Book contents
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Law and Christianity
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Themes in Understandings of Conscience in Christianity
- Part II Conscience According to Major Figures and Traditions
- Part III Applied Topics in Law and Conscience
- Index
- References
Part III - Applied Topics in Law and Conscience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2021
Book contents
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Law and Christianity
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Themes in Understandings of Conscience in Christianity
- Part II Conscience According to Major Figures and Traditions
- Part III Applied Topics in Law and Conscience
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Christianity and the Laws of ConscienceAn Introduction, pp. 285 - 434Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Recommended Reading
Chapman, Nathan S. “Disentangling Conscience and Religion.” University of Illinois Law Review (2013): 1457–1501.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. “Religion As a Concept in Constitutional Law.” California Law Review 72 (1984): 753–816.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. “Conscience, Volitional Necessity, and Religious Exemptions.” Legal Theory 15, no. 3 (2009): 215–44.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas. “Religious Liberty As Liberty.” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 7 (1996): 313–56.Google Scholar
Lund, Christopher C. “Religion Is Special Enough.” Virginia Law Review 103 (2017): 481–524.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. “The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion.” Harvard Law Review 103 (1990): 1409–1517.Google Scholar
Miller, William Lee. The First Liberty: America’s Foundation in Religious Freedom. Washington, dc: Georgetown University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York, ny: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Micah. “What if Religion Is Not Special?” University of Chicago Law Review 79 (2012): 1351–1427.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven D. “What Does Religion Have to Do with Freedom of Conscience?” Colorado Law Review 76 (2005): 911–40.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Adams, Arlin M., and Emmerich, Charles J.. A Nation Dedicated to Religious Liberty: The Constitutional Heritage of the Religion Clauses. Philadelphia, pa: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Antieau, Chester James, Carroll, Phillip Mark, and Burke, Thomas Carroll. Religion under the State Constitutions. Brooklyn, ny: Central Book Company, 1965.Google Scholar
Carmella, Angela C. “State Constitutional Protection of Religious Exercise: An Emerging Post-Smith Jurisprudence.” Brigham Young University Law Review (1993): 275–325.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sanford H. The Rise of Religious Liberty in America: A History. New York, ny: The MacMillan Company, 1902.Google Scholar
Curry, Thomas J. The First Freedoms: Church and State in America to the Passage of the First Amendment. New York, ny: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dreisbach, Daniel L., and Hall, Mark David, eds. The Sacred Rights of Conscience: Selected Readings on Religious Liberty and Church-State Relations in the American Founding. Indianapolis, in: Liberty Fund, Inc., 2009.Google Scholar
Feldman, Noah. “The Intellectual Origins of the Establishment Clause.” New York University Law Review 77 (2002): 346–428.Google Scholar
Gunn, T. Jeremy, and Witte, John Jr., eds. No Establishment of Religion: America’s Original Contribution to Religious Liberty. New York, ny: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip. Separation of Church and State. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kurland, Philip B., and Lerner, Ralph, eds. The Founders’ Constitution, vol. 5. Chicago, il: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Linton, Paul Benjamin. “Religious Freedom Claims and Defenses under State Constitutions.” University of St. Thomas Journal of Law & Policy 7 (2013): 103–91.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. “The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion.” Harvard Law Review 102 (1990): 1409–1517.Google Scholar
Miller, William Lee. The First Liberty: America’s Foundation in Religious Freedom, expanded and updated ed. Washington, dc: Georgetown University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr., and Nichols, Joel A.. Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment, 4th ed. New York, ny: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Anderson, Ryan T., Corvino, John, and Girgis, Sherif. Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination. New York, ny: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Barringer Gordon, Sarah. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, nc: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Luke. Free to Believe: The Battle over Religious Liberty in America. NewYork, ny: Multnomah, 2019.Google Scholar
George, Robert. Conscience and Its Enemies: Confronting the Dogmas of Liberal Secularism. Wilmington, de: Intercollegiate Studies Institute Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip. Separation of Church and State. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hasson, Kevin Seamus. The Right to Be Wrong. San Francisco, ca: Encounter Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Lasson, Kenneth. “Free Exercise in the Free State: Maryland’s Role in Religious Liberty and the First Amendment.” Journal of Church and State 31 (1989): 419–49.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael. “Why Is Religious Liberty the ‘First Freedom’?” Cardozo Law Review 21, no. 4 (February 2000): 1243–65.Google Scholar
Paul, VI. Nostra Aetate (Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Religions). October 29, 1965.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Michael Stokes, and Paulsen, Luke. The Constitution: An Introduction. New York, ny: Basic Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Rienzi, Mark L. “The Case for Religious Exemptions – Whether Religion Is Special or Not.” Review of Why Tolerate Religion?, by Leiter, Brian and Defending American Religious Neutrality, by Koppelman, Andrew. Harvard Law Review 127, no. 5 (2014): 1395–1418.Google Scholar
Wardle, Lynn D. “Protection of Health-Care Providers’ Rights of Conscience in American Law: Present, Past, and Future.” Ave Maria Law Review 9, no. 1 (2011): 1–46.Google Scholar
Washington, George. Letter to the Hebrew Congregation in Newport, Rhode Island, August 18, 1790. In The Papers of George Washington, edited by Abbot, W. W, et al., 6:285. Charlottesville, va: University of Virginia Press, 1987.Google Scholar
West, John G. The Politics of Revelation and Reason: Religion and Civic Life in the New Nation. Lawrence, ks: University Press of Kansas, 1996.Google Scholar
