Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Part I Framings
- Part II Equity
- Part III Ethics
- Part IV Reflexivity
- 9 Linking sustainable development with climate change adaptation and mitigation
- 10 Global poverty and climate change: towards the responsibility to protect
- 11 Social contracts in a changing climate: security of what and for whom?
- 12 Towards a new science on climate change
- Index
- References
9 - Linking sustainable development with climate change adaptation and mitigation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Part I Framings
- Part II Equity
- Part III Ethics
- Part IV Reflexivity
- 9 Linking sustainable development with climate change adaptation and mitigation
- 10 Global poverty and climate change: towards the responsibility to protect
- 11 Social contracts in a changing climate: security of what and for whom?
- 12 Towards a new science on climate change
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Climate change impacts, and potential adaptive and mitigative responses, have been the subject of major assessments by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), including the Fourth Assessment Report, which was published in 2007. Throughout the assessment process, increasing attention was focused on linkages between climate change responses and sustainable development, in part because climate change adds to the list of stressors that challenge the ability to achieve the ecologic, economic and social objectives that define sustainable development. Development choices, furthermore, can inadvertently result in altered vulnerabilities to climate variability and change, changed patterns of energy and material consumption and, consequently, emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants. Risks to human security could increase because global climate change interacts with specific regional stresses, including ecosystem degradation, economic difficulties, exposure to climate-related impacts, low response capacities and weak governance systems at sub-national and national scales (Barnett and Adger, 2007).
Klein et al. (2005) suggest that climate policy can evolve to facilitate the successful embedding of climate change within broader development goals to help reduce vulnerability and insecurity, but the integration of adaptation and mitigation at different operational scales remains a challenge (Jones et al., 2007). Although these responses are widely regarded as complements rather than substitutes, gaps in our understanding of the various capacities that are required to carry out these responses have prevented a truly integrated assessment of response options.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Change, Ethics and Human Security , pp. 157 - 179Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, ed. 2005. Bridge over Troubled Waters: Linking Climate Change and Development. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.
2006. Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-building in the Philippines. Disasters, 30, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2007. Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26, 639–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. 2002. Linkages between climate change and sustainable development. Climate Policy, 2, 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2002. Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as learning machines. Global Environmental Change, 12, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds. 2007. Integrating climate change actions into local development. Climate Policy, Special Issue, 4, 105.
and 2007. Beyond capacity: a framework for explaining the links between capacity and action in response to global climate change. Climate Policy, 4, 304–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2007. Upscaling the results of local research on adaptation, mitigation and sustainable development. Climate Policy, 4, 353–70.Google Scholar
, , et al. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. PNAS 100, 8086–91. Available online: http://www.pnas.org/content/100/14/8086.full?sid=65702fcc-255f-4f93-a872-5845f44f4492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2000. Introducing interactive social science. Science and Public Policy, 27, 154–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2003. The role of constructivist learning in scenario planning, Futures, 35, 445–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2006. Participatory Integrated Assessment of Water Management and Climate Change in the Okanagan Basin, British Columbia. Final report, Project A846, submitted to Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Environment Canada and University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
and 2009. Climate Change in the 21st Century. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
, , et al. 2006. Learning with local help: expanding the dialogue on climate change and water management in the Okanagan Region, British Columbia, Canada. Climatic Change, 75, 331–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. Engaging stakeholders in the adaptation process. In and , eds., Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–66.Google Scholar
and , eds. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny?London: Zed Books.
, and 2003. Synergy of adaptation and mitigation strategies in the context of sustainable development: the case of Vietnam. Climate Policy, 3, S81–S96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. 1997. Focus Groups in Integrated Assessments: A Manual for a Participatory Tool. ULYSSES working paper, WP-97–2, Darmstadt: Darmstadt University of Technology.Google Scholar
and 2006. Helping operationalise Article 2: a transdisciplinary methodological tool for evaluating when climate change is dangerous. Global Environmental Change, 16, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 569–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Setting the stage, a dramaturgy of policy deliberation. Administration & Society, 36, 624–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2001. The relevance of participatory approaches in integrated environmental assessment. Integrated Assessment, 2, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2006. Facing dilemmas: sense-making and decision-making in late modernity. Futures, 38, 350–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and 2004. Exploring the Future of the Ijsellmeer: Report of the River Dialogue Project on the Dutch Citizen's Juries, Amsterdam: Institute for Environment Studies, Vrije Universitat, 94 pp.Google Scholar
, , et al. 2006. The significance of context in community-based research: understanding discussions about wildfire in Huslia, Alaska. Ecology and Society, 11, article 40. Available online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art40/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 419–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2007. The relationship between adaptation and mitigation in managing climate change risks: a regional response from North Central Victoria, Australia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12, 685–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2005. Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 579–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2002. The Earth is Faster Now: Indigenous Observations of Arctic Environmental Change. Washington, DC: ARCUS.
