Antar, M., Lyu, D., Nazari, M., Shah, A., Zhou, X., & Smith, D. L. (2021). Biomass for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: An Overview of World Biomass Production and Utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 139, 110691.Google Scholar

Baumann, H., & Tillman, A.-M. (2004). The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA : An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Application. Lund: Studentlitteratur, Print.Google Scholar

Benoît, C., Andrews, E., Barthel, L., … Manhart, A. (2009). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and life cycle costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development.Google Scholar

Bouillass, G., Blanc, I., & Perez-Lopez, P. (2021). Step-by-Step Social Life Cycle Assessment Framework: A Participatory Approach for the Identification and Prioritization of Impact Subcategories Applied to Mobility Scenarios. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26(12), 2408–2435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carus, M., & Dammer, L. (2018). The Circular Bioeconomy – Concepts, Opportunities, and Limitations. Industrial Biotechnology, 14(2), 83–91.Google Scholar

D’Adamo, I., Falcone, P. M., & Morone, P. (2020). A New Socio-economic Indicator to Measure the Performance of Bioeconomy Sectors in Europe. Ecological Economics, 176, 106724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Ioppolo, G., & Morone, P. (2022). An Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Italian Cities: Performance Measurements and Policy Implications. Land Use Policy, 120, 106278.Google Scholar

Dahiya, S., Katakojwala, R., Ramakrishna, S., & Mohan, S. V. (2020). Biobased Products and Life Cycle Assessment in the Context of Circular Economy and Sustainability. Materials Circular Economy, 2(1), 7.Google Scholar

de Besi, M., & McCormick, K. (2015). Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies. Sustainability, 7(8), 10461–10478.Google Scholar

de Luca, A. I., Iofrida, N., Leskinen, P., … Gulisano, G. (2017). Life Cycle Tools Combined with Multi-Criteria and Participatory Methods for Agricultural Sustainability: Insights from a Systematic and Critical Review. Science of The Total Environment, 595, 352–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

EC. (2018). A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/edace3e3-e189-11e8-b690-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-149755478Google Scholar

Falcone, G., de Luca, A., Stillitano, T., Strano, A., Romeo, G., & Gulisano, G. (2016). Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Vine-Growing Combining Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Costing and Multicriterial Analysis. Sustainability, 8(8), 793.Google Scholar

Fauzi, R. T., Lavoie, P., Sorelli, L., Heidari, M. D., & Amor, B. (2019). Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability, 11(3), 636.Google Scholar

Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A., & Traverso, M. (2010). Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability, 2(10), 3309–3322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gnansounou, E., & Pandey, A. (2016). Life-Cycle Assessment of Biorefineries, Elsevier.Google Scholar

Heinonen, T, Pukkala, T, Mehtätalo, L, Asikainen, A, Kangas, J, Peltola, H. (2017) Scenario Analyses for the Effects of Harvesting Intensity on Development of Forest Resources, Timber Supply, Carbon Balance and Biodiversity of Finnish Forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 80–98.Google Scholar

Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Sciences: Ten Years of Applications and Trends. Science of The Total Environment 409(19), 3578–3594.Google Scholar

Hunkeler, D., Lichtenvort, K., & Rebitzer, G. (2008). Environmental Life Cycle Costing, CRC press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurmekoski, E., Myllyviita, T., Seppälä, J., Heinonen, T., Kilpeläinen, A., Pukkala, T., et al. (2020) Impact of Structural Changes in Wood-using Industries on Net Carbon Emissions in Finland. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(4), 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imbert, E., & Falcone, P. M. (2020). Chapter 6. Social Assessment, pp. 166–191.Google Scholar

ISO. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. ISO 14040., Pub. L. No. ISO 14040. (2006a).Google Scholar

ISO. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044., Pub. L. No. ISO 14044. (2006b).Google Scholar

Ladu, L., & Morone, P. (2021). Holistic Approach in the Evaluation of the Sustainability of Bio-Based Products: An Integrated Assessment Tool. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 911–924e6.Google Scholar

