References

Lorenz Ratke; Pavel Gurikov

doi:10.1017/9781108778336.021

Gibson, L.J., Ashby, M.F. Cellular Solids. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.Google Scholar

Lunt, A.J.G., Chater, P., Korsunsky, A.M. On the origins of strain inhomogeneity in amorphous materials. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8(1):1574.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brinker, C.J., Scherer, G.W. Sol–Gel Science: The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing. HBJI, editor. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.; 1990.Google Scholar

Wen, D., Eychmüller A. 3D assembly of preformed colloidal nanoparticles into gels and aerogels: function-led design. Chem Commun. 2017; 53:12608–12621.Google Scholar

Beier, M.G., Ziegler, C., Wegner, K., et al. A fast route to obtain modified tin oxide aerogels using hydroxostannate precursors. Mater Chem Front. 2018; 2:710–717.Google Scholar

Cai, B., Sayevich, V., Gaponik, N., Eychmüller A. Emerging hierarchical aerogels: self-assembly of metal and semiconductor nanocrystals. Advanced Materials. 2018; 30(33):1707518.Google Scholar

Du, R., Hu, Y., Hübner, R., et al. Specific ion effects directed noble metal aerogels: versatile manipulation for electrocatalysis and beyond. Science Advances. 2019; 5(5).Google Scholar

Pekala, R.W. Organic aerogels from the polycondensation of resorcinol with formaldehyde. Journal of Materials Science. 1989; 24(9):3221–3227.Google Scholar

Pekala, R.W., Alviso, C.T., Lu, X., Gross, J., Fricke, J. New organic aerogels based upon a phenolic-furfural reaction. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1995; 188:34–40.Google Scholar

BASF. Slentite aerogel. www.basf.com/global/de/products/plastics-rubber/corpus/ideas-and-solutions/solid_air.html.Google Scholar

Betz, M., García-González, C.A., Subrahmanyam, R.P., Smirnova, I., Kulozik, U. Preparation of novel whey protein-based aerogels as drug carriers for life science applications. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2012; 72:111–119.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kistler, S.S. Coherent and expanded aerogels and jellies. Nature. 1931; 127:741.Google Scholar

Kistler, S.S. Coherent expanded aerogels. Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1932; 31: 52–64.Google Scholar

Aegerter, M.A., Leventis, N., Koebel, M.M., editors. Aerogels Handbook. NewYork: Springer Verlag; 2011.Google Scholar

Nicola Hüsing U.S. Aerogels – airy materials: chemistry, structure, and properties. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 1998; 37:22–45.Google Scholar

Pierre, A.C., Pajonk, G.M. Chemistry of aerogels and their applications. Chemical Reviews. 2002; 102:4243–4266.Google Scholar

Teichner, S.J., Nicolaon, G.A., Vicarini, M.A., Gardes, G.E.E. Inorganic oxide aerogels. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 1976; 5(3):245–273.Google Scholar

Fricke, J., editor. Aerogels. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 1988.Google Scholar

Leventis, N., Sotiriou-Leventis, C., Mohite, D.P., et al. Polyimide aerogels by ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP). Chemistry of Materials. 2011; 23:2250–2261.Google Scholar

Chidambareswarapattar, C., McCarver, P.M., Luo, H., Lu, H., Sotiriou-Leventis, C., Leventis, N. Fractal multiscale nanoporous polyurethanes: flexible to extremely rigid aerogels from multifunctional small molecules. Chemistry of Materials. 2013; 25:3205–3224.Google Scholar

Malakooti, S., Rostami, S., Churu, H.G., et al. Scalable, hydrophobic and highly-stretchable poly(isocyanurate–urethane) aerogels. RSC Advances. 2018; 8:21214.Google Scholar

Tan, C., Fung, B.M., Newman, J.K., Yu, C. Organic aerogels with very high impact strength. Advanced Materials. 2001; 13(9):644–646.Google Scholar

Ganesan, K., Ratke, L. Facile preparation of monolithic κ-carrageenan aerogels. Soft Matter. 2014; 10:3218–3224.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, R., Gurikov, P., Dieringer, P., Sun, M., Smirnova, I. On the road to biopolymer aerogels – dealing with the solvent. Gels. 2016; 1:291–313.Google Scholar

Smirnova, I., Gurikov, P. Aerogels in chemical engineering: strategies toward tailor-made aerogels. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. 2017; 8(1): 307–334.Google Scholar

Ganesan, K., Budtova, T., Ratke, L., et al. Review on the production of polysaccharide aerogel particles. Materials. 2018; 11(11):2144.Google Scholar

Aravind, P.R., Mukundan, P., P (KP), Warrier, K.G.K. Mesoporous silica-alumina aerogels with high thermal pore stability through hybrid sol-gel route followed by subcritical drying. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2006; 96(1):14–28.Google Scholar

Liu, S., Yu, T., Hu, N., Liu, R., Liu, X. High strength cellulose aerogels prepared by spatially confined synthesis of silica in bioscaffolds. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2013; 439:159–166.Google Scholar

Kong, Y., Zhong, Y., Shen, X., Gu, L., Cui, S., Yang, M. Synthesis of monolithic mesoporous siliconcarbide from resorcinol-formaldehyde/silica composites. Materials Letters. 2013; 99:108–110.Google Scholar

Demilecamps, A., Reichenauer, G., Rigacci, A., Budtova, T. Cellulose-silica composite aerogels from ‘one-pot’ synthesis. Cellulose. 2014; 21:2625–2636.Google Scholar

Demilecamps, A., Beauger, C., Hildenbrand, C., Rigacci, A. Cellulose-silica aerogels. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2015; 122:293–300.Google Scholar

Zhao, S., Malfait W.J., Jeong, E., et al. Facile one-pot synthesis of mechanically robust biopolymer-silica nanocomposite aerogel by coagulation of silicic acid with chitosan in aaqueous media. ACS Sustainable Chemical Engineering. 2016; 4(10):5674–5683.Google Scholar

Zhao, S., Malfait W.J., Demilecamps, A., et al. Strong, thermally superinsulating biopolymer-silica aerogel hybrids by cogelation of silicic acid with pectin. Angewandte Chemie. 2015; 48:1521–3757.Google Scholar

Corporation, C. Aerogel. www.cabotcorp.com/solutions/products-plus/aerogel.Google Scholar

Aerogels, A. Aspen Aerogel webpage. www.aerogel.com.Google Scholar

Murillo, J.S.R., Bachlehner, M.E., Campo, F., Barbero, E.J. Structure and mechanical properties of silica aerogels and xerogels modelled by molecular dynamics simulation. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2010; 356:1325–1331.CrossRef Google Scholar

Patil, S.P., Rege, A., Sagardas, Itskov, M., Markert, B. Mechanics of nanostructured porous silica aerogel resulting from molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2017; 121:5660–5668.Google Scholar

Goncalves, W., Morthomas, J., Chantrenne, P., Perez, M., Foray, G., Martin, C.L. Elasticity and strength of silica aerogels: a molecular dynamics study on large volumes. Acta Materialia. 2018; 145:165–174.Google Scholar

Gurav, J.L., Jung, I.K., Park, H.H., Kang, E.S., Nadargi, D.Y. Silica aerogel: synthesis and applications. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2010; 409310.Google Scholar

Koebel, M.M., Rigacci, A., Achard, P. Aerogel-based thermal superinsulation: an overview. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology. 2012; 63:315–339.Google Scholar

Maleki, H., Durães, L., Portugal, A. An overview on silica aerogels synthesis and different mechanical reinforcing strategies. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2014; 385:55–74.Google Scholar

Parale, V.G., Lee, K.Y., Park, H.H. Flexible and transparent silica aerogels: an overview. Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society. 2017; 54:184–199.Google Scholar

Zsigmondy, R. Kolloidchemie. vol. II. Spezieller Teil. 5th ed. Verlag Otto Spamer; 1927.Google Scholar

Graham, T. Anwendung der Diffusion der Flüssigkeiten zur Analyse. Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie. 1862; 121:36.Google Scholar

Iler, R.K. The Chemistry of Silica. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1979.Google Scholar

Grimaux, E. Compt rend. 1884; 98:1434–1437.Google Scholar

Wang, S., Wang, D.K., Smart, S., Diniz da Costa, J.C. Ternary phase-separation investigation of sol-gel derived silica from ethyl silicate 40. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5(1):14560.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schaefer, D.W. What factors control the structure of silica aerogels? Revue de Physique Applique, Colloque C4. 1989; 24:C4–121–C4–126.Google Scholar

Viscek, T. Fractal Growth Phenomena. 2nd ed. World Scientific Publishing Co.; 1992.Google Scholar

Ratke, L., Voorhees, P.W. Growth and Coarsening: Ostwald Ripening in Material Processing. Engineering Materials and Processes. Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2002.Google Scholar

Wagner, C. Theorie der Alterung von Niederschlägen durch Umlösen (Ostwald-Reifung). Z Elektrochemie. 1961; 65:581–591.Google Scholar

Tiller, W.A. The Science of Crystallization – Microscopic Interfacial Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ratke, L., Uffelmann, D., Bender, W., Voorhees, P.W. Theory of Ostwald ripening due to a second order reaction. Scripta Metall et Materialia. 1995; 33:363–367.Google Scholar

Teraoka, I. Polymer Solutions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.Google Scholar

Peitgen, H.O., Jürgens, H., Saupe, D. Fractals for the Classroom. Part 1. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992.Google Scholar

Peitgen, H.O., Jürgens, H., Saupe, D. Fractals for the Classroom. Part 2. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992.Google Scholar

Kaye, B.H. A Random Walk through Fractal Dimensions. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 1989.Google Scholar

Nichols, F.A, Mullins, W.W. Surface-(interface-) and volume-diffusion contributions to morphological changes driven by capillarity. Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME. 1965; 233:1840.Google Scholar

Nichols, F.A. On the spheroidization of rod-shaped particles of finite length. Journal of Materials Science. 1976; 11(6):1077–1082.Google Scholar

Einarsrud, M.A. Light gels by conventional drying. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1998; 225:1–7.Google Scholar

Einarsrud, M.A., Nilsen, E., Rigacci, A., et al. Strengthening of silica gels and aerogels by washing and aging processes. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2001; 285:1–7.Google Scholar

Haerid, S., Dahle, M., Lima, S., Einarsrud, M.A. Preparation and properties of monolithic silica xerogels from TEOS-based alcogels aged in silane solutions. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1995; 186:96–103.Google Scholar

Smitha, S., Shajesh, P., Aravind, P.R., Kumar, S.R., Pillai, P.K., Warrier, K.G.K. Effect of aging time and concentration of aging solution on the porosity characteristics of subcritically dried aerogels. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2006; 91:286–292.Google Scholar

Reichenauer, G. Thermal aging of silica gels in water. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2004; 350:189–195.Google Scholar

Iswar, S., Malfait, W.J., Balog, S., Winnefeld, F., Lattuada, M., Koebel, M.M. Effect of aging on silica aerogel properties. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2017; 241:293–302.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rao, A.V., Bhagat, S.D., Hirashima, H., Pajonk, G.M. Synthesis of flexible silica aerogels using methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMS) precursor. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2006; 300(1):279–285.Google Scholar

Guo, H., Nguyen, B.N., McCorkle, L.S., Shonkwiler, B., Meador, M.A.B. Elastic low density aerogels derived from bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]disulfide, tetramethylorthosilicate and vinyltrimethoxysilane via a two-step process. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2009; 19:9054–9062.Google Scholar

Aravind, P.R., Niemeyer, P., Ratke, L. Novel flexible aerogels derived from methyltri-methoxysilane/3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyltrimethoxysilane co-precursor. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2013; 181:111–115.Google Scholar

Kanamori, K., Aizawa, M., Nakanishi, K., Hanada, T. New transparent methylsilsesquiox-ane aerogels and xerogels with improved mechanical properties. Advanced Materials. 2007; 19:1589–1593.Google Scholar

Hayase, G., Kanamori, K., Kazuki, K., Hanada, T. Synthesis of new flexible aerogels from MTMS/DMDMS via ambient pressure drying. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. vol. 18. Ceramic Society of Japan; 2013. p. 032013.Google Scholar

