Aarts, J.M., de Groot, J. and McDowell, R.H. Cocompactness. Nieuw Arch. Wisk. 18 (1970), 2–15. 57Google Scholar

Aarts, J.M., de Groot, J. and McDowell, R.H. Cotopology for metrizable spaces. Duke Math. J. 37 (1970), 291–295. 57, 135, 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aarts, J.M. and Lutzer, D.J. Completeness properties designed for recognizing Baire spaces. Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 116 (1974), 48. 37Google Scholar

Aczél, J. and Dhombres, J. Functional Equations in Several Variables. Encycl. Math. Appl. 31. Cambridge University Press, 1989. 8Google Scholar

Alberti, G. and Marchese, A. On the differentiability of Lipschitz functions with respect to measures in the Euclidean space. Geom. Funct. Anal. 26 (2016), 1–66. 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albeverio, S., Garko, I., Ibragim, M. and Torbin, G. Non-normal numbers: Full Hausdorff dimensionality vs zero dimensionality. Bull. Sci. Math. 141 (2017), 1–19. 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alon, N. and Spencer, J.H. The Probabilistic Method, 3rd ed. Wiley, 2008 (2nd ed. 2000, 1st ed. 1992). 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambrose, W. Measures on locally compact topological groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 61 (1947), 106–121. 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anantharaman, R. and Lee, J.P. Planar sets whose complements do not contain a dense set of lines. Real Anal. Exchange 11 (1985–1986), 168–179. 156Google Scholar

Ancel, F.D. An alternative proof and applications of a theorem of E.G. Effros. Michigan Math. J. 34 (1987), 39–55. 172, 173, 176, 178, 181, 182, 196, 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arhangelskii, A.V. On a class of spaces containing all metric and all locally compact spaces. Soviet Math. Dokl. 151 (1963), 751–754. 49, 165Google Scholar

Arhangelskii, A.V. Paracompactness and metrization: The method of covers in the classification of spaces. In Arhangelskii, A.V. (ed), General Topology III. Encyclopaedia Math. Sci. 51. Springer, 1995, 1–70. 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arhangelskii, A.V. and Malykhin, V.I. Metrizability of topological groups (in Russian). Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh. 91 (1996), 13–16; English translation in Moscow Univ. Math. Bull. 51 (1996), 9–11. 86Google Scholar

Arhangelskii, A.V. and Reznichenko, E.A. Paratopological and semitopological groups versus topological groups. Topol. Appl. 151 (2005), 107–119. 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arhangelskii, A. and Tkachenko, M. Topological Groups and Related Structures. Atlantis Press, 2008. 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avigad, J. An effective proof that open sets are Ramsey. Arch. Math. Logic 37 (1998), 235–240. 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baernstein, A. A non-linear Tauberian theorem in function theory. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 146 (1969), 87–105. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baernstein, A. A generalization of the cos πλ theorem. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 193 (1974), 181–197. 6Google Scholar

Bagaria, J. and Woodin, H.W. -sets of reals. J. Symbol. Logic 62 (1997), 1379–1428. 222, 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baire, R. Thèse: Sur les fonctions de variable réelle. Ann. di Math. 3 (1899), 1–123. 34, 36Google Scholar

Baire, R. Sur la représentation des fonctions discontinues (2me partie). Acta Math. 32 (1909), 97–176. 34Google Scholar

Bajšanski, B. and Karamata, J. Regular varying functions and the principle of equicontinuity. Publ. Ramanujan Inst. 1 (1969), 235–246. 278Google Scholar

Balkema, A.A. Monotone Transformations and Limit Laws. Mathematical Centre Tracts 45. Mathematisch Centrum, 1973. v+170 pp. 278Google Scholar

Banach, S. Sur l’équation fonctionelle f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). Fund. Math. 1 (1920), 123–124. Reprinted in Collected Works I, 47–48, PWN, 1967 (Commentary by Fast, H., p. 314). 8, 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banach, S. Über additive Maßfunktionen in abstrakten Mengen. Fund. Mathe. 15 (1930), 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banach, S. Über metrische Gruppen. Studia Math. III (1931), 101–113. Reprinted in Collected Works II, 401–411, PWN, 1979. vii+254 pp. 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banach, S. Théorie des Opérations Linéaires. Monog. Mat. I (1932). Reprinted in Collected Works II, PWN, 1979. 21, 162, 176, 184, 186, 187, 189, 190, 191, 232, 283Google Scholar

Banach, S. and Tarski, A. Sur la décomposition des ensembles de points en parties respectivement congruents. Fund. Math. 6 (1924), 244–277. 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banakh, T. Cardinal characteristics of the ideal of Haar null sets. Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 45 (2004), 119–137. 234Google Scholar

Banakh, T., Glab, S., Jablonska, E. and Swaczyna, J. Haar-I sets: Looking at small sets in Polish groups through compact glasses. Diss. Math. 564 (2021), 1–105. 255Google Scholar

Banakh, T. and Jablonska, E. Null-finite sets in topological groups and their applications. Israel J. Math. 230 (2019), 361–386. 249, 264, 265, 266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartle, R.G. Implicit functions and solutions of equations in groups. Math. Z. 62 (1955), 335–346. 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoszewicz, A., Filipczak, M. and Filipczak, T. On supports of probability Bernoulli-like measures. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 462 (2018), 26–35. 254, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoszewicz, A., Filipczak, M. and Natkaniec, T. On Smítal properties. Topol. Appl. 158 (2011), 2066–2075. 255, 256, 258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoszynski, T. Additivity of measure implies additivity of category. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 28 (1984), 209–213. 230, 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoszynski, T. A note on duality between measure and category. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 128 (2000), 2745–2748. 138, 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoszynski, T. Invariants of measure and category. In Forman, M. and Kanamori, A. (eds), Handbook of Set Theory, vol. 1. Springer, 2010, 491–556. 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoszynski, T., Goldstern, M., Judah, H. and Shelah, S. All meager filters may be null. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 117 (1993), 515–521. 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoszynski, T., Judah, H. and Shelah, S. The Cichon diagram. J. Symbol. Logic 58 (1993), 401–423. 138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoszynski, T. and Judah, H. On the Structure of the Real Line. A.K. Peters, 1995. 154, 222, 232, 233, 234Google Scholar

Barwise, J. (ed). Handbook of Mathematical Logic. North-Holland, 1977. 301Google Scholar

Bary, N.K. A Treatise on Trigonometric Series, vols. I, II. Pergamon, 1964. 120, 138Google Scholar

Bauer, F. Aspects of modern potential theory. In Proc. Int. Conf. Math. Vancouver, 1974, vol., 41–51. Canadian Mathematical Congress, 1975. 115, 118Google Scholar

Beck, A. A note on semi-groups in a locally compact group. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 11 (1960), 992–993. 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, A., Corson, H.H. and Simon, A.B. The interior points of the product of two subsets of a locally compact group. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 9 (1958), 648–652. 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, H. and Kechris, A.S. The Descriptive Set Theory of Polish Group Actions. London Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 232. Cambridge University Press, 1996. 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, J.L. and Slomson, A.B. Models and Ultraproducts: An Introduction. North-Holland, 1969. Reprinted by Dover, 2006. 62, 275Google Scholar

Berge, C. Topological Spaces, Including a Treatment of Multi-valued Functions, Vector Spaces and Convexity. Oliver and Boyd, 1963. Reprinted by Dover, 1997. 54Google Scholar

Bergelson, V., Hindman, N. and Weiss, B. All-sums sets in (0,1] – Category and measure. Mathematika 44 (1997), 61–87. 74, 76, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertoin, J. Lévy Processes. Cambridge Tracts in Math. 121. Cambridge University Press, 1996. 12Google Scholar

