Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- 1 Children, Social Science, and the Law: An Introduction to the Issues
- PART I CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, THEIR CAPABILITIES, AND SOCIETY'S RESPONSIBILITIES TO CHILDREN
- PART II CHILDREN AND FAMILY CHANGE
- PART III JUVENILE AGGRESSION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE
- PART IV CHILDREN AS VICTIMS AND WITNESSES
- 12 The Effects of Community Violence on Children and Adolescents: Intervention and Social Policy
- 13 Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect
- 14 Children's Eyewitness Memory: True Disclosures and False Reports
- 15 Expert Testimony on the Suggestibility of Children: Does It Fit?
- 16 The Status of Evidentiary and Procedural Innovations in Child Abuse Proceedings
- PART V CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- Author Index
- Case Index
- Subject Index
- References
15 - Expert Testimony on the Suggestibility of Children: Does It Fit?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- 1 Children, Social Science, and the Law: An Introduction to the Issues
- PART I CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, THEIR CAPABILITIES, AND SOCIETY'S RESPONSIBILITIES TO CHILDREN
- PART II CHILDREN AND FAMILY CHANGE
- PART III JUVENILE AGGRESSION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE
- PART IV CHILDREN AS VICTIMS AND WITNESSES
- 12 The Effects of Community Violence on Children and Adolescents: Intervention and Social Policy
- 13 Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect
- 14 Children's Eyewitness Memory: True Disclosures and False Reports
- 15 Expert Testimony on the Suggestibility of Children: Does It Fit?
- 16 The Status of Evidentiary and Procedural Innovations in Child Abuse Proceedings
- PART V CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- Author Index
- Case Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
State v. Sloan (1995 [Mo. Ct. App.]) was a criminal case of child sexual abuse. A.D., the 6-year-old alleged victim, was dropped off on Friday by her mother at her grandmother's house, where the child's aunt Evelyn and the defendant also resided. Two days later, on Sunday, the child's aunt Anita phoned the child's mother and told her that something was wrong. A.D. then told her mother that the defendant had sexually assaulted her the day before. The mother called the child abuse hot line. On Thursday, 5 days after the alleged abuse, a social worker and a police detective interviewed the child at her school. A.D. reported that her aunt Evelyn had allowed her to get into bed with the defendant and had then left the house. She stated that defendant had “placed his finger in her punkie,” that she had touched his “wiener,” and that defendant “had placed her on his wiener.” Approximately 3 weeks later, the police detective reinterviewed the child, and she gave a similar report. The child testified at the trial, and her testimony was consistent with the testimony of her mother, the social worker, and the detective. The testimony of the child's aunt Evelyn and her grandmother (who both testified for the defense) as to the events subsequent to the alleged abuse was consistent with the child's.
The defendant was convicted, but the conviction was overturned on appeal.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Children, Social Science, and the Law , pp. 378 - 411Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
Barlow v. State, 507 S.E.2d 416 (Ga. 1998)
, & (1999). The suggestibility of children's memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 419–439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , & (2000). Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: Developmental and gender comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 74–83Google Scholar
, , , & (1995). Anatomically detailed dolls do not facilitate preschoolers' reports of a pediatric examination involving genital touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 95–109Google Scholar
, , & (1998). Reliability and credibility of young children's reports: From research to policy and practice. American Psychologist, 53, 136–151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruck, M., Hembrooke, H., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). Children's reports of pleasant and unpleasant events. In D. Read & S. Lindsay (Eds.), Recollections of trauma: Scientific research and clinical practice (pp. 199–213). New York: Plenum PressCrossRef
, , & (1996). Linguistic and socio-emotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports. Law & Human Behavior, 20, 335–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
, , , & (1994). The possible role of source misattribution in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 62, 304–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceci, S. J., Powell, M. B., & Crossman, A. M. (1999). The scientific status of children's memory and testimony. In D. L. Faigman, D. H. Kaye, M. J. Saks, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence: Supplemental Vol. 3 (pp. 40–69). St. Paul, MN: West