Hayase, G., Kanamori, K., Nakanishi, K. New flexible aerogels and xerogels derived from methyltrimethoxysilane/dimethyldimethoxysilane co-precursors. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011; 21:17077–17079.Google Scholar

Hayase, G., Kanamori, K., Hasegawa, G., Maeno, A., Kaji, H., Nakanishi, K. A super-amphiphobic macroporous silicone monolith with marshmallow-like flexibility. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2013; 52(41):10788–10791.Google Scholar

Hayase, G., Kanamori, K., Abe, K., et al. Polymethylsilsesquioxane-cellulose nanofiber biocomposite aerogels with high thermal insulation, bendability, and superhydrophobic-ity. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2014; 6:9466–9471.Google Scholar

Hayase, G., Nomura, S.M. Large-scale preparation of giant vesicles by squeezing a lipid-coated marshmallow-like silicone gel in a buffer. Langmuir. 2018; 34(37):11021–11026.Google Scholar

Durães, L., Maia, A., Portugal, A. Effect of additives on the properties of silica based aerogels synthesized from methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMS). Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2015; 106:85–92.Google Scholar

Maleki, H., Durães, L., Portugal, A. Development of mechanically strong ambient pressure dried silica aerogels with optimized properties. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2015 04; 119(14):7689–7703.Google Scholar

Maleki, H., Durães, L., Portugal, A. Synthesis of lightweight polymer-reinforced silica aerogels with improved mechanical and thermal insulation properties for space applications. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2014; 197:116–129.Google Scholar

Lu, X., Caps, R., Fricke, J., Alviso, C.T., Pekala, R.W. Correlation between structure and thermal conductivity of organic aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1995; 188:226–234.Google Scholar

ElKhatat, A.M., Al-Muhtaseb, S.A. Advances in tailoring resorcinol-formaldehyde organic and carbon aerogels. Advanced Materials. 2011; 23:2887–2903.Google Scholar

Reuss, M., Ratke, L. Subcritically dried RF-aerogels catalysed by hydrochloric acid. Journal of Sol–Gel Sciences and Technology. 2008; 47:74–80.Google Scholar

Job, N. Matériaux carbonés poreux de texture contrôlée synthétisés par procédé sol-gel et leur utilisation en catalyse hétérogène. University of Liege. Liege, Belgium; 2005.Google Scholar

Chatchawalsaisin, J., Kendrick, J., Tubleb, S.C., Anwar, J. An optimized force field for crystalline phases of resorcinol. CrystEngComm. 2008; 10:437–445.Google Scholar

Durairaj, R.B. Resorcinol. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2005.Google Scholar

Job, N., Panariello, F., Crine, M., Pirard, J.P., Leonard, A. Rheological determination of the sol-gel transition during the aqueous synthesis of resorcinol-formaldehyde resins. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2007; 293:224–228.Google Scholar

Barbieri, O., Ehrburger-Dolle, F., Rieker, T.P., Pajonk, G.M., Pinto, N., Rao, A.V. Small-angle X-ray scattering of a new series of organic aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2001; 285:109–115.Google Scholar

Li, T., Cao, M., Liang, J., Xie, X., Du, G. Mechanisms of base-catalyzed resorcinol-formaldehyde and phenol-resorcinol-formaldehyde condensation reactions: a theoretical study. Polymers. 2017; 9:426.Google Scholar

Mulik, S., Sotiriou-Leventis, C. Resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels. In: Aegerter, M.F., Leventis, N., Koebel, M.M., editors. Aerogels Handbook. New York: Springer; 2011. pp. 215–234.Google Scholar

Pekala, R.W., Kong, F.M. A synthetic route to organic aerogels – mechanisms, structure and properties. Revue de Physique Applique, Colloque C4. 1989; 24:33–40.Google Scholar

Schwan, M. Synthese und Eigenschaften flexibler Resorcin-Formaldehyd- und Kohlenstoffaerogele. RWTH University: Aachen, Germany; 2018.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, T., Mukai, S.R., Endo, A., Nakaiwa, M., Tamon, H. Interpretation of structure formation during sol-gel transition of resorcinol-formaldehyde solution by population balance. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2003; 264:532–537.Google Scholar

Franek, J., Nowak, A., Turska, E. Kinetics of polycondensation. Acta Polymerics. 1982; 33:169–174.Google Scholar

Paventi, M. Particular solution for any consecutive second-order reaction. Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 1987; 65:1987–1994.Google Scholar

Grenier-Loustalot, M.F., Larroque, S., Grande, D., Grenier, P., Bedel, D. Phenolic resins: 2. Influence of catalyst type on reaction mechanisms and kinetics. Polymer. 1996; 37(8):1363–1369.Google Scholar

Tamon, H., Ishikaza, H. SAXS study on gelation process in preparation of resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogel. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1998; 206:577–582.Google Scholar

Horikawa, T., Hayashi, J, Muroyama, K. Controllability of pore characteristics of resorcinol-formaldehyde carbon aerogels. Carbon. 2004; 42:1625–1633.Google Scholar

Pekala, R.W., Schaefer, D.W. Structure of organic aerogels: I. Morphology and scaling. Macromolecules. 1993; 26:5487–5493.Google Scholar

Bock, V., Emmerling, A., Fricke, J. Influence of monomer and catalyst concentration on RF and carbon aerogel structure. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1998; 225:69–73.Google Scholar

Czakkel, O., Marthi, K., Geissler, E., Laszlo, K. Influence of drying on the morphology of resorcinol–formaldehyde-based carbon gels. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2005; 86:124–133.Google Scholar

Gommes, C.J., Roberts, A.P. Structure development of resorcinol-formaldehyde gels: microphase separation or colloid aggregation. Physical Review. 2008; E77:041409.Google Scholar

Gommes, C.J., Job, N., Pirard, J.P., Blacher, S., Goderis, B. Critical opalescence points to thermodynamic instability: relevance to small-angle X-ray scattering of resorcinol-formaldehyde gel formation at low pH. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2008; 41:663–668.Google Scholar

Gaca, K.Z., Sefcik, J. Mechanism and kinetics of nanostructure evolution during early stages of resorcinol–formaldehyde polymerisation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2013; 406:51–59.Google Scholar

Brandt, R. Sauer katalysierte, unterkritisch getrocknete Resorcin-Formaldehyd-Aerogele und daraus abgeleitete Kohlenstoff-Aerogele. Bayerische Julius-Maximilian Universität Würzburg; 2004.Google Scholar

Mulik, S., Sotiriou-Leventis, C., Leventis, N. Time-efficient acid-catalyzed synthesis of resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels. Chemistry of Materials. 2007; 19:6138–6144.Google Scholar

Milow, B., Ratke, L, Ludwig, S. Ctiric acid catalyzed organic aerogels. In: Smirnova, I., Perrut, M., editors. Proceedings ‘Seminar on Aerogels’. Nancy, France: ISASF Society; 2012.Google Scholar

Schwan, M., Ratke, L. Flexibilisation of resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2013; 1:13462–13468.Google Scholar

Schwan, M., Naikade, M., Raabe, D., Ratke, L. From hard to rubber-like: mechanical properties of resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels. Journal of Material Science. 2015; 50:5482–5493.Google Scholar

Hillert, M. Phase Equilibria, Phase Diagrams and Phase Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.Google Scholar

Lüdecke, D.L. Thermodynamik. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2000.Google Scholar

Atkins, P.W., De Paula, J., Keeler, J. Atkins’ Physical Chemistry. Oxford University Press; 2018.Google Scholar

Wang, F., Ratke, L., Zhang, H., Altschuh, P., Nestler, B. A phase-field study on polymerization-induced phase separation occasioned by diffusion and capillary flow – mechanism for the formation of porous microstructures in membranes. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology. 2020; 94:356–374.Google Scholar

Stauffer, D, Aharony, A. Introduction to Percolation Theory. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1994.Google Scholar

Zugenmaier, P. Crystalline Cellulose and Derivatives: Characterization and Structures. Springer Series in Wood Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008.Google Scholar

Marsh, J.T., Wood, F.C. An Introduction to the Chemistry of Cellulose. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall Ltd.; 1942.Google Scholar

Klemm, D., Phlipp, B., Heinze, T., Heinze, U., Wagenknecht, W. Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry: Fundamentals and Analytical Methods. vol. 1 and 2. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 1998.Google Scholar

Hearle, J.W.S. A fringed fibril theory of structure in crystalline polymers. Journal of Polymer Science. 1958; 28(117):432–435.Google Scholar

Flory, P.J. Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1953.Google Scholar

Israelachvili, J.N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. Toronto: Academic Press; 1985.Google Scholar

Olsson, C., Westman, G. Direct dissolution of cellulose: background, means and applications. In: de Wen, TGNV, editor. Cellulose – Fundamental Aspects. INTECH; 2013. www.intechopen.com/books/howtoreference/cellulose-fundamental-aspects/direct-dissolution-of-cellulose-background-means-and-applications.Google Scholar

Medronho, B., Lindmann, B. Brief overview on cellulose dissolution/regeneration interactions. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2015; 222:502–508.Google Scholar

Budtova, T., Navard, P. Cellulose in NaOH-water based solvents: a review. Cellulose. 2016; 23:5–55.Google Scholar

Hirosi, S., Heinz, K., Kurt, H. Das System Cellulose–Natriumhydroxyd–Wasser in Abhängigkeit von der Temperatur. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie. 43B(1): 309–328.Google Scholar

Kihlman, M., Medronho, B., Romano, A., Germgard, U., Lindman, B. Cellulose dissolution in an alkali based solvent: influence of additives and pretreatments. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 2013; 24(2):295–303.Google Scholar

Cibik, T. Untersuchungen am System NMMO/H2O/Cellulose. TU Berlin; 2003.Google Scholar

Walker, M., Zimmerman, R.L., Whitcombe, G.P., Humbert, H.H. N-Methylmorpholinoxid (NMMO) – Die Entwicklung eines Lösemittels zur industriellen Produktion von Zellulosefasern. Lenzinger Berichte. 1997; 97:76–80.Google Scholar

Wilcox, R.J., Losey, B.P., Folmer, J.C.W., Martin, J.D., Zeller, M., Sommer, R. Crystalline and liquid structure of zinc chloride trihydrate: a unique ionic liquid. Inorganic Chemistry. 2015; 54:1109–1119.Google Scholar

Sen, S., Losey, B.P., Gordon, E.E., Argyropoulos, D.S., Martin, J.D. Ionic liquid character of zinc chloride hydrates define solvent characteristics that afford the solubility of cellulose. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2016; 120:1134–1141.Google Scholar

Sen, S., Martin, J.D., Argyropoulos, D.S. Review of cellulose non-derivatizing solvent interactions with emphasis on activity in inorganic molten salt hydrates. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2013 08; 1(8):858–870.Google Scholar

Philip, B., Schleicher, H., Wagenknecht, W. Non-aquous solvents of cellulose Chemtech. 1977; 7:702–709.Google Scholar

Fischer, S. Anorganische Salzhydratschmelzen – ein unkonventionelles Löse- und Reaktionsmedium für Cellulose. TU Bergakademie Freiberg. Freiberg, Germany; 2004.Google Scholar

Deguchi, S., Tsujii, K., Horikoshi, K. Crystalline-to-amorphous transformation of cellulose in hot and compressed water and its implications for hydrothermal conversion. Green Chemistry. 2008; 10:191–196.Google Scholar

Hattori, M., Koga, T., Shimaya, Y., Saito, M. Aqueous calcium thiocyanate solutions as a cellulose solvent. structure and interactions with cellulose. Polymer Journal. 1998; 30:43–48.Google Scholar

Frey, M., Theil, M.H. Calculated phase diagrams for cellulose/ammonia/ammonium thiocyanate solutions in comparison to experimental results. Cellulose. 2004; 11:53–63.Google Scholar

Schestakow, M. Nanostrukturierte Cellulose-Aerogel-Polyesterverbunde. Aachen, Germany: RWTH Aachen University; 2020.Google Scholar

