Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- Introduction
- PART I LEGAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL TENSIONS
- PART II PU FA AND THE DISSEMINATION OF LAW IN THE CHINESE CONTEXT
- 5 The Impact of Nationalist and Maoist Legacies on Popular Trust in Legal Institutions
- 6 Public Attitudes toward Official Justice in Beijing and Rural China
- 7 Users and Non-Users: Legal Experience and Its Effect on Legal Consciousness
- 8 With or without the Law: The Changing Meaning of Ordinary Legal Work in China, 1979–2003
- PART III LAW FROM THE BOTTOM UP
- Conclusion: Chinese Justice from the Bottom Up
- Index
- References
7 - Users and Non-Users: Legal Experience and Its Effect on Legal Consciousness
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- Introduction
- PART I LEGAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL TENSIONS
- PART II PU FA AND THE DISSEMINATION OF LAW IN THE CHINESE CONTEXT
- 5 The Impact of Nationalist and Maoist Legacies on Popular Trust in Legal Institutions
- 6 Public Attitudes toward Official Justice in Beijing and Rural China
- 7 Users and Non-Users: Legal Experience and Its Effect on Legal Consciousness
- 8 With or without the Law: The Changing Meaning of Ordinary Legal Work in China, 1979–2003
- PART III LAW FROM THE BOTTOM UP
- Conclusion: Chinese Justice from the Bottom Up
- Index
- References
Summary
A major question in the law and society literature is the effect of legal experience on individual attitudes toward legal institutions, in particular the court system. Positive attitudes and confidence in the legal system are important for generating citizen trust and confidence in government generally and also for inculcating citizen values and behavior that support the rule of law and encourage legal (and peaceful) resolution of disputes and grievances more specifically. Thus, these values are important for sustaining democracy. For a country like China, in transition from state socialism, in which legal modes of governance and social control were less common than administrative edicts, Communist Party campaigns, and state repression, attempts to build an effective legal system are also linked to limited political reform. Rule of law building is the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) attempt to build more effective and efficient governance, while making an end run around democratization and the sharing of political power. In this case, creating positive citizen attitudes toward the legal system is part of a strategy to avoid democracy.
In this chapter, we examine how experience with the legal system affects Chinese citizens' evaluation of the courts through a series of comparisons between those who have used the law to resolve an employment dispute and those who have not as well as comparisons between disputants who remained positive and confident in the legal system and disputants who were fully disillusioned and negative.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Chinese JusticeCivil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China, pp. 204 - 233Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
, “‘Hope for Protection and Hopeless Choices’: Labor Legal Aid in the PRC.” In Grassroots Political Reform in Contemporary China, ed. and (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
, “The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice: Chinese Lawyers at Work,” Law & Society Review 40, no. 1 (2006): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture,” Law & Society Review 15, no. 3/4 (1980–1981): 525–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Climbing the Dispute Pagoda: Grievances and Appeals to the Official Justice System in Rural China,” American Sociological Review 72, no. 3 (2007): 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science 29, no. 4 (1985): 891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Political Life: Why and How People Get Involved in Politics (New York: Free Press, 1965)Google Scholar
, “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept of ‘Sense of Political Efficacy,’” Political Methodology 1, no. 2 (1974): 1–43Google Scholar
, “Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma,” American Politics Research 7, no. 2 (1979): 225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook 1952–1978 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980), p. 253.Google Scholar
, “The Effects of Participation on Political Efficacy and Political Support: Evidence from a West German Panel,” Journal of Politics 49, no. 2 (1987): 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Political Self-Efficacy Tested,” American Political Science Review 81, no. 2 (1987): 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “Relationships of Media Use and Political Disaffection to Political Efficacy and Voting Behavior,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 42, no. 1 (1998): 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Familiarity Breeds Respect: How Wisconsin Citizens View Their Courts,” Judicature 82, no. 2 (1998): 59–64.Google Scholar
and , “Confidence in the Courts: A Comparison of Users and Non-users,” Behaviorial Sciences and the Law 19, no. 2 (2001): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
, “Corruption and Corruption Control: More of the Same in 1996,” In China Review, 1997, ed. Maurice Brosseau, Kuan Hsin-chi, and Y. Y. Kueh (Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1997), pp. 33–56Google Scholar
, Economic Contract Law of China: Legitimation and Contract Autonomy in the PRC (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1992)Google Scholar
, China's Long March toward Rule of Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Mobilizing the Law in China: ‘Informed Disenchantment’ and the Development of Legal Consciousness,” Law & Society Review 40, no. 4 (2006): 783–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of Law in the Political System,” American Political Science Review 77, no. 3 (1983): 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Rightful Resistance in Rural China (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Citizens v. Mandarins: Administrative Litigation in China,” The China Quarterly, no. 152 (1997): 832–862
, “In China, Turning the Law Into the People's Protector,” The Washington Post, December 28, 2004, p. A01
, “On the Wave of Political Reform,” South China Morning Post, June 21, 2000, p. 18
, “Chinese Farmers Learn Their Rights,” Asian Wall Street Journal, November 27, 2000, p. A31
and , “Mass Media Mobilization as a Means of Legal Reform in China.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 30–September 1, 2007, http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/0/9/2/7/pages209272/p209272–1.php (accessed September 27, 2008).
and , “Citizens' Perceptions of the Courts: The Impact of Race, Gender, and Recent Experience,” Journal of Criminal Justice 34, no. 5 (2006): 457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment,” Law & Society Review 34, no. 4 (2000): 1055–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Pursuing Rights and Getting Justice on China's Ethnic Frontier, 1949–1966,” Law & Society Review 35, no. 4 (2001): 799–840CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Litigation and Moral Consciousness in Japan: An Interpretative Analysis of Four Japanese Pollution Suits,” Law & Society Review 10, no. 4 (1976): 579–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Contesting Citizenship in Urban China: Peasant Migrants, the State, and the Logic of the Market (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999)Google Scholar
, “The Empowering Effect of Village Elections in China,” Asian Survey 43, no. 4 (2003): 648–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” Law & Society Review 9, no. 1 (1974): 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “‘Use the Law as Your Weapon!’ Institutional Change and Legal Mobilization in China.” In Engaging the Law in China: State, Society, and Possibilities for Justice, ed. , , and (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
- 21
- Cited by