The Status of Evidentiary and Procedural Innovations in Child Abuse Proceedings

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511500114.016

16 - The Status of Evidentiary and Procedural Innovations in Child Abuse Proceedings

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2009

Bradley D. McAuliff and

Margaret Bull Kovera

Edited by

Bette L. Bottoms ,

Margaret Bull Kovera and

Bradley D. McAuliff

Show author details

Bradley D. McAuliff: Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Margaret Bull Kovera: Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Psychology Florida International University
Bette L. Bottoms: Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Margaret Bull Kovera: Affiliation:
Florida International University
Bradley D. McAuliff: Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Prosecuting physical and sexual crimes allegedly perpetrated against children is a complex and difficult task. Often the sole eyewitness to the crime is the abused child. As a result, the successful prosecution of many child abuse cases hinges on the child victim's account of the crime. Testifying in court can be stressful for any witness, particularly for child victims of physical or sexual abuse (Goodman et al., 1992). Several features of traditional trial proceedings, such as facing the accused or describing the details of the alleged crime in open court, may make children reluctant to testify about their abuse (Sas, 1991) and may decrease the accuracy of their testimony (Saywitz & Nathanson, 1993).

Various evidentiary and procedural innovations have been introduced over the past decade to help enable victims to testify in child abuse proceedings. At the federal level, for example, the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990 (§3266) amended the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, extending special accommodations to children such as allowing the presence of a support person during the child's testimony and closing the courtroom to the public (Whitcomb, 1992). Many states have enacted statutes permitting the use of innovative procedures, such as videotaped or closed-circuit television (CCTV) testimony, in trials involving alleged child abuse victims. Those innovations are examples of a broad spectrum of alternatives to traditional testimony that were designed to reduce the stress associated with appearing in court and to increase the accuracy of children's testimony.

Type: Chapter
Information: Children, Social Science, and the Law , pp. 412 - 446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511500114.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aldridge, J., & Freshwater, K. (1993). The preparation of child witnesses. Journal of Child Law, 5, 25–27Google Scholar

Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Francoeur, E. (1999). The accuracy of mothers' memories of conversations with their preschool children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 89–106Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., & LePoire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20, 67–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., & Walther, J. B. (1990). Nonverbal expectancies and the evaluative consequences of violations. Human Communication Research, 17, 232–265CrossRef Google Scholar

Cashmore, J. (1992). The use of closed-circuit television for child witnesses in the ACT. Sydney, New South Wales: Australian Law Reform Commission

Davies, G., & Noon, E. (1991). An evaluation of the live link for child witnesses. London: Home Office

Feldman, R. S., & Chesley, R. B. (1984). Who is lying, who is not: An attributional analysis of the effects of nonverbal behavior on judgments of defendant believability. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 451–461CrossRef Google Scholar

Golding, J. M., Alexander, M. C., & Stewart, T. L. (1999). The effect of hearsay witness age in a child sexual assault trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 420–438CrossRef Google Scholar

Golding, J. M., Sanchez, R. P., & Sego, S. A. (1997). The believability of hearsay testimony in a child sexual assault trial. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 299–325CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodman, G. S., Quas, J. A., Bulkley, J., & Shapiro, C. (1999). Innovations for child witnesses: A national survey. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 255–281CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodman, G. S., Taub, E. P., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. K., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Testifying in criminal court: Emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57 (Serial No. 229)CrossRef

Goodman, G. S., Tobey, A. E., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Orcutt, H., Thomas, S., Shapiro, C., & Sachsenmaier, T. (1998). Face-to-face confrontation: Effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 165–203CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hafemeister, T. L. (1996). Protecting child witnesses: Judicial efforts to minimize trauma and reduce evidentiary barriers. Violence and Victims, 11, 71–92Google Scholar PubMed

Hemsley, G., & Doob, A. (1978). The effect of looking behavior on perceptions of a communicator's credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 136–144CrossRef Google Scholar

Keeney, K. S., Amacher, E., & Kastanakis, J. A. (1992). The court prep group: A vital part of the court process. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds.), Children as witnesses (pp. 201–209). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley

Kovera, M. B., Gresham, A. W., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P. C. (1997). Does expert testimony inform or influence juror decision-making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178–191CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K. J., Hershkowitz, I., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Accuracy of investigators' verbatim notes of their interviews with alleged child abuse victims. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 699–708CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lindsay, R. C. L., Ross, D. F., Lea, J. A., & Carr, C. (1995). What's fair when a child testifies?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 870–888CrossRef Google Scholar

