Book contents
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Climate Ethics, Affirmative Action, and Unjust Enrichment
- 2 Historical Responsibility and Climate Change
- 3 Historical Emissions
- 4 How Legal Systems Deal with Issues of Responsibility for Past Harmful Behavior
- 5 Asking Beneficiaries to Pay for Past Pollution
- 6 Benefiting from Unjust Acts and Benefiting from Injustice
- 7 A Luck-Based Moral Defense of Grandfathering
- 8 In Defense of Emissions Egalitarianism?
- 9 In the Name of Political Possibility
- 10 Right to Development and Historical Emissions
- Index
- References
1 - Climate Ethics, Affirmative Action, and Unjust Enrichment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2017
By
Book contents
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Climate Ethics, Affirmative Action, and Unjust Enrichment
- 2 Historical Responsibility and Climate Change
- 3 Historical Emissions
- 4 How Legal Systems Deal with Issues of Responsibility for Past Harmful Behavior
- 5 Asking Beneficiaries to Pay for Past Pollution
- 6 Benefiting from Unjust Acts and Benefiting from Injustice
- 7 A Luck-Based Moral Defense of Grandfathering
- 8 In Defense of Emissions Egalitarianism?
- 9 In the Name of Political Possibility
- 10 Right to Development and Historical Emissions
- Index
- References
Summary
Climate ethics typically calls for the consideration of both backward- and forward-looking considerations and hence can gain insight from the structural analogy to the issue of affirmative action. Yet, unlike affirmative action, global warming has not been the effect of wrongful behaviour (like slavery or colonial oppression). Still, it is argued here, the present generation in the developed countries carries a special duty to restrict their emissions due to what may be referred to as the unjust enrichment from which they benefited through the continued depletion of the absorption capacity of the atmosphere by their ancestors. Consequently, past polluters cannot be morally blamed for the current ecological crisis, but we, as beneficiaries of their actions, owe those who have been harmed restitution. Present people, who know the risks of continuing pollution, owe developing countries compensation. Future people, after having settled the historical accounts of restitution and compensation, will have to share the burdens of mitigation and adaptation on the basis of distributive justice.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions , pp. 22 - 45Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Appiah, K. A. (2011). Group Rights and Racial Affirmative Action. Journal of Ethics, 15, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kama, folio 20a-b.Google Scholar
Bovens, L. (2014). A Lockean Defense of Grandfathering Emission Rights. In The Ethics of Global Climate Change, ed. Arnold, D. G.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–144.Google Scholar
Broome, J. (2012). The Public and Private Morality of Climate Change. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. University of Michigan, March 16. URL: http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Broome%20Lecture.pdf.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2006). Environmental Degradation, Reparations, and the Moral Significance of History. Journal of Social Philosophy, 37, 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duus-Otterström, G. (2014). The Problem of Past Emissions and Intergenerational Debts. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17, 448–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. M. (2010). Ethics and Global Climate Change. In Climate Ethics: Essential Readings, ed. Gardiner, S., Caney, S., Jamieson, D., and Shue, H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosseries, A. (2004). Historical Emissions and Free-Riding. Ethical Perspectives, 11(1), 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, K. (2009). A Just Response to Climate Change: Personal Carbon Allowances and the Normal-Functioning Approach. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyd, D. (2009). The Intractability of the Nonidentity Problem. In Harming Future Persons, ed. Roberts, M. and Wasserman, D.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimchuk, D. (2004). Unjust Enrichment and Reparations for Slavery. Boston University Law Review, 84, 1257–1276.Google Scholar
Margalioth, Y. (2012). Assessing Moral Claims in International Climate Change Negotiations. Journal of Energy, Climate, and the Environment, 3, 42–80.Google Scholar
Margalioth, Y. (2013). Analysis of the US Case in Climate Change Negotiations. Chicago Journal of International Law, 13(2), 489–505.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. H., and Roser, D. (2006). Distributive Justice and Climate Change: The Allocation of Emission Rights. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2008). Global Justice and Climate Change: How Should Responsibilities be Distributed? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Beijing: Tsinghua University, March 24–25. URL: http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/m/Miller_08.pdf.Google Scholar
Mora, C. et al. (2013). The Projected Timing of Climate Departure from Recent Variability. Nature, 502, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumayer, E. (2000) In Defence of Historical Accountability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Ecological Economics, 33, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E. A. (2012). Give It Up for Climate Change: A Defence of the Beneciary Pays Principle. International Theory, 4, 300–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E. A. and Weisbach, D. (2010). Climate Change Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, G. (2002). Principles for Measuring the Damages of American Slavery. Public Affairs Quarterly, 16, 377–404.Google Scholar
Sebok, A. J. (2002). The Brooklyn Slavery Class Action: More than Just a Political Gambit. April 9. URL: http://writ.news.findlaw.com/sebok/20020409.html.Google Scholar
Shue, H. (1999). Global Environment and International Inequality. International Affairs, 75, 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. (2010). One Atmosphere. In Climate Ethics: Essential Readings, ed. Gardiner, S., Caney, S., Jamieson, D., and Shue, H.. Oxford University Press, pp. 181–199.Google Scholar
Traxler, M. (2002). Fair Chore Division for Climate Change. Social Theory and Practice, 28(1), 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5
- Cited by