Book contents
- Carpe Diem
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Carpe Diem
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- A Note on Ancient Texts and Translations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction In Search of Present Time
- 1 The Archaeology of Carpe Diem
- 2 A Moveable Feast
- 3 Gathering Leaves
- 4 The Pleasure of Images
- 5 As Is the Generation of Leaves, So Are the Generations of Cows, Mice, and Gigolos
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 November 2022
Book contents
- Carpe Diem
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Carpe Diem
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- A Note on Ancient Texts and Translations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction In Search of Present Time
- 1 The Archaeology of Carpe Diem
- 2 A Moveable Feast
- 3 Gathering Leaves
- 4 The Pleasure of Images
- 5 As Is the Generation of Leaves, So Are the Generations of Cows, Mice, and Gigolos
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Carpe DiemThe Poetics of Presence in Greek and Latin Literature, pp. 239 - 281Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E., and Baumbach, M., eds. 2004. Labored in papyrus leaves. Perspectives on an epigram collection attributed to Posidippus (P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A.. 2012. Callimachus in context. From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. and Vincent, N., eds. 2016. Early and late Latin. Continuity or change? Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albrecht, M. von. 1993. ‘Musik und Dichtung bei Horaz’. In Bimillenario della morte di Q. Orazio Flacco, Atti del convegno di Venosa (1992), 75–100. Venosa.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G., Hölscher, T., Kettemann, R., and Petersmann, H., eds. 1995. Römische Lebenskunst. Interdisziplinäres Kolloquium zum 85. Geburtstag von Viktor Pöschl. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M., eds. 1999. The Cambridge history of Hellenistic philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameling, W. 1985. ‘Φάγωμεν καὶ πίωμεν. Griechische Parallelen zu zwei Stellen aus dem Neuen Testament’. ZPE 60: 35–43.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. and Rojas, F., eds. 2017. Antiquarianisms. Contact, conflict, comparison. Oxford and Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1992. ‘Horace’s different recommenders of “carpe diem” in C. 1.4, 7, 9, 11’. CJ 88: 115–22.Google Scholar
Arcaz Pozo, J. L. 1989. ‘En torno al De adventu veris de Pentadio’. CFC(L) 23: 157–69.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1968. Toward a theory of structure in Horace. Diss. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1995. ‘The impossibility of metathesis. Philodemus and Lucretius on form and content in poetry’. In Obbink, D., ed. 1995: 210–32.Google Scholar
Arnold, T. 1891. Die griechischen Studien des Horaz. Edited by Fries, W.. Halle a.S. Original edition 1855–6.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. 1999. Erinnerungsräume. Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. 3rd ed. Munich [tr.= (2011)]Google Scholar
Assmann, A. 2011. Cultural memory and Western civilization. Functions, media, archives. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. 1977. ‘Feste des Augenblicks – Verheißung der Dauer. Die Kontroverse der ägyptischen Harfnerlieder’. In Assmann, J., E. Feucht, and R. Grieshammer, eds. 1977: 55–84.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. 1989. ‘Der schöne Tag. Sinnlichkeit und Vergänglichkeit im altägytischen Fest’. In Haug, W. and Warning, R., eds. 1989: 3–28.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., Feucht, E., and Grieshammer, R., eds. 1977. Fragen an die altägyptische Literatur. Studien zum Gedenken an Eberhard Otto. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. and Gladigo, B., eds. 1995. Text und Kommentar. Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation IV. Munich.Google Scholar
Babcock, C. L. 1978. ‘Horace, Epodes 13. Some comments on language and meaning’. In Riechel, D. C., ed. 1978: 107–18.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1981. ‘From the prehistory of novelistic discourse’. In The dialogic imagination. Translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin, TX, and London.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1996a. ‘Poetry, praise, and patronage. Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s Odes’. ClAnt 15: 5–47.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1996b. ‘Simonides and Horace on the death of Achilles’. In The New Simonides, edited by D. Boedeker and D. Sider, Arethusa 29.2: 247–53 [= Boedeker and Sider (2001) 255–60]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2000. ‘Rituals in ink. Horace on the Greek lyric tradition’. In Depew, M. and Obbink, D., eds. 2000: 167–82 [= Lowrie (2009b) 418–40]Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2005. ‘Lane-switching and jughandles in contemporary interpretations of Roman poetry’. TAPhA 135: 135–62.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2007. ‘Carmina. Odes and Carmen Saeculare’. In Harrison, S. J., ed. 2007a: 144–62.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W., eds. 2010. The Oxford handbook of Roman studies. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barigazzi, A. 1975. ‘Saghe sicule e beotiche nel simposio delle Muse di Callimaco’. Prometheus 1: 5–26.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 1995. ‘Heterophonia and poikilia. Accompaniments to Greek melody’. In Gentili, B. and Perusino, F., eds. 1995: 41–60.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1964. ‘Éléments de sémiologie’. Communications 4: 91–135. [tr. = (1968)]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. 1968. Elements of semiology. Translated by A. Lavers and C. Smith. New York.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1988. ‘Semantics of the object’. In The semiotic challenge, 179–90. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A., and Petrovic, I., eds. 2010. Archaic and classical Greek epigram. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. and Dümmler, N., eds. 2014. Imitate Anacreon! Mimesis, poiesis and the poetic inspiration in the Carmina Anacreontea. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. 1987. ‘A complex of times. No more sheep on Romulus’ birthday’. PCPhS 33: 1–15.Google Scholar
Bellandi, F. 2008. ‘Buffoni e cavalieri (A proposito di Iuv. 9, 9 ss.: agebas vernam equitem)’. MD 60: 205–17.Google Scholar
Ben-Dov, J. and Doering, L., eds. 2017. The construction of time in antiquity. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, W. 1969. Charles Baudelaire. Ein Lyriker im Zeitalter des Hochkapitalismus. Zwei Fragmente. Edited by Tiedemann, R.. Frankfurt. [tr. = (1973)]Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. 1973. Charles Baudelaire. A lyric poet in the era of high capitalism. Translated by H. Zohn. London.Google Scholar
Bernardo, A. S. 1975–85. Letters on familiar matters = Rerum familiarium libri. Francesco Petrarca. 3 vols. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R. 2009. ‘Sardanapal. Urbild des lasterhaften orientalischen Despoten. Entstehung, Bedeutung für die griechisch-römische Welt und Nachwirkung’. Tyche 24: 1–25.Google Scholar
Bettenworth, A. 2016. Hoc satis in titulo … Studien zu den Inschriften in der römischen Elegie. Münster.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. 1988. Antropologia e cultura romana. Parentela, tempo, immagini dell’anima. Rome. [tr. = (1991)]Google Scholar
Bettini, M. 1991. Anthropology and Roman culture. Kinship, time, images of the soul. Translated by J. Van Sickle. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Bing, P. 1995. ‘Ergänzungsspiel in the epigrams of Callimachus’. A&A 41: 115–31. [= (2009) 85–105]Google Scholar
Bing, P. 1998. ‘Between literature and the monuments’. In Harder, M. A., R. F. Regtuit, and G. C. Wakker, eds. 1998: 21–43. [= (2009) 194–216]Google Scholar
Bing, P. 2002. ‘The un-read muse? Inscribed epigram and its readers in antiquity’. In Harder, M. A., R. F. Regtuit, and G. C. Wakker, eds. 2002: 39–66. [= (2009) 116–46]Google Scholar
Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S., eds. 2007a. Brill’s companion to Hellenistic epigram. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S.. 2007b. ‘Introduction’. In Bing, P. and J. S. Bruss, eds. 2007a: 1–26.Google Scholar
Blake, S. H. 2008. Writing materials. Things in the literature of Flavian Rome. Diss. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Bo, D. 1943–4. ‘Gli epiteti della lirica oraziana in relazione a quelli dei modelli greci’. RIL 77: 233–58.Google Scholar
Bo, D. 1960. De Horati poetico eloquio. Indices nominum propriorum, metricarum rerum, prosodiacarum grammaticarumque. Turin.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. 2002. The archaeology of nostalgia. How the Greeks re-created their mythical past. London.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. 1995. ‘Chronology and succession 2. Notes on some consular lists on stone’. ZPE 105: 279–96.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D., eds. 2001. The New Simonides. Contexts of praise and desire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonavia-Hunt, N. A. 1969. Horace the minstrel. A practical and aesthetic study of his aeolic verse. Kineton.Google Scholar
Boncquet, J. 1987. Diodorus Siculus (II, 1–34) over Mesopotamië. Een historische kommentaar. Brussels.Google Scholar
Borchhardt, J. 1996–7. ‘Zur Politik der Dynasten Trbbênimi und Perikle von Zêmuri’. Lykia 3: 1–23.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1980–95. A historical commentary on Arrian’s history of Alexander. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bounia, A. 2004. The nature of classical collecting. Collectors and collections, 100 BCE–100 CE. Aldershot and Burlington, VA.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1986. ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’. JHS 106: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007. ‘From archaic elegy to Hellenistic sympotic epigram?’ In Bing, P. and J. S. Bruss, eds. 2007a: 95–112.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2010. ‘Stobaeus and early Greek lyric, elegiac and iambic poetry’. In Horster, M. and C. Reitz, eds. 2010: 587–617.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012. ‘Unnatural selection. Expurgation of Greek melic, elegiac and iambic poetry’. In Harrison, S. J. and C. Stray, eds. 2012: 9–24.Google Scholar
Braden, G. 2010. ‘Carpe diem’. In Grafton, A., G. W. Most, and S. Settis, eds. 2010: 169–70.Google Scholar
Bramble, J. C. 1974. Persius and the programmatic satire. A study in form and imagery. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandis, T. and Ehlers, W.-W.. 1974. ‘Zu den Petronexzerpten des Florilegium Gallicum’. Philologus 118: 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. M. 1988. Beyond anger. A study of Juvenal’s Third Book of Satires. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Breed, B. W. 2006. Pastoral inscriptions. Reading and writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar
Brelich, A. 1937. Aspetti della morte nelle iscrizioni sepolcrali dell’impero romano. Diss. Budapest.Google Scholar
Brendel, O. 1934. ‘Untersuchungen zur Allegorie des pompejanischen Totenkopf-Mosaiks’. MDAI(R) 49: 157–79.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1965. On reading a Horatian satire. An interpretation of Sermones II 6. Sydney.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1971b. ‘Horatian notes II. Despised readings in the manuscripts of the Odes, Book II’. PCPhS 197: 17–29.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1982a. Horace on poetry. Epistles, Book 2. The letters to Augustus and Florus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1982b. ‘Horatian notes III. Despised readings in the manuscripts of the Epodes and a passage of Odes Book 3’. PCPhS 28: 30–56.Google Scholar
