Abildtrup, J., Jensen, F., & Dubgaard, A. (2012). Does the Coase Theorem Hold in Real Markets? An Application to the Negotiations Between Waterworks and Farmers in Denmark. Journal of Environmental Management, 93(1), 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbier, E. B. (1987). The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development. Environmental Conservation, 14(2), 101–110.Google Scholar

Barbier, M., & Benoit, M. (1996). Programme AGREV. Synthèse des investigations menées de 1992 à 1995, sous la responsabilite scientifique de l’Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar

Bingham, L. R. (2021). Vittel as a Model Case in PES Discourse: Review and Critical Perspective. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börner, J., Baylis, K., Corbera, E., … Wunder, S. (2017). The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. World Development, 96, 359–374.Google Scholar

Boulding, K. E. (1966). The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In Jarrett, H., ed., Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Resources for the Future, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Brei, V. A. (2018). How is a Bottled Water Market Created? WIREs Water, 5(1). doi:10.1002/wat2.1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capodaglio, A., & Callegari, A. (2018). Can Payment for Ecosystem Services Schemes Be an Alternative Solution to Achieve Sustainable Environmental Development? A Critical Comparison of Implementation between Europe and China. Resources, 7(3), 40.Google Scholar

Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.Google Scholar

Common, M. (1995). Sustainability and Policy: Limits to Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Costanza, R. (1989). What is Ecological Economics? In Ecological Economics, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar

Costanza, R., & Cleveland, C. (2008). Natural Capital. The Encyclopedia of Earth, 31. Retrieved from http://editors.eol.org/eoearth/wiki/Natural_capitalGoogle Scholar

Daly, H. E. (1996). Beyond Growth, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Depres, C., Grolleau, G., & Mzoughi, N. (2008). Contracting for Environmental Property Rights: The Case of Vittel. Economica, 75(299), 412–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everard, M. (2011). Common Ground: The Sharing of Land and Landscapes for Sustainability, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

Folke, C., & Kåberger, T. (1991). Recent Trends in Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy. In Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy: Essays from the Eco-Eco Group, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 273–300.Google Scholar

Grolleau, G. (2013). Chapter 9: Collective Action Case Study – France. In Providing Agri-environmental Public Goods through Collective Action, Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 183–193.Google Scholar

GSI. (2009). Achieving the G-20 Call to Phase out Subsidies to Fossil Fuels: Policy Brief, Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar

Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hernandez, S., & Benoît, M. (2011). Gestion durable de la ressource en eau : l’utilisation du paiement pour service environnemental au service de la protection des captages. Annales Des Mines – Responsabilité et Environnement, N° 63(3), 87–95.Google Scholar

Ishiguro, S. (2003). Comparing Allocations Under Asymmetric Information: Coase Theorem revisited. Economics Letters, 80(1), 67–71.Google Scholar

Lawton, J. (2015). Payments for Ecosystem Services: A best practice guide.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. J., & Polasky, S. (2018). An Auction Mechanism for the Optimal Provision of Ecosystem Services Under Climate Change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92, 20–34.Google Scholar

Lichfield, J. (2004, September 16). Eau dear, what can the matter be? Retrieved from 16/09/2022 www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/eau-dear-what-can-the-matter-be-32590.htmlGoogle Scholar

Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London (8th Ed. Published in 1920): Macmillan.Google Scholar

Meramveliotakis, G., & Milonakis, D. (2018). Coasean Theory of Property Rights and Law Revisited: A Critical Inquiry. Science & Society, 82(1), 38–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pareto, V. (1897). The New Theories of Economics. Journal of Political Economy, 5(4), 485–502.Google Scholar

Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Perrot-Maître, D. (2006). The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Perfect PES Case? London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar

Perrot-Maître, D. (2014). The Vittel Case: A Public-Private Partnership in the Mineral Water Industry. Case studies on Remuneration of Positive Externalities (RPE)/ Payments for Environmental Services (PES), Rome. Retrieved from www.fao.org/3/a-bl927e.pdfGoogle Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare, First Edition, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Santos, R., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Antunes, P., Ring, I., & Clemente, P. (2015). Reviewing the Role of Habitat Banking and Tradable Development Rights in the Conservation Policy Mix. Environmental Conservation, 42(4), 294–305.Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2006). Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change.Google Scholar