Wilken, Robert Louis. Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Alvaré, Helen. Putting Children’s Interests First in U.S. Family Law and Policy: With Power Comes Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Corvino, John, Anderson, Ryan, and Gergis, Sherif. Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Freitas, Donna. Sex and the Soul: Juggling Sexuality, Spirituality, Romance, and Religion on America’s College Campuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Redwood City, ca: Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Harrison, Glynn. A Better Story: God, Sex & Human Flourishing. London: InterVarsity Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Illouz, Eva. Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar
John Paul, II. Man and Woman He Created Them: A Theology of the Body, translated by Waldstein, Michael. Boston, ma: Pauline Books & Media, 2006.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas. “Religious Liberty and the Culture Wars.” University of Illinois Law Review (2014): 839–40.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas, Picarello, Anthony, and Wilson, Robin Fretwell, eds. Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty: Emerging Conflicts. Lantham, md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.Google Scholar
Regnerus, Mark. Cheap Sex: The Transformation of Men, Marriage, and Monogamy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Seidman, Steven. Romantic Longings: Love in America 1830–1980. New York, ny: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robin Fretwell, ed. The Contested Place of Religion in Family Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Mr. Truman’s Degree.” In Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. 3, Ethics, Religion and Politics, 51–71. Minneapolis, mn: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Augustine, . The City of God against the Pagans, translated and edited by Dyson, R. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Capizzi, Joseph E. Politics, Justice, and War: Christian Governance and the Ethics of Warfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 (1971).Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. “All or Nothing at All: The Defeat of Selective Conscientious Objection.” The Supreme Court Review (1971): 31–94.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War. Princeton, nj: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Murray, John Courtney SJ. “Remarks on the Moral Problem of War.” Theological Studies 20, no. 1 (1959): 40–61.Google Scholar
National Conference of Catholic Bishops. The Challenge of Peace: God’s Promise and Our Response (1983). www.usccb.org/upload/challenge-peace-gods-promise-our-response-1983.pdf.Google Scholar
Negre v. Larsen, 394 U.S. 968 (1969).Google Scholar
Ramsey, Paul. “The Uses of Power.” In The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility, 3–18. Lanham, md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Solis, Gary D. The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
United States v. McFadden, 309 F. Supp. 502, 506 (1970).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York, ny: Basic Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Zahn, Gordon. In Solitary Witness: The Life and Death of Franz Jägerstätter. New York, ny: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Bedford, Elliott Louis. “The Concept of Institutional Conscience.” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (2012): 409–20.Google Scholar
Corvino, John, Anderson, Ryan T., and Gergis, Sherif. Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination. New York, ny: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Durland, Spencer L. “The Case against Institutional Conscience.” Notre Dame Law Review 86 (2011): 1655–86.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. “Persons and Their Associations.” In Collected Essays: Volume II, Intention and Identity, 92–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. “The Priority of Persons.” In Collected Essays: Volume II, Intention and Identity, 19–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory. Lanham, md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar
Kaczor, Christopher. “Conscientious Objection and Health Care: A Reply to Bernard Dickens.” Christian Bioethics 18 (2012): 59–71.Google Scholar
Savulescu, Julien. “Conscientious Objection in Medicine.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 332 (2006): 294–97.Google Scholar
Sulmasy, Daniel, P. “Institutional Conscience and Moral Pluralism in Healthcare.” New Theology Review 10 (1997): 5–21.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher O. “Conscience, Religion, and State.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 54 (2009): 93–116.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher O. “The Philosophical and Theological Roots of Institutional Conscience.” In The Conscience of the Institution, edited by Alvaré, Helen M., 28–46. Notre Dame, in: St. Augustine’s Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wicclair, Mark R. Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: An Ethical Analysis. New York, ny: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Wildes, Kevin. “Institutional Identity, Integrity, and Conscience.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (1993): 413–19.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).Google Scholar
Gedicks, Frederick Mark. “An Unfirm Foundation: The Regrettable Indefensibility of Religious Exemptions.” University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Journal 20 (1998): 555–74.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. When Free Exercise and Nonestablisment Conflict. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. Exemptions: Necessary, Justified or Misguided? Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. “Religious Toleration and Claims of Conscience.” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 21 (2013): 449–86.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Marci A., and Seligsohn, Lana. “Religion Governed by the Rule of Law.” Human Rights 39, no. 2 (Jan. 2013): 7, 10.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. “You Can’t Hurry Love: Why Antidiscrimination Protections for Gay People Should Have Religious Exemptions.” Brooklyn Law Review 72, no. 1 (Fall 2006): 125–46.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas. “Regulatory Exemptions of Religious Behavior and the Original Understanding of the Establishment Clause.” Notre Dame Law Review 81, no. 5 (June 2006): 1793–1842.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas, Picarello, Anthony R. Jr., and Wilson, Robin Fretwell, eds. Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty: Emerging Conflicts. Lanham, md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.Google Scholar
Lund, Christopher. “Religion Is Special Enough,” Virginia Law Review 103 (May 2017): 481–524.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. “Accommodation of Religion: An Update and a Response to the Critics.” George Washington Law Review 60 (1992): 642–85.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. “The Problem of Singling Out Religion.” DePaul Law Review 50, no. 1 (Fall 2000): 1–47.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Micah. “What if Religion Is Not Special?” The University of Chicago Law Review 79, no. 4 (Fall 2012): 1351–1427.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Micah, Tebbe, Nelson, and Schragger, Richard. “The Costs of Conscience.” Kentucky Law Journal 106, no. 4 (2017–18): 781–812.Google Scholar
Seeger v. U.S., 380 U.S. 163 (1965).Google Scholar
Welsh v. U.S., 398 U.S. 333 (1970).Google Scholar