Brink, L. and Green, D. A., eds. 2008. Commemmorating the dead. Texts and artifacts in context. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Brun, J.-P., Poux, M., and Tchernia, A., eds. 2004. Le vin. Nectar des dieux, génie des hommes. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Bruss, J. S. 2005. Hidden presences. Monuments, gravesites, and corpses in Greek funerary epigram. Leuven.Google Scholar
Bruss, J. S. 2010. ‘Ecphrasis in fits and starts? Down to 300 BC’. In Baumbach, M., A. Petrovic, and I. Petrovic, eds. 2010: 385–403.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T., eds. 2018. Textual events. Performance and the lyric in early Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Power, T.. 2013. ‘The inbetweenness of sympotic elegy’. JHS 133: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buora, M. and Magnani, S., eds. 2016. Le iscrizioni con funzione didascalico-esplicativa. Committente, destinatario, contenuto e descrizione dell’oggetto nell’instrumentum inscriptum. Atti del VI incontro Instrumenta inscripta. Trieste.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. 2001. The tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the epic cycle. Baltimore, MD, and London.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1991. ‘Oriental symposia. Contrasts and parallels’. In Slater, W. J., ed. 1991: 7–24.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 2009. ‘Sardanapal zwischen Mythos und Realität. Das Grab in Kilikien’. In Dill, U. and C. Walde, eds. 2009: 502–15.Google Scholar
Busch, S. 1999. Versus balnearum. Die antike Dichtung über Bäder und Baden im Römischen Reich. Stuttgart and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busine, A. 2012. ‘The discovery of inscriptions and the legitimation of new cults’. In Dignas, B. and R. R. R. Smith, eds. 2012: 241–56.Google Scholar
Butler, S. and Nooter, S., eds. 2019. Sound and the ancient senses. London and New York.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1982. ‘Horace Odes 3,22. Genre and sources’. Philologus 126: 227–46. [= (2012) 441–61]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1992. ‘The power of implication. Horace’s invitation to Maecenas (Odes 1.20)’. In Woodman, A. J. and J. Powell, eds. 1992: 84–109. [= (2012) 213–43]Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 2012. Roman lyric. Collected papers on Catullus and Horace. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. 1977. Les chœurs de jeunes filles en Grèce archaïque I. Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale. Rome. [tr. = (1997)]Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1997. Choruses of young women in ancient Greece. Their morphology, religious role and social function. Translated by D. Collins and J. Orion. Lanham, MD, and London.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. 2002. ‘On Horace’s Ars Poetica 139. Parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus’. In Sawicki, L. and D. Shalev, eds. 2002: 65–76.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M., Goldsmith, U. K., and Kenevan, P. B., eds. 1985. Hypatia. Essays in Classics, comparative literature and philosophy presented to Hazel E. Barnes. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Cannatà Fera, M. and D’Alessio, G. B., eds. 2001. I lirici greci. Forme della comunicazione e storia del testo. Messina.Google Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. 2015. Hesiod’s Works and days. How to teach self-sufficiency. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. 2019. ‘Materiality and Classics. (Re)turning to the material’. JHS 139: 1–11.Google Scholar
Carpino, A. A., D’Angelo, T., Muratov, M., and Saunders, D., eds. 2018. Collecting and collectors from antiquity to modernity. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Casagrande-Kim, R. 2018. ‘Collecting gems in ancient Rome’. In Carpino, A. A., T. D’Angelo, M. Muratov, and D. Saunders, eds. 2018: 99–112.Google Scholar
Castagna, L. and Vogt-Spira, G., eds. 2002. Pervertere. Ästhetik der Verkehrung. Literatur und Kultur neronischer Zeit und ihre Rezeption. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cataudella, Q. 1927–8. ‘L’elegia di Semonide e l’ode di Orazio IV 7’. Bollettino di filologia classica 34: 229–32.Google Scholar
Cazzato, V. 2016. ‘Symposia en plein air in Alcaeus and others’. In Cazzato, V., D. Obbink, and E. E. Prodi, eds. 2016: 184–206.Google Scholar
Cazzato, V. and Lardinois, A. P. M. H., eds. 2016. The look of lyric. Greek song and the visual. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazzato, V., Obbink, D., and Prodi, E. E., eds. 2016. The cup of song. Studies on poetry and the symposion. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazzato, V. and Prodi, E. E.. 2016. ‘Introduction. Continuity in the sympotic tradition’. In Cazzato, V., D. Obbink, and E. E. Prodi, eds. 2016: 184–206.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. 1969. ‘Florilegium’. In Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, edited by Klauser, T., 1131–60. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Chepel, E. 2016. ‘Alcestis’ daily bread. The meaning of vv. 788–9 and a new Oxyrhynchus papyrus’. ZPE 200: 86–7.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 1983. ‘Occasione e piani di destinazione nella lirica di Orazio’. MD 10–11: 133–214. [tr. = (2009)]Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 1995. Poesia e lettori in Roma antica. Forme della comunicazione letteraria. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 2009. ‘Occasion and level of address in Horatian lyric’. In M. Lowrie, ed. 2009b: 72–105.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 2017. ‘Heinze, Fraenkel e altre voci. Contributi sparsi alla storia e al significato del dibattito su occasione e destinatario in Orazio lirico’. Dictynna 14.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. 1998. Looking at lovemaking. Constructions of sexuality in Roman art 100 B.C.–A.D. 250. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, W.V., Goodyear, F. R. D., Kenney, E. J., and Richmond, J. A.. 1966. Appendix Vergiliana. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M., eds. 2010. A companion to Hellenistic literature. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, J. S. 2016. ‘How to construct a sympotic space with words’. In Cazzato, V. and A. P. M. H. Lardinois, eds. 2016: 204–16.Google Scholar
Clayman, D. L. 2007. ‘Philosophers and philosophy in Greek epigram’. In Bing, P. and J. S. Bruss, eds. 2007a: 497–517.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. E., Snell, D. C., and Weisberg, D. B., eds. 1993. The tablet and the scroll. Near Eastern studies in honor of William W. Hallo. Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
Commager, S. 1957. ‘The function of wine in Horace’s Odes’. TAPhA 88: 68–80. [= Lowrie (2009b) 33–49]Google Scholar
Comotti, G. 1988. ‘I problemi dei valori ritmici’. In Gentili, B. and R. Pretagostini, eds. 1988: 17–25.Google Scholar
Comotti, G. 1989. Music in Greek and Roman culture. Translated by R. V. Munson. Baltimore, MD and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, C. 1998. Petronius the poet. Verse and literary tradition in the Satyricon. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1986. The rhetoric of imitation. Translated by C. Segal. Ithaca, NY, and London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1987. Letteratura latina. Manuale storico dalle origini alla fine dell’Impero romano. Florence.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1994. Latin literature. A history. Translated by J. B. Solodow. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1996. The hidden author. Translated by E. Fantham. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. 2017. Stealing the club from Hercules. On imitation in Latin poetry. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. 1995. Musa lapidaria. A selection of Latin verse inscriptions. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 1994. ‘A Homeric writing exercise and reading Homer in school’. Tyche 9: 1–9.Google Scholar
Cristóbal, V. 1985. ‘Los versos ecoicos de Pentadio y sus implicaciones métricas’. CFC(L) 19: 157–67.Google Scholar
Culler, J. D. 1981. The pursuit of signs. Semiotics, literature, deconstruction. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. 1983–7. Zu Fragmenten römischer Dichter. 3 vols. Wiesbaden and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2009. ‘Language and pragmatics’. In Budelmann, F., ed. 2009a: 114–29.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2018. ‘Fiction and pragmatics in ancient Greek lyric. The case of Sappho’. In Budelmann, F. and T. Phillips, eds. 2018: 31–62.Google Scholar
D’Angour, A. 2018. ‘The musical setting of ancient Greek texts’. In Phillips, T. and A. D’Angour, eds. 2018: 47–72.Google Scholar
D’Angour, A. 2019. ‘Hearing ancient sounds through modern ears’. In Butler, S. and S. Nooter, eds. 2019: 31–43.Google Scholar
D’Ansse de Villoison, J.-B. G. 1801. ‘Palæographie’. Magasin encyclopédique, ou journal des sciences, des lettres et des arts 7: 451–509.Google Scholar
Davis, G. 1991. Polyhymnia. The rhetoric of Horatian lyric discourse. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G., ed. 2010a. A companion to Horace. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. 2010b. ‘Defining a lyric ethos. Archilochus lyricus and Horatian melos’. In Davis, G., ed. 2010a: 105–27.Google Scholar
Day, J. W. 2007. ‘Poems on stone. The inscribed antecedents of Hellenistic epigram’. In Bing, P. and J. S. Bruss, eds. 2007a: 29–47.Google Scholar
Day, J. W. 2010. Archaic Greek epigram and dedication. Representation and reperformance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Day, J. W. 2019. ‘Reading inscriptions in literary epigram’. In Kanellou, M., I. Petrovic, and C. Carey, eds. 2019: 19–34.Google Scholar
Dehon, P.-J. 1993. ‘Note sur le sens de carpo dans Lucilius, fragment 828 (Krenkel)’. TAPhA 114: 557–9.Google Scholar
Deitz, L. and Vogt-Spira, G.. 1994–2011. Julius Caesar Scaliger. Poetices libri septem. Sieben Bücher über die Dichtkunst. 6 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. and Sullivan, J. P., eds. 1994. Modern critical theroy and classical literature. Leiden, New York, and Cologne.Google Scholar
Delignon, B. 2017. ‘Dîner avec Mécène’. In Delignon, B., N. Dauvois, and L. Cottegnies, eds. 2017: 77–90.Google Scholar
Delignon, B., Dauvois, N., and Cottegnies, L., eds. 2017. L’invention de la vie privée et le modèle d’Horace. Paris.Google Scholar
Delz, J. 1995. ‘Wie die Blätter am Baum, so wechseln die Wörter’. In Krömer, D., ed. 1995: 1–12.Google Scholar
Dentzer, J-.M. 1982. Le motif du banquet couché dans le Proche-Orient et le monde grec du VIIe au IVe siècle avant J.C. Rome.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. 1980b. ‘The law of genre’. Translated by Avital Ronell. Critical Inquiry 7: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desbat, A. 2004. ‘Marques et images de marques’. In Brun, J.-P., M. Poux, and A. Tchernia, eds. 2004: 305–15.Google Scholar
Dignas, B. and Smith, R. R. R., eds. 2012. Historical and religious memory in the ancient world. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dill, U. and Walde, C., eds. 2009. Antike Mythen. Medien, Transformationen und Konstruktionen. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinter, M. 2005. ‘Epic and epigram. Minor heroes in Virgil’s Aeneid’. CQ 55: 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinter, M. 2009. ‘Laying down the law. Horace’s reflection in his sententiae’. In Houghton, L. B. T. and M. Wyke, eds. 2009: 96–108.Google Scholar
Donahue, J. F. 1999. ‘Euergetic self-representation and the inscriptions at Satyricon 71.10’.CPh 94: 69–74.Google Scholar
Donahue, J. F. 2004. The Roman community at table during the Principate. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döpp, S. 1991. ‘“Leben und Tod” in Petrons Satyrica’. In Binder, G. and B. Effe, eds. 1991: 144–66.Google Scholar
Draycott, C. M. and Stamatopoulou, M., eds. 2016. Dining and death. Interdisciplinary perspectives on the funerary banquet in ancient art, burial and belief. Leuven.Google Scholar
Dressel, H. 1878. ‘Ricerche sul monte Testaccio’. Annali dell’Istituto di corrispondenza archeologica 50: 118–92.Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le, M. 1995. ‘Horace, Odes 4.5. Pro Reditu Imperatoris Caesaris Divi Filii Augusti’. In Harrison, S. J., ed. 1995: 128–87. [= Lowrie (2009b) 271–336]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le, M. and Woodman, A. J., eds. 2012. Catullus. Poems, books, readers. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufallo, B. 2005. ‘Words born and made. Horace’s defense of neologisms and the cultural poetics of Latin’. Arethusa 36: 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufallo, B. 2013. The captor’s image. Greek culture in Roman ecphrasis. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbabin, K. 1986. ‘Sic erimus cuncti … The skeleton in Graeco-Roman art’. JDAI 101: 185–255.Google Scholar
Durbec, Y. and Trajber, F., eds. 2017. Traditions épiques et poésie épigrammatique. Leuven.Google Scholar
Ecker, U. 1990. Grabmal und Epigramm. Studien zur frühgriechischen Sepulkraldichtung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the reading of Roman poetry. Baltimore, MD, and London.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1994. ‘From the pyramids to Pausanias and Piglet. Monuments, travel and writing’. In Goldhill, S. and R. Osborne, eds. 1994: 224–54.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2007. Roman eyes. Visuality and subjectivity in art and text. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, J. 2014a. ‘Afterword. Framing knowledge. Collecting objects, collecting texts’. In Gahtan, M. W. and D. Pegazzano, eds. 2014: 156–62.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2014b. ‘Lithic poetics. Posidippus and his stones’. Ramus 43: 152–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, J. 2017. ‘Late Narcissus’. In Elsner, J. and J. Hernández Lobato, eds. 2017: 176–204.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Hernández Lobato, J., eds. 2017. The poetics of late Latin literature. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erler, M. 2012. ‘Schmerzfreiheit als Lust. Traditionelles in Epikurs Hedonekonzept’. In Erler, M. and W. Rother, eds. 2012: 53–69. [tr. = (2015)]Google Scholar
Erler, M. 2015. ‘Hedonê in the poets and Epicurus’. In King, R. A. H., ed. 2015: 303–18.Google Scholar
Erler, M. and Rother, W., eds. 2012. Philosophie der Lust. Studien zum Hedonismus. Basel.Google Scholar
Erler, M. and Schofield, M.. 1999. ‘Epicurean ethics’. In Algra, K., J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield, eds. 1999: 642–74.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 1987. ‘Caducità dell’uomo ed eternità della natura. Variazioni di un motivo letterario’. QUCC 26: 101–10.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2010. ‘Typologies of variation on a theme in archaic and classical metrical inscriptions’. In Baumbach, M., A. Petrovic, and I. Petrovic, eds. 2010: 289–310.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. L.. 2004. Tradition and innovation in Hellenistic poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fassino, M. and Prauscello, L.. 2001. ‘Memoria ritmica e memoria poetica. Saffo e Alceo in Teocrito Idilli 28–30 tra ἀρχαιολογία metrica e innovazione alessandrina’. MD 46: 9–37.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2017. Pindar’s eyes. Visual and material culture in epinician poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2018. ‘Materialities of political commitment? Textual events, material culture, and metaliterarity in Alcaeus’. In Budelmann, F. and T. Phillips, eds. 2018: 93–113.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2020. Greek lyric of the archaic and classical periods. From the past to the future of the lyric subject. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. 1994a. ‘Commentare Orazio’. In Atti dei convegni di Venosa, Napoli, Roma. Novembre 1993, 287–98. Venosa.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1993. ‘Horace and the Greek lyric poets’. In Rudd, N., ed. 1993: 41–63. [= (2021) ii.64–90 = Lowrie (2009b) 202–31]Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and religion at Rome. Cultures, contexts, and beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2010. Playing gods. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the politics of fiction. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford.Google Scholar
Fink, S. 2014. ‘Sardanapal. Ein Hedonist aus Mesopotamien?’ In Gaspa, S., A. Greco, D. Morandi Bonacossi, S. Ponchia, and R. Rollinger, eds. 2014: 239–50.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. 1996. Die Aufforderung zur Lebensfreude im Buch Kohelet und seine Rezeption der ägyptischen Harfnerlieder. Diss. University of South Africa.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2007. Martial. The world of the epigram. Chicago, IL and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2016. Variety. The life of a Roman concept. Chicago, IL and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flashar, H. and Gaiser, K., eds. 1965. Synusia. Festgabe für Wolfgang Schadewaldt. Pfullingen.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. 2000. Patrii sermonis egestas. Einstellungen lateinischer Autoren zu ihrer Muttersprache. Ein Beitrag zum Sprachbewusstsein in der römischen Antike. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M., Kurke, L., and Weiss, N., eds. 2019a. Genre in archaic and classical Greek poetry. Theories and models. Leiden.Google Scholar
Foster, M., Kurke, L., and Weiss, N.. 2019b. ‘Introduction’. In Foster, M., L. Kurke, and N. Weiss, eds. 2019a: 1–28.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 2002. ‘From letters to literature. Reading the “song culture” of classical Greece’. In Yunis, H., ed. 2002: 15–37.Google Scholar
Forsberg, S. 1995. Near Eastern destruction datings as sources for Greek and Near Eastern Iron Age chronology. Archaeological and historical studies. The Cases of Samaria (722 B.C.) and Tarsus (696 B.C.). 2nd ed. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1991. ‘Narrate and describe. The problem of ecphrasis’. JRS 81: 25–35. [= (2000) 64–85]Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1994. ‘Postmodernism, romantic irony, and classical closure’. In de Jong, I. J. F. and J. P. Sullivan, eds. 1994: 231–56. [= (2000) 5–33]Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1997. ‘On the shoulders of giants. Intertextuality and classical studies’. MD 39: 13–34. [= (2000) 115–37]Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 2000. Roman constructions. Readings in postmodern Latin. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 1987. The nature of the early Greek lyric. Three preliminary studies. Toronto, ON, Buffalo, NY, and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frahm, E., ed. 2017. A companion to Assyria. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S .J., and Papanghelis, T. D., eds. 2018. Intratextuality and Latin Literature. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1962. Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums. 2nd ed. Munich. [tr. = (1975)]Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1975. Early Greek poetry and philosophy. A history of Greek epic, lyric, and prose to the middle of the fifth century. Translated by M. Hadas and J. Willis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fredricksmeyer, E. A. 1985. ‘Horace Odes 4.7. The most beautiful poem in ancient literature?’ In Calder, W. M., U. K. Goldsmith, and P. B. Kenevan, eds. 1985: 15–26.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 1993. The walking muse. Horace on the theory of satire. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K., ed. 2005. The Cambridge companion to Roman satire. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2006. ‘Playing at lyric’s boundaries. Dreaming forward in Book Two of Horace’s Sermones’. Dictynna 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K., ed. 2009. Horace. Satires and Epistles. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2018. ‘Satire’s censorial waters in Horace and Juvenal’. JRS 108: 141–55.Google Scholar
Friedländer, L. 1923. Darstellungen aus der Sittengeschichte Roms. 10th ed. 4 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1912. Johannes von Gaza und Paulus Silentiarius. Kunstbeschreibungen Justinianischer Zeit. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1941. ‘Pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius’. AJPh 62: 16–34.Google Scholar
Froning, H., Hölscher, T., and Mielsch, H., eds. 1992. Kotinos. Festschrift für Erika Simon. Mainz.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2017. A literary commentary on the elegies of the Appendix Tibulliana. Oxford.Google Scholar
Furtwängler, A. 1900. Die antiken Gemmen. Geschichte der Steinschneidekunst im klassischen Altertum. 3 vols. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, D. 1975–6. ‘Temporalità e angoscia nella lirica oraziana’. AAPel 53: 37–44.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. 2016. ‘The world in a cup’. In Cazzato, V., D. Obbink, and E. E. Prodi, eds. 2016: 207–29.Google Scholar
Gahtan, M. W. and Pegazzano, D., eds. 2014. Museum archetypes and collecting in the ancient world. Boston, MA, and Leiden.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. 1991. ‘Man and beast in Lucretius and the Georgics’. CQ 41: 414–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Baracco, M. E. 2020. Larvae convivales. Gli scheletri da banchetto dell’antica Roma. Rome.Google Scholar
Gaspa, S., Greco, A., Morandi Bonacossi, D., Ponchia, S., and Rollinger, R., eds. 2014. From source to history. Studies on ancient Near Eastern worlds and beyond. Dedicated to Giovanni Battista Lanfranchi on the occasion of his 65th birthday on June 23, 2014. Münster.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts. Thresholds of interpretation. Translated by J. E. Lewin. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentili, B. 1984. Poesia e pubblico nella Grecia antica da Omero al V secolo. Rome and Bari. [tr. = (1988)]Google Scholar
Gentili, B. 1988. Poetry and its public in ancient Greece. From Homer to the fifth century. Translated by A. T. Cole. Baltimore, MD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentili, B. 1990. ‘Die pragmatischen Aspekte der archaischen griechischen Dichtung’. A&A 36: 1–17.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. and Perusino, F., eds. 1995. Mousike. Metrica ritmica e musica greca in memoria di Giovanni Comotti. Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1967. ‘“Arte allusiva” and Alexandrian epic poetry’. CQ 17: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1968. ‘Sympotic literature and epigram’. In Dihle, A., ed. 1968: 91–175.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. 1994. ‘Orazio tra Simonide e Posidippo’. AAT Supplemento al vol. 128: 55–71. [= (2006) 369–85]Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I., Gotter, U., Havener, W., and Hodgson, L., eds. 2019. Augustus and the destruction of history. The Politics of the past in early Imperial Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giovini, M. 2005. ‘“Lo sento, l’inverno è fuggito”. Pentadio e le simbologie primaverili dal mondo antico a Valafrido Strabone (con un postilla su Eliot)’. FuturAntico 2: 85–119.Google Scholar
Gitner, A. 2012. Horace and the Greek language. Aspects of literary bilingualism. Diss. Princeton University.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. 1993. ‘Mitte sectari, rosa quo locorum sera moretur. Time and nature in Horace’s Odes’. CPh 88: 16–31.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1994. ‘The naïve and knowing eye. Ekphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic world’. In Goldhill, S. and R. Osborne, eds. 1994: 197–223.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2017. ‘Is this reperformance?’ In Hunter, R. L. and A. Uhlig, eds. 2017: 283–301.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R., eds. 1994. Art and text in ancient Greek culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gori, A. F. 1726–43. Inscriptiones antiquae in Etruriae urbibus exstantes. 3 vols. Florence.Google Scholar
Görler, W. 1995. ‘Carpere, capere, rapere. Lexikalisches und Philosophisches zum Lob der Gegenwart bei lateinischen Dichtern’. In Alföldy, G., T. Hölscher, R. Kettemann, and H. Petersmann, eds. 1995: 47–56.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L.. 1965. The Greek Anthology. Hellenistic epigrams. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L.. 1968. The Greek Anthology. The Garland of Philip, and some contemporary epigrams. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993b. The loaded table. Representations of food in Roman literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 1994. ‘Persius and the decoction of Nero’. In Elsner, J. and J. Masters, eds. 1994: 131–50. [= Plaza (2009) 173–98]Google Scholar
Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Settis, S., eds. 2010. The classical tradition. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar
Gramps, A. 2021. The fiction of occasion in Hellenistic and Roman poetry. Berlin and Boston, MD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graverini, L. 2011–12. ‘“Of mice and poets”. Callimaco e Virgilio in Orazio, Sat. II 6’. Incontri di filologia classica 11: 151–70.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2009. ‘Horace, Suetonius, and the lives of Greek poets’. In Houghton, L. B. T. and M. Wyke, eds. 2009: 140–60.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 2009. ‘Greek lyric and the place of humans in the world’. In Budelmann, F., ed. 2009a: 72–94.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B., eds. 2018. The Cambridge companion to the writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grondona, M. 1980. La religione e la superstizione nella Cena Trimalchionis di Petronio. Brussels.Google Scholar
Grottanelli, C. 1995. ‘Wine and death. East and west’. In Murray, O. and M. Tecușan, eds. 1995: 62–89.Google Scholar
Guichard, L. A. 2017. ‘From school to desacralisation, or how Palladas read Homer’. In Durbec, Y. and F. Trajber, eds. 2017: 157–70.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, H. U. 1997. In 1926. Living at the edge of time. Cambridge, MA and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumbrecht, H. U. 2004. Production of presence. What meaning cannot convey. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, H. U. 2006. ‘Presence achieved in language (with special attention given to the presence of the past)’. H&T 45: 317–27.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, H. U. 2012. Atmosphere, mood, Stimmung. On a hidden potential of literature. Translated by E. Butler. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Gummere, R. M. 1917–25. Seneca. Ad Lucilium Epistulae morales. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Günther, H.-C. 2010. Die Ästhetik der augusteischen Dichtung. Eine Ästhetik des Verzichts. Überlegungen zum Spätwerk des Horaz. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günther, H.-C., ed. 2015. Virgilian studies. A miscellany dedicated to the memory of Mario Geymonat. Nordhausen.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 1997. ‘The poetics of editing in Meleager’s Garland’. TAPhA 127: 169–200.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 1998. Poetic garlands. Hellenistic epigrams in context. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2002. ‘Art’s echo. The tradition of Hellenistic ecphrastic epigram’. In Harder, M. A., R. F. Regtuit, and G. C. Wakker, eds. 2002: 85–112.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2010. ‘Heroic epitaphs of the classical age. The Aristotelian Peplos and beyond’. In Baumbach, M., A. Petrovic, and I. Petrovic, eds. 2010: 219–49.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. 2005. The world of Roman song. From ritualized speech to social order. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1995. Philosophy as a way of life. Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hall, E. 1991. Inventing the barbarian. Greek self-definition through tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2008. Greek laughter. A study of cultural psychology from Homer to early Christianity. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C., eds. 1998. Genre in Hellenistic poetry. Leuven.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C., eds. 2002. Hellenistic epigrams. Leuven.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1993. ‘Ut pictura poesis? Horace and the visual arts’. In Rudd, N., ed. 1993: 120–39.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2005. ‘Time in Lucretius and the Augustan poets. Freedom and innovation’. In Schwindt, J. P., ed. 2005a: 19–42. [= (2009) 41–64]Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2012. ‘Virgil’s Catullan plots’. In Du Quesnay, I. M. Le M. and A. J. Woodman, eds. 2012: 212–38.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2014. ‘The Ars Poetica and the poetics of didactic’. In New approaches to Horace’s Ars poetica, edited by A. Ferenczi and P. R. Hardie, MD 72: 43–54.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., ed. 1995. Homage to Horace. A bimillenary celebration. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2001. ‘Simonides and Horace’. In Boedeker, D. and D. Sider, eds. 2001: 261–71.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2002. ‘A. E. Housman’s Latin elegy to Moses Jackson’. TAPhA 132: 209–13.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2013. ‘Author and speaker(s) in Horace’s Satires 2’. In Marmodoro, A. and J. Hill, eds. 2013: 153–71.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. and Stray, C., eds. 2012. Expurgating the Classics. Editing out in Greek and Latin. London.Google Scholar
Hartmann, A. 2013. ‘Cui vetustas fidem faciat. Inscriptions and other material relics of the past in Graeco-Roman antiquity’. In Liddel, P. P. and P. Low, eds. 2013: 33–54.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. N. 2014. ‘The barking cure. Horace’s “anatomy of rage” in Epodes 1, 6, and 16’. AJPh 135: 57–85.Google Scholar
Heilmann, W. 1998. ‘Epigramme Martials über Leben und Tod’. In Grewing, F., ed. 1998: 205–19.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. 1918. ‘Die lyrischen Verse des Horaz’. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, philologisch-historische Klasse 70. [= (1960) 227–94]Google Scholar
Heinze, R. 1923. ‘Die horazische Ode’. Neue Jahrbücher 51: 153–68. [= (1960) 172–89; tr. = (2009)]Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1995. ‘Horace, Odes 3.22, and the life of meaning’. Ramus 24: 103–51. [= (1999) 114–44]Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1996. ‘Pump up the volume. Juvenal, Satires 1.1–21’. PCPhS 41: 101–37. [= (1999) 249–73]Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1999. Writing down Rome. Satire, comedy and other offences in Latin poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2002. ‘Corny Copa, the motel muse’. In Spentzou, E. and D. P. Fowler, eds. 2002: 253–78.Google Scholar
Henderson, W. J. 2010. ‘“This is life”. Transience and carpe diem in Palladas of Alexandria’. Ekklesiastikos Pharos 92: 243–63.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. 1985. Poetry into drama. Early tragedy and the Greek poetic tradition. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Herzog, R. 1989. ‘Fest, Terror und Tod in Petrons Satyrica’. In Haug, W. and R. Warning, eds. 1989: 120–50.Google Scholar
Heusch, H. 1951. ‘Der Grabspruch des Sardanapal und die Entgegnung des Krates von Theben’. RhM 94: 250–6.Google Scholar
Hilgers, W. 1969. Lateinische Gefäßnamen. Bezeichnungen, Funktion und Form römischer Gefäße nach den antiken Schriftquellen. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Hill, G. B. and Powell, L. F., eds. 1934. Boswell’s Life of Johnson; together with Boswell’s Journal of a tour to the Hebrides and Johnson’s Diary of a journey into North Wales. 6 vols. Vol. 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Himmelmann-Wildschütz, N. 1973. ‘Ein antikes Vorbild für Guercinos “Et in Arcadia ego”?’ Pantheon 31: 229–36.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and intertext. Dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobden, F. 2013. The symposion in ancient Greek society and thought. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, J. 1981. The figure of echo. A mode of allusion in Milton and after. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1991. ‘Die Fabel von Stadtmaus und Landmaus bei Phaedrus und Horaz’. WJA 17: 229–39.Google Scholar
Hooley, D. M. 1997. The knotted thong. Structures of mimesis in Persius. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, D. 1993. ‘Cowley’s Horatian mice’. In Martindale, C. and D. Hopkins, eds. 1993: 103–26.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1989a. ‘“The uses of literacy” and the Cena Trimalchionis: I’. G&R 36: 74–89. [= (2020) 230–44]Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1989b. ‘“The uses of literacy” and the Cena Trimalchionis: II’. G&R 36: 194–209. [= (2020) 244–57]Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 2020. Fifty years at the Sibyl’s heels. Selected papers on Virgil and Rome. Edited by Crofts, A.. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höschele, R. 2010. Die blütenlesende Muse. Poetik und Textualität antiker Epigrammsammlungen. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. 2014. ‘“Er fing an zu singen, und sang lauter Mägdchen”. Johann Wolfgang Ludwig Gleim, the German Anacreon’. In Baumbach, M. and N. Dümmler, eds. 2014: 199–226.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. 2019. ‘Greek epigram in Rome in the first century CE’. In Henriksén, C., ed. 2019: 475–90.Google Scholar
Hose, M. 2008. ‘“Der Leser schneide dem Lied Länge ab”. Vom Umgang mit Poesie im Hellenismus’. Hermes 136: 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. 2009. ‘Two letters to Horace. Petrarch and Andrew Lang’. In Houghton, L. B. T. and M. Wyke, eds. 2009: 161–81.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. and Wyke, M., eds. 2009. Perceptions of Horace. A Roman poet and his readers. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. 1890. ‘Horatiana III’. Journal of Philology 18: 1–35. [= (1972) i.136–61]Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. 1972. The classical papers of A. E. Housman. Edited by Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F. R. D.. 3 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1994. ‘Elemental psychology and the date of Semonides of Amorgos’. AJPh 115: 175–97.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1996. ‘“New Simonides” or old Semonides? Second thoughts on POxy 3965, fr. 26’. In The New Simonides, edited by D. Boedeker and D. Sider, Arethusa 29.2: 255–62. [= Boedeker and Sider (2001) 226–31]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1996a. ‘Callimachus swings (frr. 178 and 43 Pf.)’. Ramus 25: 17–26. [= (2008) i.278–89 = Fantuzzi and Hunter (2004) 76–83]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1996b. Theocritus and the archaeology of Greek poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2008. On coming after. Studies in post-classical Greek literature and its reception. 2 vols. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2010. ‘Language and interpretation in Greek epigram’. In Baumbach, M., A. Petrovic, and I. Petrovic, eds. 2010: 265–88. [= (2021) 131–55]Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2014. Hesiodic voices. Studies in the ancient reception of Hesiod’s Works and days. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2018. The measure of Homer. The ancient reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2021. The layers of the text. Collected papers on classical literature 2008–2021. Edited by Rengakos, Antonios and Karakasis, Evangelos. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. and Oakley, S. P., eds. 2015. Latin literature and its transmission. Papers in honour of Michael Reeve. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L., Rengakos, A., and Sistakou, E., eds. 2014. Hellenistic studies at a crossroads. Exploring texts, contexts and metatexts. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. and Uhlig, A., eds. 2017. Imagining reperformance in ancient culture. Studies in the traditions of drama and lyric. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2008. Talking books. Readings in Hellenistic and Roman books of poetry. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2013. Greek to Latin. Frameworks and contexts for intertextuality. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2016. ‘Hierarchy and symposiastic poetry’. In Cazzato, V., D. Obbink, and E. E. Prodi, eds. 2016: 247–70.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2018. ‘What is a setting?’ In Budelmann, F. and T. Phillips, eds. 2018: 115–32.Google Scholar
Huxley, H. H. 1970. ‘“Marked literary inferiority” in the poems of the “Satyricon”’. CJ 66: 69–70.Google Scholar
Hyman, W. B. 2019. Impossible desire and the limits of knowledge in Renaissance poetry. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indelli, G. and Tsouna-McKirahan, V.. 1995. [Philodemus]. [On choices and avoidances]. Naples.Google Scholar
Jackson, V. and Prins, Y., eds. 2014. The lyric theory reader. A critical anthology. Baltimore, MD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, C. 2000. ‘Athenaeus the librarian’. In Braund, P. and J. Wilkins, eds. 2000: 85–110.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. 2004. ‘La citation comme performance dans les Deipnosophists d’Athénée’. In Darbo-Peschanski, C., ed. 2004: 147–74.Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. 1794–1814. Anthologia Graeca siue Poetarum Graecorum lusus ex recensione Brunckii. Indices et commentarium adiecit Fridericus Iacobs. Animadversiones in epigrammata Anthologiae Graecae. 13 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Jacoby, C. 1875. ‘Ktesias und Diodor. Eine Quellenuntersuchung von Diodor B. II, c. 1–34’. RhM 30: 555–615.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1933–47. Paideia. Die Formung des griechischen Menschens. 3 vols. Berlin. [tr. = (1939–45)]Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1939–45. Paideia. The ideals of Greek culture. Translated by G. Highet. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jauß, H. R. 1967. Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft. Konstanz.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. M. 2008. ‘Dining with the dead. From the mensa to the altar in Christian late antiquity’. In Brink, L. and D. A. Green, eds. 2008: 107–43.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. S. 2002. ‘Horace, Carmina 1.36.13. Should Damalis outdrink Bassus?’ Philologus 146: 187–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. S. 2004. A symposion of praise. Horace returns to lyric in Odes IV. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N., eds. 2009. Ancient literacies. The culture of reading in Greece and Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 1982. The idea of lyric. Lyric modes in ancient and modern poetry. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Kannellou, M., Petrovic, I., and Carey, C., eds. 2019. Greek epigram from the Hellenistic to the early Byzantine era. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassel, R. and Austin, C., eds. 1983–2001. Poetae comici Graeci. 9 vols. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V., eds. 1982. The Cambridge history of classical literature. Vol. II. Latin literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kießling, A. 1867. ‘Horatianische Kleinigkeiten’. In Gratulationsschrift der philosophischen Facultaet in Basel zu dem fünfzigjährigen Doctorjubilaeum ihres Seniors des Herrn Professor Fr. Dor. Gerlach, 1–16. Basel.Google Scholar
Kießling, A. and Heinze, R.. 1966. Q. Horatius Flaccus. Oden und Epoden. 12th ed. Dublin and Zurich.Google Scholar
Kilbansky, R. and Paton, H. J., eds. 1963. Philosophy and history. Essays presented to Ernst Cassirer. New York.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, R. S. 1970. ‘An interpretation of Horace, Epodes 13’. CQ 20: 135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. A. H., ed. 2015. The good life and conceptions of life in early China and Graeco-Roman antiquity. Berlin, Munich, and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirstein, R. 2002. ‘Companion pieces in the Hellenistic epigram’. In Harder, M. A., R. F. Regtuit, and G. C. Wakker, eds. 2002: 113–35.Google Scholar
Kleinlogel, A. 2019. Scholia Graeca in Thucydidem. Scholia vetustiora et Lexicon Thucydideum Patmense. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. 1938. ‘Herculis ritu 3,14’. In Werke und Tage. Festschrift für Rudolf Alexander Schröder zum Geburtstage, 74–82. Berlin. [= (1961) 395–405]Google Scholar
Klingner, F. 1964. Studien zur griechischen und römischen Literatur. Edited by Bartels, K.. Zurich.Google Scholar
Knorr, O. 2004. Verborgene Kunst. Argumentationsstruktur und Buchaufbau in den Satiren des Horaz. Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. 2013. ‘Language, style and meter in Horace’. In Günther, H.-C., ed. 2013: 527–46.Google Scholar
König, J. 2012. Saints and symposiasts. The literature of food and the symposium in Greco-Roman and early Christian culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. and Whitmarsh, T., eds. 2007a. Ordering knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. and Whitmarsh, T.. 2007b. ‘Ordering knowledge’. In König, J. and T. Whitmarsh, eds. 2007a: 3–39.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2011. ‘Excerpting as reading practice’. In Reydams-Schils, G., ed. 2011: 9–22.Google Scholar
Krasser, H. and Schmidt, E. A., eds. 1996. Zeitgenosse Horaz. Der Dichter und seine Leser seit zwei Jahrtausenden. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Krömer, D., ed. 1995. Wie die Blätter am Baum, so wechseln die Wörter. 100 Jahre Thesaurus Linguae Latinae. Stuttgart and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurke, L. 1996. ‘Pindar and the prostitutes, or reading ancient “pornography”’. Arion 4: 49–75.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 2000. ‘The strangeness of “song culture”. Archaic Greek poetry’. In Taplin, O., ed. 2000: 58–87.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 1995. ‘Il vino di Orazio’. In Murray, O. and M. Tecușan, eds. 1995: 266–82.Google Scholar
Lampe, K. 2015. The birth of hedonism. The cyrenaic philosophers and pleasure as a way of life. Princeton, NJ and Oxford.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, G. B. 2003. ‘Il “monumento di Sardanapalo” e la sua iscrizione’. In Studi trentini di scienze storiche 82: 79–86.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, G. B. 2011. ‘Gli ΑΣΣYΡΙΑΚᾺ di Ctesia e la documentazione assira’. In Wiesehöfer, J., R. Rollinger, and G. B. Lanfranchi, eds. 2011: 175–223.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, G. B., Roaf, M., and Rollinger, R., eds. 2003. Continuity of empires (?). Assyria, Media, Persia. Padua.Google Scholar
Lange, W., Schwindt, J. P., and Westerwelle, K., eds. 2004. Temporalität und Form. Konfigurationen ästhetischen und historischen Bewußtseins. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1993. ‘Horace’s Sabine topography in lyric and hexameter verse’. AJPh 114: 271–302.Google Scholar
Lee, C. and Morley, N., eds. 2015. A handbook to the reception of Thucydides. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1993b. ‘Waren horazische Gedichte zum “öffentlichen” Vortrag bestimmt?’ In Vogt-Spira, G., ed. 1993: 143–57.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2017. ‘Nero the performer’. In Littlewood, C., K. Freudenburg, and S. Bartsch, eds. 2017: 21–33.Google Scholar
Lenfant, D. 2001. ‘De Sardanapale à Élagabal. Les avatars d’une figure du pouvoir’. In Molin, M., ed. 2001: 45–55.Google Scholar
LeVen, P. A. 2013. ‘Reading the octopus. Authorship, intertexts and a Hellenistic anecdote (Machon, fr. 9 Gow)’. AJPh 126: 23–35.Google Scholar
LeVen, P. A. 2014. The many-headed muse. Tradition and innovation in late classical Greek lyric poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVen, P. A. 2018. ‘Echo and the invention of the lyric listener’. In Budelmann, F. and T. Phillips, eds. 2018: 213–33.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P., eds. 2002. Clio and the poets. Augustan poetry and the traditions of ancient historiography. Leiden, Boston, MA, and Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, G. 2016. ‘Some thoughts on the symposiastic catena, Aisakos, and skolia’. In Cazzato, V., D. Obbink, and E. E. Prodi, eds. 2016: 42–62.Google Scholar
Liddel, P. P. and Low, P., eds. 2013. Inscriptions and their uses in Greek and Latin literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1965. ‘Die Bedeutung des Festes bei Horaz’. In Flashar, H. and K. Gaiser, eds. 1965: 403–27.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, W. 1965. ‘Beast and man in the Third Book of Virgil’s Georgics’. G&R 12: 64–77.Google Scholar
Lier, B. 1904. ‘Topica carminum sepulcralium Latinorum. Pars III’. Philologus 63: 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1987. Un flot d’images. Une esthétique du banquet grec. Paris. [tr. = (1990)]Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1990. The aesthetics of the Greek banquet. Images of wine and ritual. Translated by A. Szegedy-Maszak. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, C., Freudenburg, K., and Bartsch, S., eds. 2017. The Cambridge companion to the age of Nero. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2002. ‘Beyond performance envy. Horace and the modern in the Epistle to Augustus’. In Paschalis, M., ed. 2002: 141–71. [= (2009a) 235–50]Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2006. ‘Review of T. N. Habinek, The world of Roman song. From ritualized speech to social order’. BMCR 2006.04.34.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2009a. Writing, performance, and authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M., ed. 2009b. Horace. Odes and Epodes. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. A. C. 2020. ‘Rhythmics’. In Lynch, T. A. C. and E. Rocconi, eds. 2020: 275–95.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. A. C. and Rocconi, E., eds. 2020. A companion to ancient Greek and Roman music. Hoboken, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 2005. ‘Structure and allusion in Horace’s Book of Epodes’. JRS 95: 1–19.Google Scholar
Maas, E. 1895. Orpheus. Untersuchungen zur griechischen, römischen, altchrist-lichen Jenseitsdichtung und Religion. Munich.Google Scholar
Maaskant-Kleibrink, M. 1978. Catalogue of the engraved gems in the royal cabinet in The Hague. 2 vols. The Hague.Google Scholar
Magnelli, E. 1997. ‘Review of G. Massimilla, Callimaco, Aitia. Libri primo e secundo’. RFIC 125: 445–59.Google Scholar
Mann, W.-R. 2006. ‘Learning how to die. Seneca’s use of Aeneid 4.653 at Epistulae morales 12.9’. In Volk, K. and G. D. Williams, eds. 2006: 103–22.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, I. 2007. Stimme, Schrift und Bild. Zum Verhältnis der Künste in der hellenistischen Dichtung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Marquardt, J. and Mau, A.. 1964. Das Privatleben der Römer. Darmstadt. Original edition, 1886.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J., eds. 2013. The author’s voice in classical and late antiquity. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, F. 1925. ‘M. Agrippa und die zeitgenössische römische Dichtkunst’. RhM 74: 174–94.Google Scholar
Mastrorosa, I. G. 2010. ‘Collectables, antiques and sumptuary trends in ancient Roma. A look around the dining halls of the late Republic and early Empire’. In Gahtan, M. W. and D. Pegazzano, eds. 2010: 102–8.Google Scholar
Mathiesen, T. J. 1999. Apollo’s lyre. Greek music and music theory in antiquity and the Middle Ages. Lincoln, NE and London.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. 2009. ‘Vivere secundum Horatium. Otto Vaenius’ Emblemata Horatiana’. In Houghton, L. B. T. and M. Wyke, eds. 2009: 200–18.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. and Adams, J. N., eds. 1999. Aspects of the language of Latin poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mazzoli, G. 1991. ‘II giorno “lacerato” e il tempo “sfruttato”’. In Studi di filologica classica in onore di G. Monaco, 1025–1037. Palermo.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. 2019. I, the poet. First-person form in Horace, Catullus, and Propertius. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
McGill, S. 2005. Virgil recomposed. The mythological and secular centos in antiquity. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, J. C. 1987–. Ovid. Amores. Text, prolegomena and commentary in four volumes. 4 vols. Leeds.Google Scholar
Meier, L. 2017. ‘Sprechende Steine, Gesang und “professionelles” Wissen. Kulturhistorische Überlegungen zur Grabsäule des Seikilos (I. Tralleis 219)’. Tyche 32: 101–18.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 1993. ‘Die Einbeziehung des Lesers in den Epigrammen des Kallimachos’. In Harder, M. A., R. F. Regtuit, and G. C. Wakker, eds. 1993: 161–75.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 2005. Inszeniertes Lesevergnügen. Das inschriftliche Epigramm und seine Rezeption bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 2007. ‘The act of reading and the act of writing in Hellenistic epigram’. In Bing, P. and J. S. Bruss, eds. 2007a: 187–210.Google Scholar
Micheli, M. E. 2016. ‘Dactyliothecae Romanae. Tra publica magnificentia e privata luxuria’. RAL 27: 73–113.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 1994. Lyric texts and lyric consciousness. The birth of a genre from archaic Greece to Augustan Rome. London.Google Scholar
Mindt, N. 2013. ‘Griechische Autoren in den Epigrammen Martials’. Millennium 10: 501–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mindt, N. 2017. ‘Horace, Seneca, and Martial. “Sententious style” across genres’. In Stöckinger, M., K. Winter, and A. T. Zanker, eds. 2017a: 315–44.Google Scholar
Molin, M., ed. 2001. Images et représentations du pouvoir et de l’ordre social dans l’antiquité. Paris.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1982. ‘The origins of universal history’. ASNP 12: 533–60. [= (1987) 31–57]Google Scholar
Monerie, J. 2015. ‘De Šamaš-Šum-Ukin à Sardanapale. Histoire d’un mythe de la décadence’. Topoi(Lyon) 20: 167–85.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. 2017. ‘Music, sexuality and stagecraft in the pseudo-Vergilian Copa’. Greek & Roman Musical Studies 5: 82–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, L. 2005. ‘A yoke connecting baskets. Odes 3.14, Hercules, and Italian unity’. CQ 55: 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, A. D. 2007. The narrator in archaic Greek and Hellenistic poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morson, G. S. 2011. The words of others. From quotations to culture. New Haven, CT and London.Google Scholar
Moss, A. 1996. Printed commonplace-books and the structuring of Renaissance thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosshammer, A. A. 1979. The Chronicle of Eusebius and Greek chronographic tradition. Lewisburg, PA.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 2010. ‘Horace’. In Grafton, A., G. W. Most, and S. Settis, eds. 2010: 454–60.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 2014. ‘Τὸν Ἀνακρέοντα μίμου. Imitation and enactment in the Anacreontics’. In Baumbach, M. and N. Dümmler, eds. 2014: 145–59.Google Scholar
Mundt, F. 2018. Römische Klassik und griechische Lyrik. Transformationen der Archaik in augusteischer Zeit. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. 1983. ‘The Greek symposion in history’. In Gabba, E., ed. 1983: 257–72. [= (2018) 11–23]Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1985. ‘Symposium and genre in the poetry of Horace’. JRS 75: 39–50. [= (2018) 313–30 = Rudd, N., ed. 1993: 89–105]Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1988. ‘Death and the symposion’. AION(archeol) 10: 239–57. [= (2018) 215–36]Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2016. ‘The symposium between east and west’. In Cazzato, V., D. Obbink, and E. E. Prodi, eds. 2016: 17–27. [= (2018) 77–88]Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2018. The symposion. Drinking Greek style. Essays on Greek pleasure, 1983–2017. Edited by Cazzato, V.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. W. 1889. Götzen-Dämmerung oder, Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophirt. Leipzig. [tr. = (1911)]Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1962. ‘Review of K. Müller, Petronii Arbitri Satyricon, and W.V. Clausen, A. Persi Flacci et D. Iuni Iuvenalis Saturae’. JRS 52: 227–38. [= (1995) 6–28]Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1983. ‘Some problems of text and interpretation in Horace Odes 3.14 (Herculis ritu)’. Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 4: 105–9.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1987. ‘The oak and the axe. Symbolism in Seneca, Hercules Oetaeus 1618ff’. In Whitby, M., P. R. Hardie, and M. Whitby, eds. 1987: 243–51. [= (1995) 202–12]Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1995. Collected papers on Latin literature. Edited by Harrison, S. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nollé, J. 1985. ‘Grabepigramme und Reliefdarstellungen aus Kleinasien’. ZPE 60: 117–36.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1905. ‘Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der horazischen Epistula ad Pisones’. Hermes 40: 481–528.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1956. Agnostos theos. Untersuchungen zur Formengschichte religiöser Rede. Darmstadt. Original edition, 1913.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 1998. Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, W. J. 1932. The influence of Simonides of Ceos upon Horace. Diss. Princeton University.Google Scholar
Obbink, D., ed. 1995. Philodemus and poetry. Poetic theory and practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberhelman, S. and Armstrong, D.. 1995. ‘Satire as poetry and the impossibility of metathesis in Horace’s Satires’. In Obbink, D., ed. 1995: 233–54.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. 2002. ‘Archaism and historicism in Horace’s Odes’. In Levene, D. S. and D. P. Nelis, eds. 2002: 81–101.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 2017. True names. Vergil and the Alexandrian tradition of etymological wordplay. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. and Sens, A.. 2000. Archestratos of Gela. Greek culture and cuisine in the fourth century BCE. Oxford.Google Scholar
Orelli, J. K. von and Baiter, J. G.. 1850. Q. Horatius Flaccus. 3rd ed. 2 vols. Zurich.Google Scholar
Otto, A. 1962. Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Hildesheim. Original edition, 1890.Google Scholar
Pamir, H. and Sezgin, N.. 2016. ‘The sundial and convivium scene on the mosaic from the rescue excavation in a late antique house of Antioch’. Adalya 19: 251–80.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. 1995. Theatrum mundi. Theatrical elements in the Satyrica of Petronius. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panayotakis, C. 2009. ‘Petronius and the Roman literary tradition’. In Prag, J. and I. D. Repath, eds. 2009: 48–64.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1963. ‘Et in Arcadia ego’. In Kilbansky, R. and H. J. Paton, eds. 1963: 225–54.Google Scholar
Paolucci, P. 2015a. ‘Ovidio in Pentadio. Musicalità del De adventu veris’. Paideia 70: 121–36.Google Scholar
Paolucci, P. 2015b. ‘Pentadio poeta ovidiano’. AL. Rivista di studi di Antholiga Latina 6: 57–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, H. N. 2009. ‘Books and reading Latin poetry’. In Johnson, W. A. and H. N. Parker, eds. 2009: 186–229.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. 2001. ‘These fragments we have shored against our ruin’. In Boedeker, D. and D. Sider, eds. 2001: 55–64.Google Scholar
Payne, M. 2006. ‘On being vatic. Pindar, pragmatism, and historicism’. AJPh 127: 159–84.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. M. 1995. On collecting. An investigation into collecting in the European tradition. London.Google Scholar
Peek, W. 1979. ‘Die Inschriften am Grabbau des Patron an der Via Latina’. ZPE 35: 255–63.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. N. 2002. ‘The interpretation of Iliad 6.145–9 and the sympotic contribution to rhetoric’. ColbQ 38: 197–230.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. 2016. ‘Sidonius Apollinaris and Horace, Ars poetica 14–23’. Philologus 160: 322–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peponi, A.-M. 2002. ‘Fantasizing lyric. Horace, Epistles 1.19’. In Paschalis, M., ed. 2002: 19–45.Google Scholar
Perri, A. 2011. ‘Il Giambo di Nino di Fenice di Colofone e la tradizione dell’auto-epitafio fittizio’. ARF 13: 59–68.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. 2007. ‘Inscribed epigram in pre-Hellenistic literary sources’. In Bing, P. and J. S. Bruss, eds. 2007a: 49–68.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. 2019. ‘The materiality of text. An introduction’. In Petrovic, A., I. Petrovic, and E. Thomas, eds. 2019: 1–25.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A., Petrovic, I., and Thomas, E., eds. 2019. The materiality of text. Placement, perception, and presence of inscribed texts in classical antiquity. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzini, G. 2016. ‘Comic lexicon. Searching for “submerged” Latin from Plautus to Erasmus’. In Adams, J. N. and N. Vincent, eds. 2016: 14–46.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. 2018. ‘Caesar the linguist. The debate about the Latin language’. In Grillo, L. and C. B. Krebs, eds. 2018: 173–92.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. and D’Angour, A., eds. 2018. Music, text, and culture in ancient Greece. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaza, M., ed. 2009. Persius and Juvenal. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. 1960. Griechische Musikfragmente. Ein Weg zur altgriechischen Musik. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. 1965. ‘Marius Victorinus zum Odengesang bei Horaz’. Philologus 109: 134–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. 1970. Denkmäler altgriechischer Musik. Sammlung, Übertragung und Erläuterung aller Fragmente und Fälschungen. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. 1988. ‘Sulla preistoria della tradizione di testi musica e per il teatro’. In Gentili, B. and R. Pretagostini, eds. 1988: 132–44.Google Scholar
Ponzio, A. 2001. ‘Tradizione di un frammento alcaico (frg. 347 V.)’. In Cannatà Fera, M. and G. B. D’Alessio, eds. 2001: 63–9.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. 2011. ‘Sublime monuments and sublime ruins in ancient aesthetics’. In Image, word and the antiquity of ruins, edited by A. Kahane, European Review of History 18: 829–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöschl, V. 1992. ‘Horazens Lebenskunst’. In Froning, H., T. Hölscher, and H. Mielsch, eds. 1992: 375–81.Google Scholar
Prag, J. and Repath, I. D., eds. 2009. Petronius. A handbook. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauscello, L. 2006. Singing Alexandria. Music between practice and textual transmission. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preger, T. 1891. Inscriptiones Graecae metricae. Ex scriptoribus praeter Anthologiam collectae. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Prentice, W. K. 1923. ‘Callisthenes, the original historian of Alexander’. TAPhA 54: 74–85.Google Scholar
Pretagostini, R. 1997. ‘La ripresa teocritea della poesia erotica arcaica e tardoarcaica (Idd. 29 e 30)’. MD 38: 9–24.Google Scholar
Price, S. 2012. ‘Memory and ancient Greece’. In Dignas, B. and R. R. R. Smith, eds. 2012: 15–36.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. 2007. Regards alexandrins. Histoire et théorie des arts dans l’épigramme hellénistique. Leuven, Paris, and Dudley.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. 2008. Petits musées en vers. Épigramme et discours sur les collections antiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. 2014. ‘The jewels and the dolls. Late Hellenistic ecphrastic epigrams as metapoetic texts’. In Hunter, R. L., A. Rengakos, and E. Sistakou, eds. 2014: 185–212.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. 2015. ‘Poetic depictions of ancient dactyliothecae’. In Gahtan, M. W. and D. Pegazzano, eds. 2015: 54–71.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1979. Virgil’s poem of the earth. Studies in the Georgics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1986. Artifices of eternity. Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1996a. ‘Horace C. 3.14 and the designing of Augustus’. In Krasser, H. and E. A. Schmidt, eds. 1996: 442–64.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1996b. ‘Horace’s arboreal anniversary (C. 3.8)’. Ramus 25: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Race, W. H. 1993. ‘Carpe Diem’. In The new Princeton encyclopedia of poetry and poetics, edited by Preminger, A. and Brogan, T. V. F., 171–2. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Rackham, H., Jones, W. H. S., and Eichholz, D. E.. 1938–63. Pliny. Natural History. 10 vols. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar
Raible, W. 1995. ‘Arten des Kommentierens, Arten der Sinnbildung, Arten des Verstehens. Spielarten der generischen Intertextualität’. In Assmann, J. and B. Gladigo, eds. 1995: 51–73.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. 2018. Simonides the poet. Intertextuality and reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, J. E. 1995. ‘Symposion in ancient Mesopotamia. Archaeological evidence’. In Murray, O. and M. Tecușan, eds. 1995: 35–56.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. 1985. ‘Review of D. R. Shackleton Bailey, Anthologia Latina 1.1’. Phoenix 39: 174–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. S. 1925. M. Tulli Ciceronis De finibus bonorum et malorum libri I, II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, R. 1893. Epigramm und Skolion. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung. Gießen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitzenstein, R. 1924. ‘Eine neue Auffassung der horazischen Ode’. Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum 53: 232–41. [= (1963) 73–82]Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G., ed. 2011. Thinking through excerpts. Studies on Stobaeus. Turnhout.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., ed. 1983. Texts and transmission. A survey of the Latin classics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. 1869. Des Q. Horatius Flaccus Episteln und Buch von der Dichtkunst. Berlin.Google Scholar
Richter, A. 1970. ‘La vertu du vin dans les Odes d’Horace’. Bulletin de la faculté des lettres de Mulhouse 3: 3–10.Google Scholar
Riechel, D. C., ed. 1978. Wege der Worte. Festschrift für Wolfgang Fleischhauer. Cologne.Google Scholar
Riese, A. (1894–1906). Anthologia Latina. Carmina in codicibus scripta. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rigato, D. and Mongardi, M.. 2016. ‘Tituli picti con datazione consolare su anfore vinarie italiche. Indagini preliminari’. In Buora, M. and S. Magnani, eds. 2016: 101–29.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2007. ‘Petronius’ lessons in learning – the hard way’. In König, J. and T. Whitmarsh, eds. 2007a: 108–32.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2020. ‘Name means fame. Egos, authorship and uncertainty. [Review of K. McCarthy, I, the poet. First-person form in Horace, Catullus, and Propertius; T. Geue, Author unknown. The power of anonymity in ancient Rome]’. Times Literary Supplement 6107: 29.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1937. Études anatoliennes. Recherches sur les inscriptions grecques de l’Asie Mineure. Paris.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1965. Hellenica. Recueil d’épigraphie de numismatique et d’antiquités grecques. Vol. 13. Paris.Google Scholar
Rohland, R. A. 2019. ‘Highway to hell. AP 11.23 = Antipater of Thessalonica 38 G-P’. Mnemosyne 72: 459–70.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2006. Dining posture in ancient Rome. Bodies, values, and status. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Rood, T. 2015. ‘The reception of Thucydides’ Archaeology’. In Lee, C. and N. Morley, eds. 2015: 474–92.Google Scholar
Roos, A. G. 1967. Flavii Arriani quae exstant omnia. I. Alexandri Anabasis. G. Wirth ed. of 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 1992. The poetics of imitation. Anacreon and the Anacreontic tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 2018. The language of ruins. Greek and Latin inscriptions on the Memnon colossus. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. 1980. Dichter und Gruppe. Eine Untersuchung zu den Bedingungen und zur historischen Funktion früher griechischer Lyrik am Beispiel Alkaios. Munich.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. 1983. ‘Über Deixis und einige Aspekte mündlichen und schriftlichen Stils in antiker Lyrik’. WJA 9: 7–28.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. E. 1983. ‘Il simposio greco arcaico e classico come spettacolo a se stesso’. In Spettacoli conviviali dall’antichità classica alle corti italiane del ’400. Atti del VII convegno di studio, Viterbo, 27–30 maggio, 1982, 41–50. Viterbo. [= (2020) ii.333–50]Google Scholar
Rossi, L. E. 1998. ‘Orazio, un lirico greco senza musica’. SemRom 1: 163–81. [= (2020) i.383–402; tr. = (2009)]Google Scholar
Rossi, L. E. 2009. ‘Horace, a Greek lyrist without music’. In M. Lowrie, ed. 2009b: 356–77.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. E. 2020. Κηληθμῷ δ᾽ ἔσχοντο. Scritti editi e inediti. Edited by Colesanti, G. and Nicolai, R.. 3 vols. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. I. 1957. The social and economic history of the Roman Empire. P. M. Frazer ed. of 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ruch, M. 1963. ‘Horace et les fondements de la “iunctura” dans l’ordre de la création poétique (AP, 46–72)’. REL 41: 246–8.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1989. Horace. Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (Ars Poetica). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 1995a. ‘Fasti. Quellen oder Produkte römischer Geschichtsschreibung?’ Klio 77: 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. 1995b. Kalendar und Öffentlichkeit. Die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation der Zeit in Rom. Berlin and New York. [tr. = (2011)]Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 1997. ‘Geschichtsschreibung in Listenform. Beamtenlisten unter römischen Kalendern’. Philologus 141: 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2011. The Roman calendar from Numa to Constantine. Translated by D. M. B. Richardson. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2017. ‘Doubling religion in the Augustan age’. In Ben-Dov, J. and L. Doering, eds. 2017: 50–68.Google Scholar
Russell, A. 2019. ‘The Augustan senate and the reconfiguration of time on the Fasti Capitolini’. In Gildenhard, I., U. Gotter, W. Havener, and L. Hodgson, eds. 2019: 157–86.Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. S. 1986. Unity and design in Horace’s Odes. Chapel Hill, NC and London.Google Scholar
Sawicki, L., and Shalev, D., eds. 2002. Donum grammaticum. Studies in Latin and Celtic linguistics in honour of Hannah Rosén. Leuven.Google Scholar
Schetter, W. 1986. ‘Zum anonymen Libellus epanaleptischer Monodisticha des Salmasianischen Corpus’. Hermes 114: 231–39.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G. 2011. A commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius. With the collaboration of Aldo Setaioli. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1980. ‘Alter Wein zum Fest bei Horaz’. A&A 26: 18–32. [= (2002) 248–65]Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1994–5. ‘“Vornehm par excellence”. Über Noblesse und Takt in Horazens Philippi-Gedichten (Epode 13 – Ode 2, 7 – Ode 3, 14)’. WS 107/108: 377–96. [= (2002) 266–85]Google Scholar
Schmitt Pantel, P. 1992. La cité au banquet. Histoire des repas publics dans les cités grecques. Rome.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. 1993. La conquête du passé. Aux origines de l’archéologie. Paris. [tr. = (1996)]Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. 1996. The discovery of the past. The origins of archaeology. Translated by Kinnes, I. and Vardndell, G.. London.Google Scholar
Schnurbusch, D. 2011. Convivium. Form und Bedeutung aristokratischer Geselligkeit in der römischen Antike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schwienhorst-Schönberger, L. 1996. ‘Nicht im Menschen gründet das Glück’ (Koh 2,24). Kohelet im Spannungsfeld jüdischer Weisheit und hellenistischer Philosophie. Freiburg.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2004a. ‘Blinde Mimesis. Über Ordo und Kontingenz in der literaturgeschichtlichen Traditionsbildung (Horaz und Petron)’. Dictynna 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2004b. ‘Dislocatio temporis. Struktur und Ereignis in Horaz’ Lyrik’. In Lange, W., J. P. Schwindt, and K. Westerwelle, eds. 2004: 77–93.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P., ed. 2005a. La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne. Zur Poetik der Zeit in augusteischer Dichtung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2005b. ‘Zeiten und Räume in augusteischer Dichtung’. In Schwindt, J. P., ed. 2005a: 1–18.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2016. ‘The magic of counting. On the cantatoric status of poetry (Catullus 5 and 7; Horace Odes 1.11)’. In Hardie, P. R., ed. 2016: 117–33.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2010. ‘Iambos and parody’. In Clauss, J. J. and M. Cuypers, eds. 2010: 251–66.Google Scholar
Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M., eds. 2017. Selfhood and the soul. Essays on ancient thought and literature in honour of Christopher Gill. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 1976. ‘Epicurus and his professional rivals’. In Bollack, J. and A. Laks, eds. 1976: 119–59.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2017. ‘Epicurean versus Cyrenaic happiness’. In Seaford, R., J. Wilkins, and M. Wright, eds. 2017: 89–106.Google Scholar
Seel, O. 1972. Verschlüsselte Gegenwart. Drei Interpretationen antiker Texte. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Seel, O. and Pöhlmann, E.. 1959. ‘Quantität und Wordakzent im horazischen Sapphiker’. Philologus 103: 237–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sens, A. 2007. ‘One thing leads back to another. Allusion and the invention of tradition in Hellenistic epigrams’. In Bing, P. and J. S. Bruss, eds. 2007a: 373–90.Google Scholar
Sens, A. 2015. ‘Hedylus (4 and 5 Gow-Page) and Callimachean poetics’. Mnemosyne 68: 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sens, A. 2016. ‘Party or perish. Death, wine, and closure in Hellenistic sympotic epigram’. In Cazzato, V., D. Obbink, and E. E. Prodi, eds. 2016: 230–46.Google Scholar
Sergueenkova, V. and Rojas, F.. 2017. ‘Asianics in relief. Making sense of Bronze and Iron Age monuments in classical Anatolia’. CJ 112: 140–78.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. 2011. Arbitri nugae. Petronius’ short poems in the Satyrica. Frankfurt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1982. Anthologia Latina. Vol. 1, carmina in codicibus scripta. Fasc. I, libri Salmasiani aliorumque carmina. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 1996. ‘As is the generation of leaves in Homer, Simonides, Horace, and Stobaios’. In The New Simonides, edited by D. Boedeker and D. Sider, Arethusa 29.2: 263–82. [= Boedeker and Sider (2001) 272–88]Google Scholar
Slater, N. W., ed. 2017. Voice and voices in antiquity. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, S. G. P. 1951. ‘Marcus Argentarius. A poet of the Greek Anthology’. YClS 12: 65–145.Google Scholar
Smereka, J. 1935. ‘De Horatianae vocabulorum copiae certa qadam lege’. In Commentationes Horatianae, 65–91. Kraków.Google Scholar
Smith, M. 2004. ‘Elusive stones. Reading Posidippus’ Lithika through technical writing on stones’. In Acosta-Hughes, B., E. Kosmetatou, and M. Baumbach, eds. 2004: 105–17.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1946. Die Entstehung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen. Hamburg. [tr. = (1953)]Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1953. The discovery of the mind. The Greek origins of European thought. Translated by T. G. Rosenmeyer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Solomon, J. 1986. ‘The Seikilos inscription. A theoretical analysis’. AJPh 107: 455–79.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1995. ‘Reading’ Greek death. To the end of the classical period. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. P., eds. 2002. Cultivating the muse. Struggles for power and inspiration in classical literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, M. 2014. ‘Reading a view. Poem and picture in the Greek Anthology’. Ramus 39: 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöckinger, M., Winter, K., and Zanker, A. T., eds. 2017a. Horace and Seneca. Interactions, intertexts, interpretations. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöckinger, M., Winter, K., and Zanker, A. T.. 2017b. ‘Introduction’. In Stöckinger, M., K. Winter, and A. T. Zanker, eds. 2017a: 1–23.Google Scholar
Stucchi, S. 2002. ‘Esempi di sapienza oraziana nel Satyricon. Tra svilimento e rovesciamento’. In Castagna, L. and G. Vogt-Spira, eds. 2002: 213–22.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. B. 2014. ‘On Horace’s pyramids (C. 3.30.1–2)’. The Cambridge Classical Journal 60: 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suriano, M. J. 2017. ‘Kingship and carpe diem, between Gilgamesh and Qoheleth’. VT 67: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenbro, J. 1988. Phrasikleia. Anthropologie de la lecture en Grèce ancienne. Paris. [tr. = (1993)]Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. 1993. Phrasikleia. An anthropology of reading in ancient Greece. Translated by J. Lloyd. Ithaca, N,Y and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. 1972–3. Die Lyrik des Horaz. Eine Interpretation der Oden. 2 vols. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Tammaro, V. 2014. ‘Un riesame di Alex. fr. 25 K.-A’. In Tulli, M., M. Magnani, and A. Nicolosi, eds. 2014: 55–66.Google Scholar
Taplin, O., ed. 2000. Literature in the Greek and Roman worlds. A new perspective. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 2015a. ‘Virgil and Vergilius in Horace Odes 4.12’. In Günther, H.-C., ed. 2015: 429–52.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 2015b. ‘A new critical edition of Horace’. In Hunter, R. L. and S. P. Oakley, eds. 2015: 291–321.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 2016. Texts, editors, and readers. Methods and problems in Latin textual criticism. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchernia, A. 1995. ‘Le vin et l’honneur’. In Murray, O. and M. Tecuşan, eds. 1995: 297–303.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1987. ‘Prose into poetry. Tradition and meaning in Virgil’s Georgics’. HSPh 91: 229–60. [= Volk (2008) 142–72]Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1998. ‘Melodious tears. Sepulchral epigram and generic mobility’. In Harder, M. A., R. F. Regtuit, and C. C. Wakker, eds. 1998: 205–23.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 2010. ‘Grist to the mill. The literary uses of the quotidian in Horace Satires 1.5’. In Dickey, E. and A. Chahoud, eds. 2010: 255–65.Google Scholar
Thurmond, D. L. 2017. From vines to wines in classical Rome. A handbook of viticulture and oenology in Rome and the Roman west. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigay, J. 1993. ‘On evaluating claims of literary borrowing’. In Cohen, M. E., D. C. Snell, and D. B. Weisberg, eds. 1993: 250–5.Google Scholar
Tischer, U. 2017. ‘Nostra faciamus. Quoting in Horace and Seneca’. In Stöckinger, M., K. Winter, and A. T. Zanker, eds. 2017a: 289–314.Google Scholar
Tolman, J. A. 1910. A study of the sepulchral inscriptions in Buecheler’s Carmina epigraphica Latina. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Traina, A. 1975–98. Poeti latini (e neolatini). Note e saggi filologici. 5 vols. Bologna.Google Scholar
Traina, A. 1985. ‘Introduzione a Orazio lirico. La poesia della saggezza’. In Mandruzzato, E. 1985: 5–45. [= (1975–98) v.133–68]Google Scholar
Traina, A. 1991. ‘Orazio e Aristippo. Le Epistole e l’arte di convivere’. RFIC 119: 285–305. [= (1975–98) iv.161–86; tr. = (2009)]Google Scholar
Traina, A. 1993. ‘La linea e il punto (ancora sul carpe diem)’. Paideia 48: 100–103. [= (1975–98) iv.191–5]Google Scholar
Traina, A. 2009. ‘Horace and Aristippus. The Epistles and the art of couiuere’. In Freudenburg, K., ed. 2009: 287–307.Google Scholar
Trédé-Boulmer, M. 2015. Kairos. L’à-propos et l’occasion. Le mot et la notion, d’Homère à la fin du IVe siècle avant J.-C. 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Trimble, G. 2018. ‘Echoes and reflections in Catullus’ long poems’. In Frangoulidis, S., S. J. Harrison, and T. D. Papanghelis, eds. 2018: 35–54.Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. C. 2008. Inscribing sorrow. Fourth-century Attic funerary epigrams. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tueller, M. A. 2008. Look who’s talking. Innovations in voice and identity in Hellenistic epigram. Leuven, Paris, and Dudley.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. A. 2010. ‘The passer-by in archaic and classical epigram’. In Baumbach, M., A. Petrovic, and I. Petrovic, eds. 2010: 42–60.Google Scholar
Tulli, M., Magnani, M., and Nicolosi, A., eds. 2014. Φιλία. Dieci contributi per Gabriele Burzacchini. Bologna.Google Scholar
Van Oyen, A. 2020. The socio-economics of Roman storage. Agriculture, trade, and family. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 2002. ‘Ars pervertendi. I Satyrica di Petronio e i limiti del rovesciamento’. In Castagna, L. and G. Vogt-Spira, eds. 2002: 193–212.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 2017. ‘Time in Horace and Seneca’. In Stöckinger, M., K. Winter, and A. T. Zanker, eds. 2017a: 185–210.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2002. The poetics of Latin didactic. Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. and Williams, G. D., eds. 2006. Seeing Seneca whole. Perspectives on philosophy, poetry, and politics. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vössing, K. 2004. Mensa regia. Das Bankett beim hellenistischen König und beim römischen Kaiser. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vössing, K., ed. 2008. Das römische Bankett im Spiegel der Altertumswissenschaften. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Vout, C. 2009. ‘The Satyricon and Neronian culture’. In Prag, J. and I. D. Repath, eds. 2009: 101–13.Google Scholar
Vout, C. 2018. Classical art. A life history from antiquity to the present. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Vredeveld, H. 1987. ‘Two philological puzzles in Erasmus’ Poem on old age’. BiblH&R 49: 597–604.Google Scholar
Wachter, R. 2004. ‘Drinking inscriptions on Attic Little-Master Cups. A catalogue (AVI 3)’. Kadmos 42: 141–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, G. 1789–95. Silva critica, sive in auctores sacros profanosque commentarius philologus. 5 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1987. ‘Time for Augustus. Ovid, Augustus and the Fasti’. In Whitby, M., P. R. Hardie, and M. Whitby, eds. 1987: 221–30.Google Scholar
Waltz, A. 1881. Des variations de la langue et de la métrique d’Horace dans ses différents ouvrages. Paris.Google Scholar
Wankel, H. 1983. ‘“Alle Menschen müssen sterben”. Variationen eines Topos der griechischen Literatur’. Hermes 111: 129–54.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1964. ‘De poëtische expressie in Horatius’ lyrische gedichten’. Forum der Letteren 5: 1–22. [German tr. = (1972)]Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. 1972. ‘Der dichterische Ausdruck in den Oden des Horaz’. In Oppermann, H., ed. 1972: 271–301.Google Scholar
Watson, P. A. 1998. ‘Ignorant Euctus. Wit and literary allusion in Martial 8.6’. Mnemosyne 51: 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrli, F. 1967–9. Die Schule des Aristoteles. Texte und Kommentar. 2nd ed. 10 vols. Basel.Google Scholar
West, D. 1973. ‘Horace’s poetic technique in the Odes’. In Costa, C. D. N., ed. 1973: 29–58.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1969. ‘Near Eastern material in Hellenistic and Roman literature’. HSPh 73: 113–34.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1990. ‘The Anacreontea’. In Murray, O., ed. 1990: 272–6. [= (2011–3) ii.385–90]Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1997. The east face of Helicon. West Asiatic elements in Greek poetry and myth. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. 2011–13. Hellenica. Selected papers on Greek literature and thought. 3 vols. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Whitby, M., Hardie, P. R., and Whitby, M., eds. 1987. Homo viator. Classical essays for John Bramble. Bristol.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. 1993. ‘The Cena Trimalchionis and biographical narration in Roman middle class art’. In Holliday, P. J., ed. 1993: 299–325.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. and Thomson, S., eds. 2013. The romance between Greece and the East. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesehöfer, J., Rollinger, R., and Lanfranchi, G. B., eds. 2011. Ktesias’ Welt. Ctesias’ world. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1900. Die Textgeschichte der griechischen Lyriker. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1913. Sappho und Simonides. Untersuchungen über die griechischen Lyriker. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1924. Hellenistische Dichtung in der Zeit des Kallimachos. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1974. ‘A. E. Housman, scholar and poet’. Housman Society Journal 1: 32–46.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2015. The Roman audience. Classical literature as social history. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wöhrle, G. 1990. ‘“Eine sehr hübsche Mahn-Mumie … ” Zur Rezeption eines herodoteischen Motivs’. Hermes 118: 292–301.Google Scholar
Wolkenhauer, A. 2011. Sonne und Mond, Kalender und Uhr. Studien zur Darstellung und poetischen Reflexion der Zeitordnung in der römischen Literatur. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1972. ‘Horace’s Odes “Diffugere niues” and “Soluitur acris hiems”’. Latomus 31: 752–78.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. and Powell, J., eds. 1992. Author and audience in Latin literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. and West, D., eds. 1974. Quality and pleasure in Latin poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wörrle, M. 1996–7. ‘Die Inschriften am Grab des Apollonios am Asartaş von Yazir in Ostlykien’. Lykia 3: 24–37.Google Scholar
Wörrle, M. 1998. ‘Leben und Sterben wie ein Fürst. Überlegungen zu den Inschriften eines neuen Dynastengrabes in Lykien’. Chiron 28: 77–86.Google Scholar
Yeh, W.-J. 2007. Structures métriques des poésies de Pétrone. Pour quel art poétique? Leuven, Paris, and Dudley.Google Scholar
Ypsilanti, M. 2018. The epigrams of Crinagoras of Mytilene. Introduction, text, commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. ed. 2002. Written texts and the rise of literate culture in ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. 2003. ‘New light on the literary category of “ekphrastic epigram” in antiquity. The New Posidippus’. ZPE 149: 59–62.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, T. 2005. ‘Uses and abuses of Horace. His reception since 1935 in Germany and Anglo-America’. IJCT 12: 183–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwierlein-Diehl, E. 2007. Antike Gemmen und ihr Nachleben. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access