Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-6m42z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T21:09:40.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Beyond mean climate change: what climate models tell us about future climate extremes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2009

By
Claudia Tebaldi  and
Gerald A. Meehl
Edited by
Henry F. Diaz  and
Richard J. Murnane
Claudia Tebaldi
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
Gerald A. Meehl
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
Henry F. Diaz
Affiliation:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, District of Columbia
Richard J. Murnane
Affiliation:
Bermuda Biological Station for Research, Garrett Park, Maryland
Get access

Summary

Condensed summary

Atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) necessarily have a limited ability to simulate extreme phenomena, due to their finite – and currently still relatively coarse – resolution. Nevertheless, recent studies have analyzed output from AOGCMs in order to assess their ability to simulate current extremes, mostly temperature-related, in order to infer what the future may bring, under scenarios of continuing and increasing greenhouse gas emissions.

We present results of analyzing heat wave changes as projected by the Parallel Climate Model (PCM; National Center for Atmospheric Research/US Department of Energy [NCAR/DOE]) under a “business as usual” emission scenario, pointing at future increases in frequency, duration, and intensity of heat waves. We also describe a broader study of extreme indicators from multiple AOGCMs that contributed their output as part of the activities Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

We looked at ten different indicators, describing aspects of extreme temperature and precipitation events, for current climate and for the rest of the twenty-first century, under a range of emissions scenarios. We find strong and consistent signals of changes towards warmer temperature extremes, and an overall agreement of the different models on the intensification of precipitation, particularly in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere.

Introduction

Atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) are the principal tools at our disposal when we seek to characterize projections of future climate. Many studies in the past decade have addressed projected changes in global average temperature and precipitation, and other general climate indicators.

Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Extremes and Society , pp. 99 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, L. V., Zhang, X., Peterson, T. C., et al. (2006). Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmosphere, 111, D5, D05109, doi:10.1029/2005JD006290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, S. (2001). An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covey, C. K., AchutaRao, K. M., Cubasch, U., et al. (2003). An overview of the results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Global and Planetary Change, 37, 103–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, H. F., and Bradley, R. S. (eds.) (2005). The Hadley Circulation: Present, Past and Future (Advances in Global Change Research). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Duffy, P. B., Govindasamy, B., Iorio, J. P., et al. (2003). High-resolution simulations of global climate, part 1: present climate. Climate Dynamics, 21, 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., et al. (2000). Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science, 289, 2068–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frich, P., Alexander, L. V., Della-Marta, P., et al. (2002). Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Climate Research, 19, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govindasamy, B., Duffy, P. B., and Coquard, J. (2003). High-resolution simulations of global climate, part 2: effects of increased greenhouse gases. Climate Dynamics, 21, 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, R., Kysely, J., and Pokorna, L. (2000). A GCM simulation of heat waves, dry spells and their relationships to circulation. Climate Change, 46, 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, T. R., and Knight, R. W. (1997). The 1995 Chicago heat wave: how likely is a recurrence?Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78 (6), 1107–19.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R. W., and Brown, B. G. (1994). Sensitivity of extreme events to climate change: the case of autocorrelated time-series. Environmetrics, 5, 451–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiktev, D., Sexton, D., Alexander, L., and Folland, C. (2003). Comparison of modeled and observed trends in indices of daily climate extremes. Journal of Climate, 16, 3560–71.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, K. E., Pielke, R. Jr., and Changnon, S. A. (1999). Temporal fluctuations in weather and climate extremes that cause economic and human health impacts: a review. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80, 1077–98.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, G. A., and Tebaldi, C. (2004). More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the twenty-first century. Science, 305, 994–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., and Tebaldi, C. (2005). Understanding future patterns of increased precipitation intensity in climate model simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, Art. No. L18719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, G. A., Karl, T., Easterling, D., et al. (2000). An introduction to trends in extreme weather and climate events: observations, socioeconomic impacts, terrestrial ecological impacts, and model projections. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81, 413–16.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, G. A., Tebaldi, C., and Nychka, D. (2004). Changes in frost days in simulations of twenty-first-century climate. Climate Dynamics, 23, 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakicenovic, N., and Swart, R. (eds.) (2000). Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schär, C., Vidale, P. L., Lüthi, D., et al. (2004). The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heat waves. Nature, 427, 332–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherrer, S. C., Appenzeller, C., Liniger, M. A., and Schär, C. (2005). European temperature distribution changes in observations and climate change scenarios. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, Art. No. L19705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semenov, V., and Bengtsson, L. (2002). Secular trends in daily precipitation characteristics: greenhouse gas simulation with a coupled AOGCM. Climate Dynamics, 19(2), 123–40.Google Scholar
Tebaldi, C., Hayhoe, K., Arblaster, J. M., and Meehl, G. A. (2007). Going to the extremes: an intercomparison of model-simulated historical and future changes in extreme events. Climatic Change, 79, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, W. M., Weatherly, J. W., Meehl, G. A., et al. (2000). Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations. Climate Dynamics, 16, 755–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, J. (2005). A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of twenty-first-century climate. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, Art. No. L18701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Hegerl, G., Zwiers, F. W., and Kenyon, J. (2005). Avoiding inhomogeneity in percentile-based indices of temperature extremes. Journal of Climate, 18 (11), 1641–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×