Turner, R. K., Subak, S., & Adger, W. N. (1996). Pressures, Trends, and Impacts in Coastal Zones: Interactions between Socioeconomic and Natural Systems. Environmental Management, 20(2), 159–173.Google Scholar

United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Addressing Single-Use Plastic Products Pollution using a Life Cycle Approach. Retrieved from www.unep.org/resources/publication/addressing-single-use-plastic-products-pollution-using-life-cycle-approachGoogle Scholar

Wunder, S., Börner, J., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Feder, S., & Pagiola, S. (2020). Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 209–234.Google Scholar

Zhang, D. (2016). Payments for Forest-based Environmental Services: A Close Look. Forest Policy and Economics, 72, 78–84.Google Scholar

Antikainen, M., & Valkokari, K. (2016). A framework for sustainable circular business model innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosman, R., & Rotmans, J. (2016). Transition governance towards a bioeconomy: A comparison of Finland and the Netherlands. Sustainability, 8(10), 1017.Google Scholar

Caniëls, M. C. J., & Romijn, H. A. (2008). Strategic niche management: Towards a policy tool for sustainable development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(2), 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Amato, D., Veijonaho, S., & Toppinen, A. (2020). Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in Finnish SMEs. Forest Policy and Economics, 110, 101848.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2018). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. European Commission.–2018.–URL: https://Ec.Europa.Eu/Research/Bioeconomy/Pdf/Ec_bioeconomy_Strategy_2018.Pdf (Дата Обращения 25.02. 2020).Google Scholar

Foxon, T. J., Hammond, G. P., & Pearson, P. J. G. (2010). Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1203–1213.Google Scholar

Fritsche, U., & Rösch, C. (2020). The Conditions of a Sustainable Bioeconomy. In Bioeconomy for Beginners, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 177–202.Google Scholar

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.Google Scholar

Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510.Google Scholar

Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., … Wassermann, S. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45(4), 896–913.Google Scholar

Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geels, F. W., & Smit, W. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: Pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32(9–10), 867–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hetemäki, L., Hanewinkel, M., Muys, B., … Potoćnik, J. (2017). Leading the Way to a European Circular Bioeconomy Strategy, Vol. 5, European Forest Institute Joensuu, Finland.Google Scholar

Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(1), 78–91.Google Scholar

Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.Google Scholar

Kershaw, E. H., Hartley, S., McLeod, C., & Polson, P. (2021). The sustainable path to a circular bioeconomy. Trends in Biotechnology, 39(6), 542–545.Google Scholar

Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217.Google Scholar

Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2006). Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development. In Understanding Industrial Transformation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar

Lopolito, A., Morone, P., & Sisto, R. (2011). Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: A case study of bio-refinery production. Futures, 43(1), 27–38.Google Scholar

Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615.Google Scholar

Morone, P., Lopolito, A., Anguilano, D., Sica, E., & Tartiu, V. E. (2016). Unpacking landscape pressures on socio-technical regimes: Insights on the urban waste management system. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 20, 62–74.Google Scholar

Morone, P., Tartiu, V. E., & Falcone, P. (2015). Assessing the potential of biowaste for bioplastics production through social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 43–54.Google Scholar

OECD. (2018). Meeting Policy Challenges for a Sustainable Bioeconomy, OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264292345-enGoogle Scholar

Owen, R., Brennan, G., & Lyon, F. (2018). Enabling investment for the transition to a low carbon economy: government policy to finance early stage green innovation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 137–145.Google Scholar

Pagotto, M., & Halog, A. (2016). Towards a circular economy in Australian agri-food industry: An application of input-output oriented approaches for analyzing resource efficiency and competitiveness potential. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(5), 1176–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Asselt, M. (2001). Transition management: A promising policy perspective. In Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 165–197.Google Scholar

Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554.Google Scholar

Sillanpää, M., & Ncibi, C. (2017). A Sustainable Bioeconomy, Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6Google Scholar

Stegmann, P., Londo, M., & Junginger, M. (2020). The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, 6, 100029.Google Scholar

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Penguin.Google Scholar

Turnheim, B., & Geels, F. W. (2012). Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy, 50, 35–49.Google Scholar

Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016). The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Procedia, 104, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aguilar, A., Wohlgemuth, R., & Twardowski, T. (2018). Perspectives on Bioeconomy. New Biotechnology, 40, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Asada, R., Cardellini, G., Mair-Bauernfeind, C., … Stern, T. (2020). Effective Bioeconomy? a MRIO-based Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Generic Sectoral Innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119946.Google Scholar