Lokesh, K., Matharu, A. S., Kookos, I. K., … Clark, J. (2020). Hybridised Sustainability Metrics for Use in Life Cycle Assessment of Bio-based Products: Resource Efficiency and Circularity. Green Chemistry, 22(3), 803–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marazza, D., Merloni, E., & Balugani, E. (2020). Chapter 7. Indirect Land Use Change and Bio-based Products, pp. 192–222.Google Scholar

Martin, M., Røyne, F., Ekvall, T., & Moberg, Å. (2018). Life Cycle Sustainability Evaluations of Bio-based Value Chains: Reviewing the Indicators from A Swedish Perspective. Sustainability, 10(2), 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martínez-Blanco, J., Lehmann, A., Chang, Y. J., & Finkbeiner, M. (2015). Social Organizational LCA (SOLCA) – A New Approach for Implementing Social LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(11), 1586–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miah, J. H., Koh, S. C. L., & Stone, D. (2017). A Hybridised Framework Combining Integrated Methods for Environmental Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 846–866.Google Scholar

Morone, P., & Yilan, G. (2020). A Paradigm Shift in Sustainability: From Lines to Circles. Acta Innovations, (36), 5–16.Google Scholar

Mukherjee, S., Sharma, P. K., & Kumar, M. (2020). Bioeconomy and Environmental Sustainability. In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier, pp. 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, G. A. (2006). Social Impacts in Product Life Cycles – Towards Life Cycle Attribute Assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(S1), 97–104.Google Scholar

Popovic, T., & Kraslawski, A. (2015). Social Sustainability of Complex Systems, pp. 605–614.Google Scholar

Sijtsema, S. J., Onwezen, M. C., Reinders, M. J., Dagevos, H., Partanen, A., & Meeusen, M. (2016). Consumer Perception of Bio-Based Products – An Exploratory Study in 5 European Countries. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 77(1), 61–69.Google Scholar

Soimakallio, S, Saikku, L, Valsta, L, Pingoud, K. (2016). Climate Change Mitigation Challenge for Wood Utilization: The Case of Finland. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(10):5127–34.Google Scholar

Statistics Finland, 2021. Greenhouse gas emissions in Finland 1990 to 2019. National Inventory Report under the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol. Submission to the European Union, p. 581.Google Scholar

Swarr, T. E., Hunkeler, D., Klöpffer, W., … Pagan, R. (2011). Environmental Life-Cycle Costing: A Code of Practice. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(5), 389–391.Google Scholar

UNEP. (2020). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations. Retrieved from www.lifecycleinitiative.org/library/guidelines-for-social-life-cycle-assessment-of-products-and-organisations-2020/Google Scholar

UNEP/SETAC. (2011). Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment.Google Scholar

Vance, C., Sweeney, J., & Murphy, F. (2022). Space, Time, and Sustainability: The Status and Future of Life Cycle Assessment Frameworks for Novel Biorefinery Systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159, 112259.Google Scholar

Vera, I., Wicke, B., Lamers, P., … van der Hilst, F. (2022). Land Use for Bioenergy: Synergies and Trade-offs Between Sustainable Development Goals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112409.Google Scholar

Weiss, M., Haufe, J., Carus, M., … Patel, M. K. (2012). A Review of the Environmental Impacts of Biobased Materials. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16, S169–S181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yilan, G., Cordella, M., & Morone, P. (2023). Evaluating and Managing the Sustainability Performance of Investments in Green and Sustainable Chemistry: Development and Application of an Approach to Assess Bio-Based and Biodegradable Plastics. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 6, 100353.Google Scholar

Yilan, G., Kadirgan, M. A. N., & Çiftçioğlu, G. A. (2020). Analysis of Electricity Generation Options for Sustainable Energy Decision Making: The Case of Turkey. Renewable Energy, 146, 519–529.Google Scholar

Yıldız-Geyhan, E., Yılan, G., Altun-Çiftçioğlu, G. A., & Kadırgan, M. A. N. (2019). Environmental and Social Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Different Packaging Waste Collection Systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 143, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yu, D., Tan, H., & Ruan, Y. (2011). A Future Bamboo-Structure Residential Building Prototype in China: Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Use and Carbon Emission. Energy and Buildings, 43(10), 2638–2646.Google Scholar

Zeug, W., Bezama, A., & Thrän, D. (2020). Towards a Holistic and Integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the Bioeconomy: Background on Concepts, Visions and Measurements, UFZ Discussion Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bathelt, H., & Cohendet, P. (2014). The creation of knowledge: local building, global accessing and economic development – Toward an agenda. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(5), 869–882.Google Scholar

Befort, N. (2021). The promises of drop-in vs. functional innovations: The case of bioplastics. Ecological Economics, 181, 106886.Google Scholar

Birch, K. (2016). Innovation, regional development and the life sciences: Beyond clusters, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birch, K. (2017). Innovation, regional development and the life sciences: Beyond clusters, First published. ed, Regions and cities. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

Bolwig, S., Ponte, S., du Toit, A., Riisgaard, L., & Halberg, N. (2010). Integrating poverty and environmental concerns into value-chain analysis: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 28(2), 173–194.Google Scholar

Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128.Google Scholar

Cooke, P. (2010). Regional innovation systems: development opportunities from the ‘green turn.’ Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 831–844.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. (Eds.). (1988). Technical change and economic theory, London: Pinter.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2012). Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions SWD(2012).Google Scholar

Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19(1). doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309Google Scholar

Galambos, L., Hikino, T., & Zamagni, V. (2007). The global chemical industry in the age of the petrochemical revolution, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gereffi, G. (1994). The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, 95–122.Google Scholar

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (1997). Learning economies, innovation systems and European integration. Regional Studies, 31(5), 479–490.Google Scholar

Hellsmark, H., Frishammar, J., Söderholm, P., & Ylinenpää, H. (2016). The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technology development and innovation policy. Research Policy, 45(9), 1743–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Limoges, C., Scott, P., Schwartzman, S., Nowotny, H., & Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. The New Production of Knowledge, 1–192. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221853Google Scholar

Lipinsky, E. S. (1981). Chemicals from biomass: Petrochemical substitution options. Science, 212(4502), 1465–1471.Google Scholar

Lipinsky, E. S., & Sinclair, R. G. (1986). Is lactic acid a commodity chemical. Chemical Engineering Progress, 82(8), 26–32.Google Scholar

Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar

Lundvall, B.-A. (1998). Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(4), 403–422.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264.Google Scholar

Marchi, V. de, Maria, E. di, & Micelli, S. (2013). Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 62–72.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy: A moonshot guide to changing capitalism, Penguin UK.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Oltra, V., & Saint Jean, M. (2009). Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs): A patent data analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 201–213.Google Scholar

Pansera, M., & Fressoli, M. (2021). Innovation without growth: Frameworks for understanding technological change in a post-growth era. Organization, 28(3), 380–404.Google Scholar

Pauliuk, S. (2018). Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001: 2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 81–92.Google Scholar

Ponte, S. (2014). The evolutionary dynamics of biofuel value chains: From unipolar and government-driven to multipolar governance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(2), 353–372.Google Scholar

Ponte, S. (2019). Business, power and sustainability in a world of global value chains, Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

Pyka, A. (2017), Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: Creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(4), 27.Google Scholar

Pyka, A., & Urmetzer, S. (2023). Transformation-analysis – Potentials and current limits of evolutionary economic. In K. Dopfer, ed., Elgar Research Agenda for Evolutionary Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2023.Google Scholar

Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: RD, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567.Google Scholar

Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367–1387.Google Scholar

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Towards a circular economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition. Retrieved from https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-a-circular-economy-business-rationale-for-an-accelerated-transitionGoogle Scholar

