Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:30:55.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

On the Significance of Historical Emissions for Climate Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Lukas H. Meyer
Affiliation:
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria
Pranay Sanklecha
Affiliation:
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria
Get access

Summary

We discuss the main underlying issues of the significance of historical emissions and their consequences: according to which principle current agents are responsible for them and whether past emitters' supposed ignorance of the long-term global consequences matters for the attribution of such responsibilities. We also discuss how taking into account historical emissions should inform policy choices.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumert, K., Herzog, T., and Pershing, J. (2005). Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (2008). Carbon Justice? The Case against a Universal Right to Equal Carbon Emissions. In Seeking Environmental Justice, ed. Wilks, S.. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 239–57.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (2011). Global Climate Justice, Historic Emissions, and Excusable Ignorance. Monist, 94(3), 391411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, L. (2011). A Lockean Defense of Grandfathering Emission Rights. In The Ethics of Global Climate Change, ed. Arnold, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–44.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2010). Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S. (2012). Just Emissions. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 40(4):255300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2009). Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. (2007). Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Farrelly, C. (2007). Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation. Political Studies, 55(4), 844–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2013). The Feasibility Constraint on the Concept of Justice. Philosophical Quarterly, 63(252), 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, P. (2012). Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(1), 3956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosseries, A. (2004). Historical Emissions and Free-Riding. Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 11(1), 3660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, A. A. (2007). Don’t Know, Don’t Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution. Philosophical Studies, 136(1), 5997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, E. (2011). Does Moral Ignorance Exculpate? Ratio, 24(4), 443–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, C. (2013). What Is Grandfathering? Environmental Politics, 22, 410–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, C. (2014). Moderate Emissions Grandfathering. Environmental Values, 23, 571–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolstad, C., Urama, K., Broome, J., Bruvoll, A., Fullerton, D., Gollier, C., Hahnemann, W. M., Hassan, R., Jotzo, F., Khan, M. R., Meyer, L., Mundaca, L., Olvera, C. (2015). Social, Economic, and Ethical Concepts and Methods. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Edenhofer, O. et al. New York: Cambridge University Press, 207282.Google Scholar
Kumar, R. (2003). Who Can Be Wronged? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31, 98118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R., and Silver, D. (2004). The Legacy of Injustice: Wronging the Future, Responsibility for the Past. In Justice in Time: Responding to Historical Injustice, ed. Meyer, L. H.. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 145–58.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (1997). More than They Have a Right to: Future People and Our Future Oriented Projects. In Contingent Future Persons: On the Ethics of Deciding Who Will Live, or Not, in the Future, ed. Fotion, N. and Heller, J. C.. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic, pp. 137–56.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (2004). Compensating Wrongless Historical Emissions of Greenhouse Gases. Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 11(1), 2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. (ed.) (2004). Justice in Time: Responding to Historical Injustice. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Meyer, L., (2006). Reparations and Symbolic Restitution. Journal of Social Philosophy, 37(3), 406–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. (2013). Why Historical Emissions Should Count. Chicago Journal of International Law, 13(2), 598614.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (2015). Intergenerational Justice. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta, URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/justice-intergenerational/.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. and Roser, D. (2006). Distributive Justice and Climate Change: The Allocation of Emission Rights. Analyse & Kritik 28(2), 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. and Roser, D. (2010). Climate Justice and Historical Emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 229–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. and Sanklecha, P. (2009). Introduction: Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law: Three Perspectives on the Debate. In Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law, ed. Meyer, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. and Sanklecha, P. (2011). Individual Expectations and Climate Change. Analyse & Kritik, 32(2), 449–71.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. and Sanklecha, P. (2014). How Legitimate Expectations Matter in Climate Justice, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 13(3), 369–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2008). Political Philosophy for Earthlings. In Political Theory: Methods and Approaches, ed. Leopold, D. and Stears, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. W. (2005). “Ideal Theory” as Ideology. Hypatia, 20(3), 165–83.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. (1987). Abstraction, Idealization and Ideology in Ethics. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series, 22, 5569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E. (2006). Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1986). Comments. Ethics, 96, 832–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1951). Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics. Philosophical Review, 60, 177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, G. (2004). Skepticism about Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 295313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2013). Death and the Afterlife. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuessler, R. (2011). Climate Justice: A Question of Historic Responsibility? Journal of Global Ethics, 7, 261–78.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2006). What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice? Journal of Philosophy, 103, 215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (2011). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stemplowska, Z. (2008). What’s Ideal about Ideal Theory? Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, A. (2008). The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances. Social Theory and Practice, 34, 363–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. (2012). Identity and Obligation in a Transgenerational Polity. In Intergenerational Justice, ed. Gosseries, A. and Meyer, L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2549.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (1997). Moral Responsibility and Ignorance. Ethics, 107, 410–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×