Gavillon, R., Budtova, T. Aerocellulose: new highly porous cellulose prepared from cellulose–NaOH aqueous solutions. Biomacromolecules. 2008; 9:269–277.Google Scholar

te Nijenhuis, K. Thermoreversible Networks. vol. 130 of Advances in Polymer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1997.Google Scholar

Liu, W., Budtova, T., Navard, P. Influence of ZnO on the properties of dilute and semi-dilute cellulose–NaOH–water solutions. Cellulose. 2011; 18:911–920.Google Scholar

Trygg, J., Fardim, P., Gericke, M., Mäkilä, E., Salonen, J. Physicochemical design of the morphology and ultrastructure of cellulose beads. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013; 93(1):291–299.Google Scholar

Mohamed, S.M.K., Ganesan, K., Milow, B., Ratke, L. The effect of zinc oxide (ZnO) addition on the physical and morphological properties of cellulose aerogel beads. RSC Advances. 2015; 5:90193–90201.Google Scholar

Cussler, E.L. Diffusion – Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar

Kuttler, C. Reaction–diffusion equations with applications; 2011. Westfälische Wilhelms Universität Münster, online. www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/physik_tp/ lectures/ws2016-2017/num_methods_i/rd.pdf.Google Scholar

Kimura, Y.T. The mathematics of patterns: the modeling and analysis of reaction-diffusion equations. Princeton University; 2014.Google Scholar

Innerlohinger, J., Weber, H.K., Kraft, G. Aerocellulose: aerogels and aerogel-like materials made from cellulose. Macromolecular Symposia. 2006; 244:126–135.Google Scholar

Liebner, F., Potthast, A., Rosenau, T., Haimer, E., Wendland, M. Ultralight-weight cellulose aerogels from NBnMO-stabilized lyocell dopes. Research Letters in Materials Science. 2007; 2007(ID 7324).Google Scholar

Liebner, F., Rosenau, T., Wendland, M., Potthast, A., Haimer, E. Cellulose aerogels: highly porous, ultra-lightweight materials. Holzforschung. 2008; 62(2):129–135.Google Scholar

Liebner, F., Haimer, E., Potthast, A., et al. Cellulosic aerogels as ultra-lightweight materials. Part 2: Synthesis and properties. Holzforschung. 2009; 63:3–11.Google Scholar

Liebner, F., Haimer, E., Wendland, M. et al. Aerogels from unaltered bacterial cellulose: application of scCO2 drying for the preparation of shaped, ultra-lightweighted cellulosic aerogels. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2010; 10:349–352.Google Scholar

Perrut, M., Smirnova, I., editors. Aerogels from bacterial cellulose: a new dimension in preparing shaped cellulose aerogels. ISASF, International Society for Advancement of Supercritical Fluids; 2010.Google Scholar

Hoepfner, S., Ratke, L., Milow, B. Synthesis and characterization of nanofibrillar cellulose aerogels. Cellulose. 2008; 15:121–129.Google Scholar

Karadagli, I., Schulz, B., Schestakow, M., Milow, B., Gries, T., Ratke, L. Production of porous cellulose aerogel fibers by an extrusion process. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2015; 106:105–114.Google Scholar

Schestakow, M., Karadagli, I., Ratke, L. Cellulose aerogels prepared from an aqueous zinc chloride salt hydrate melt. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016; 137:642–649.Google Scholar

Pircher, N., Carbajal, L., Schimper, C., et al. Impact of selected solvent systems on the pore and solid structure of cellulose aerogels. Cellulose. 2016; 23:1949–1966.Google Scholar

Schulz, B. Cellulose-Aerogelfasern. RWTH Aachen University. Aachen, Germany; 2015.Google Scholar

Pinnow, M., Fink, H.P., Fanter, C., Kunze, J. Characterization of highly porous materials from cellulose carbamate. Macromolecular Symposia. 2008; 262:129–139.Google Scholar

Gan, S., Zakaria, S., Chia, C.H., Chen, R.S., Ellis, A.V., Kaco, H. Highly porous regenerated cellulose hydrogel and aerogel prepared from hydrothermal synthesized cellulose carbamate. PLoS One. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173743.Google Scholar

Gavillon, R. Preparation et caracterisation der materiaux cellulosiques ultra poreux. Ecole des Mines de Paris. Paris; 2007.Google Scholar

Jin, H., Nishiyama, Y., Wada, M., Kuga, S. Nanofibrillar cellulose aerogels. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2004; 240:63–67.Google Scholar

Innerlohinger, J., Weber, H.K., Kraft, G. Aerocell: Aerogels from cellulosic materials. Lenzinger Berichte. 2006; 86:137–143.Google Scholar

Pircher, N., Fischhuber, D., Carbajal, L., et al. Preparation and reinforcement of dual-porous biocompatible cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 2015; 300(9):911–924.Google Scholar

Donati, I., Paoletti, S. Non-aquous solvents of cellulose. In: Rehm, B.H.A., editor. Material Properties of Alginates. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. pp. 1–53.Google Scholar

Jones, R.G. Dispersity in polymer science. Polymer International. 2010; 59(1):22–22.Google Scholar

Aarstad, O.A., Tøndervik, A., Sletta, H., Skjåk-Bræk, G. Alginate sequencing: an analysis of block distribution in alginates using specific alginate degrading enzymes. Biomacromolecules. 2012 01; 13(1):106–116.Google Scholar

Usov, A.I. Alginic acids and alginates: analytical methods used for their estimation and characterisation of composition and primary structure. Russian Chemical Reviews. 1999; 68(11):957–966.Google Scholar

Stokke, B.T., Smidsroed, O., Bruheim, P., Skjaak-Braek, G. Distribution of uronate residues in alginate chains in relation to alginate gelling properties. Macromolecules. 1991 08; 24(16):4637–4645.Google Scholar

Agulhon, P., Constant, S., Chiche, B., et al. Controlled synthesis from alginate gels of cobalt–manganese mixed oxide nanocrystals with peculiar magnetic properties. Catalysis Today. 2012; 189(1):49–54.Google Scholar

Grasdalen, H., Larsen, B, Smisrod, O. 13C-n.m.r. studies of monomeric composition and sequence in alginate. Carbohydrate Research. 1981; 89(2):179–191.Google Scholar

Pawar, S.N., Edgar, K.J. Alginate derivatization: a review of chemistry, properties and applications. Biomaterials. 2012; 33(11):3279–3305.Google Scholar

Matsushima, K., Minoshima, H., Kawanami, H., et al. Decomposition reaction of alginic acid using subcritical and supercritical water. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2005 12; 44(25):9626–9630.Google Scholar

Villard, P., Rezaeeyazdi, M., Colombani, T., et al. Autoclavable and injectable cryogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2019; 8(17):1900679.Google Scholar

Pawar, S.N. Chemical modification of alginate. In: Venkatesan, J., Anil, S., Kim, S.K., editors. Seaweed Polysaccharides. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 111–155.Google Scholar

Pawar, S.N., Edgar, K.J. Chemical modification of alginates in organic solvent systems. Biomacromolecules. 2011 11; 12(11):4095–4103.Google Scholar

Schleeh, T., Madau, M., Roessner, D. Synthesis enhancements for generating highly soluble tetrabutylammonium alginates in organic solvents. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014; 114:493–499.Google Scholar

Budtova, T. Cellulose II aerogels: a review. Cellulose. 2019 Jan; 26(1):81–121.Google Scholar

Ventura, M.G., Paninho, A.I., Nunes, A.V.M., Fonseca, I.M., Branco, L.C. Biocompatible locust bean gum mesoporous matrices prepared by ionic liquids and a scCO2 sustainable system. RSC Advances. 2015; 5:107700–107706.Google Scholar

Cordeiro, T., Paninho, A.B., Bernardo, M., et al. Biocompatible locust bean gum as mesoporous carriers for naproxen delivery. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2020; 239:121973.Google Scholar

Sun, X., Xue, Z., Mu, T. Precipitation of chitosan from ionic liquid solution by the compressed CO2 anti-solvent method. Green Chemistry. 2014; 16:2102–2106.Google Scholar

Aarstad, O., Strand, B.L., Klepp-Andersen, L.M., Skjåk-Bræk, G. Analysis of G-block distributions and their impact on gel properties of in vitro epimerized mannuronan. Biomacromolecules. 2013 10; 14(10):3409–3416.Google Scholar

Fang, Y., Al-Assaf, S., Phillips, G.O., et al. Multiple steps and critical behaviors of the binding of calcium to alginate. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2007 03; 111(10): 2456–2462.Google Scholar

Hecht, H., Srebnik, S. Structural characterization of sodium alginate and calcium alginate. Biomacromolecules. 2016 06; 17(6):2160–2167.Google Scholar

Robitzer, M., David, L., Rochas, C., Di Renzo, F., Quignard, F. Nanostructure of calcium alginate aerogels obtained from multistep solvent exchange route. Langmuir. 2008 11; 24(21):12547–12552.Google Scholar

Robitzer, M., David, L., Rochas, C., Di Renzo, F., Quignard, F. Supercritically-dried alginate aerogels retain the fibrillar structure of the hydrogels. Macromolecular Symposia. 2008; 273(1):80–84.Google Scholar

Takeshita, S., Sadeghpour, A., Malfait, W.J., Konishi, A., Otake, K., Yoda, S. Formation of nanofibrous structure in biopolymer aerogel during supercritical CO2 processing: the case of chitosan aerogel. Biomacromolecules. 2019 05; 20(5):2051–2057.Google Scholar

Agulhon, P., Markova, V., Robitzer, M., Quignard, F., Mineva, T. Structure of alginate gels: interaction of diuronate units with divalent cations from density functional calculations. Biomacromolecules. 2012 06; 13(6):1899–1907.Google Scholar

Plazinski, W., Drach, M. Binding of bivalent metal cations by α-l-guluronate: insights from the DFT-MD simulations. New Journal of Chemistry. 2015; 39:3987–3994.Google Scholar

Menakbi, C., Quignard, F., Mineva, T. Complexation of trivalent metal cations to mannuronate type alginate models from a density functional study. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2016 04; 120(15):3615–3623.Google Scholar

Topuz, F., Henke, A., Richtering, W., Groll, J. Magnesium ions and alginate do form hydrogels: a rheological study. Soft Matter. 2012; 8:4877–4881.Google Scholar

Westmann, J.O., Taherzadeh, M.J., Franzén, C.J. Proteomic analysis of the increased stress tolerance of saccharomyces cerevisiae encapsulated in liquid core alginate–chitosan capsules. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49335.Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, G., Zhu, P. Characterization and functional assessment of alginate fibers prepared by metal–calcium ion complex coagulation bath. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2020; 232:115693.Google Scholar

Tritz, J., Rahouadj, R., de Isla, N., et al. Designing a three-dimensional alginate hydrogel by spraying method for cartilage tissue engineering. Soft Matter. 2010; 6:5165–5174.Google Scholar

Marpani, F., Luo, J., Mateiu, R.V., Meyer, A.S., Pinelo, M. In situ formation of a biocatalytic alginate membrane by enhanced concentration polarization. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015 08; 7(32):17682–17691.Google Scholar

Chen, D., Lewandowski, Z., Roe, F., Surapaneni, P. Diffusivity of Cu2+ in calcium alginate gel beads. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1993; 41(7):755–760.Google Scholar

Nestle, N.F.E.I., Kimmich, R. NMR imaging of heavy metal absorption in alginate, immobilized cells, and kombu algal biosorbents. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1996; 51(5):538–543.Google Scholar

Kuo, C.K., Ma, P.X. Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: Part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties. Biomaterials. 2001; 22(6):511–521.Google Scholar

Gurikov, P., Raman, S.P., Weinrich, D., Fricke, M., Smirnova, I. A novel approach to alginate aerogels: carbon dioxide induced gelation. RSC Advances. 2015; 5:7812–7818.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, R., Gurikov, P., Meissner, I., Smirnova, I. Preparation of biopolymer aerogels using green solvents. JoVE. 2016; (113):e54116.Google Scholar