Unruh, C. G. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817–830.Google Scholar

von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky Information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilke, U., Schlaile, M., Urmetzer, S., Müller, M., Bogner, K, & Pyka, A. (2021), Time to say ‘Good Buy’ to the passive consumer? A conceptual review of the consumer in the bioeconomy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 34, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asselin, A., Rabaud, S., Catalan, C., … Neveux, G. (2020). Product biodiversity footprint – A novel approach to compare the impact of products on biodiversity combining life cycle assessment and ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119262.Google Scholar

Befort, N. (2020). Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biomonitor. (2022). Biomonitor Project. Retrieved from https://biomonitor.eu/Google Scholar

Bracco, S., Tani, A., Çalıcıoğlu, Ö., Gomez San Juan, M., & Bogdanski, A. (2019). Indicators to Monitor and Evaluate the Sustainability of Bioeconomy: Overview and a Proposed Way Forward, FAO.Google Scholar

Calicioglu, Ö., & Bogdanski, A. (2021). Linking the bioeconomy to the 2030 sustainable development agenda: Can SDG indicators be used to monitor progress towards a sustainable bioeconomy? New Biotechnology, 61, 40–49.Google Scholar

Circle economy. (2018). The Circularity Gap Report 2018. Circle Economy.Google Scholar

Corona, B., Shen, L., Reike, D., Rosales Carreón, J., & Worrell, E. (2019). Towards sustainable development through the circular economy – A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151, 104498.Google Scholar

D’Adamo, I., Falcone, P. M., & Morone, P. (2020). A new socio-economic indicator to measure the performance of bioeconomy sectors in Europe. Ecological Economics, 176, 106724.Google Scholar

Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., … Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21–28.Google Scholar

de Wit, M., Hoogzaad, J., & von Daniels, C. (2018). The Circularity gap report. Circle Economy.Google Scholar

Citizen, Dual. (2022). Global Green Economy Index (GGEI). Retrieved from https://dualcitizeninc.com/global-green-economy-index/Google Scholar

EC. (2022). EU Bioeconomy Monitoring System. Retrieved from https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/bioeconomy/monitoring_enGoogle Scholar

Ellen Mac Arthur Foundation. (2022a). Resources and toolkits for Circulytics®. Retrieved from https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/circulytics/resources#:~:text=The%20Material%20Circularity%20Indicator%20(MCI)&text=Measures%20the%20circularity%20of%20material,product%20design%20and%20material%20procurementGoogle Scholar

Ellen Mac Arthur Foundation. (2022b). Resources and toolkits for the Material Circularity Indicator. Retrieved from https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/material-circularity-indicatorGoogle Scholar

European standards. DIN EN 16785-1 Bio-based products – Bio-based content – Part 1: Determination of the bio-based content using the radiocarbon analysis and elemental analysis. (2022). Retrieved from www.en-standard.eu/din-en-16785-1-bio-based-products-bio-based-content-part-1-determination-of-the-bio-based-content-using-the-radiocarbon-analysis-and-elemental-analysis/?gclid=CjwKCAjwve2TBhByEiwAaktM1EIYGW2nda20UtVE_VHghu4m_A3QZc4FWydtNrcHBSfbXGNOszC6xxoCkYAQAvD_BwEGoogle Scholar

Eurostat. (2022). Circular economy – Material flows. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Circular_economy_-_material_flows#Sankey_diagram_of_material_flowsGoogle Scholar

Fava, F., Gardossi, L., Brigidi, P., Morone, P., Carosi, D. A. R., & Lenzi, A. (2021). The bioeconomy in Italy and the new national strategy for a more competitive and sustainable country. New Biotechnology, 61, 124–136.Google Scholar

Giampietro, M., & Renner, A. (2021). The Generation of Meaning and Preservation of Identity in Complex Adaptive Systems the LIPHE4 Criteria, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar

Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Heinz, M. (2015). How circular is the global economy?: An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 765–777.Google Scholar

Harrison, P. A., Dunford, R., Barton, D. N., … Zulian, G. (2018). Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach. Ecosystem Services, 29, 481–498.Google Scholar

Holmgren, S., D’Amato, D., & Giurca, A. (2020). Bioeconomy imaginaries: A review of forest-related social science literature. Ambio, 49(12), 1860–1877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Intesa Sanpaolo & Assobiotec. (2019). 5th report on European Bioeconomy. Retrieved from https://group.intesasanpaolo.com/content/dam/portalgroup/repository-documenti/research/it/bioeconomia/La%20Bioeconomia%20in%20Europa_nr%205.pdfGoogle Scholar

ISTAT. (2022). Istat indicators for sustainable development goals. Retrieved from www.istat.it/it/benessere-e-sostenibilit%C3%A0/obiettivi-di-sviluppo-sostenibile/gli-indicatori-istatGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, A., le Bocq, A., Nazarkina, L., & Hauschild, M. (2008). Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), 96–103.Google Scholar

Kangas, A. (2015). Natural Resources Institute Finland – A foundation for the bioeconomy.Google Scholar

Kardung, M., Cingiz, K., Costenoble, O., … Zhu, B. X. (2021). Development of the circular bioeconomy: Drivers and indicators. Sustainability, 13(1), 413.Google Scholar

Kardung, M., & Drabik, D. (2021). Framework for Assessing the Development of a Circular Bioeconomy: BioMonitor Policy Brief# 5.Google Scholar

Karvonen, J., Halder, P., Kangas, J., & Leskinen, P. (2017). Indicators and tools for assessing sustainability impacts of the forest bioeconomy. Forest Ecosystems, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.039Google Scholar

Lier, M., Aarne, M., Kärkkäinen, L., Korhonen, K. T., Yli-Viikari, A., & Packalen, T. (2018). Synthesis on bioeconomy monitoring systems in the EU Member States.Google Scholar

Morales, M. R., Tirado, A. A., & Lobato-Calleros, O. (2015). Additional indicators to promote social sustainability within government programs: Equity and efficiency. Sustainability (2071–1050), 7(7).Google Scholar

Natural Capital Coalition. (2016). Natural Capital Protocol. Retrieved from www.naturalcapitalcoalition.org/protocolGoogle Scholar

OECD. (2022). Green growth indicators framework. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/greengrowth/green-growth-indicators/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CGreen%20growth%20is%20about%20fostering,give%20rise%20to%20new%20economicGoogle Scholar

Oliveira, M., Miguel, M., van Langen, S. K., … Genovese, A. (2021). Circular economy and the transition to a sustainable society: Integrated assessment methods for a new paradigm. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(1), 99–113.Google Scholar

PBF. (2022). Product Biodiversity Footprint. Retrieved from https://sayari.co/product-biodiversity-footprint#:~:text=The%20%E2%80%9CProduct%20Biodiversity%20Footprint%E2%80%9D%20(,considering%20their%20impact%20on%20biodiversity.Google Scholar

SEEA. (2022). Green growth indicators. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. Retrieved from https://seea.un.org/Google Scholar

Sikkema, R., Dallemand, J. F., Matos, C. T., van der Velde, M., & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. (2017). How can the ambitious goals for the EU’s future bioeconomy be supported by sustainable and efficient wood sourcing practices? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 32(7), 551–558.Google Scholar

ten Brink, P., Mazza, L., Badura, T., Kettunen, M., & Withana, S. (2012). Nature and its role in the transition to a green economy. A TEEB Report. www.Teebweb.org and www.Ieep.eu.Google Scholar

TNFD. (2022). Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from https://tnfd.global/.Google Scholar

Villamagna, A. M., Angermeier, P. L., & Bennett, E. M. (2013). Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecological Complexity, 15, 114–121.Google Scholar