Lipovsky, J., & Stern, P. (1997). Preparing children for court: An interdisciplinary view. Child Maltreatment, 2, 150–163CrossRef Google Scholar

Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990)

McGough, L. S. (1994). Child witnesses: Fragile voices in the American legal system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Melton, G. B., Limber, S. P., Jacobs, J. E., & Oberlander, L. B. (1992). Preparing sexually abused children for testimony: Children's perceptions of the legal process (Final Report to the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, Grant No. 90-CA-1274). Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Murray, K. (1995). Live television link: An evaluation of its use by child witnesses in Scottish criminal trials. Edinburgh: Scottish Office, Central Research Unit

Myers, J. E. B. (1992). Legal issues in child abuse and neglect. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

Myers, J. E. B., Redlich, A. D., Goodman, G. S., Prizmich, L. P., & Imwinkelried, E. (1999). Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 388–419CrossRef Google Scholar

Peters, W. W., & Nunez, N. (1999). Complex language and comprehension monitoring: Teaching child witnesses to recognize linguistic confusion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 661–669CrossRef Google Scholar

Quas, J. A., DeCicco, V., Bulkley, J., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). District attorneys' views of legal innovations for child witnesses. American Psychology-Law Society Newsletter, 16, 5–8Google Scholar

Redlich, A. D., Myers, J. E. B., Goodman, G. S., & Qin, J. (1999). A comparison of two forms of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Manuscript submitted for publication

Ross, D. F., Hopkins, S., Hanson, E., Lindsay, R. C. L., Hazen, K., & Eslinger, T. (1994). The impact of protective shields and videotape testimony on conviction rates in a simulated trial of child sexual abuse. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 553–566CrossRef Google Scholar

Ross, D. F., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Marsil, D. F. (1999). The impact of hearsay testimony on conviction rates in trials of child sexual abuse: Toward balancing the rights of defendants and child witnesses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 439–455CrossRef Google Scholar

Salekin, R. T., Ogloff, J. R. P., McFarland, C., & Rogers, R. (1995). Influencing jurors' perceptions of guilt: Expression of emotionality during testimony. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 293–305CrossRef Google Scholar

Sas, L. D. (1991). Reducing the system-induced trauma for child sexual abuse victims through court preparation, assessment and follow-up (Final Report, Project No. 4555-1-125, National Welfare Grants Division, Health and Welfare Canada). London, Ontario: London Family Court Clinic

Sas, L. D. (1992). Empowering child witnesses for sexual abuse prosecution. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds.), Children as witnesses (pp. 181–199). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley

Saywitz, K. J., & Nathanson, R. (1993). Children's testimony and their perceptions of stress in and out of the courtroom. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 613–622CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1993). Improving children's testimony with preparation. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 117–146). New York: Guilford Press

Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1996). Narrative elaboration: Test of a new procedure for interviewing children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1347–1357CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Saywitz, K. J., Snyder, L., & Lamphear, V. (1996). Helping children tell what happened: A follow-up study of the narrative elaboration procedure. Child Maltreatment, 1, 200–212CrossRef Google Scholar

Saywitz, K. J., Snyder, L., & Nathanson, R. (1999). Facilitating the communicative competence of the child witness. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 58–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54, 182–203CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schmidt, C. W., & Brigham, J. C. (1996). Jurors' perceptions of child victim-witnesses in a simulated sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 581–606CrossRef Google Scholar

Sigler, R. T., Crowley, J. M., & Johnson, I. (1990). Judicial and prosecutorial endorsement of innovative techniques in the trial of domestic abuse cases. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 443–453CrossRef Google Scholar

Swim, J. K., Borgida, E., & McCoy, K. (1993). Videotaped versus in-court witness testimony: Does protecting the child witness jeopardize due process?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 603–631CrossRef Google Scholar

Tobey, A. E., Goodman, G. S., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Orcutt, H. K., & Sachsenmaier, T. (1995). Balancing the rights of children and defendants: Effects of closed-circuit television on children's accuracy and jurors' perceptions. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 214–239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Child Abuse and Neglect State Statute Series, 4. Washington DC: National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information

Warren, A. R., & Woodall, C. E. (1999). The reliability of hearsay testimony: How well do interviewers recall their interviews with children?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 355–371CrossRef Google Scholar

Whitcomb, D. (1992). When the victim is a child (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.