artifacts induced by the motion arising from respiratory and cardiac motion and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pulsation. Conventional qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences may be useful to localize the damage and clarify the type of injury in the spinal cord, but they do not reflect the underlying pathological mechanisms, such as axonal integrity, myelin disruption, and gliosis. Therefore, there is a need to develop new quantitative MRI techniques to provide measures that are more pathologically specific and that may be used in the future to monitor therapies to enhance the mechanisms of spinal cord repair and improve clinical outcome.

This chapter reviews the main physiological MR techniques that have been used in the most common neurological diseases affecting the spinal cord before discussing possible future developments of imaging of the spine and promising clinical applications.

Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical MR Neuroimaging
Physiological and Functional Techniques
 , pp. 853 - 863
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gomez-Anson, B, MacManus, DG, Parker, GJ et al. In vivo 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the spinal cord in humans. Neuroradiology 2000; 42: 515–517.Google ScholarPubMed
Cooke, FJ, Blamire, AM, Manners, DN, et al. Quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the cervical spinal cord. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 1122–1128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marliani, AF, Clementi, V, Albini-Riccioli, L, et al. Quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human cervical spinal cord at 3 tesla. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 160–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendi, AT, Tan, FU, Kendi, M, et al. MR spectroscopy of cervical spinal cord in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology 2004; 46: 764–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blamire, AM, Cader, S, Lee, M, et al. Axonal damage in the spinal cord of multiple sclerosis patients detected by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 880–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciccarelli, O, Wheeler-Kingshott, CA, McLean, MA, et al. Spinal cord spectroscopy and diffusion-based tractography to assess acute disability in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2007; 130: 2220–2231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciccarelli, O, Altmann, DR, McLean, M, et al. Spinal cord repair in MS: does mitochondrial metabolism play a role Neurology 2009; in press.
Helms, G.Volume correction for edema in single-volume proton MR spectroscopy of contrast-enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 256–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henning, A, Schar, M, Kollias, SS, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the entire human cervical spinal cord and beyond at 3 T. Magn Reson Med, 2008; 59: 1250–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, YG, Choi, GH, Kim, DH, et al. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human spinal mass lesions. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004; 17: 405–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demir, A, Ries, M, Moonen, CT, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Radiology 2003; 229: 37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bammer, R, Fazekas, F.Diffusion imaging of the human spinal cord and the vertebral column. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 14: 461–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler-Kingshott, CA, Hickman, SJ, Parker, GJ, et al. Investigating cervical spinal cord structure using axial diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2002; 16: 93–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesseltine, SM, Law, M, Babb, J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in multiple sclerosis: assessment of regional differences in the axial plane within normal-appearing cervical spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1189–1193.Google ScholarPubMed
Valsasina, P, Rocca, MA, Agosta, F, et al. Mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy histogram analysis of the cervical cord in MS patients. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 822–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agosta, F, Benedetti, B, Rocca, MA, et al. Quantification of cervical cord pathology in primary progressive MS using diffusion tensor MRI. Neurology 2005; 64: 631–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agosta, F, Absinta, M, Sormani, MP, et al. In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Brain 2007; 130: 2211–2219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanmuganathan, K, Gullapalli, RP, Zhuo, J, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 655–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aota, Y, Niwa, T, Uesugi, M, et al. The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity. Spine 2008; 33: 814–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurnher, MM, Bammer, R. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in spinal cord ischemia. Neuroradiology 2006; 48: 795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agosta, F, Lagana, M, Valsasina, P, et al. Evidence for cervical cord tissue disorganisation with aging by diffusion tensor MRI. Neuroimage 2007; 36: 728–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Hecke, W, Leemans, A, Sijbers, J, et al. A tracking-based diffusion tensor imaging segmentation method for the detection of diffusion-related changes of the cervical spinal cord with aging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 978–991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozanne, A, Krings, T, Facon, D, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1271–1279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renoux, J, Facon, D, Fillard, P, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in inflammatory diseases of the spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1947–1951.Google ScholarPubMed
Ducreux, D, Lepeintre, JF, Fillard, P, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in 5 spinal cord astrocytomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 214–216.Google ScholarPubMed
Facon, D, Ozanne, A, Fillard, P, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord compression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1587–1594.Google ScholarPubMed