Berz, E. Sublinear functions on ℝ. Aequat. Math. 12 (1975), 200–206. 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beurling, A. and Deny, J. Dirichlet spaces. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 45 (1959), 208–215. 120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bingham, N.H. Tauberian theorems and the central limit theorem. Ann. Probab. 9 (1981), 221–231. 14, 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. Tauberian theorems for summability methods of random-walk type. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 30 (1984), 281–287. 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. On Valiron and circle convergence. Math. Z. 186 (1984), 273–286. 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. Tauberian theorems for Jakimovski and Karamata–Stirling methods. Mathematika 35 (1988), 216–224. 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. Regular variation and probability: The early years. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 200 (2007), 357–363. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. Finite additivity versus countable additivity. Elect. J. His. Probab. Stat. 6 (2010), 35p. 240Google Scholar

Bingham, N.H. The worldwide influence of the work of B. V. Gnedenko. Theory Probab. Appl. 58 (2014), 17–24. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. On scaling and regular variation. Publ. Inst. Math. Beograd (NS) 97 (111) (2015), 161–174. 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. Hardy, Littlewood and probability. Bull. London Math. Soc. 47 (2015), 191–201. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. Riesz means and Beurling moving averages. In Barrieu, P.M. (ed). Risk and Stochastics: Ragnar Norberg Memorial Volume. World Scientific, 2019, 159–172; arXiv:1502.07494. 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Fry, J.M. Regression: Linear models in Statistics. Springer Undergraduate Series in Mathematics (SUMS), Springer, 2010. 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Gashi, B. Logarithmic moving averages. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 421 (2015), 1790–1802. 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Gashi, B. Voronoi means, moving averages and power series. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 449 (2017), 682–696. 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Goldie, C.M. Extensions of regular variation, I. Uniformity and quantifiers. Proc. London Math. Soc. 44 (1982), 473–496. 10, 145, 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Goldie, C.M. Extensions of regular variation, II. Representations and indices. Proc. London Math. Soc. 44 (1982), 497–534. 11, 12, 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Goldie, C.M. On one-sided Tauberian conditions. Analysis 3 (1983), 159–188. 15, 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H., Goldie, C.M. and Teugels, J.L. Regular Variation, Encycl. Math. Appl. 27, Cambridge University Press, 1987 (2nd ed. 1989). 6, 19, 64, 78, 80, 81, 82, 140, 141, 144, 145, 239, 240, 282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Inoue, A. The Drasin–Shea–Jordan theorem for Fourier and Hankel transforms. Quart. J. Math. 48 (1997), 279–307. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Inoue, A. Ratio Mercerian theorems with applications to Hankel and Fourier transforms. Proc. London Math. Soc. 79 (1999), 626–648. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Inoue, A. Abelian, Tauberian and Mercerian theorems for arithmetic sums. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 250 (2000), 465–493. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Inoue, A. Tauberian and Mercerian theorems for systems of kernels. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 252 (2000), 177–197. 7, 8, 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H., Jablonska, E., Jablonski, W. and Ostaszewski, A.J. On subadditive functions bounded above on a large set. Results Math. 75:58 (2020), 12p. xiiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Generic subadditive functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), 4257–4266. 63, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Very slowly varying functions II. Colloq. Math. 116 (2009), 105–117. 176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Beyond Lebesgue and Baire: Generic regular variation. Colloq. Math. 116 (2009), 119–138. 63, 73, 137, 141, 146, 163, 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. The index theorem of regular variation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 358 (2009), 238–248. 64, 278, 283, 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Infinite combinatorics and the foundations of regular variation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 360 (2009), 518–529. 145, 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Automatic continuity: Subadditivity, convexity, uniformity. Aequat. Math. 78 (2009), 257–270. 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Infinite combinatorics on functions spaces: Category methods. Publ. Inst. Math. Beograd (NS) 86 (100) (2009), 55–73. 117, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Automatic continuity by analytic thinning. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), 907–919. 10, 11, 22, 145, 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Regular variation without limits. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 370 (2010), 322–338. 53, 62, 63, 65, 236, 237, 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Topological regular variation. I, Slow variation. Topol. Appl. 157 (2010), 1999–2013. 278, 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Topological regular variation. II, The fundamental theorems. Topol. Appl. 157 (2010), 2014–2023. 278, 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Topological regular variation. III, Regular variation. Topol. Appl. 157 (2010), 2024–2037. 278, 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Kingman, category and combinatorics. In Bingham, N.H. and Goldie, C.M. (eds), Probability and Mathematical Genetics: Sir John Kingman Festschrift. London Math.Soc. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 378, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 135–168. 71, 72, 81, 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Normed groups: Dichotomy and duality. Dissertationes Math. 472 (2010), 138p. 74, 86, 89, 99, 138, 139, 140, 141, 162, 185, 199, 217, 221, 236, 285, 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Beyond Lebesgue and Baire II: Bitopology and measure-category duality. Colloq. Math. 121 (2010), 225–238. 73, 137, 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Dichotomy and infinite combinatorics: The theorems of Steinhaus and Ostrowski. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 150 (2011), 1–22. 21, 62, 99, 141, 239, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Homotopy and the Kestelman–Borwein–Ditor theorem. Canadian Math. Bull. 54 (2011), 12–20. 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Steinhaus theory and regular variation: De Bruijn and after. Indag. Math. (N. G. de Bruijn Memorial Issue) 24 (2013), 679–692. 278, 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Beurling slow and regular variation. Trans. London Math. Soc. 1 (2014), 29–56. 13, 278, 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Cauchy’s functional equation and extensions: Goldie’s equation and inequality, the Gołąb-Schinzel equation and Beurling’s equation. Aequat. Math. 89 (2015), 1293–1310. 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Beurling moving averages and approximate homomorphisms. Indag. Math. 27 (2016), 601–633. 17, 62, 63, 288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. The Steinhaus–Weil property and its converse: Subcontinuity and amenability. arXiv:1607.00049. (See BinO2020c,d, BinO2021a, BinO2022a.) 228, 235, 240, 242, 247, 249, 253Google Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Category–measure duality: Jensen convexity and Berz sublinearity. Aequat. Math. 91 (2017), 801–836. 62, 232, 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Additivity, subadditivity and linearity: Automatic continuity and quantifier weakening. Indag. Math. 29 (2018), 687–713. 10, 11, 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Beyond Lebesgue and Baire IV: Density topologies and a converse Steinhaus theorem. Topol. Appl. 239 (2018), 274–292. 104, 234, 241, 242, 244, 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Set theory and the analyst. Eur. J. Math. 5 (2019), 2–48. 229, 240, 241, 268, 269, 270, 273, 274, 275, 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Variants on the Berz sublinearity theorem. Aequat. Math. 93 (2019), 351–369. 232, 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Beyond Haar and Cameron–Martin: The Steinhaus support. Topol. App. 260 (2019), 23–56. 240, 247, 256, 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. General regular variation, Popa groups and quantifier weakening. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 483 (2020), 123610. 10, 11, 17, 18, 288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Sequential regular variation: Extensions to Kendall’s theorem. Quart. J. Math. 71 (2020), 1171— 1200. 18, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. The Steinhaus–Weil property and its converse. I, Subcontinuity and amenability. Sarajevo Math. J. 16 (2020), 13–32. 228, 232, 234, 235, 242, 243, 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. The Steinhaus–Weil property and its converse. II, The Simmons–Mospan converse. Sarajevo Math. J. 16 (2020), 179–186; 235, 246, 252, 255, 256, 257Google Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. The Steinhaus–Weil property and its converse. III, Weil topologies. Sarajevo Math. J.17 (2021), 129–142. 235, 240, 259, 290Google Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Extremes and regular variation. In Chaumont, L. and Kyprianou, E.A. (eds), A Lifetime of Excursions through Random Walks and Lévy Processes (A volume in honour of Ron Doney’s 80th birthday). Progr. Prob. 78, 2021b, 121–137, Birkhäuser. 3, 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. The Steinhaus–Weil property and its converse. IV, Other interior-point properties. Sarajevo Math. J. 18 (2022), 203–210. 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Homomorphisms from functional equations: The Goldie equation II. ArXiv:1910.05816. 288Google Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Homomorphisms from functional equations: The Goldie equation III. ArXiv:1910.05817. 288Google Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. The Gołąb–Schinzel and Goldie functional equations in Banach algebras. ArXiv:2105.07794. 288Google Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Ostaszewski, A.J. Parthasarathy, shiftcompactness and infinite combinatorics. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 55 (2024), 931–948. 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Stadtmüller, U. Jakimovski methods and almostsure convergence. In Grimmett, G.R. and Welsh, D.J.A. (eds), Disorder in Physical Systems (J.M. Hammersley Festschrift). Oxford University Press, 1990, 5–18. 16Google Scholar