Yuguchi, Y., Hasegawa, A., Padoł, A.M., Draget, K.I., Stokke, B.T. Local structure of Ca2+ induced hydrogels of alginate–oligoguluronate blends determined by small-angle-X-ray scattering. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016; 152:532–540.Google Scholar

Valentin, R., Horga, R., Bonelli, B., Garrone, E., Di Renzo, F., Quignard, F. FTIR spectroscopy of NH3 on acidic and ionotropic alginate aerogels. Biomacromolecules. 2006 03; 7(3):877–882.Google Scholar

Mørch, Ý.A., Holtan, S., Donati, I., Strand, B.L., Skjåk-Bræk, G. Mechanical properties of C-5 epimerized alginates. Biomacromolecules. 2008 09; 9(9):2360–2368.Google Scholar

Aarstad, O, Strand, B.L., Klepp-Andersen, L.M., Skjåk-Bræk, G. Analysis of G-block distributions and their impact on gel properties of in vitro epimerized mannuronan. Biomacromolecules. 2013 10; 14(10):3409–3416.Google Scholar

Lozinsky, V. Cryogels on the basis of natural and synthetic polymers: preparation, properties and application. Russian Chemical Reviews. 2002; 71:489–511.Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Shen, W., Chen, Z., Wu, T. Freeze-thaw induced gelation of alginates. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016; 148:45–51.Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Zhang, F., Wu, J. Physically crosslinked hydrogels from polysaccharides prepared by freeze–thaw technique. Reactive and Functional Polymers. 2013; 73(7): 923–928.Google Scholar

Giannouli, P., Morris, E. Cryogelation of xanthan. Food Hydrocolloids. 2003 July; 17(4):495—501.Google Scholar

Shan, L., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. Fabrication and use of alginate-based cryogel delivery beads loaded with urea and phosphates as potential carriers for bioremediation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2016 07; 55(28):7655–7660.Google Scholar

Ho, M.H., Kuo, P.Y., Hsieh, H.J., et al. Preparation of porous scaffolds by using freeze-extraction and freeze-gelation methods. Biomaterials. 2004 January; 25(1):129–138.Google Scholar

Tkalec, G., Knez, Ž, Novak, Z. Formation of polysaccharide aerogels in ethanol. RSC Advances. 2015; 5:77362–77371.Google Scholar

Pérez-Madrigal, M.M., Torras, J., Casanovas, J., Häring, M., Alemán, C., Díaz, D.D. Paradigm shift for preparing versatile M2+-free gels from unmodified sodium alginate. Biomacromolecules. 2017 09; 18(9):2967–2979.Google Scholar

Gurikov, P., Smirnova, I. Non-conventional methods for gelation of alginate. Gels. 2018; 4:14.Google Scholar

Groot, S.R.D., Mazur, P. Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1962.Google Scholar

de Groot, S. Thermodynamics of Irrversible Processes. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1952.Google Scholar

Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M. Lehrbuch der theoretischen Physik. vol. X. Berlin: Akademie Verlag; 1983.Google Scholar

Jäckle, J. Einführung in die Transporttheorie. Braunschweig: Vieweg Verlag; 1987.Google Scholar

Huang, K. Statistical Mechanics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1963.Google Scholar

Born, M., Green, H. A general kinetic theory of liquids. III. Dynamical properties. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 1947; 190:455–474.Google Scholar

Yokoyama, I., Tsuchiya, S. Excess entropy, diffusion coefficient, viscosity coefficient and surface tension of liquid simple metals from diffraction data. Materials Transactions. 2002; 43:67–72.Google Scholar

Christensen, R.M. Theory of Viscoelasticity. 2nd ed. Mineola: Dover Civil and Mechanical Engineering. Dover Publications; 2013.Google Scholar

Thiel, J. Kinetik des Sol/Gel Übergangs in wässrigen Resorcin/Formaldehyd-Lösungen. Fachhochschule Aachen and DLR; 2001.Google Scholar

Vogelsberger, W., Opfermann, J., Wank, U., Schulze, H., Rudakoff, G. A model for viscosity in the early stages of the sol–gel transformation. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1991; 145:20–24.Google Scholar

Buchtová, N, Budtova, T. Cellulose aero-, cryo- and xerogels: towards understanding of morphology control. Cellulose. 2016; 23(4):2585–2595.Google Scholar

Krause, J., Lisinski, S., Ratke, L., et al. Observation of gelation process and particle distribution during sol–gel synthesis by particle image velocimetry. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology 2008; 45:73–77.Google Scholar

Raffel, M., Willert, C., Kompenhans, J. Particle Image Velocimetry. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag; 1997.Google Scholar

Ratke, L., Hajduk, A. On the size effect of gelation kinetics in RF aerogels. Gels. 2015; 1:276–290.Google Scholar

Mandelbrot, B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. 3rd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1977.Google Scholar

Smoluchowski, M. Drei Vorträge über Diffusion, Brownsche Molekularbewegung und Koagulation von Kolloidteilchen. Physik Zeitschrift. 1916; 17:586–599.Google Scholar

Fuchs, N. Aerosol Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.; 1964.Google Scholar

Rogers, R.R., Yau, M.K. A Short Course in Cloud Physics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.; 1989.Google Scholar

Ratke, L., Diefenbach, S. Liquid immiscible allyos. Materials Science and Engineering Reports. 1995; R15:263–347.Google Scholar

Christensen, K., Moloney, N.R. Complexity and Criticality. London: Imperial College Press; 2005.Google Scholar

Percolation and thresholds. www.wikiwand.com/en/Percolation_threshold#.Google Scholar

Lorenz, C.D., Ziff, R.M. Precise determination of the critical percolation threshold for the three-dimensional ‘Swiss cheese’ model using a growth algorithm. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2001; 114(8):3659–3661.Google Scholar

Stauffer, D., Coniglio, A., Adam, M. Gelation and critical phenomena. Advances in Polymer Science. 1982; 44:104–158.Google Scholar

Christensen, K. Percolation Theory; 2002. London: Imperial College London.Google Scholar

Witten,, T.A., Sander, L.M. Diffusion-limited aggregation, a kinetic critical phenomenon. Physical Review of Letters. 1981; 47:1400–1403.Google Scholar

Meakin, P. Formation of fractal clusters and networks by irreversible diffusion-limited aggregation. Physical Review of Letters. 1983; 51:1119–1122.Google Scholar

Kolb, M., Botet, R., Jullien, R. Scaling of Kinetically Growing Clusters. Physical Review of Letters. 1983; 51:1123–1126.Google Scholar

Halperin, W.P. Low Temperature Physics Group. http://spindry.phys.northwestern.edu/ agel.htm.Google Scholar

Haard, T.M., Gervais, G., Nomura, R., Halperin, W.P. The pathlength distribution of simulated aerogels. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2000; 284-288:289–290.Google Scholar

Toxiclibs. Simutils-0001: Diffusion limited aggregation http://toxiclibs.org/2010/02/new-package-simutils/.Google Scholar

Sayama, H. Diffusion-limited aggregation: a real-time agent-based simulation. Wolfram Demonstration Projects. https://demonstrations.wolfram.com/DiffusionLimited AggregationARealTimeAgentBasedSimulation/.Google Scholar

Drake, R.L.A. A General Mathematical Survey of the Coagulation Equation. edited by Hidy, G.M., Brock, J.R. Topics in Current Aerosol Research. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press Ltd.; 1970.Google Scholar

Golovin, A.M. The solution of the coagulation equation for cloud droplets in a rising air current. Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 1963; 5:482–487.Google Scholar

Stauffer,, D. Percolation and cluster size distribution. In: Stanley, H.E. and Ostrowsky, N., editors, On Growth and Form. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht; 1986. pp 79–100.Google Scholar

Lushnikov, A.A. Critical behavior of the particle mass spectra in a family of gelling systems. Physical Review E. 2007; 76:011120.Google Scholar

Lushnikov, A.A. Postcritical behavior of a gelling system. Physical Review E. 2013; 88:052120.Google Scholar

Barenblatt, G.I. Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.Google Scholar

Friedlander, S.K., Wang, C.S. The self-preserving particle size distribution for coagulation by brownian motion. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1966; 22:126–132.Google Scholar

Pulvermacher, B., Ruckenstein, E. Similarity solutions of populations balances. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1974; 46:428–436.Google Scholar

Family, F., Vicsek, T. Scaling of the active zone in the Eden process on percolation networks and the ballistic deposition model. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 1985; 18:L75–L81.Google Scholar

Meakin, P., Viscek, T., Family, F. Dynamic cluster-size distribution in cluster–cluster aggregation: effects of cluster diffusivity. Physical Review B. 1985; 31:564–569.Google Scholar

Ball, R.C., Connaughton, C., Stein, T.H.M., Zaboronski, O. Instantaneous gelation in Smoluchowski’s coagulation equation revisited. Physical Review E. 2011; 84:011111.Google Scholar

Rezakhanlou, F. Gelation for Marcus–Lushnikov process. Annals of Probability. 2013; 41:1806–1830.Google Scholar

Fournier, N., Laurencot, P. Marcus–Lushnikov processes, Smoluchowski’s and Flory’s models. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications. 2009; 119:167–189.Google Scholar

Schaefer, D.W., Pekala, R., Beaucage, G. Origin of porosity in resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystallline Solids. 1995; 186:159–167.Google Scholar

Berthon, S., Barbieri, O., Ehrburger-Dolle, F., et al. DLS and SAXS investigations of organic gels and aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2001; 285:154–161.Google Scholar

Tanaka, H. New mechanisms of droplet coarsening in phase-separating fluid mixtures. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1997; 107(9):3734–3737.Google Scholar

Tanaka, H. Viscoelastic model of phase separation. Physical Review E. 1997 Oct; 56:4451–4462.Google Scholar

Tanaka, F., Okamura, K. Characterization of cellulose molecules in bio-system studied by modeling methods. Cellulose. 2005; 12:243–252.Google Scholar

Taniguchi, T., Onuki, A. Network domain structure in viscoelastic phase separation. Physical Review of Letters. 1996; 77:4910–4913.Google Scholar

Glotzer, S.C., Marzio, E.A.D., Mthukumur, M. Reaction-controlled morphology of phase-separating mixtures. Physical Review of Letters. 1995; 74:2034–2039.Google Scholar

Glotzer, S. Computer simulations of spinodal decompositions in polymer blends. In: Stauffer, D, editor. Annual Reviews of Computational Physics II. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.; 1995. pp. 1–47.Google Scholar

Oh, J., Rey, A.D. Theory and simulation of polymerization-induced phase separation in polymeric media. Macromolecular Theory and Simulations. 2000; 9(8):641–660.Google Scholar

Zha, L., Hu, W. Homogeneous crystal nucleation triggered by spinodal decomposition in polymer solutions. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2007; 111:11373–11378.Google Scholar

Lee, K.W.D., Chan, P.K., Feng, X. A computational study of the polymerization-induced phase separation phenomenon in polymer solutions under a temperature gradient. Macromolecular Theory and Simulations. 2003; 12:413–424.Google Scholar

Hara, A., Inoue, R., Takahashi, N., Nishida, K., Kanaya, T. Trajectory of critical point in polymerization-induced phase separation of epoxy/oligoethylene glycol solutions. Macromolecules. 2014; 47:4453–4459.Google Scholar

Luo, K. The morphology and dynamics of polymerization-induced phase separation. European Polymer Journal. 2006; 42:1499–1505.Google Scholar

Kyu, T., Lee, J.H. Nucleation initiated spinodal decomposition in an polymerizing system. Physical Review of Letters. 1996; 76:3746–3749.Google Scholar

Koyama, T., Araki, T., Tanaka, H. Fracture phase separation. Physical Review of Letters. 2009; 102:065701.Google Scholar

Sciortino, F., Bansil, R., Stanley, H.E. Interference of phase separation and gelation: zeroth-order kinetic model. Physical Review E. 1993; 47(6):4615–4618.Google Scholar

Muratov, C.B. Unusual coarsening during phase separation in polymer systems. Physical Review of Letters. 1998 Oct; 81:3699–3702.Google Scholar