Ciccarelli, O, Catani, M, Johansen-Berg, H, et al. Diffusion based tractography in neurological disorders: concepts, applications and future developments. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 715–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, H, Golay, X, Pekar, JJ, et al. Sustained poststimulus elevation in cerebral oxygen utilization after vascular recovery. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2004; 24: 764–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, H, Law, M, Johnson, G, et al. Novel approach to the measurement of absolute cerebral blood volume using vascular-space-occupancy magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1403–1411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, H, Law, M, Ge, Y, et al. Quantitative measurement of spinal cord blood volume in humans using vascular-space-occupancy MRI. NMR Biomed 2008; 21: 226–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogawa, S, Lee, TM, Kay, AR, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 9868–9872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govers, N, Beghin, J, van Goethem, JW, et al. Functional MRI of the cervical spinal cord on 1.5 T with fingertapping: to what extent is it feasible? Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stracke, CP, Pettersson, LG, Schoth, F, et al. Interneuronal systems of the cervical spinal cord assessed with BOLD imaging at 1.5 T. Neuroradiology 2005; 47: 127–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroman, PW, Krause, V, Malisza, KL, et al. Extravascular proton-density changes as a non-BOLD component of contrast in fMRI of the human spinal cord. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 122–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroman, PW, Krause, V, Malisza, KL, et al. Characterization of contrast changes in functional MRI of the human spinal cord at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19: 833–838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, MC, Wong, KK, Li, G, et al. Proton-density-weighted spinal fMRI with sensorimotor stimulation at 0.2 T. Neuroimage 2006; 29: 995–999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroman, PW. Discrimination of errors from neuronal activity in functional MRI of the human spinal cord by means of general linear model analysis. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 452–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valsasina, P, Agosta, F, Caputo, DStroman, PW, Filippi, M., Spinal fMRI during proprioceptive and tactile tasks in healthy subjects: activity detected using cross-correlation, general linear model and independent component analysis. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 895–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, JC, Beckmann, CF, Miller, KL, et al. Physiological noise modelling for spinal functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neuroimage 2008; 39: 680–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckmann, CF, Smith, SM. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004; 23: 137–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corfield, DR, Murphy, K, Josephs, O, et al. Cortical and subcortical control of tongue movement in humans: a functional neuroimaging study using fMRI. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86: 1468–1477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Restom, K, Behzadi, Y, Liu, TT. Physiological noise reduction for arterial spin labeling functional MRI. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 1104–1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroman, PW, Krause, V, Malisza, KL, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human cervical spinal cord with stimulation of different sensory dermatomes. Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 20: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, JM, Stroman, PW, Kollias, SS. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human spinal cord during vibration stimulation of different dermatomes. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 273–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, MC, Wu, EX, Lau, HF, et al. Cervical spinal cord BOLD fMRI study: modulation of functional activation by dexterity of dominant and non-dominant hands. Neuroimage 2008; 39: 825–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xie, CH, Kong, KM, Guan, JT, et al. SSFSE sequence functional MRI of the human cervical spinal cord with complex finger tapping. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroman, PW, Tomanek, B, Krause, V, et al. Mapping of neuronal function in the healthy and injured human spinal cord with spinal fMRI. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 1854–1860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, YX, Kong, KM, Wang, WD, et al. Functional MR imaging of the spinal cord in cervical spinal cord injury patients by acupuncture at LI 4 (Hegu) and LI 11(Quchi). In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Engineering in Medical and Biological Science, 2007; pp. 3388–3391.Google Scholar
Xie, CH, Kong, KM, Guan, JT, et al. Functional MR imaging of the cervical spinal cord by use of 20 Hz functional electrical stimulation to median nerve. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Engineering in Medical and Biological Science, 2007; pp. 3392–3395.Google Scholar
Agosta, F, Valsasina, P, Rocca, MA, et al. Evidence for enhanced functional activity of cervical cord in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 1035–1042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agosta, F, Valsasina, P, Caputo, D, et al. Tactile-associated recruitment of the cervical cord is altered in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2008; 39: 1542–1548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edden, RA, Bonekamp, D, Smith, MA, et al. Proton MR spectroscopic imaging of the medulla and cervical spinal cord. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 1101–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevo, U, Hauben, E, Yoles, E, et al. Diffusion anisotropy MRI for quantitative assessment of recovery in injured rat spinal cord. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 45: 1–9.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, ED, Shumsky, JS, Wehrli, S, et al. Ex vivo MR determined apparent diffusion coefficients correlate with motor recovery mediated by intraspinal transplants of fibroblasts genetically modified to express BDNF. Exp Neurol 2003; 182: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freund, P, Schmidlin, E, Wannier, T, et al. Nogo-A-specific antibody treatment enhances sprouting and functional recovery after cervical lesion in adult primates. Nat Med 2006; 12: 790–792.Google ScholarPubMed
Farrell, JA, Smith, SA, Gordon-Lipkin, EM, et al. High b-value q-space diffusion-weighted MRI of the human cervical spinal cord in vivo: feasibility and application to multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 1079–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellingson, BM, Ulmer, JL, Schmit, BD. Gray and white matter delineation in the human spinal cord using diffusion tensor imaging and fuzzy logic. Acad Radiol 2007; 14: 847–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellingson, BM, Ulmer, JL, Schmit, BD. Morphology and morphometry of human chronic spinal cord injury using diffusion tensor imaging and fuzzy logic. Ann Biomed Eng 2008; 36: 224–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, DC. A general framework for experiment design in diffusion MRI and its application in measuring direct tissue-microstructure features. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 439–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duhamel, G, Callot V, Decherchi P, et al. Mouse lumbar and cervical spinal cord blood flow measurments by arterial spin labeling: sensitivity, optimization and first application. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 430–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×