, , , and 2007. An exploration of water resources futures under climate change using system dynamics modeling. The Integrated Assessment Journal, 7(1), 51–79.Google Scholar
, , , and 2000. A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment. Part II: a scenario-based case study in East Anglia (UK). Global Environmental Change, 10, 145–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , eds., 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation; Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
, , , and , eds., 2001. Climate Change 2001. Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
, , , and , eds., 2007. Climate Change 2007. Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2005. Impacts assessments and policy responses to sea-level rise in three US states: an exploration of human dimension uncertainties. Global Environmental Change, 15, 353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2006. Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaptation decision-making on climate change in Norway. Global Environmental Change, 16, 221–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Interactive social sciences: patronage or partnership?Science and Public Policy, 27, 211–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 18, 529–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and , eds. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
, and 2006. ‘Signals’ from pre-crisis discourse: lessons from UK flooding for global environmental policy change?Global Environmental Change, 16, 323–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. Past and future of backcasting: the shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures, 38, 1027–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , eds. 2006. Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
1994. Backcasting. In , ed., The Encyclopedia of Conservation and Environmentalism. New York, NY: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
2003. Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35, 839–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. Co-production, emergent properties, and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project. Science and Public Policy, 33, 151–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. 2006. Climate change and sustainable development: realizing the opportunity. Ambio, 35, 2–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1998. Methods for IA: the challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3, 155–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1996. Integrated assessment: a growing child on its way to maturity. Climatic Change, 34, 327–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. Managing the interrelations among urban infrastructure, population, and institutions. Climate Policy, 4, 317–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters, 30, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , et al. 2001. Overview of impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability to climate change Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. In , , , and , eds., Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–103.Google Scholar
, and 2006. Context matters: what shapes adaptation to water stress in the Okanagan. Climatic Change, 78, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. The legacy of the Kyoto Protocol: its role as the rulebook for an international climate framework. International Review for Environmental Strategies, 5, 3–14.Google Scholar
, , et al. 2007. Preparing for Climate Change: A Guidebook for Local, Regional, and State Governments. Oakland, CA: ICLEI (Local Governments for Sustainability), 172 pp.Google Scholar
, and 2004. The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analyses. Global Environmental Change, 14, 137–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2003. Climate change and sustainable development: expanding the options. Climate Policy, 3, S19–S40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2002. The future is not what it used to be: participatory integrated assessment in the Georgia Basin. Global Environmental Change, 12, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy. Environmental Sciences and Policy, 8, 562–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2008. Managing the inconceivable: participatory assessments of impacts and responses to extreme climate change. Climatic Change, 91, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2004. A scoping study of user needs for integrated assessment of climate change in the UK context: Part 1 of the development of an interactive integrated assessment process. Integrated Assessment, 4, 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Socio-economic scenarios for climate change impact assessment: a guide to their use in the UK Climate Impacts Programme. Oxford, UK: UKCIP.
and 2002. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change, 12, 167–84.Google Scholar
and 2005. Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: methodological considerations. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 72, 733–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Debating climate change: a study of stakeholder participation in an integrated assessment of long-term climate policy in the Netherlands. Utrecht: Lemma Publishers.Google Scholar
2004. Mediated modeling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
, and 2006. Science-based stakeholder dialogues: theories and tools. Global Environmental Change, 16, 170–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , 2006. Functions of scenarios in transition processes. Futures, 38, 740–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. Linking climate change adaptation, mitigation and sustainable development with structured decision-making tools: the Gateway Program example, Climate Policy, 4, 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and 2006. What factors influence mitigative capacity?Energy Policy, 35, 692–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 12, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. ‘Mitigative capacity: the mirror image of adaptive capacity on the emissions side. Climatic Change, 49, 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10
- Cited by