Lee, D., Huh, J.Y., Jeong, D., Shin, J., Yun, A., Kim, J. Physical, mathematical, and numerical derivations of the Cahn–Hilliard equation. Computational Materials Science. 2014; 81:216–225.Google Scholar

Kontogeorgis, G.M., von Solms, N. Thermodynamics of polymer solutions. In: Birdi, K.S., editor, Handbook of Surface and Colloid Chemistry. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, New York: Taylor and Francis Group, 2009. pp. 499–537.Google Scholar

Yamakawa, H. Modern Theory of Polymer Solutions. Electronic edition ed. Kyoto University, original New York: Harper and Row, 1971; 2002.Google Scholar

Courant, R., Hilbert, D. Methoden der mathematischen Physik. Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer-Verlag; 1968.Google Scholar

Morse, P.M, Feshbach, H. Methods of Theoretical Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1953.Google Scholar

Churchill, S.W. Viscous Flows. Butterworths Series in Chemical Engineering. Stoneham: Butterworths Publishers; 1988.Google Scholar

Subramanian, R.S., Balasubramaniam, R. The Motion of Bubbles and Drops in Reduced Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.Google Scholar

Levich, V. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1962.Google Scholar

Wan, F., Altschuh, P., Ratke, L., Zhang, H., Selzer, M., Nestler, B. Progress report on phase separation in polymer solutions. Advanced Materials. 2019; pp. 1806733.Google Scholar

Chan, P.K., Rey, A.D. Polymerization-induced phase separation. 1. Droplet size selection mechanism. Macromolecules. 1996; 29:8934–8941.Google Scholar

Anglaret, E., Hasmy, A., Jullien, R. Effect of container size on gelation time: experiments and simulations. Physical Review of Letters. 1995; 75:4059–4062.Google Scholar

Vafai, K., editor. Handbook of Porous Media. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group; 2005.Google Scholar

Metzger, T., Kwapinski, M., Peglow, M., Saage, G., Tsotsas, E. Modern modelling methods in drying. Transport in Porous Media. 2007; 66:103–120.Google Scholar

Prat, M. Recent advances in pore-scale models for drying of porous media. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2002; 86:153–164.Google Scholar

Prat, M. On the influence of pore shape, contact angle and film flows on drying of capillary porous media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2007; 50:1455–1468.Google Scholar

Nusselt, W. Heat Transfer, Diffusion and Evaporation. Washington: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics; 1954.Google Scholar

Bisson, A., Rodier, E., Rigacci, A., Lecomte, D, Achard, P. Study of evaporative drying of treated silica gels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2004; 350:230–237.Google Scholar

Smith, D.M., Stein, D., Anderson, J.M., Ackerman, W. Preparation of low-density xerogels at ambient pressure. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1995; 186:104–112.Google Scholar

Reuss, M., Ratke, L. Drying of aerogel-bonded sands. Journal of Materials Science. 2010; 45:3974–3980.Google Scholar

Reuss, M., Ratke, L. RF-aerogels catalysed by ammonioum carbonate. Journal of Sol–Gel Sciences and Technology. 2010; 53:85–92.Google Scholar

Schwerdtfeger, F., Frank, D., Schmidt, M. Hydrophobic waterglass based aerogels without solvent exchange or supercritical drying. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1998; 225:24–29.Google Scholar

Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1975.Google Scholar

Mahadik, D.B., Rao, A.V., Rao, A.P., Waghb, P.B., Ingale, S.V., Gupta, S.C. Effect of concentration of trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) and hexamethyldisilazane (HMDZ) silylating agents on surface free energy of silica aerogels. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2011; 356:298–302.Google Scholar

Zgura, I., Moldovsn, R., Negrila, C.C., Frunza, S., Cotorobai, V.F., Frunza, L. Surface free energy of smooth and dehydroxylated fused quartz from contact angel measuremmets using some particular organics as probe liquids. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials. 2013; 15:627–634.Google Scholar

Zenkiewicz, M. Methods for the calculation of surface free energies of solids. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 2007; 24:137–145.Google Scholar

Zdziennicka, A., Janczuk, B. Adhesion of aqueous solution of TX-100 and TX-165 mixture with propanol to quartz. Journal of Materials Science and Nanotechnology. 2018; 6. http://www.annexpublishers.co/articles/JMSN/6206-Adhesion-of-Aqueous-Solution-of-TX-100-and-TX-165-Mixture-with-Propanol-to-Quartz.pdf.Google Scholar

Yiotis, A.G., Tsimpanogiannis, I.N., Stubos, A.K., Yortsos, Y.C. Pore-network study of the characteristic periods in the drying of porous materials. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2006; 297:738–748.Google Scholar

Kohout, M., Grof, Z., Stepanek, F. Pore-scale modelling and tomographic visualisation of drying in granular media. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2006; 299:342–351.Google Scholar

Deville, S. Freeze-casting of porous biomaterials: structure, properties and opportunities. Materials. 2010; 3:1913–1927.Google Scholar

Deville, S., Meille, S., Seuba, J. A meta-analysis of the mechanical properties of ice-templated ceramics and metals. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 2015; 16:043501.Google Scholar

Glicksman, M.E. Principles of Solidification. New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2011.Google Scholar

Dantzig, J., Rappaz, M. Solidification. 2nd ed. EPFL Press; 2018.Google Scholar

Kurz, W., Fisher, D.J. Fundamentals of Solidification. 4th ed. Aedermannsdorf: Trans. Tech. Publisher; 1998.Google Scholar

Rosenberger, F. Fundamentals of Crystal Growth. Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer; 1979.Google Scholar

Grant, P.S., Cantor, B. Modelling of droplet dynamic and thermal histories during spray forming – III. Analysis of spray solid fraction. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia. 1995; 43(3):913–921.Google Scholar

Grant, P.S., Cantor, B., Katgerman, L. Modelling of droplet dynamic and thermal histories during spray forming – I. individual droplet behaviour. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia. 1993; 41(11):3097–3108.Google Scholar

Grant, P.S., Cantor, B., Katgerman, L. Modelling of droplet dynamic and thermal histories during spray forming – II. Effect of process parameters. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia. 1993; 41(11):3109–3118.Google Scholar

Kauerauf, B., Zimmermann, G., Rex, S., Mathes, M., Grote, F. Directional cellular growth of succinonitrile-0.075wt samples Part 1: results of space experiments. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2001; 223:265–276.Google Scholar

Kauerauf, B., Zimmermann, G., Rex, S., Billia, B., Jamgotchian, H., Hunt, J.D. Directional cellular growth of succinonitrile-0.075wt samples Part 2: Analysis of cellular pattern. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2001; 223:277–284.Google Scholar

Mullins, W.W., Sekerka, R.F. Stability of a planar interface during solidification of a dilute binary alloy. Journal of Applied Physics. 1964; 35(2):444–451.Google Scholar

Grosse, K., Ratke, L., Feuerbacher, B. Solidification and melting of succinonitrle within the porous structure of an aerogel. Physical Review B. 1997; 55:2894–2902.Google Scholar

Stefanescu, D.M. Science and Engineering of Casting Solidification. New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2009.Google Scholar

Jiménez-Saelices, C., Cathala, B.S., Grohens, Y. Spray freeze-dried nanofibrillated cellulose aerogels with thermal superinsulating properties. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017; 157:105–113.Google Scholar

Ghafar, A., Parikka, K., Haberthür, D., Tenkanen, M., Mikkonen, K.S., Suuronen, J.P. Synchroton microtomography reveals the fine three-dimensional porosity of composite polysaccharide aerogels. Materials. 2017; 10:871.Google Scholar

Alkemper, J., Sous, S., Stöcker, C., Ratke, L. Directional solidification in an aerogel furnace with high resolution optical temperature measurement. Journal of Crystal Growth. 1998; 191:252–260.Google Scholar

Blum, J., Wurm, G., Kempf, S., et al. Growth and form of planetary seedlings: results from a microgravity aggregation experiment. Physical Review of Letters. 2000; 85:2426–2429.Google Scholar

Ratke, L., Kochan, H. Fracture Mechanical Aspects of Dust Emission Processes from a Model Comet Surface. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Physics and Mechanics of Cometary Materials. ESA SP-302. European Space Agency. Noordwijk: ESA; 1989. pp. 121–128.Google Scholar

Thiel, K., Kölzer, G., Kochan, H., Ratke, L., Grün, E., Kohl, H. Dynamics of crust formation and dust emission of comet nucleus analogues under insolation. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Physics and Mechanics of Cometary Materials. ESA SP-302. European Space Agency. Noordwijk: ESA; 1989. pp. 221–225.Google Scholar

Newborn, R.L., Neugebauer, M., Rahe, J., editors. Comets in the Post-Halley Era. vols. 1 and 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991.Google Scholar

Meyer, E.F., Meyer, T.P. Supercritical fluid: liquid, gas, both, or neither? A different approach. Journal of Chemical Education. 1986; 63(6):463.Google Scholar

Tarafder, A., Guiochon, G. Use of isopycnic plots in designing operations of supercritical fluid chromatography: II. The isopycnic plots and the selection of the operating pressure-temperature zone in supercritical fluid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 2011 July; 1218(28):4576–4585.Google Scholar

Pilar, F.L. The critical temperature: a necessary consequence of gas non-ideality. Journal of Chemical Education. 1967; 44(5):284.Google Scholar

Westwell, M.S., Searle, M.S., Wales, D.J., Williams, D.H. Empirical correlations between thermodynamic properties and intermolecular forces. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1995; 117(18):5013–5015.Google Scholar

Joback method https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joback_method.Google Scholar

Moldover, M.R. Interfacial tension of fluids near critical points and two-scale-factor universality. Physical Review A. 1985; 31:1022–1033.Google Scholar

Domb, C. The Critical Point. London: CRC Press; 1996.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Lipowsky, R., Dimova, R. Concentration dependence of the interfacial tension for aqueous two-phase polymer solutions of dextran and polyethylene glycol. Langmuir. 2012; 28:3831–3839.Google Scholar

Pierre, A.C., Pajonk, G.M. Chemistry of aerogels and their applications. Chemical Reviews. 2002; 102(11):4243–4266.Google Scholar

Schott, J., Dandurand, J.L. Prediction of the thermodynamic behavior of aqueous silica in aqueous complex solutions at various temperatures. In: Helgeson, H.C., editor. Prediction of the Thermodynamic Behavior of Aqueous Silica in Aqueous Complex Solutions at Various Temperatures. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1987. pp. 733–754.Google Scholar

Kocon, L., Despetis, F., Phalippou, J. Ultralow density silica aerogels by alcohol supercritical drying. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1998; 225:96–100.Google Scholar

Estella, J., Echeverría, J.C., Laguna, M., Garrido, J.J. Effect of supercritical drying conditions in ethanol on the structural and textural properties of silica aerogels. Journal of Porous Materials. 2008; 15(6):705–713.Google Scholar

Pajonk, G.M. A short history of the preparation of aerogels and carbogels. In: Attia, Y.A., editor. Sol-Gel Processing and Applications. Boston: Springer US, pp. 201–219.Google Scholar

Woignier, T., Phalippou, J., Quinson, J.F., Pauthe, M., Laveissiere, F. Physicochemical transformation of silica gels during hypercritical drying. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1992; 145:25–32.Google Scholar

Yoda, S., Ohshima, S. Supercritical drying media modification for silica aerogel preparation. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1999; 248(2):224–234.Google Scholar

Yoda, S., Ohshima, S., Ikazaki, F. Supercritical drying with zeolite for the preparation of silica aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1998; 231(1):41–48.Google Scholar

Popovici, M., Gich, M., Roig, A., et al. Ultraporous single phase iron oxide – silica nanostructured aerogels from ferrous precursors. Langmuir. 2004; 20(4):1425–1429.Google Scholar

Zu, G., Shen, J., Zou, L., et al. Nanoengineering super heat-resistant, strong alumina aerogels. Chemistry of Materials. 2013; 25(23):4757–4764.Google Scholar

Ren, H., Zhu, J., Bi, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, L. One-step fabrication of transparent hydrophobic silica aerogels via in situ surface modification in drying process. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology. 2016; 80(3):635–641.Google Scholar