Committee of Concerned Social Scientists. (1993). Reprinted in M. Bruck & S. J. Ceci (1995). Amicus brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. Michaels presented by committee of concerned social scientists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 272–322
Commonwealth v. Allen, 665 N.E.2d 105 (Ct. App. Mass. 1996)
Commonwealth v. Cheryl Amirault LeFave, Middlesex S.S., Superior Court, Criminal Action Nos. 85–63, 66, 67; 85–2678–2680 (1998)
Commonwealth v. Ianello, 515 N.E.2d 1181 (Mass. 1987)
Commonwealth v. Trowbridge, 647 N.E.2d 413 (Mass. 1995)
Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
Davis, S. L., & Bottoms, B. L. (1998, March). Effects of social support on children's eyewitness reports. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology–Law Society, Redondo Beach, CA
Davis, S. L., & Bottoms, B. L. (2001). Social support and children's eyewitness memory. In M. L. Eisen, G. S. Goodman, & J. A. Quas (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
, & (1995). The use of dolls to interview young children: Issues of symbolic representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 155–173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doe v. Johnson, 52 F.3d 1448 (7th Cir. 1995)
Faigman, D. L., Kaye, D. H., Saks, M. J., & Sanders, J. (1997). Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony (Vol. 1). St. Paul, MN: West
Federal Rules of Evidence (2001)
Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923)
, , & (2000). Allegations of wrongdoing: The effects of reinforcement on children's mundane and fantastic claims. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 38–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , & (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 347–359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997)
Glendening v. State, 536 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1988)
Goodman, G. S., Emery, R. E., & Haugaard, J. J. (1998). Developmental psychology and law: Divorce, child maltreatment, foster care, and adoption. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), D. Kuhn, & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., pp. 775–874). New York: Wiley
Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc. 167 F.3d 146 (3d Cir. 1999)
(1997). Expert testimony on children's suggestibility: Should it be admitted?APSAC Advisor, 10(1), 10–14Google Scholar
In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation, 35 F.3d 717 (3rd Cir. 1994)
Isquith, P. K., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1993). Blaming the child: Attribution of responsibility to victims of child sexual abuse. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 203–228). New York: Guilford Press
Joiner v. General Electric Co., 78 F.3d 524 (11th Cir. 1996)
Kovera, M. B., & Borgida, E. (1998). Expert scientific testimony on child witnesses in the age of Daubert. In S. J. Ceci & H. Hembrooke (Eds.), Expert witnesses in child abuse cases: What can and should be said in court (pp. 185–215). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
, , , , & (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178–191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, & (2000). The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers?Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 574–586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumho Tire Co., Ltd., v. Carmichael, 119 S.Ct. 1167 (1999)
, & (1995). The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers' reports. Developmental Psychology, 31, 568–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/persuasion analysis of jurors' reactions to child witnesses. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 155–177). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
, , & (1998). Accuracy and confidence in person identification: The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely. Psychological Science, 9, 215–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). The new wave in children's suggestibility research: A critique. Cornell Law Review, 84, 1004–1087Google Scholar
Lyon, T. D. (2002). Scientific support for child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. In J. Conte (Ed.), Critical issues in child sexual abuse (pp. 107–138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Lyon, T. D., & Koehler, J. J. (1998). Where researchers fear to tread: Interpretive differences among testifying experts in child sexual abuse cases. In S. J. Ceci & H. Hembrooke (Eds.), Expert witnesses in child abuse cases: What can and should be said in court (pp. 249–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
(1995). The child sex abuse syndrome: The other major issue in State of New Jersey v. Margaret Kelly Michaels. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuliff, B. D., & Kovera, M. B. (1998, August). Are layperson's beliefs about suggestibility consistent with expert opinion? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco
Moore v. Ashland Chemical, Inc., 151 F.3d 269 (5th Cir. 1998)
, & (1992). Juror and expert knowledge of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 595–613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, C. B., & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (2000). Evidence under the rules: Text, cases, and problems. Gaithersburg, NY: Aspen
Myers, J. E. B. (1997). Evidence in child abuse and neglect cases (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). New York: Wiley
, , & (1996). Psychological research on children as witnesses: Practical implications for forensic interviews and courtroom testimony. Pacific Law Journal, 28, 3–91Google Scholar
People v. Dunkle, 602 A.2d 830 (Pa. 1992)
People v. Gibbs, 550 N.Y.S.2d 400 (1990)
People v. McDonald, 690 P.2d 709 (Cal. 1984)
, & (1996). Children's memory for traumatic injury. Child Development 67, 3045–3070CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, & (1997). Interviewing children about trauma: Problems with “specific” questions. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10, 279–290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
, & (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1993). Two years later: Effects of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness memory of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 29, 844–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter v. Whitehall Laboratories, Inc., 9 F.3d 607 (7th Cir. 1993)
Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1989). Age stereotypes, communication modality, and mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia, Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 37–56). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
, , , & (1991). Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 682–691CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saywitz, K. J., & Lyon, T. D. (2002). Coming to grips with children's suggestibility. In M. Eisen, G. Goodman, & J. Quas (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 85–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52 (Ct. Crim. App. Tex. 1997)
Scientists for the Accurate Communication of Data. (1998). Amicus Curiae brief in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Cheryl Amirault LeFave, Middlesex S.S., Supreme Judicial Court, No. SJC-7529
Shyamalan, B., & Lamb, S. (1995, August). The effects of repeated questioning on preschoolers reports of abusive behavior. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association
Sorensen v. Shaklee Corp., 31 F.3d 638 (8th Cir. 1994)
State v. Biezer, 947 S.W.2d 540 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
State v. Ellis, 669 A.2d 752 (Me. 1996)
State v. Erickson, 454 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990)
State v. Gersin, 668 N.E.2d 486 (Ohio 1996)
State v. Gordius, 544 A.2d 309 (Me. 1988)
State v. Hulbert, 481 N.W.2d 329 (Iowa 1992)
State v. James, 560 A.2d 426 (Conn. 1989)
State v. Kirschbaum, 535 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995)
State v. Long, 575 A.2d 435 (N.J. 1990)
State v. Malarney, 617 So.2d 739 (Fl. Ct. App. 1993)
State v. Mazerolle, 614 A.2d 68 (Me. 1992)
State v. Russell, 571 A.2d 229 (Me. 1990)
State v. Sloan, 912 S.W.2d 592 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
State v. Steffes, 887 P.2d 1196 (Mont. 1994)
State v. Swan, 790 P.2d 610 (Wash. 1990)
Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Esplin, P. W., Orbach, Y., & Hershkowitz, I. (2002). Using a structured protocol to improve the quality of investigative interviews. In M. Eisen, G. Goodman, & J. Quas (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 409–436). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Stringer v. Commonwealth, 956 S.W.2d 883 (Ky. 1997)
United States v. Brien, 59 F.3d 274 (1st Cir. 1995)
United States v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214 (1995)
United States v. Curry, 977 F.2d 1042 (7th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Daniels, 64 F.3d 311 (7th Cir. 1995)
United States v. Downing, 609 F.Supp. 784 (E.D. Penn. 1985)
United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224 (3rd Cir. 1985)
United States v. George, 975 F.2d 1431 (9th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Hall, 165 F.3d 1095 (7th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Harris, 995 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Kime, 99 F.3d 870 (8th Cir. 1996)
United States v. Larkin, 978 F.2d 964 (7th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Nguyen, 793 F.Supp. 497 (D.N.J. 1992)
United States v. Norwood, 939 F.Supp. 1132 (D.N.J. 1996)
United States v. Rouse, 100 F.3d 560 (8th Cir. 1996)
United States v. Rouse, 111 F.3d 561 (8th Cir. 1997)
United States v. Scheffer, 118 S.Ct. 1261 (1998)
United States v. Shay, 57 F.3d 126 (1st Cir. 1995)
United States v. Smith, 736 F.2d 1103 (6th Cir. 1984)
Utley v. State, 826 S.W.2d 268 (Ark. 1992)
Westcott, H. (1998). Jeopardy in the courtroom. [Review of the book Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children's testimony]. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 525
Wigmore, J. H. (1904). A treatise on the system of evidence in trials at common law (Vol. 3). Boston: Little, Brown
Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1979). Is the psychology of eyewitness identification a matter of common sense? In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives (pp. 13–40). Chichester, UK: Wiley
- 26
- Cited by