Bai, X., van der Leeuw, S., O’Brien, K., … Syvitski, J. (2016). Plausible and Desirable Futures in the Anthropocene: A New Research Agenda. Global Environmental Change, 39, 351–362.Google Scholar

Barbier, E., & Burgess, J. (2017). Natural Resource Economics, Planetary Boundaries and Strong Sustainability. Sustainability, 9(10), 1858.Google Scholar

Bennich, T., & Belyazid, S. (2017). The Route to Sustainability – Prospects and Challenges of the Bio-Based Economy. Sustainability, 9(6), 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergmann. (2019). Interspecies Sustainability to Ensure Animal Protection: Lessons from the Thoroughbred Racing Industry. Sustainability, 11(19), 5539.Google Scholar

Braat, L. C., & de Groot, R. (2012). The Ecosystem Services Agenda: Bridging the Worlds of Natural Science and Economics, Conservation and Development, and Public and Private Policy. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 4–15.Google Scholar

Cohen, F., Hepburn, C. J., & Teytelboym, A. (2019). Is Natural Capital Really Substitutable? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44(1), 425–448.Google Scholar

Costanza, R. (1989). What is Ecological Economics? Ecological Economics, 1(1), 1–7.Google Scholar

Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1987). Toward an Ecological Economics. Ecological Modelling, 38(1–2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crownshaw, T., Morgan, C., Adams, A., … Horen Greenford, D. (2019). Over the Horison: Exploring the Conditions of a Post-Growth World. The Anthropocene Review, 6(1–2), 117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Amato, D. (2021). Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(1), 231–242.Google Scholar

Dube, B. (2021). Why Cross and Mix Disciplines and Methodologies?: Multiple Meanings of Interdisciplinarity and Pluralism in Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics, 179, 106827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Chichakli, B., von Braun, J., Lang, C., Barben, D., & Philp, J. (2016). Policy: Five Cornerstones of a Global Bioeconomy. Nature, 535(7611), 221–223.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2018). A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment: Updated Bioeconomy Strategy SWD/2018/431. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/edace3e3-e189-11e8-b690-01aa75ed71a1/Google Scholar

Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological Resilience and Biosphere-based Sustainability Science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341Google Scholar

Gardner, T. (2004). Limits to Growth? – A Perspective on the Perpetual Debate. Environmental Sciences, 1(2), 121–138.Google Scholar

Geels, F.W. (2019). Socio-technical Transitions to Sustainability: A Review of Criticisms and Elaborations of the Multi-level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009Google Scholar

Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A Review on Circular Economy: The Expected Transition to a Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economic Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.Google Scholar

Giampietro, M. (2019). On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth. Ecological Economics, 162, 143–156.Google Scholar

Giampietro, M., & Funtowics, S. O. (2020). From Elite Folk Science to the Policy Legend of the Circular Economy. Environmental Science & Policy, 109, 64–72.Google Scholar

Goodland, R., & Daly, H. (1996). Environmental Sustainability: Universal and Non-Negotiable. Ecological Applications, 6(4), 1002–1017.Google Scholar

Haffar, M., & Searcy, C. (2018). Target-Setting for Ecological Resilience: Are Companies Setting Environmental Sustainability Targets in Line with Planetary Thresholds? Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1079–1092.Google Scholar

Hamilton, C. (2008). Intellectual Property Rights, the Bioeconomy and the Challenge of Biopiracy. Genomics, Society and Policy, 4(3), 26.Google Scholar

Harmon, M. E. (2019). Have Product Substitution Carbon Benefits Been Overestimated? A Sensitivity Analysis of Key Assumptions. Environmental Research Letters. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heikkurinen, P., & Bonnedahl, K. J. (2018). Dead ends and liveable futures: A framework for sustainable change. In Bonnedahl, K. J. & Heikkurinen, P., eds., Strongly Sustainable Societies: Organising Human Activities on a Hot and Full Earth , Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge, 2019. | Series: Routledge studies in sustainability: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351173643Google Scholar

Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet, Routledge.Google Scholar

Jander, W., & Grundmann, P. (2019). Monitoring the Transition Towards a Bioeconomy: A General Framework and a Specific Indicator. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236 (117564). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.039Google Scholar

Johnson, F. X. (2017). Biofuels, Bioenergy and the Bioeconomy in North and South. Industrial Biotechnology, 13(6), 289–291.Google Scholar

Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and Its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46.Google Scholar

Leach, M., Newell, P., & Scoones, I. (2015). The Politics of Green Transformations, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315747378CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, M., Raworth, K., & Rockström, J. (2013). Between Social and Planetary Boundaries: Navigating Pathways in the Safe and Just Space for Humanity. In World Social Science Report 2013, Paris, France: OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing, pp. 84–89.Google Scholar

Lewandowski, I., Gaudet, N., Lask, J., Maier, J., Tchouga, B., & Vargas-Carpintero, R. (2018). Context. In Bioeconomy: Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy. Springer Open University of Hohenheim. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_2Google Scholar

Managi, S., & Kumar, P. (2018). Inclusive Wealth Report 2018, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351002080CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mastini, R., Kallis, G., & Hickel, J. (2021). A Green New Deal without Growth? Ecological Economics, 179, 106832.Google Scholar

Munda, G. (1997). Environmental Economics, Ecological Economics, and the Concept of Sustainable Development. Environmental Values, 6(2), 213–233.Google Scholar

Neill, A. M., O’Donoghue, C., & Stout, J. C. (2020). A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature. Sustainability, 12(19), 8033.Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. (2020). What Is Lost through No Net Loss. Economics & Philosophy, 36(2), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otto, S., Hildebrandt, J., Will, M., Henn, L., & Beer, K. (2021). Tying Up Loose Ends. Integrating Consumers’ Psychology into a Broad Interdisciplinary Perspective on a Circular Sustainable Bioeconomy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 34(2), 8.Google Scholar

Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Evidence and Arguments against Green Growth as a Sole Strategy for Sustainability. European Environmental Bureau. https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Decoupling-Debunked.pdfGoogle Scholar

Patterson, J., Schuls, K., Vervoort, J., … Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the Governance and Politics of Transformations Towards Sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–16.Google Scholar

Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Pülsl, H. (2018). Sustainable Development – A ‘Selling Point’ of the Emerging EU Bioeconomy Policy Framework? Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4170–4180.Google Scholar

Raworth, K. (2012). A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live Within the Doughnut?, Oxfam. www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/dp-a-safe-and-just-space-for-humanity-130212-en_5.pdfGoogle Scholar

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a Twenty-First Century Economist. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., … Foley, J. A. (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.Google Scholar

Røpke, I. (2004). The Early History of Modern Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics. 50(3–4), 293–314. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.012Google Scholar

Røpke, I. (2005). Trends in the Development of Ecological Economics from the Late 1980s to the Early 2000s. Ecological Economics, 55(2), 262–290.Google Scholar

Scheidel, A., Temper, L., Demaria, F., & Martínes-Alier, J. (2018). Ecological Distribution Conflicts as Forces for Sustainability: An Overview and Conceptual Framework. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 585–598.Google Scholar

Sheppard, A. W., Gillespie, I., Hirsch, M., & Begley, C. (2011). Biosecurity and Sustainability within the Growing Global Bioeconomy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(1–2), 4–10.Google Scholar

Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015a). The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., … Sörlin, S. (2015b). Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science, 347(6223). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stirling, A. (2015). Emancipating Transformations: From Controlling ‘The Transition’ to Culturing Plural Radical Progress. In The Politics of Green Transformations, Abingon, Oxon, New York: Routledge, pp. 54–67.Google Scholar

Vadén, T., Lähde, V., Majava, A., … Eronen, J. T. (2020). Decoupling for Ecological Sustainability: A Categorisation and Review of Research Literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 236–244.Google Scholar

Vivien, F.-D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197.Google Scholar

Ward, J. D., Sutton, P. C., Werner, A. D., Costansa, R., Mohr, S. H., & Simmons, C. T. (2016). Is Decoupling GDP Growth from Environmental Impact Possible? PLOS ONE, 11(10), e0164733.Google Scholar

Wiedmann, T., Lensen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ Warning on Affluence. Nature Communications, 11(1), 3107.Google Scholar

Zeug, W., Besama, A., & Thrän, D. (2020). Towards a Holistic and Integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the Bioeconomy: Background on Concepts, Visions and Measurements, UFZ Discussion Paper.Google Scholar