Lermontov, S.A., Malkova, A.N., Yurkova, L.L., et al. Diethyl and methyl-tert-buthyl ethers as new solvents for aerogels preparation. Materials Letters. 2014; 116:116–119.Google Scholar

Lermontov, S.A., Straumal, E.A., Mazilkin, A.A., et al. How to tune the alumina aerogels structure by the variation of a supercritical solvent. Evolution of the structure during heat treatment. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2016; 120(6):3319–3325.Google Scholar

Wang, J., Angnes, L., Tobias, H., et al. Carbon aerogel composite electrodes. Analytical Chemistry. 1993; 65(17):2300–2303.Google Scholar

Szczurek, A., Amaral-Labata, G., Fierro, V., Pizzi, A., Masson, E., Celzarda, A. Porosity of resorcinol-formaldehyde organic and carbon aerogels exchanged and dried with supercritical organic solvents. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2011; 129:1221–1232.Google Scholar

Amaral-Labat, G., Szczurek, A., Fierro, V., Masson, E., Pizzi, A., Celzard, A. Impact of depressurizing rate on the porosity of aerogels. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2012; 152:240–245.Google Scholar

Amaral-Labat, G., Szczurek, A., Fierro, V., Pizzi, A., Masson, E., Celzard, A. ‘Blue glue’: a new precursor of carbon aerogels. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2012; 158:272–280.Google Scholar

Feng, J., Feng, J, Zhang, C. Shrinkage and pore structure in preparation of carbon aerogels. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology. 2011; 59(2):371–380.Google Scholar

Liang, C., Sha, G, Guo, S. Resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels prepared by supercritical acetone drying. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2000; 271(1):167–170.Google Scholar

Albert, D.F., Andrews, G.R., Mendenhall, R.S., Bruno, J.W. Supercritical methanol drying as a convenient route to phenolic–furfural aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2001; 296(1):1–9.Google Scholar

Poco, J.F., Coronado, P.R., Pekala, R.W., Hrubesh, L.W. A rapid supercritical extraction process for the production of silica aerogels. MRS Proceedings. 1996; 431:297.Google Scholar

Gauthier, B.M., Bakrania, S.D., Anderson, A.M., Carroll, M.K. A fast supercritical extraction technique for aerogel fabrication. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2004; 350:238–243.Google Scholar

Brown, L.B., Anderson, A.M., Carroll, M.K. Fabrication of titania and titania–silica aerogels using rapid supercritical extraction. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology. 2012; 62(3):404–413.Google Scholar

Bono, M.S., Anderson, A.M., Carroll, M.K. Alumina aerogels prepared via rapid supercritical extraction. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology. 2010; 53(2):216–226.Google Scholar

Tewari, P.H., Hunt, A.J., Lofftus, K.D. Ambient-temperature supercritical drying of transparent silica aerogels. Materials Letters. 1985; 3(9):363–367.Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Scherer, G.W. Supercritical drying of cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research. 2017; 99:137–154.Google Scholar

van Bommel, M.J., de Haan, A.B. Drying of silica aerogel with supercritical carbon dioxide. Journal of Non-Crystallline Solids. 1995; 186:78–82.Google Scholar

Bouledjouidja, A., Masmoudi, Y., Speybroeck, M.V., Schueller, L., Badens, E. Impregnation of fenofibrate on mesoporous silica using supercritical carbon dioxide. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2016; 499(1):1–9.Google Scholar

Takenouchi, S., Kennedy, GC. The binary system H₂ O–CO₂ at high temperatures and pressures. American Journal of Science. 1964; 262(9):1055–1074.Google Scholar

Sanz-Moral, L.M., Rueda, M., Mato, R., Martín, Á. View cell investigation of silica aerogels during supercritical drying: analysis of size variation and mass transfer mechanisms. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2014; 92:24–30.Google Scholar

Özbakır, Y., Erkey, C. Experimental and theoretical investigation of supercritical drying of silica alcogels. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2015; 98:153–166.Google Scholar

Sahin, I., Özbakir, Y., Inönu, Z., Ulker, Z., Erkey, C. Kinetics of supercritical drying of gels. Gels. 2017; p. gels4010003.Google Scholar

García-González, C.A., Camino-Rey, M.C., Alnaief, M., Zetzl, C., Smirnova, I. Supercritical drying of aerogels using CO₂ : effect of extraction time on the end material textural properties. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2012; 66:297–306.Google Scholar

Griffin, J.S., Mills, D.H., Cleary, M., Nelson, R., Manno, V.P., Hodes, M. Continuous extraction rate measurements during supercritical CO ₂ drying of silica alcogel. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2014; 94:38–47.Google Scholar

Lebedev, A.E., Katalevich, A.M., Menshutina, N.V. Modeling and scale-up of supercritical fluid processes. Part I: supercritical drying. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2015; 106:122–132.Google Scholar

Selmer, I., Behnecke, A.S., Quiño, J., Braeuer, A.S., Gurikov, P., Smirnova, I. Model development for sc-drying kinetics of aerogels: Part 1. Monoliths and single particles. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2018; 140:415–430.Google Scholar

Quiño, J., Ruehl, M., Klima, T., Ruiz, F., Will, S., Braeuer, A. Supercritical drying of aerogel: in situ analysis of concentration profiles inside the gel and derivation of the effective binary diffusion coefficient using Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2016; 108:1–12.Google Scholar

Bueno, A., Selmer, I., et al. First evidence of solvent spillage under subcritical conditions in aerogel production. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2018; 57(26):8698–8707.Google Scholar

Jessop, P.G., Jessop, D.A., Fu, D., Phan, L. Solvatochromic parameters for solvents of interest in green chemistry. Green Chemistry. 2012; 14:1245–1259.Google Scholar

Silva, S.S., Duarte, A.R.C., Carvalho, A.P., Mano, J.F., Reis, R.L. Green processing of porous chitin structures for biomedical applications combining ionic liquids and supercritical fluid technology. Acta Biomaterialia. 2011; 7(3):1166–1172.Google Scholar

Plappert, S.F., Nedelec, J.M., Rennhofer, H., Lichtenegger, H.C., Bernstorff, S., Liebner, F.W. Self-assembly of cellulose in super-cooled ionic liquid under the impact of decelerated antisolvent infusion: an approach toward anisotropic gels and aerogels. Biomacromolecules. 2018; 19(11):4411–4422.Google Scholar

Paraskevopoulou, P., Smirnova, I., Athamneh, T., et al. Mechanically strong polyurea/polyurethane-cross-linked alginate aerogels. ACS Applied Polymer Materials. 2020 05; 2(5):1974–1988.Google Scholar

Smidsrød, O. Molecular basis for some physical properties of alginates in the gel state. Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society. 1974; 57:263–274.Google Scholar

Di Renzo, F., Valentin, R., Boissière, M., et al. Hierarchical macroporosity induced by constrained syneresis in core-shell polysaccharide composites. Chemistry of Materials. 2005; 17(18):4693–4699.Google Scholar

Molvinger, K., Quignard, F., Brunel, D., Boissière, M., Devoisselle, J.M. Porous chitosan-silica hybrid microspheres as a potential catalyst. Chemistry of Materials. 2004; 16(17):3367–3372.Google Scholar

Gurikov, P., Raman, S.P., Griffin, J.S., Steiner, S.A., Smirnova, I. 110th anniversary: solvent exchange in the processing of biopolymer aerogels: current status and open questions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2019 10; 58(40):18590–18600.Google Scholar

Lindvig, T., Michelsen, M.L., Kontogeorgis, G.M. A Flory–Huggins model based on the Hansen solubility parameters. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2002; 203(1):247–260.Google Scholar

Constantinescu, D., Gmehling, J. Further development of modified UNIFAC (Dortmund): revision and extension 6. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2016; 61(8): 2738–2748.Google Scholar

Hansen, C.M. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User’s Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group; 2007.Google Scholar

Weerachanchai, P., Wong, Y., Lim, K.H., Tan, T.T.Y., Lee, J.M. Determination of solubility parameters of ionic liquids and ionic liquid/solvent mixtures from intrinsic viscosity. ChemPhysChem. 2014; 15(16):3580–3591.Google Scholar

Ravindra, R., Krovvidi, K.R., Khan, A.A. Solubility parameter of chitin and chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers. 1998; 36(2):121–127.Google Scholar

Lehnert, R.J., Kandelbauer, A. Comments on ‘solubility parameter of chitin and chitosan’. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017; 175:601–602.Google Scholar

Rowe, R.C. Interaction of lubricants with microcrystalline cellulose and anhydrous lactose – a solubility parameter approach. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1988; 41(3):223–226.Google Scholar

Pena, M.A., Daali, Y., Barra, J., Bustamente, P. Partial solubility parametes of lactose, mannitol and saccharose using the modified extended hansen method and evaporation light scattering detection. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2000; 48(2):179–183.Google Scholar

Pircher, N., Veigel, S., Aigner, N., Nedelec, J.M., Rosenau, T., Liebner, F. Reinforcement of bacterial cellulose aerogels with biocompatible polymers. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014; 111:505–513.Google Scholar

Heath, L., Thielemans, W. Cellulose nanowhisker aerogels. Green Chemistry. 2010; 12:1448–1453.Google Scholar

Heath, L., Zhu, L, Thielemans, W. Chitin nanowhisker aerogels. ChemSusChem. 2013; 6(3):537–544.Google Scholar

Watt, I.M. The Principles and Practice of Electron Microscopy. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997.Google Scholar

Reimer, L., Pfefferkorn, G. Rasterelektronenmikroskopie. 2nd ed. Berlin–Heidelberg– New York: Springer-Verlag; 1977.Google Scholar

Stroud, R.M., Long, J.W., Pietron, J.J., Rolison, D.R. A practical guide to transmission electron microscopy of aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2004; 350:277–284.Google Scholar

Liu, G., Zhou, B., Du, A., Shen, J., Wu, G. Greatly strengthened silica aerogels via co-gelation of binary sols with different concentrations: a method to control the microstructure of the colloids. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2013; 436:763–774.Google Scholar

Despetis, F., Bengoura, N., Lartigue, B., Spagnol, S., Olivi-Tan, N. Three dimensional reconstruction of aerogels from TEM images. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2012; 358:1180–1184.Google Scholar

Hedge, N.D., Rao, A.V. Physical properties of methyltrimethoxysilane based elastic silica aerogels prepared by the two-stage sol–gel process. Journal of Materials Science. 2007; 42:6965–6971.Google Scholar

Gurav, J.L., Rao, A.V., Rao, A.P., Nadargi, D.Y., Bhagat, S.D. Physical properties of sodium silicate based silica aerogels prepared by single step sol-gel process dreid at ambient pressure. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2009; 476:397–402.Google Scholar

Micromeritics Instruments Corporation. Envelope density analyzer. www.micromeritics.com/Product-Showcase/GeoPyc-1365.aspx Google Scholar

Woignier, T., Phalippou, J. Skeletal density of silica aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1987; 93:17–21.Google Scholar

Ayral, A., Phalipou, J., Woignier, T. Skeletal density of silica aerogels determined by helium pycnometry. Journal of Materials Science. 1992; 27:1166–1170.Google Scholar

Stumpf, C., von Gässler, K., Reichenauer, G., Fricke, J. Dynamic gas flow measurements on aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1992; 145:180–184. Aerogele.Google Scholar

Reichenauer, G., Stumpf, C., Fricke, J. Characterization of SiO₂, RF and carbon aerogels by dynamic gas expansion. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1995; 186:334–341.Google Scholar

Hosticka, B., Norris, P.M., Brenizer, J.S., Daitch, C.E. Gas flow through aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1998; 225:293–297.Google Scholar

Beurroies, J., Bourret, D., Sempéré, R., Duffours, L., Phalippou, J. Gas permeability of partially densified aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1995; 186:328–333.Google Scholar

Job, N., Théry, A., Pirard, R., et al. Carbon aerogels, crygels and xerogels: Influence of the drying method on the textural properties of porous cabron materials. Carbon. 2005; 43:2481–2494.Google Scholar

Torquato, S. Random heterogeneous materials. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.Google Scholar