Bingham, N.H. and Tenenbaum, G. Riesz and Valiron means and fractional moments. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 99 (1986), 143–149. 15, 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkhoff, G. A note on topological groups. Compos. Math. 3 (1936), 427–430. 86Google Scholar

Birkhoff, G. and Mac Lane, S. A Survey of Modern Algebra, revised ed., Macmillan, 1953, (1st ed. 1941). 272Google Scholar

Blass, A. Existence of bases implies the Axiom of Choice. Contemp. Math. 31 (1984), 31–33. 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, S. A characterization of B-slowly varying functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 54 (1976), 243–250. 13Google Scholar

Blumenthal, R.M. and Getoor, R.K. Markov Processes and Potential Theory. Academic Press, 1968. 117Google Scholar

Boboc, N., Bucur, Gh. and Cornea, A. Order and Convexity in Potential Theory: H-cones. Lecture Notes in Math. 853 (1981), Springer. 118, 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogachev, V.I. Gaussian Measures. Math. Surveys and Monographs 62, Am. Math. Soc., 1998. 240, 259, 260, 261Google Scholar

Bogachev, V.I. Measure Theory, I. Springer, 2007. xiii, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 73, 104, 126, 232, 244, 273, 274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogachev, V.I. Measure Theory, II. Springer, 2007. 25, 33, 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogachev, V.I. Differentiable Measures and the Malliavin Calculus. Math. Surveys and Monographs 164, Am. Math. Soc., 2010. 243Google Scholar

Bogachev, V.I. Negligible sets in infinite-dimensional spaces. Anal. Math. 44 (2018), 299–323. 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogachev, V.I. and Smolyanov, O.G. Topological Vector Spaces and Their Applications, Springer, 2017. 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bojanic, R. and Karamata, J. On a class of functions of regular asymptotic behaviour. Math. Res. Center Tech. Rep. 436 (1963), Madison WI. Reprinted in Kar2009, pp. 545–569. 9Google Scholar

Bollobás, B. Modern Graph Theory, Springer, 1998. 274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Border, K.C. Fixed Point Theorems with Applications to Economics and Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1989. 50Google Scholar

Borel, E. Les probabilités dénombrables et leurs applications arithmétiques. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 27 (1909), 247–271. 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borell, C. Gaussian Radon measures on locally convex spaces. Math. Scand. 36 (1976), 265–284. 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borwein, D. and Ditor, S.Z. Translates of sequences in sets of positive measure. Canadian Math. Bull. 21 (1978), 497–498. 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourbaki, N. Elements of Mathematics: General Topology. Parts 1 and 2. Hermann, Paris/Addison-Wesley, 1966. 86Google Scholar

Bouziad, A. The Ellis theorem and continuity in groups. Topol. Appl. 50 (1993), 73–80. 49, 176, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouziad, A. Every Cech-analytic Baire semitopological group is a topological group. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 124 (1996), 953–959. 197, 198, 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradford, J.C. and Goffman, C. Metric spaces in which Blumberg’s theorem holds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 11 (1960), 667–670. 40, 127Google Scholar

Brelot, M. Sur la théorie autonome des fonctions sousharmoniques. Bull. Sci. Math. 65 (1941), 72–98. 116Google Scholar

Breuer, J. and Simon, B. Natural boundaries and spectral theory. Adv. Math. 226 (2011), 4902–4920. 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brezinski, C. History of Continued Fractions and Padé Approximants. Springer, 1991. 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruckner, A.M. Differentiation of integrals. Am. Math. Monthly 78 (9) (1971), Part II, ii+51 pp. 104Google Scholar

Brzdęk, J. Subgroups of the group ℤ_n and a generalization of the Gołąb–Schinzel functional equation. Aequat. Math. 43 (1992), 59–71. 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bugeaud, Y. Distribution Modulo One and Diophantine Approximation. Cambridge Tracts in Math. 193, Cambridge University Press, 2012. 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bukovský, L. The Structure of the Real Line. Monografie Matematyczne (New Series) 71, Birkhäuser, 2011. 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burago, D., Burago, Y. and Ivanov, S. A Course in Metric Geometry. Graduate Studies in Mathematics 33, Am. Math. Soc., 2001. 86Google Scholar

Burgess, J.P. Classical hierarchies from a modern standpoint. I: C-sets. Fund. Math. 115 (1983), 81–95. 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, J.P. Classical hierarchies from a modern standpoint. II: r-sets. Fund. Math. 115 (1983), 97–105. 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabello Sánchez, F. and Castillo, J.M.F. Banach space techniques underpinning a theory for nearly additive mappings. Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 404 (2002), 73pp.Google Scholar

Calude, C.S. and Marcus, S. A topological characterization of random sequences. Inform. Proc. Lett. 88 (2003), 245–250. 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, J., Drozdowski, R. and Piotrowski, Z. Weak continuity properties of topologized groups. Czechoslovak Math. J. 60 (2010), 133–148. 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, J. and Moors, W.B. Separate and joint continuity of homomorphisms defined on topological groups. New Zealand J. Math. 33 (2004), 41–45. 197Google Scholar

Cartan, H. Théorie du potentiel newtonien: énergie, capacité, suites de potentiels. Bull. Soc. Math. France 73 (1945), 74–106. 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartan, H. Théorie générale du balayage en potentiel newtonien. Ann. Inst. Fourier Grenoble 22 (1946), 221–280. 117Google Scholar

Champernowne, D. G. The construction of decimals normal in the scale of ten. J. London Math. Soc. 8 (1933), 254–260. 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandrasekharan, K. and Minakshisundaram, S. Typical Means. Oxford University Press, 1952. 17Google Scholar

Charatonik, J.J. and Charatonik, W.J. The Effros metric. Topol. Appl. 110 (2001), 237–255. 176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charatonik, J.J. and Mackowiak, T. Around Effros’ theorem. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 298 (1986), 579–602. 173Google Scholar

Choquet, G. Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 5 (1953–54), 131–295. 116Google Scholar

Choquet, G. Lectures on Analysis. Vol. I, Benjamin, 1969. 45Google Scholar

Christensen, J.P.R. On sets of Haar measure zero in abelian Polish groups. Israel J. Math. 13 (1973), 255–260. 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, J.P.R. Topology and Borel Structure. Descriptive Topology and Set Theory with Applications to Functional Analysis and Measure Theory. North-Holland, 1974. 47, 241, 251Google Scholar

Christensen, J.P.R. Joint continuity of separately continuous functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 82 (1981), 455–461. 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, K.-L. A Course in Probability Theory. Academic Press, 1968. (3rd ed., 2001.) 117Google Scholar

Chung, K.-L. Elementary Probability Theory with Stochastic Processes. Springer, 1974. (4th ed., 2003.) 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, K.-L. Lectures from Markov Processes to Brownian Motion. Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 249, Springer, 1982. 116, 117, 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, K.-L. Green, Brown and Probability. World Scientific, 1995. 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciesielski, K. Set-theoretic real analysis. J. Appl. Anal. 3 (1997), 143–190. 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciesielski, K. and Jasinski, J. Topologies making a given ideal nowhere dense or meager. Topol. Appl. 63 (1995), 277–298. 248CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciesielski, K. and Larson, L. The density topology is not generated. Real Anal. Exchange 16 (1990/1991), 522–525. 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciesielski, K., Larson, L. and Ostaszewski, K., -Density Continuous Functions. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 107 (1994), no. 515. 167Google Scholar

Cohen, P. The independence of the continuum hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 50 (1963), 105–110. 268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohn, P.M. Algebra, Vol. 2, 2nd ed. Wiley, 1989. (1st ed. 1977.) 273Google Scholar

Comfort, W.W. Topological Groups. In KunV1984, Chapter 24. 94, 140, 236Google Scholar

Comfort, W.W. and Negrepontis, S. The ring C(X) determines the category of X. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 16 (1965), 1041–1045. 40, 41Google Scholar

Comfort, W.W. and Negrepontis, S. The Theory of Ultrafilters. Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 211, Springer, 1974. 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Constantinescu, C. and Cornea, A. Potential Theory on Harmonic Spaces. Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 158, Springer, 1972. 116, 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, J.B. A Course in Functional Analysis. 2nd ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 96 Springer, 1990. 182, 183Google Scholar

Croft, H.T. A question of limits. Eureka 20 (1957), 11–13. 18Google Scholar

Csiszár, I. and Erdős, P. On the function g (t) = lim sup_x→∞ (f (x + t) – f (x)). Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Kőzl. A 9 (1964), 603–606. 145, 170Google Scholar

Dales, H.G. Automatic continuity: A survey. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10(1978), 129–183. 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dales, H.G. Banach Algebras and Automatic Continuity. London Math. Soc. Monog. New Series, 24, Oxford University Press, 2000. 197Google Scholar

Dales, H.G. and Woodin, W.H. An Introduction to Independence for Analysts. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series, 115. Cambridge University Press, 1987. 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dales, H.G. and Woodin, W.H. Super-Real Fields. Totally Ordered Fields with Additional Structure. London Math. Soc. Monog., New Series, 17, Oxford University Press, 1996. 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darboux, G. Sur la composition des forces en statiques. Bull. des Sci. Math. 9 (1875), 281–288. 144Google Scholar

Darji, Udayan B. On Haar meager sets. Topol. Appl. 160 (2013), 2396–2400. 249, 261, 262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, R.O. Subsets of finite measure in analytic sets. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A. 14 (1952), 488–489. 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Roy O., Jayne, J.E., Ostaszewski, A.J. and Rogers, C.A. Theorems of Novikov type. Mathematika 24 (1977), 97–114. 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debs, G. Points de continuité d’une fonction séparément continue. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 97 (1986), 167–176. 47Google Scholar

Debs, G. Points de continuité d’une fonction séparément continue II. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 99 (1987), 777–782. 48Google Scholar

Debs, G. and Saint Raymond, J. Ensembles d’unicité et d’unicité au sens large, Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 37(1987) 217–239. 138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dellacherie, C. Capacités et Processus Stochastiques, Ergebnisse Math. 67, Springer, 1972. 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dellacherie, C. Un cours sur les ensembles analytiques, Part II. In RogJD 1980, pp. 183–316. 51Google Scholar

Dellacherie, C. and Meyer, P.-A. Probabilités et Potentiel, Ch. I–IV (1975), Ch. V–VIII (1980), Ch. IX–XI (1983), Ch. XII–XVI (1987), Ch. XVII–XXIV (with Maisonneuve, B.) (1992). Hermann, Paris. 118Google Scholar

Denjoy, A. Sur les fonctions dérivées sommable. Bull. Soc. Math. France 43 (1915), 161–248. 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devlin, K.J. Aspects of Constructibility. Lecture Notes Math. 354, Springer, 1973. 53, 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devlin, K.J. Constructibility. In Barw1977, p. 453–489. 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devlin, K.J. Constructibility. Perspectives Math. Logic, Springer, 1984. 270, 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devlin, K.J. The Joy of Sets: Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory, 2nd ed. Springer, 1993. (1st ed. 1979.) 272, 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deza, E., Deza, M.M. and Deza, M. Dictionary of Distances, Elsevier, 2006. 86Google Scholar

Diestel, J. and Spalsbury, A. The Joys of Haar Measure, Grad. Studies in Math. 150, Am. Math Soc., 2014. 242, 285Google Scholar

Dijkstra, J.J. On homeomorphism groups and the compact-open topology. Am. Math. Monthly 112 (2005), 910–912. 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodos, P. Dichotomies of the set of test measures of a Haar-null set. Israel J. Math. 144 (2004), 15–28. 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodos, P. On certain regularity properties of Haar-null sets. Fund. Math. 191 (2004), 97–109. 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodos, P. The Steinhaus property and Haar-null sets. Bull. Lon. Math. Soc. 41 (2009), 377–384. 258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doob, J.L. Classical Potential Theory and its Probabilistic Counterpart. Grundl. Math. Wiss. 262, Springer, 1984. 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorais, F.G., Filipów, R. and Natkaniec, T. On some properties of Hamel bases and their applications to Marczewski measurable functions. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 11 (2013), 487–508. 22Google Scholar

Dougherty, R. and Foreman, M. Banach–Tarski decompositions using sets with the Baire property. J. Am. Math. Soc. 7 (1994), 75–124. 138, 224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Douwen, E.K. The integers and topology. In Kunen, K. and Vaughan, J.E. (eds), Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology. North-Holland, 1984, 111–167. 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Douwen, E.K. Fubini’s theorem for null sets. Am. Math. Monthly 96(8) (1989), 718–721. 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Douwen, E. A technique for constructing honest locally compact submetrizable examples. Topol. Appl. 47 (1992), 179–201. 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowker, C.H. Mapping theorems for non-compact spaces. Am. J. Math. 69 (1947), 200–242. 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drake, F.R. Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals, North-Holland, 1974. 271, 274, 276, 277Google Scholar

Drasin, D. Tauberian theorems and slowly varying functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 133 (1968), 333–356. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drasin, D. Baernstein’s thesis and entire functions with negative zeros. Mat. Stud. 34 (2010), 160–167. 5Google Scholar

Drasin, D. and Shea, D.F. Asymptotic properties of entire functions extremal for the cos πρ theorem. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 75 (1969), 119–122. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drasin, D. and Shea, D.F. Complements to some theorems of Bowen and Macintyre on the radial growth of entire functions with negative zeros. In Shankar, H. (ed), Mathematical Essays Dedicated to A.J. Macintyre. Ohio University Press, 1970, 101–121. 4Google Scholar

Drasin, D. and Shea, D.F. Pólya peaks and the oscillation of positive functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 34 (1972), 403–411. 6Google Scholar

Drasin, D. and Shea, D.F. Convolution inequalities, regular variation and exceptional sets. J. Analyse Math. 29 (1976), 232–293. 4, 10, 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dudley, R.M. Real Analysis and Probability. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 74. Cambridge University Press, 2002. (1st ed. 1989.) 29, 30, 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dugundji, J. Topology. Allyn and Bacon, 1966. 35, 85, 176, 197Google Scholar

Edgar, G.A. Measure, Topology and Fractal Geometry. Undergrad. Texts in Math., Springer, 1990. 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edrei, A., Locally Tauberian theorems for meromorphic functions of lower order less than one. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 140 (1969), 309–332. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edrei, A. and Fuchs, W.H.J. Tauberian theorems for a class of mero-morphic functions with negative zeros and positive poles. In Contemporary Problems in Anal. Functions (Proc. Internat. Conf. Erevan, 1965, Russian), 339–358. Nauka, 1966. 4, 5Google Scholar

Effros, E.G. Transformation groups and C*-algebras. Ann. Math. 81 (1965), 38–55. 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elekes, M. and Nagy, D. Haar null and Haar meagre sets: A survey and new results. Bull. Lon. Math. Soc. 52 (2020), 561–619 (arXiv:1606.06607v2) 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elekes, M. and Vidyánsky, Z. Naively Haar null sets in Polish groups. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 446 (2017), 193–200. 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellentuck, E. A new proof that analytic sets are Ramsey. J. Symbolic Logic 39, 163–165. 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. Continuity and homeomorphism groups. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 4 (1953). 969–973. 183, 197, 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. A note on the continuity of the inverse, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 8 (1957). 372–373. 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. Lectures on Topological Dynamics, Benjamin, 1969. 288Google Scholar

Emeryk, A., Frankiewicz, R. and Kulpa, W. On functions having the Baire property. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. 27 (1979), 489–491. 185Google Scholar

Engelking, R. On closed images of the space of irrationals. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 21 (1969), 583–586. 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engelking, R. General Topology. Heldermann, 1989. xiii, 25, 26, 27, 28, 35, 36, 41, 44, 56, 58, 85, 86, 120, 136, 153, 157, 162, 165, 193, 194, 208, 214, 215, 279, 282Google Scholar

Erdos, P., Kestelman, H. and Rogers, C.A. An intersection property of sets with positive measure, Coll. Math. 11 (1963), 75–80. 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Essén, R.R. The cos πλ Theorem. Lecture Notes in Math. 467, Springer, 1975. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falconer, K.J. The Geometry of Fractal Sets. Cambridge Tracts in Math. 85, Cambridge University Press, 1985. 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falconer, K., Gruber, Peter M., Ostaszewski, A.J. and Stuart, Trevor. Claude Ambrose Rogers: 1 November 1920–5 December 2005. R. Soc. Biogr. Mem. 61 (2015), 403–435. xiiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Federer, H. Geometric Measure Theory. Grundl. Math. Wiss. 153, Springer, 1969. 228Google Scholar

Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II, Wiley, 1966. (2nd ed. 1971.) 2Google Scholar

Fenstad, J.E. and Normann, D. On absolutely measurable sets. Fund. Math. 81 (1973/74), 91–98. 62, 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filipczak, M. and Wilczynski, W. Strict density topology on the plane. Measure case. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo(2) 60 (2011), 113–124. 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, V., Friedman, S.S. and Khomskii, Y. Cichon diagram, regularity properties and sets of reals. Arch. Math. Logic 53 (2014), 695–729. 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foreman, M. and Kanamori, A. (eds). Handbook of Set Theory. Springer, 2010. 231, 271, 312, 315, 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foreman, M. and Woodin, W.H. The generalized continuum hypothesis can fail everywhere. Ann. Math. 133 (1991), 1–35. 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fort, M.K. Jr. A unified theory of semi-continuity. Duke Math. J. 16 (1949), 237–246. 242Google Scholar

Fosgerau, M. When are Borel functions Baire functions? Fund. Math. 143 (1993), 137–152. 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankiewicz, R. On functions having the Baire property, II. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. 30 (1982), 559–560. 185Google Scholar

Frankiewicz, R. and Kunen, K. Solution of Kuratowski’s problem on function having the Baire property, I. Fund. Math. 128 (1987), 171–180. 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fréchet, M., Pri la funkcia ekvacio f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) (in Esperanto). Enseignement Math. 15 (1913), 390–393 21Google Scholar

Fréchet, M. Sur la notion de différentielle d’une fonction de ligne. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 15 (1914), 135–161. 21Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Cech-Analytic Spaces, (1980). Available from www1.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/n80l08.pdf. 57Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Consequences of Martin’s Axiom. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 84, Cambridge University Press, 1984. 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Measure-additive coverings and measurable selectors. Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 260 (1987), 116pp. 185Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Universally Kuratowski–Ulam spaces, (2000a). Available from www1.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/preprints.htm. 149, 158Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Measure Theory, 1. The Irreducible Minimum. Torres Fremlin, 2000. Available from www1.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/mt1.2011/index.htm. 25Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Measure Theory, 2. Broad Foundations. Torres Fremlin, 2001. Available from www1.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/mt2.2016/index.htm. 25, 207Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Measure Theory, 3. Measure Algebras. Torres Fremlin, 2002. Available from www1.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/mt3.2012/index.htm. 25, 148, 149, 241Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Measure Theory, 4. Topological Measure Spaces. Part I, II. Torres Fremlin, 2003. Available from www1.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/mt4.2013/index.htm. 25, 207, 272Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. Measure Theory, 5. Set-Theoretic Measure Theory. Part I, II. Torres Fremlin, 2008. Available from www1.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/mt5.2015/index.htm. 25, 33, 138, 222, 232Google Scholar

Fremlin, D.H. and Grekas, S. Products of completion regular measures. Fund. Math. 147 (1995), 27–37. 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fremlin, D., Natkaniec, T. and Recław, I. Universally Kuratowski–Ulam spaces. Fund. Math. 165 (2000), 239–247. 139, 148, 149, 159, 175, 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, S.D. and Schrittesser, D. Projective measure without projective Baire. Memoirs Am. Math. Soc. 267 No. 1298, 2020. 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frolík, Z. Generalizations of the G_δ-property of complete metric spaces. Czechoslovak Math. J. 10 (1960), 359–379. 56, 58, 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frolík, Z. Absolute Borel and Souslin sets. Pacific J. Math. 32 (1970), 663–683. 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frolík, Z. and Holický, P. Decomposability of completely Suslin-additive families. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 82 (1981), 359–365. 209, 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frolík, Z. and Netuka, I. Čech completeness and fine topologies in potential theory and real analysis. Expos. Math. 8 (1990), 81–89. 111Google Scholar

Fuchs, L. Infinite Abelian Groups, I. Pure and Applied Mathematics 36, Academic Press, 1970. 142Google Scholar

Fuglede, B. The quasi topology associated with a countably subadditive set function. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 21 (1971), 123–169. 116, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukushima, M., Oshima, Y. and Takeda, M. Dirichlet Forms and Markov Processes. Walter de Gruyter, 1994. (1st ed., Fukushima, M., North-Holland, 1980.) 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, R.V. Relations among continuous and various non-continuous functions. Pacific J. Math. 25 (1968), 495–509. 242, 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gao, S. Invariant Descriptive Theory, CRC Press, 2009. 62Google Scholar

Ger, R. and Kuczma, M. On the boundedness and continuity of convex functions and additive functions. Aequat. Math. 4 (1970), 157–162. 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghoussoub, N. and Maurey, B. G_δ-embeddings in Hilbert space. J. Funct. Anal. 61 (1985), 72–97. 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillman, L. and Jerison, M. Rings of Continuous Functions. Van Nostrand, 1960. (Reprinted in Graduate Texts in Mathematics 43, Springer, 1976.) 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glimm, J. Locally compact transformation groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 101 (1961), 124–138. 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gnedenko, B.V. and Kolmogorov, A.N. Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables. Addison-Wesley, 1954. 2Google Scholar

Gödel, K. The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis. Ann. Math. Studies 3, Princeton University Press, 1940. 269, 270Google Scholar

Goffman, C. On Lebesgue’s density theorem. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1 (1950), 384–388. 112Google Scholar

Goffman, C. On the approximate limits of a real function. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 23 (1962), 76–78. 107Google Scholar

Goffman, C. Everywhere differentiable functions and the density topology. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 51 (1975), 250. 112Google Scholar

Goffman, C., Neugebauer, C.J. and Nishiura, T. Density topology and approximate continuity. Duke Math. J. 28 (1961), 497–505. 107, 109, 110, 113, 167, 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, C. and Waterman, D. Approximately continuous transformations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 12 (1961), 116–121. 107, 110, 167, 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstern, M., Schmeling, J. and Winkler, R. Metric, fractal dimensional and Baire results on the distribution of subsequences. Math. Nachr. 219 (2000), 97–108. 2263.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goswami, K.C. Density topology on ℝ is not a Borel subset of its Stone–Čech compactification. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 16 (1985), 45–48. 111Google Scholar

Gowisankaran, C. Radon measures on groups. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 25 (1970), 381–384. 243, 244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowisankaran, C. Quasi-invariant Radon measures on groups. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 35 (1972), 503–506. 243, 244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, R.L., Rothschild, B.L. and Spencer, J.H. Ramsey Theory, 2nd ed. Wiley, 1990. (1st ed. 1980.) 141Google Scholar

Green, G. An Essay on the application of mathematical analysis to the theories of electricity and magnetism. T. Wheelhouse, Nottingham, 1828. (Facsimile edition, Wazäta-Melins Aktiebolag, Göteberg, 1958.) 114Google Scholar

de Groot, J. Subcompactness and the Baire category theorem. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 66 (1963), 761–767. 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosse-Erdmann, K.-G. Holomorphe Monster und Universelle Funktionen. Mitt. Math. Sem. Giessen 176 (1987). 228Google Scholar

Grosse-Erdmann, K.-G. An extension of the Steinhaus–Weil theorem. Colloq. Math. 57 (1989), 307–317. 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosse-Erdmann, K.-G. Universal families and hypercyclic operators. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 36 (1999), 345–381. 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruenhage, G. Generalized metric spaces. In KunV 1984, Chapter 10. 44, 45, 49Google Scholar

Gruenhage, G. Irreducible restrictions of closed mappings. Topol. Appl. 85 (1998), 127Ű135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Haan, L. On regular variation and its applications to the weak convergence of sample extremes. Math. Centre Tracts 32, Amsterdam, 1970. 3, 9Google Scholar

Halmos, P.R. Measure Theory, Van Nostrand, 1950. (Reprinted as Graduate Texts in Math. 18, Springer, 1974.) 24, 25, 75, 148, 251, 253, 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamel, G. Eine Basis aller Zahlen und die unstetigen Lösungen der Funktionalgleichung f (x + y) = f (x) + f (y). Math. Ann. 60 (1905), 459–462. 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hand, D. J. Measurement Theory and Practice: The World through Quantification. Arnold. 22Google Scholar

Hansel, G. and Troallic, J.-P. Quasicontinuity and Namioka’s theorem. Topol. Appl. 46 (1992), 135–149. 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansell, R.W. Borel measurable mappings for nonseparable metric spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 161 (1971), 145–169. 39, 185, 208, 209, 217, 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansell, R.W. On the nonseparable theory of Borel and Souslin sets. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 78 (1972), 236–241. 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansell, R.W. On the representation of nonseparable analytic sets. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 39 (1973), 402–408. 203, 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansell, R.W. On the non-separable theory of k-Borel and k-Souslin sets. General Topol. Appl. 3 (1973), 161–195. 205, 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansell, R.W. On characterizing non-separable analytic and extended Borel sets as types of continuous images. Proc. London Math. Soc. 28 (1974), 683–699. 193, 208, 209, 210, 211, 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansell, R.W. Descriptive topology. In HuŽek, H. and van Mill, J. (eds).. Elsevier, 1992, 275–315. 56, 58, 204, 209, 213, 215, 218Google Scholar

Hansell, R.W. Nonseparable analytic metric spaces and quotient maps. Topol. Appl. 85 (1998), 143–152. 209, 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansell, R.W., Jayne, J.E. and Rogers, C.A. K-analytic sets. Mathematica 30(2) (1983), 189–221. 57, 207Google Scholar

Hardy, G.H. Researches in the theory of divergent series and divergent integrals. Quart. J. Math. 35 (1904), 22–66. (Reprinted in Collected Papers of G. H. Hardy, Volume VI, Oxford University Press, 1974, 37–84.) 17Google Scholar

Hardy, G.H. A new proof of the functional equation for the zetafunction. Matematisk Tidsskrift B (1922), 71–73. Reprinted in Collected Papers of G. H. Hardy, Volume II.1, Oxford University Press. 227Google Scholar

Hardy, G.H. Divergent Series. Oxford University Press, 1949. 13, 14, 15, 17Google Scholar

Hardy, G.H. and Littlewood, J.E. Theorems concerning the summability of series by Borel’s exponential method. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 41 (1916), 36–53. (Reprinted in Collected Papers of G.H. Hardy, Volume VI, Oxford University Press, 1974, 609–628.) 16Google Scholar

Hardy, G.H. and Littlewood, J.E. The equivalence of certain integral means. Proc. London Math. Soc. 22 (1924), 60–63. (Reprinted in Collected Papers of G.H. Hardy, Volume VI, Oxford University Press, 1974, 677–680.) 12Google Scholar

Hardy, G.H. and Riesz, M. The General Theory of Dirichlet’s Series. Cambridge Tracts in Math. 18, Cambridge University Press, 1915. 17Google Scholar

Hardy, G.H. and Wright, E.M. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 6th ed. (revised Heath-Brown, D.R. and Silverman, J.H.), Oxford University Press, 2008. 8, 10, 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, G. Metric Number Theory. LMS Monographs 18, Oxford University Press, 1988. 225Google Scholar

Harrington, L.A., Kechris, A.S. and Louveau, A. A Glimm–Effros dichotomy for Borel equivalence relations. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), 903–928. 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartman, S. Travaux de W. Sierpinski sur la théorie des ensembles et ses applications IV. Mesure et catégorie. Congruence des ensembles. In Sie 1975, 20–25. 137Google Scholar

Hartman, S. and Mycielski, J. On the imbedding of topological groups into connected topological groups. Colloq. Math. 5 (1958), 167–169. 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haupt, O. and Pauc, C. La topologie approximative de Denjoy envisagée comme vraie topologie. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 234 (1952), 390–392. 107, 167, 256Google Scholar

Hawkes, J. On the potential theory of subordinators. Z. Wahrschein. 33 (1975), 113–132. 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haworth, R.C. and McCoy, R.C. Baire spaces. Dissertationes Math. 141 (1977). 37, 156Google Scholar

Hayes, C.A. and Pauc, C.Y. Derivation and Martingales. Ergebnisse Math. 49, Springer, 1970. 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayman, W.K. Meromorphic Functions. Oxford University Press, 1964. 5, 6Google Scholar

Hayman, W.K. Some examples related to the cos πρ theorem. In Shankar, H. (ed), Mathematical Essays Dedicated to A.J. Macintyre. Ohio University Press, 1970, 149–170. 6Google Scholar

Heiberg, C. A proof of a conjecture by Karamata. Publ. Inst. Math. Beograd (NS) 12 (26), 41–44. 10Google Scholar

Helms, L.L. Introduction to Potential Theory. Wiley, 1969. 115, 116Google Scholar

Hewitt, E. and Ross, K.A. Abstract Harmonic Analysis, I. Structure of Topological Groups, Integration Theory, Group Representations, 2nd ed. Grundl. Math. Wiss. 115, Springer, 1979. 173, 191, 253, 257Google Scholar

Heyer, H. Probability Measures on Locally Compact Groups. Ergebnisse Math. 94, Springer, 1977. 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hildenbrandt, W. Core and Equilibria of a Large Economy. Princeton University Press, 1974. 54Google Scholar

Hille, W. and Phillips, R.S. Functional Analysis and Semi-Groups. Am. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 31, Am. Math. Soc., 1957. 239Google Scholar

Hindman, N. and Strauss, D. Algebra in the Stone-Cech Compactification. Theory and Applications. De Gruyter Expos. Math. 27, Gruyter, Walter de, 1998 (2nd revised and extended ed., de Gruyter, 2012). 64, 274Google Scholar

Hoffmann-Jørgensen, J. Automatic continuity. In RogJD 1980, Part 3.2, 337–398. 175, 177, 185, 187, 197Google Scholar

Holá, L. and Novotný, B. Subcontinuity. Math. Slov. 62 (2012), 345–362. 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holický, P. Preservation of completeness by some continuous maps. Topol. Appl. 157 (2010), 1926–1930. 220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holický, P. and Pol, R. On a question by Alexey Ostrovsky concerning preservation of completeness. Topol. Appl. 157 (2010), 594–596. 196, 216, 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hrušák, M. and Zamora Avilés, B. Countable dense homogeneity of definable spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 133 (2005), 3429–3435. 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hult, H., Lindskog, F., Mikosch, T. and Samorodnitsky, G. Functional large deviations for multivariate regularly varying random walks. Ann. Appl. Probab. 15(4) (2005), 2651–2680. 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurewicz, W. and Wallman, H. Dimension Theory. Princeton University Press, 1941. 226Google Scholar

Hyde, J., Laschos, V., Olsen, L., Petrykiewicz, I. and Shaw, A. Iterated Cesàro averages, convergence, frequencies of digits and Baire category. Acta Arith. 144 (2010), 287–293. 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ihoda, J.I. (Judah, H.I.) and Shelah, S. -ets of reals. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 42 (1989), 207–223. 230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ionescu Tulcea, A. and Ionescu Tulcea, C. On the lifting property, I. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 3 (1961), 537–546. 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ionescu Tulcea, A. and Ionescu Tulcea, C. Topics in the Theory of Lifting. Ergebnisse Math. 48, Springer, 1969. 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Itzkowitz, G.L. A characterization of a class of uniform spaces that admit an invariant integral. Pacific J. Math. 41 (1972), 123–141. 196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jablonska, E. Some analogies between Haar meager sets and Haar null sets in abelian Polish groups. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 421 (2015), 1479–1486. 249, 263, 264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jablonska, E. A theorem of Piccard’s type in abelian Polish groups. Anal. Math. 42 (2016), 159–164. 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakimovski, A. A generalization of the Lototsky method of summation. Michigan Math. J. 6, 277–290. 16Google Scholar

James, R.C. Linearly arc-wise connected topological Abelian groups. Ann. Math. 44, (1943), 93–102. 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, R.C., Michal, A.D. and Wyman, M. Topological Abelian groups with ordered norms. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 53 (1947), 770–774. 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janson, S. Gaussian Hilbert Spaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 129. Cambridge University Press, 1997. 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Javor, P. On the general solution of the functional equation f (x + y f (x)) = f (x) f (y), Aequat. Math. 1 (1968), 235–238. 288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jech, Th.J. The Axiom of Choice. North-Holland, 1973. 20, 270Google Scholar

Jech, Th.J. Set Theory. Springer, 1977. 277Google Scholar

Jensen, R.B. The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy. Ann. Math. Logic 4 (1972), 229–308. 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jiménez-Garrido, J., Sanz, J. and Schindl, G. Indices of O-regular variation for weight functions and weight sequences. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Ex. Fac. Nat. Ser. A (RACSAM) 113 (2019), 3659–3697. 7Google Scholar

Johnstone, P.J. Stone Spaces. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 3. Cambridge University Press, 1982. 149Google Scholar

Jones, F.B. Connected and disconnected plane sets and the functional equation f (x + y) = f (x) + f (y). Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 48 (1942), 115–120. 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, F.B. Measure and other properties of a Hamel basis. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 48 (1942), 472–481. 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, F.B. Use of a new technique in homogeneous continua. Houston J. Math. 1 (1975), 57–61. 173Google Scholar

Jordan, G.S. Regularly varying functions and convolutions with real kernels. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 194 (1974), 177–194. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judah, H. and Roslanowski, A. On Shelah’s amalgamation. In Set Theory of the Reals (Ramat Gan, 1991), 385–414, Israel Math. Conf. Proc., 6, Univ, Bar-Ilan., Gan, Ramat, 1993. 233Google Scholar

Judah, H.I. (Ihoda, J.I.) and Shelah, S. -sets of reals. J. Symbolic Logic 58 (1993), 72–80. 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judah, H.I. and Shelah, S. Baire property and axiom of choice. Israel J. Math. 84 (1993), 435–450. 232, 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judah, H.I. (Ihoda, J.I.) and Spinas, O. Large cardinals and projective sets. Arch. Math. Logic 36 (1997), 137–155. 229, 233, 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahane, J.-P. Some Random Series of Functions, 2nd ed. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 5, Cambridge University Press. (1st ed. 1968, Heath, MA.) 224, 227, 229, 234Google Scholar

Kahane, J.-P. A century of interplay between Taylor series, Fourier series and Brownian motion. Bull. London Math. Soc. 29 (1997), 257–279. 223, 224, 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahane, J.-P. Baire’s category theorem and trigonometric series. J. Anal. Math. 80 (2000), 143–182. 138, 224, 227, 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahane, J.-P. Probabilities and Baire’s theory in harmonic analysis. In Byrnes, J. S. (ed), Twentieth Century Harmonic Analysis, A Celebration. Kluwer, 2001, 57–72. 138, 223, 224, 227, 229, 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahane, J.-P. and Queffélec, H. Ordre, convergence et sommabilités des séries de Dirichlet. Ann. Inst. Fourier 47 (1997), 485–529. 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kakutani, K. Über die Metrisation der topologischen Gruppen. Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 12 (1936), 82–84. (Reprinted in Selected Papers, 1, Kallman, R.R. (ed), 60–62. Birkhäuser, 1986.) 86, 91Google Scholar

Kalemba, P. and Kucharski, A. Universally Kuratowski–Ulam spaces and open–open games. Ann. Math. Siles. 29 (2015), 421–427. 149Google Scholar

Kallenberg, O. Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd ed., Springer, 2002. (1st ed. 1997.) 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalton, N.J., Peck, N.T. and Roberts, J.R. An F-space Sampler, London Math. Soc. Lect. Notes Ser. 89, Cambridge University Press, 1984. 174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanamori, A. The Higher Infinity. Large Cardinals in Set Theory from their Beginnings, 2nd ed. Springer, 2003. (1st ed. 1994.) 62, 232, 277Google Scholar

Kanamori, A. Set theory from Cantor to Cohen. In Irvine, A. (ed), Handbook of the Philosophy of Scienc. Philosophy of Mathematics, Chapter 10. North-Holland, 2009. 36Google Scholar

Kanamori, A. and Magidor, M. The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory. Higher Set Theory (Proc. Conf., Math. Forschungsinst., Oberwolfach, 1977), pp. 99–275, Lecture Notes in Math. 669, Springer, 1978. 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaniewski, J. and Pol, R. Borel-measurable selectors for compactvalued mappings in the non-separable case. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. 23 (1975), 1043–1050. 209, 218Google Scholar

Kanovei, B.G. and Lyubetskii, V.A. On some classical problems of descriptive set theory. Russian Math. Surveys 58 (2003), 839–927. 230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karamata, J. Selected Papers, Marić, V. (ed). Zavod za Udz̆benike, Beograd, 2009. 8, 298Google Scholar

Katznelson, Y. and Stromberg, K. Everywhere differentiable, nowhere monotone, functions. Am. Math. Monthly 81 (1974), 349–354. 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, R. A functional method for linear sets. Israel J. Math. 5 (1967), 185–187. 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, R. Thin sets, differentiable functions and the category method. In J. Fourier Anal. Appl., Special Issue in honour of J.-P. Kahane, 311–316. CRC Press, 1995. 223Google Scholar

Kechris, A.S. Topology and descriptive set theory. Topol. Appl. 58 (1994), 195–222. 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kechris, A.S. Classical Descriptive Set Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 156, Springer, 1995. xiii, 36, 38, 46, 47, 48, 61, 62, 79, 117, 121, 123, 154, 162, 167, 196, 203, 231, 232, 240, 241, 268, 274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kechris, A.S. and Louveau, A. Descriptive Set Theory and the Structure of Sets of Uniqueness. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series 128, Cambridge University Press, 1987. 138, 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kechris, A.S. and Solovay, R.M. On the relative consistency strength of determinacy hypotheses. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 290(1) (1985), 179–211. 232Google Scholar

Kelley, J.L. General Topology. Van Nostrand, 1955. (2nd ed. Springer, 1975.) 36, 42, 59, 86, 136, 201, 219, 282Google Scholar

Kellogg, O.D. Foundations of Potential Theory. Dover, 1953. (Originally published in Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 31 (1929), reprinted 1967, Springer.) 114, 115Google Scholar

Kemperman, J.H.B. A general functional equation. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 86 (1957), 28–56. 74, 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, D.G. Delphic semigroups, infinitely divisible regenerative phenomena and the arithmetic of p-functions. Z. Wahrschein vew. Geb. 9 (1968), 163–195. (Reprinted in Stochastic Analysis, Harding, E.F. and Kendall, D.G. (eds), 73–114. Wiley, 1973.) 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kestelman, H. The convergent sequences belonging to a set. J. London Math. Soc. 22 (1947), 130–136. 73, 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kestelman, H. On the functional equation f (x + y) = f (x) + f (y). Fund. Math. 34 (1947), 144–147. 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharazishvili, A.B. Transformation Groups and Invariant Measures. Set-Theoretic Aspects. World Scientific, 1998. 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharazishvili, Alexander. Nonmeasurable Sets and Functions. Elsevier, 2004. 22, 172Google Scholar

Kharazishvili, A.B. Strange Functions in Real Analysis, 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, 2018. (2nd ed. 2006, 1st ed. 2000.) 113Google Scholar

Kharazishvili, A. Some remarks on the Steinhaus property for invariant extensions of the Lebesgue measure. Eur. J. Math. 5 (2019), 81–90. 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khintchin, A.Y. and Kolmogorov, A.N. Über Konvergenz von Reihen, deren Glieder durch den Zufall bestimmt werden. Mat. Sbornik 32 (1925), 668–677. 224Google Scholar

Khrushchev, S. Orthogonal Polynomials and Continued Fractions, from Euler’s Point of View. Encycl. Math. Appl. 122, Cambridge University Press, 2008. 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingman, J.F.C. Ergodic properties of continuous-time Markov processes and their discrete skeletons. Proc. London Math. Soc. 13 (1963), 593–604. 78, 82, 134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingman, J.F.C. A note on limits of continuous functions. Quart. J. Math. 15 (1964), 279–282. 18, 78, 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klee, V.L. Invariant metrics in groups (solution of a problem of Banach). Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 3 (1952), 484–487. 86, 89, 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinberg, E.M. Infinitary Combinatorics and the Axiom of Determinateness. Lecture Notes in Math. 612, Springer, 1977. 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kneebone, G.T. Mathematical Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. An Introductory Survey. Nostrand, Van 1963. (Reprinted, Dover, 2001). 269Google Scholar

Kodaira, K. Über die Beziehung zwischen den Massen und den Topologien in einer Gruppe. Proc. Phys.-Math. Soc. Japan 23 (1941), 67–119. 138Google Scholar

Koellner, P. and Woodin, W.H. Large Cardinals from Determinacy. In ForK 2010. 232Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A.N. Zur Normierbarkeit eines allgemeinen topologischen linearen Raumes. Studia Math. 5 (1934), 29–33. 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kominek, Z. On the sum and difference of two sets in topological vector spaces. Fund. Math. 71 (1971), 165–169. 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kominek, Z. On the continuity of Q-convex and additive functions. Aequationes Math. 23 (1981), 146–150. 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kominek, Z. On an equivalent form of a Steinhaus theorem, Math. (Cluj) 30 (53)(1988), 25–27. 255, 259Google Scholar

Komjáth, P. Large small sets. Colloq. Math. 56 (1988), 231–233. 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Komjáth, P. and Totik, V. Ultrafilters. Am. Math. Month. 115 (2008), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korevaar, J. Tauberian Theory: A Century of Developments. Grundl. Math. Wiss. 329, 2004, Springer. 7, 13, 14, 15, 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Körner, T.W. curve, Kahane’s Helson. In J. Fourier Anal. Appl., Special Issue in honour of J.-P. Kahane, 325–346. CRC Press, 1995. 223, 227Google Scholar

Krom, M.R. Cartesian products of metric Baire spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 42 (1974), 588–594. 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kucharski, A. and Plewik, S. Game approach to universally Kuratowski–Ulam spaces. Topol. Appl. 154 (2007), 85–92. 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuczma, M. An Introduction to the Theory of Functional Equations and Inequalities. Cauchy’s Functional Equation and Jensen’s Inequality. PWN, 1985. 20, 21, 123, 144, 146, 241, 260Google Scholar

Kuczma, M. and Smítal, J. On measures connected with the Cauchy equation. Aequationes Math. 14(3) (1976), 421–428. 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunen, K. Some applications of iterated ultrapowers in set theory. Ann. Math. Logic 1 (1970), 179–227. 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunen, K. Set Theory. An Introduction to Independence Proofs. Studies in Logic and Foundations of Mathematics 102, North-Holland, 1983. 268Google Scholar

Kunen, K. Set Theory. Studies in Logic (London) 34. College Publications, London, 2011. 268Google Scholar

Kunen, K. and Vaughan, J.E. Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology. North-Holland, 1984. 25, 300, 306, 322Google Scholar

Kuratowski, C. Sur les fonctions représentables analytiquement et les ensembles de première catégorie. Fund. Math. 5 (1924), 75–86. 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuratowski, K. Topology, I. PWN, 1966. 38, 42, 122, 184, 195, 224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuratowski, K. Topology, II. PWN, 1968. 186, 279Google Scholar

Kuratowski, K. and Mostowski, A. Set Theory. North Holland, 1968. 199Google Scholar

Kuratowski, C. and Ulam, S. Quelques propriétés topologiques du produit combinatoire. Fund. Math. 19 (1932), 247–251. 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Łabedzki, G. and Repický, M. Hechler reals. J. Symbolic Logic 60 (1995), 444–458. 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laczkovich, M. Analytic subgroups of the reals. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 126 (1998), 1783–1790. 140, 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, P.B. A brief history of determinacy. In Kechris, A.S., Löwe, B., Steel, J.R. (eds), The Cabal Seminar Vol. 4. Lecture Notes in Logic, 49, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 3–60. 232Google Scholar

LePage, R.D. Subgroups of paths and reproducing kernels. Ann. Prob. 1 (1973), 345–347. 260Google Scholar

Levi, S. On Baire cosmic spaces. In General Topology and Its Relations to Modern Analysis and Algebra, V, (Prague, 1981), pp. 450–454. Sigma Ser. Pure Math. 3, Heldermann, 1983. 56, 192, 193, 196, 198Google Scholar

Lévy, A. and Solovay, R.M. Measurable cardinals and the Continuum Hypothesis. Israel J. Math. 5 (1967), 234–248. 274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, R. and Zsilinszky, L. More on products of Baire spaces. Topol. Appl. 230 (2017), 35–44. 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liouville, J. Sur les classes très-étendues des quantités dont la valeur n’est ni algébrique, ni même réductible à des irrationelles algébriques. J. Math. Pures et Appliquées 16 (1851), 133–142. 223Google Scholar

Liu, T.S. and van Rooij, A. Transformation groups and absolutely continuous measures. Indag. Math. 71 (1968), 225–231. 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar