Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Scope and method
- 3 The economic unit and economic organization
- 4 Production and exchange
- 5 The level and structure of peasant income
- 6 The economic behavior of the peasant family
- 7 Stagnation in the peasant economy and the role of demand
- 8 Economic crisis and the peasant economy, 1975–1980
- 9 Conclusions: reality, theory and policy
- Appendixes
- I The sample
- II Methodological notes concerning the calculation of peasant income
- III Andean food plants
- IV Methodology used in the calculation of Table 7.1
- Notes
- Bibliograph
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Scope and method
- 3 The economic unit and economic organization
- 4 Production and exchange
- 5 The level and structure of peasant income
- 6 The economic behavior of the peasant family
- 7 Stagnation in the peasant economy and the role of demand
- 8 Economic crisis and the peasant economy, 1975–1980
- 9 Conclusions: reality, theory and policy
- Appendixes
- I The sample
- II Methodological notes concerning the calculation of peasant income
- III Andean food plants
- IV Methodology used in the calculation of Table 7.1
- Notes
- Bibliograph
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES
Summary
The empirical study of peasant communities was undertaken in the southern sierra region of Peru. Eight communities were studied. These communities were picked from a sample universe which constituted the most important community areas in the southern sierra. Preliminary studies were conducted in seven of these communities before September 1978, at which time was begun the fieldwork for the present study. The communities studied are located in four of five departments comprising the southern sierra; Ayacucho is the department not represented. This does not, however, present any particular complication to the problems of sample representativity in as much as the differences between departments are of minor importance.
The empirical data were obtained via a peasant family survey, administered as a uniform questionnaire in all of the peasant communities. Interviews were also conducted with persons involved in the life of the community (mainly authorities and ex-authorities) from which were obtained a physical and social perspective which was of great importance in sharpening the contents of the interview to be administered to the families. This procedure also permitted the control of the quality of the interviews by the range of possibilities for response which was given by notable persons. In each community the survey itself (apart from previous visits) lasted approximately two weeks and was conducted, on average, by four persons, three of whom (including the principal researcher) constituted a permanent team, the fourth interviewer usually being a person from the community. The interviews took place in Quechua or Aymara when the family surveyed did not have sufficient command of Spanish.
After concluding the fieldwork in each community, reports were written describing all that was observed during the stay in the community.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Capitalist Development and the Peasant Economy in Peru , pp. 126 - 128Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1984