Wong, J.C.H., Kaymak, H., Brunner, S., Koebel, M.M. Mechanical properties of monolithic silica aerogels made from polyethoxydisiloxanes. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2014; 183:23–29.Google Scholar

Ludwig, S. Untersuchungen zur Gelation von RF-Aerogelen mit Zitronensäure und Bestimmung der Eigenschaften der erzeugten Aerogele. Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg; 2011.Google Scholar

Cai, J., Kimura, S., Wada, M., Kuga, S., Zhang, L. Cellulose aerogels from aqueous alkali hydroxide-urea solution. ChemSusChem. 2008; 1:149–154.Google Scholar

Thommes, M., Kaneko, K., Neimark, A.V., et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry. 2015; 87:1051–1069.Google Scholar

Underwood, E.E. Quantitative Stereology. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1970.Google Scholar

Cahn, J.W. The Significance of average mean curvature and its determination by quantitative metallography. Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME. 1967; 239:610–616.Google Scholar

Limodin, N., Salvo, L., Boller, E., et al. In situ and real time 3-D microtomography investigation of dendritic solidification in an Al-10 wt% Cu alloy. Acta Materialia. 2009; 57:2300–2310.Google Scholar

Ratke, L., Genau, A. Evolution of specific surface area with solid fraction during solidification. Acta Materialia. 2010; 58:4207–4211.Google Scholar

Neumann-Heyme, H., Eckert, K., Beckermann, C. General evolution equation for the specific interface area of dendrites during alloy solidification. Acta Materialia. 2017; 140:87–96.Google Scholar

Heyden, S. Network Modelling for the Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cellulose Fibre Fluff. Sweden: Lund University LTH; 2000.Google Scholar

Karadagli, I., Milow, B., Ratke, L., Schulz, B., Seide, G., Gries, T. Synthesis and characterization of highly porous cellulose aerogels for textile applications. In: Cellular Materials Conference – Cellmat 2012, Conventus Congressmanagement, editor. Jena: Marketing GmbH. https://elib.dlr.de/78416/.Google Scholar

Laskowski, J., Milow, B., Ratke, L. The effect of embedding highly insulating granular aerogel in cellulosic aerogel. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2015; 106:93–99.Google Scholar

Ratke, L., Milow, B., Lisinski, S., Hoepfner, S. On an effect of fine ceramic particles on the structure of aerogels. Microgravity Science and Technology. 2014; 26:103–110.Google Scholar

Sing, K.S.W., Everett, D.H., Haul, R.A.W., et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1985; 57(4):603–619. IUPAC Recommendations 1984.Google Scholar

Gregg, S.J., Sing, K.S.W. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity. London: Academic Press; 1982.Google Scholar

Rouquerol, F., Rouquerol, J., Sing, K.S.W., Llewellyn, P., Maurin, G. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids. Oxford: Academic Press; 2014.Google Scholar

Santori, G., Luberti, M., Ahn, H. Ideal adsorbed solution theory solved with direct search minimisation. Computers and Chemical Engineering. 2014; 71:235–240.Google Scholar

Langmuir, I. Surface Chemistry; 1932. www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry.Google Scholar

Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H., Teller, E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1938; 60:309–319.Google Scholar

Porod, G. Die Röntgenkleinwinkelstreuung von dichtgepackten kolloidalen Systemen. Kolloidzeitschrift. 1951; 124:83–114.Google Scholar

Porod, G. Die Röntgenkleinwinkelstreuung von dichtgepackten kolloidalen Systemen II. Teil. Kolloidzeitschrift. 1951; 125:108–122.Google Scholar

Guinier, A., Fournet, G. Small-Angle Scattering of X-Rays. New York and London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and Chapman & Hall Ltd.; 1955.Google Scholar

Debye, P., Anderson, H.R., Brumberger, H. Scattering by an inhomogeneous solid. II. The correlation function and its application. Journal of Applied Physics. 1957; 28:679–683.Google Scholar

Weigold, L. Ermittlung des Zusammenhangs zwischen mechanischer Steifigkeit und Wärmetransport über das Festkörpergerüst bei hochporösen Materialien. Bayerische Julius-Maximilian Universität; 2015.Google Scholar

Beaumont, M., Rennhofer, H., Opietnik, M., Lichtenegger, H.C., Potthast, A, Rosenau, T. Nanostructured cellulose II gel consisting of spherical particles. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2016; 4(8):4424–4432.Google Scholar

Brandt, R., Petricevic, R., Pröbstle, H., Fricke, J. Acetic acid catalyzed carbon aerogels. Journal of Porous Materials. 2003; 10:171–178.Google Scholar

Pekala, R.W., Alviso, C.T., LeMay, J.D. Organic aerogels: microstructural dependence of mechanical properties in compression. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1990; 125: 67–75.Google Scholar

Petricevic, R., Reichenauer, G., Bock, V, Emmerling, A., Fricke, J. Structure of carbon aerogels near the gelation limit of the resorcinol-formaldehyde precursor. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1998; 225:41–45.Google Scholar

Lu, B., Torquato, S. Chord-length and free path distribution functions for many-body systems. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1993; 98(8):6472–6482.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. 10th ed. Mineola: Dover Publications; 1972.Google Scholar

Chandrasekhar, S. Stoachstic problems in physics and astronomy. Review of Modern Physics. 1943; 15:1–89.Google Scholar

Steele, J.H. Metallurgical Transactions. 1976; 7A:1325.Google Scholar

Barrett, E.P., Joyner, L.G., Halenda, P.P. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1938; 60:309–319.Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Lam, F.L.Y., Yan, Z.F., Hu, X. Review of Kelvin’s equation and its modification in characterization of mesoporous materials. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics. 2006; 19:102–108.Google Scholar

Rege, A., Schestakow, M., Karadagli, I., Ratke, L., Itskov, M. Micro-mechanical modelling of cellulose aerogels from molten salt hydrates. Soft Matter. 2016; 12:7079–7088.Google Scholar

Boettinger, W.J., Kattner, U.R., Moon, K.W., Perepezko, J.H. DTA and Heat-Flux DSC Measurements of Alloy Melting and Freezing. Washington: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2006.Google Scholar

Nedelec, J.M., Grolier, J.P.E., Baba, M. Thermoporosimetry – a powerful tool to study the cross-linking in gels networks. Journal of Sol–Gel Science and Technology. 2006; 40:191–200.Google Scholar

Woignier, T., Quinson, J.F., Pauthe, M., Repellin-Lacroix, M., Phalippou, J. Evolution of the porous volume during the aerogel–glass transformation. Journal de Physique IV France. 1992; 02:C2–123,–C2–126.Google Scholar

Reichenauer, G., Scherer, G.W. Nitrogen adsorption in compliant materials. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2000; 277:162–172.Google Scholar

Reichenauer, G., Scherer, G.W. Extracting the pore size distribution of compliant materials from nitrogen adsoprtion. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2001; 187–188:41–50.Google Scholar

Reichenauer, G., Scherer, G.W. Effects upon nitrogen sorption analysis in aerogels. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2001; 236:385–386.Google Scholar

Carslaw, H., Jaeger, J. Conduction of Heat in Solids. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1959.Google Scholar

Dhont, J.K.G., Briels, W.J. Rod-like Brownian particles in shear flow: Sections 3.1–3.9. In: Soft Matter: Complex Colloidal Suspensions, Gompper, G., Schick, M., eds. Berlin: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2007; pp. 147–216.Google Scholar

Dhont, J.K.G., Briels, W.J. Rod-like Brownian particles in shear flow: Sections 3.10– 3.16. In: Gompper, G., Schick, M., editors. Soft Matter: Complex Colloidal Suspensions, Berlin: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2007; pp. 216–283.Google Scholar

Hittmair, O., Adam, G. Ringvorlesungen zur Theoretischen Physik, Wämetheorie. Braunschweig: Vieweg Verlag; 1971.Google Scholar

Carrigy, N.B., Pant, L.M., Mitra, S., Secanella, M. Knudsen diffusivity and permeability of PEMFC microporous coated gas diffusion layers for different polytetrafluorethylene loadings. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2013; 160:F81–F89.Google Scholar

Russ, S., Zschiegner, S., Bunde, A., Kärger, J. In: Kramer, B, editor. Lambert Diffusion in Porous Media in the Knudsen Regime. vol. 45 of Adv. in Solid State Phys. Switzerland: Springer-Verlag; 2005. pp. 59–69.Google Scholar

Dammers, A.J., Coppens, M.O. Anomalous Knudsen diffusion in simple pore models. Diffusion Fundamentals. 2005; 2:14.1–14.2.Google Scholar

Zschiegner, S., Russ, S., Valiullin, R., et al. Normal and anomalous diffusion of non-interacting particles in linear nanopores. The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 2008; 161:109–120.Google Scholar

Kärger, J., Ruthven, D.M., Theodoru, D.N., editors. Diffusion in Nanoporous Materials. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2012.Google Scholar

Scheidegger, A.E. The Physics of Flow through Porous Media. 3rd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1974.Google Scholar

Torrent, R.J. A two-chamber vacuum cell for measuring the coefficient of permeability to air of the concrete cover on site. Materials and Structures. 1992; 25:358–365.Google Scholar

Tanikawa, W., Shimamoto, T. Klinkenberg effect for gas permeability and its comparison to water permeability for porous sedimentary rocks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions. 2006; 3:1315–1338.Google Scholar

Vazquez, J.L. The Porous Medium Equation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar

Cunningham, R.E., Williams, R.J.J. Diffusion in Gases and Porous Media. New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 1980.Google Scholar

Kaviany, M. Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995.Google Scholar

Gupta, N.K., Gianchandani, Y.B. Thermal transpiration if zeolites: a mechanisms for motionless gas pumps. Applied Physics Letters. 2008; 93:193511.Google Scholar

Woignier, T., Primera, J., Lamy, M., et al. The use of silica aerogels as host matrices for chemical species: different ways to control the permeability and mechanical properties. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2004; 350:299–307.Google Scholar

Woignier, T., Anez, L., Calas-Etienne, S., Primera, J. Gas and liquid permeability in nano composites gels: comparison of Knudsen and Klinkenberg correction factors. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2014; 200:79–85.Google Scholar

Ganesan, K., Barowski, A., Ratke, L. Gas Permeability of Cellulose Aerogels with a Designed Dual Pore Space System. Molecules. 2019; 24:2688.Google Scholar

Ebert, H.P. Thermophysical properties of aeorgels. In: Aegerter, M.A., Leventis, N., Koebel, M.M., editors. Aerogels Handbook. New York; Springer; 2011. pp. 537–564.Google Scholar

Cherkaev, A. Bounds for effective properties of multi-material two-dimensional conducting composites. Mechanics of Materials. 2009; 41:411–433.Google Scholar

Brovelli, A., Cassiani, G. A combination of the Hashin–Shtrikman bounds aimed at modelling electrical conductivity and permittivity of variably saturated porous media. Geophysical Journal International. 2010; 180:225–237.Google Scholar

Hrubesh, L.W., Pekala, R.W. Thermal properties of organic and inorganic aerogels. Journal of Materials Research. 1994; 9:731–738.Google Scholar

Wei, G., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Yu, F., Du, X. Thermal conductivities study on silica aerogel and its composite insulation materials. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2011; 54:2355–2366.Google Scholar

Kittel, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics. 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1971.Google Scholar

Peierls, R. Ann Physik. 1929; 3:1055–1101.Google Scholar

Gross, J., Fricke, J., Hrubesh, L.W. Sound propagation in SiO₂ aerogels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1992; 91:2004–2006.Google Scholar

Nakayama, T., Yakubo, K., Orbach, R.L. Dynamical properties of fractal networks: scaling, numerical simulations, and physical realizations. Review of Modern Physics. 1994; 66:381–443.Google Scholar

Kaganer, M.G. Thermal Insulation in Cryogenic Engineering; 1969. Jerusalem: Israel Programm for Scientific Translations.Google Scholar

Schwab, H. Vakuumisolationspaneele – Gas und Feuchteeintrag sowie Feuchte- und Wärmetransport. Würzburg, Germany: Bayerische Julius-Maximilian Universität; 2004.Google Scholar

