Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:18:36.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2019

Horaƫiu Năstase
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goldstein, H., Poole, C., and Safko, J., Classical mechanics, 3rd edition, Addison-Wesley, 2002.Google Scholar
Georgi, H., Lie algebras in particle physics, Perseus Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M., Course of theoretical physics, vol 2: The classical theory of fields, 4th edition, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 2007.Google Scholar
Peskin, M. E. and Schroeder, D. V., An introduction to quantum field theory, Avalon Publishing, 1995.Google Scholar
Burgess, M., Classical covariant fields, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M., Course of theoretical physics, vol. 6: Fluid mechanics, 2nd edition, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 2007.Google Scholar
Bohr, T., Jensen, M. H., Paladin, G., and Vulpiani, A., Dynamical systems approach to turbulence, Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Babelon, O., Bernard, D., and Talon, M., Introduction to classical integrable systems, Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. D., Quantum field theory and the standard model, Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Sterman, G., An introduction to quantum field theory, Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S., The quantum theory of fields, vol. I: Foundations, Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Alves, D. W. F., Hoyos, C., Nastase, H., and Sonnenschein, J., “Knotted solutions, from electromagnetism to fluid dynamics,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, no. 33, 1750200 (2017) [arXiv:1707.08578 [hep-th]].Google Scholar
Rajaraman, R., Solitons and instantons: An introduction to solitons and instantons in quantum field theory, North Holland, 1982.Google Scholar
Manton, N. and Sutcliffe, P., Topological solitons, Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Nastase, H., “DBI skyrmion, high energy (large s) scattering and fireball production,” [arXiv:hep-th/0512171].Google Scholar
Nastase, H., String theory methods for condensed matter physics, Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Nastase, H. and Sonnenschein, J., “More on Heisenberg’s model for high energy nucleon-nucleon scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 105028 (2015) [arXiv:1504.01328 [hep-th]].Google Scholar
Alvarez-Gaume, L. and Hassan, S. F., “Introduction to S duality in N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories: A pedagogical review of the work of Seiberg and Witten,” Fortsch. Phys. 45, 159 (1997) [hep-th/9701069].Google Scholar
Kolb, E. W. and Turner, M. S., The early universe, Westview Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. R., “Q balls,” Nucl. Phys. B 262, 263 (1985) Erratum: [Nucl. Phys. B 269, 744 (1986)].Google Scholar
Lee, T. D. and Pang, Y., “Nontopological solitons,” Phys. Rept. 221, 251 (1992).Google Scholar
Taubes, C. H., “Arbitrary N-vortex solutions to the first order Landau-Ginzburg equations,” Commun. Math. Phys. 72, 277 (1980).Google Scholar
Samols, T. M., “Vortex scattering,” Commun. Math. Phys. 145, 149 (1992).Google Scholar
Manton, N. S. and Speight, J. M., “Asymptotic interactions of critically coupled vortices,” Commun. Math. Phys. 236, 535 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0205307].Google Scholar
Mohammed, A., Murugan, J., and Nastase, H., “Looking for a Matrix model of ABJM,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 086004 (2010) [arXiv:1003.2599 [hep-th]].Google Scholar
Mohammed, A., Murugan, J., and Nastase, H., “Abelian-Higgs and vortices from ABJM: Towards a string realization of AdS/CMT,” JHEP 1211, 073 (2012) [arXiv:1206.7058 [hep-th]].Google Scholar
Gervais, J. L., Jevicki, A., and Sakita, B., “Collective coordinate method for quantization of extended systems,” Phys. Rept. 23, 281 (1976).Google Scholar
Christ, N. H. and Lee, T. D., “Quantum expansion of soliton solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 12, 1606 (1975).Google Scholar
Gervais, J. L. and Jevicki, A., “Point canonical transformations in path integral,” Nucl. Phys. B 110, 93 (1976).Google Scholar
Gervais, J. L. and Jevicki, A., “Quantum scattering of solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 110, 113 (1976).Google Scholar
Jevicki, A. and Sakita, B., “The quantum collective field method and its application to the planar limit,” Nucl. Phys. B 165, 511 (1980).Google Scholar
Nastase, H., Stephanov, M. A., Nieuwenhuizen, P. van, and Rebhan, A., “Topological boundary conditions, the BPS bound, and elimination of ambiguities in the quantum mass of solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 542, 471 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9802074].Google Scholar
Dunne, G. V., “Aspects of Chern-Simons theory,” [arXiv:hep-th/9902115].Google Scholar
Rao, S., “An Anyon primer,” [arXiv:hep-th/9209066].Google Scholar
Witten, E., “Three lectures on topological phases of matter,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39, no. 7, 313 (2016) [arXiv:1510.07698 [cond-mat.mes-hall]].Google Scholar
Moore, G. W. and Read, N., “Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect,” Nucl. Phys. B 360, 362 (1991).Google Scholar
Townsend, P. K., Pilch, K., and Nieuwenhuizen, P. van, “Selfduality in odd dimensions,” Phys. Lett. 136B, 38 (1984) Addendum: [Phys. Lett.137B, 443 (1984)].Google Scholar
Murugan, J. and Nastase, H., “A nonabelian particle-vortex duality in gauge theories,” JHEP 1608, 141 (2016) [arXiv:1512.08926 [hep-th]].Google Scholar
Murugan, J., Nastase, H., Rughoonauth, N., and Shock, J. P., “Particle-vortex and Maxwell duality in the AdS4 × CP3/ABJM correspondence,” JHEP 1410, 51 (2014) [arXiv:1404.5926 [hep-th]].Google Scholar
Peebles, J., Principles of physical cosmology, Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. and Rosen, N., “On gravitational waves,” J. Franklin Inst., 223, 43 (1937).Google Scholar
Khan, K. A. and Penrose, R., “Scattering of two impulsive gravitational plane waves,” Nature 229, 185 (1971).Google Scholar
Vilenkin, A., “Gravitational field of vacuum domain walls and strings,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 852 (1981).Google Scholar
Vilenkin, A., “Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls,” Phys. Lett. 133B, 177 (1983).Google Scholar
Gott, J. R., III, “Gravitational lensing effects of vacuum strings: Exact solutions,” Astrophys. J. 288, 422 (1985).Google Scholar
Banados, M., Teitelboim, C., and Zanelli, J., “The black hole in three-dimensional space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992) [arXiv:hep-th/9204099].Google Scholar
Carlip, S., “The (2+1)-dimensional black hole,” Class. Quant. Grav. 12, 2853 (1995) [gr-qc/9506079].Google Scholar
Taub, A. H., “Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions,” Annals Math. 53, 472 (1951).Google Scholar
Newman, E., Tamburino, L., and Unti, T., “Empty space generalization of the Schwarzschild metric,” J. Math. Phys. 4, 915 (1963).Google Scholar
Misner, C. W., “The flatter regions of Newman, Unti and Tamburino’s generalized Schwarzschild space,” J. Math. Phys. 4, 924 (1963).Google Scholar
Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, G. F. R., The large scale structure of space-time, Cambrigde University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. W., “Gravitational instantons,” Phys. Lett. A 60, 81 (1977).Google Scholar
Page, D. N., “Taub-NUT instanton with an horizon,” Phys. Lett. 78B, 249 (1978).Google Scholar
Eguchi, T. and Hanson, A. J., “Asymptotically flat selfdual solutions to Euclidean gravity,” Phys. Lett. 74B, 249 (1978).Google Scholar
Gibbons, G. W. and Hawking, S. W., “Gravitational multi-instantons,” Phys. Lett. 78B, 430 (1978).Google Scholar
Eguchi, T. and Hanson, A. J., “Selfdual solutions to Euclidean gravity,” Annals Phys. 120, 82 (1979).Google Scholar
Eguchi, T. and Hanson, A. J., “Gravitational instantons,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 11, 315 (1979).Google Scholar
Rubakov, V., Classical theory of gauge fields, Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Horaƫiu Năstase, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo
  • Book: Classical Field Theory
  • Online publication: 04 March 2019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Horaƫiu Năstase, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo
  • Book: Classical Field Theory
  • Online publication: 04 March 2019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Horaƫiu Năstase, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo
  • Book: Classical Field Theory
  • Online publication: 04 March 2019
Available formats
×