Dorfmann, J.R., van Beijeren, H. 3. In: Berne, B.J., editor. Statistical Mechanics. vol. Part B. New York: Plenum Press; 1977. pp. 65–177.Google Scholar

Zeng, S.Q., Hunt, A., Greif, R. Transport properties of gas in silica aerogel. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1995; 186:264–270.Google Scholar

Swimm, K., Reichenauer, G., Vidi, S., Ebert, H.P. Gas pressure dependence of the heat transport in porous solids with pores smaller than 10 μm. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2009; 30:1329–1342.Google Scholar

Comings, E.W., Nathan, M.F. Thermal conductivity of gases at high pressures. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 1947; 39:964–970.Google Scholar

Guildner, L.A. Thermal conductivity of gases. III. Some values of the thermal conductivities of argon, helium, and nitrogen from 0 C to 75 C at pressures of 10⁵ to 2.5 10⁷ Pascals. Journal of Research at the National Bureau of Standards. 1975; 79A:407–413.Google Scholar

Kennard, E.H. Kinetic Theory of Gases. New York, London: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1938.Google Scholar

Kleeman, R.D. A Kinetic Theory of Gases and Liquids. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1920.Google Scholar

Loeb, L.B. Kinetic Theory of Gases. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Company; 1927.Google Scholar

Ganta, D., Dale, E.B., Rezac, J.R., Rosenberger, A.T. Optical method for measuring thermal accomodation coefficients using a whispering-gallery microresonator. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2011; 135:084313.Google Scholar

Caps, R., Fricke, J. Radiative Heat Transfer in Silica Aerogels. In: Fricke, J., editor. Aerogels. vol. 6 of Springer Proceedings in Physics. Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986. pp. 110–115.Google Scholar

Kubascheweski, O., Alcock, C.B., Spencer, P.J. Materials Thermo-Chemistry. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.; 1993.Google Scholar

ASTM. Standard test method for steady state heat flux measurements and thermal transmission properties by mean of the guarded hot plate apparatus. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 1997. ASTM C177.Google Scholar

ISO. Determination of Steady-state Thermal Resistance and Related Properties Guarded Hot Plate Apparatus. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1991. ISO 8302.Google Scholar

Dubois, S., Lebeau, S. Design, construction and validation of a guarded hot plate apparatus for thermal conductivity measurement of high thickness crop-based specimens. Materials and Structures. 2013; 46.Google Scholar

Jannot, Y., Felix, V., Degiovanni, A. A centered hot plate method for measurement of thermal properties of thin insulating materials. Measurement Science and Technology. 2010; 21:035106.Google Scholar

Eithun, C.F. Development of a Thermal Conductivity Apparatus: Analysis and Design. Trondheim: NTNU Department of Energy and Process Engineering; 2012.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, S.E. Transient plane source techniques for thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity measurements of solid materials. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1991; 62(3):797–804.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, M., Karawacki, E., Gustafsson, S.E. Thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and specific heat of thin samples from transient measurements with hot disk sensors. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1994; 65:3856–3859.Google Scholar

He, Y. Rapid thermal conductivity measurement with a hot disk sensor: Part 1. theoretical considerations. Thermochimica Acta. 2005; 436:122–129.Google Scholar

He, Y. Rapid thermal conductivity measurement with a hot disk sensor: Part 2. characterization of thermal greases. Thermochimica Acta. 2005; 436:130–134.Google Scholar

Hammerschmidt, U., Meier, V. New transient hot-bridge sensor to measure thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and volumetric specific heat. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2006; 27:840–865.Google Scholar

Dalton, M., Nadalini, R., Celotti, L., et al. The 3 omega transient line method for thermal characterization of superinsulator materials developed for spacecraft thermal control. In: 65th International Astronautical Congress Toronto 2014. IAC-14.C2.7.4. International Astronautical Federation; 2014.Google Scholar

Corbino, O. Periodic variation of resistance of metallic filaments on alternating current. Atti della Reale Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. 1911; 20:222–228.Google Scholar

Cahill, D.G., Pohl, R.O. Thermal conductivity of amorphous solids above the plateau. Physical Review B. 1987; 35:4067–4073.Google Scholar

Hemberger, F., Ebert, H.P., Reichenauer, G. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2009; 30:1357–1371.Google Scholar

Wiener, M., Hemberger, F., Reichenauer, G., Ebert, H.P. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2006; 27:1826–1843.Google Scholar

Guo, K., Hu, Z., Song, H., Liang Zhong, X.D., Chen, X. Low-density graphene/carbon composite aerogels prepared at ambient pressure with high mechancial strength and low thermal conductivity. RSC Advances. 2015; 5:5197–5204.Google Scholar

Reichenauer, G., Heinemann, U., Ebert, H.P. Relationship between pore size and the gas pressure dependence of the gaseous thermal conductivity. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2007; 300:204–210.Google Scholar

Oliver, F.W.J., Lozier, D.W., Boisvert, R.F., Clark, C.W. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.Google Scholar

Dieter, G.E. Mechanical Metallurgy. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1986.Google Scholar

Bisshopp, K.E., Drucker, D.C. Large deflection of cantilever beams. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics. 1945; 3:272–275.Google Scholar

Rege, A., Schwan, M., Chernova, L., Hillgärtner, M., Itskov, M., Milow, B. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of carbon aerogels: an in-situ and digital image correlation-based study. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2020; 529:119568.Google Scholar

Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theoretical_strength_of_a_solid.Google Scholar

Pokluda, J., Cerny, M., Sandra, P., Sob, M. Calculations of theoretical strength: state of the art and history. Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design. 2004; 11:1–28.Google Scholar

Li, D., Wong, L.N.Y. The Brazilian disc test for rock mechanics applications: review and new insights. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2013; 46:269–287.Google Scholar

Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M. Lehbrbuch der theoretischen Physik. vol. VII. Berlin: Akademie Verlag; 1965.Google Scholar

Rege, A., Itskov, M. A microcell-based constitutive modeling of cellulose aerogels under tension. Acta Mechanica. 2018; 229:585–593.Google Scholar

Gross, J., Fricke, J. Scaling of elastic properties in highly porous nanostructured aerogels. Nanostructured Materials. 1995; 6:905–908.Google Scholar

Ma, H.S., Roberts, A.P., Prevost, J.H., Jullien, R., Scherer, G.W. Mechanical structure– property relationship of aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2000; 277:127–141.Google Scholar

Gross, J., Scherer, G.W., Alviso, C.T., Pekala, R.W. Elastic properties of crosslinked resorcinol-formaldehyde gels and aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1997; 211:132–142.Google Scholar

Ganesan, K., Dennstedt, A., Barowski, A., Ratke, L. Design of aerogels, cryogels and xerogels of cellulose with hierarchical porous structure. Materials and Design. 2016; 92:345–355.Google Scholar

Rudaz, C., Courson, R., Bonnet, L., Calas-Etienne, S., Sallee, H., Budtova, T. Aeropectin: Fully biomass-based mechanically strong and thermal superinsulating aerogel. Biomacromolecules. 2014; 15:2188–2195.Google Scholar

Zhao, S., Malfait, W.J., Guerrero-Alburquerque, N., Koebel, M.M., Nyström, G. Biopolymer aerogels and foams: chemistry, properties and applications. Angewandte Chemie. 2018; 57:7580–7608.Google Scholar

Woignier, T., Primera, J., Alaoui, A., Etienne, P., Despetis, F., Calas-Etienne S. Mechanical properties and brittle behavior of silica aerogels. Gels. 2015; 1:256–275.Google Scholar

Scherer, G.W., Smith, D.M., Wiu, X., Anderson, J.M. Compression of aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystallline Solids. 1995; 186:316–320.Google Scholar

Fereiro-Rangel, C.A., Gelb, L.D. Computational study of uniaxial deformations in silica aerogel using a coarse-grained model. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2007; 111:15,792–15,802.Google Scholar

Rege, A., Ratke, L., Itskov, M. Modelling and simulations of polysaccharide and protein based aerogels. In: Sabu Thomas, LAP, Mavelil-Sam, R, editors. Biobased Aerogels: Polysaccharide and Protein-Based Materials. Green Chemistry Series No. 58. London: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2018. pp. 129–150.Google Scholar

Rege, A., Hillgärtner, M., Itskov, M. Mechanics of biopolymer aerogels based on microstructures generated from 2-d Voronoi tessellations. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2019; 151:24–29.Google Scholar

Haasen, P. Physical Metallurgy. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.Google Scholar

Hillert, M. Lectures on the Theory of Phase Transformations. Aaronson, H.I., editor. New York: American Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Engineering; 1975.Google Scholar

Kelton, K.F., Greer, A.L. Nucleation in Condensed Matter. 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.; 2010.Google Scholar

Binder, K., Stauffer, D. Statistical theory of nucleation, condensation and coagulation. Advances in Physics. 1976; 25:343–396.Google Scholar

Gránásy, L., Tóth, G.I., Warren, J.A., et al. Phase-field modeling of crystal nucleation in undercooled liquids – a review. Progress in Materials Science. 2019; 106:100569.Google Scholar

Merkwitz, M. Oberflächen- und Grenzflächenspannung in binären metallischen Entmischungssystemen. TU Chemnitz; 1997.Google Scholar

Kaban, I., Köhler, M., Ratke, L., et al. Interfacial tension, wetting and nucleation in Al-Bi, Al-In and Al-Pb monotectic alloys. Acta Materialia. 2011; 59:6880–6889.Google Scholar

Cahn, J.W., Hilliard, J.E. Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1958; 28(2):258–267.Google Scholar

Cahn, J.W., Hilliard, J.E. Free energy of a nonuniform system. III. Nucleation in a two-component incompressible fluid. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1959; 31(3):688–699.Google Scholar

Cahn, J.W. Phase separation by spinodal decomposition in isotropic systems. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1965; 42(1):93–99.Google Scholar

Chandra, M. Introduction to Polymer Science and Chemistry: A Problem-Solving Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group; 2013.Google Scholar

Cowie, J.M.G., Arrighi, V. Polymers: Chemistry and Physics of Modern Materials. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group; 2007.Google Scholar

Nestler, B., Wheeler, A.A., Ratke, L., Stöcker, C. Phase-field model for solidification of a monotectic alloy with convection. Physica D. 2000; 141:133–154.Google Scholar

Koningsveld, R., Kleintjens, L.A., Nies, E. Polymers and thermodynamics. Croatica Chemica Acta. 1987; 60:53–89.Google Scholar

der Haegen, R.V., Kleintjens, L.A. Thermodynamics of polymer solutions. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1981; 61:159–170.Google Scholar

Mousavi-Dehghani, S.A., Mirzayi, B., Vafaie-Sefti, M. Polymer solution and lattice theory applications for modeling of asphaltene precipitation in petroleum mixtures. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2008; 25:523–534.Google Scholar

Nyström, B. General Polymer Chemistry. www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/kjemi/ KJM4550/h08/undervisningsmateriale/KJM5500-Macromol%20in%20solution.pdf.Google Scholar

van Dijk, M., Wakker, A. Concepts of Polymer Thermodynamics. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing Company Inc.; 1997.Google Scholar

Glatter, O., Kratky, O. Small Angle X-Ray Scattering. New York: Academic Press, Inc.; 1982.Google Scholar

Sorensen, C.M. Light scattering by fractal aggregates: a review. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2001; 35:648–667.Google Scholar

Gommes, C.J., Jiao, Y., Torquato, S. Microstructural degeneracy associated with a two-point correlation function and ist information content. Physical Review E. 2012; 85:051140.Google Scholar

Gommes, C.J., Jiao, Y., Torquato, S. Density of states for a specified correlation function and the energy landscape. Physical Review of Letters. 2012; 108:080601.Google Scholar

Gommes, C.J., Roberts, A.P. Structure development of resorcinol-formaldehyde gels: Microphase separation or colloid aggregation. Physical Review E. 2008; 77:041409.Google Scholar

Li, M., Lai, A.C.K. Analytic solution to heat conduction in finite hollow composite cylinders with a general boundary condition. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2013; 60:549–556.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive