Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r8w4l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T23:41:00.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Developing symptom management drugs

from Section 5 - Government and Industry Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Joanna M. Brell
Affiliation:
National Cancer Institute
Lori M. Minasian
Affiliation:
National Cancer Institute
Charles S. Cleeland
Affiliation:
University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Michael J. Fisch
Affiliation:
University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Adrian J. Dunn
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Manoa
Get access

Summary

The experience of cancer might be described as a symptom continuum that begins at diagnosis, when cancer-related symptoms provide the first indication of disease, and continues throughout treatment to either death or survivorship. Morbidity from cancer-related symptoms is highly prevalent and has generally been managed by tumor eradication. Treatment of the malignancy, however, is associated with significant treatment-related symptoms and toxicities that can, in themselves, be disabling or life threatening. Typically, treatment toxicities have been managed by decreasing anticancer therapy doses or discontinuing the therapy altogether, but this approach is potentially detrimental to the patient's longevity. Now, decades after the first chemotherapies were administered, there is recognition of the need for balance between surviving the cancer and surviving the treatment.

Perhaps understandably, the primary focus in oncology drug development has been therapeutic drugs, with relatively less effort spent on supportive-care drugs. As a result, the number of approved high-impact agents for managing symptoms has not paralleled recent advances in cancer therapeutics, even though the evolution in anticancer treatments has engendered a spectrum of treatment-related toxicities. This chapter focuses on the development of specific drugs to reduce the toxicities and symptoms produced by cancer therapies. Issues in the assessment of symptoms and the measurement of response to treatment, as well as the design of symptom management trials, will be discussed.

Defining the problem

The rate of cancer survivorship in the United States is trending upward. In response to screening, early detection, and therapeutic advances, US cancer survivors numbered approximately 11 million in 2009.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cancer Symptom Science
Measurement, Mechanisms, and Management
, pp. 314 - 324
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Office of Cancer Survivorship Research. Estimated US cancer prevalence counts: who are our cancer survivors in the U.S.? Available from: URL: http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/ocs/prevalence/. Accessed Aug 31, 2009.
Ng, AK, Bernardo, MP, Weller, E, et al. Long-term survival and competing causes of death in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease treated at age 50 or younger. J Clin Oncol 20(8):2101–2108, 2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ott, MJ. Complementary and alternative therapies in cancer symptom management. Cancer Pract 10(3):162–166, 2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleeland, CS. Symptom burden: multiple symptoms and their impact as patient-reported outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 37:16–21, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miaskowski, C, Dodd, M, Lee, K. Symptom clusters: the new frontier in symptom management research. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr(32):17–21, 2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, M, Janson, S, Facione, N, et al. Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs 33(5):668–676, 2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrow, GR, Hickok, JT, Roscoe, JA, et al. Differential effects of paroxetine on fatigue and depression: a randomized, double-blind trial from the University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program. J Clin Oncol 21(24):4635–4641, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konsman, JP, Parnet, P, Dantzer, R. Cytokine-induced sickness behaviour: mechanisms and implications. Trends Neurosci 25(3):154–159, 2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleeland, CS, Bennett, GJ, Dantzer, R, et al. Are the symptoms of cancer and cancer treatment due to a shared biologic mechanism?Cancer 97(11):2919–2925, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, AH, Ancoli-Israel, S, Bower, JE, Capuron, L, Irwin, MR. Neuroendocrine-immune mechanisms of behavioral comorbidities in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(6):971–982, 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, FA, Rodrigues Pereira, J, Ciuleanu, T, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 353(2):123–132, 2005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacouture, ME. Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 6(10):803–812, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jatoi, A, Rowland, K, Sloan, JA, et al. Tetracycline to prevent epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced skin rashes: results of a placebo-controlled trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N03CB). Cancer 113(4):847–853, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohlius, J, Schmidlin, K, Brillant, C, et al. Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer: meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Cochrane Database SystRev3:CD007303, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis. Developmental therapeutics program (DTP). Available from: URL: http://dctd.cancer.gov/ProgramPages/dtp/default.htm. Accessed Aug 31, 2009.Google Scholar
Schilsky, RL, Gordon, G, Gilmer, TM, et al. The Translational Research Working Group developmental pathway for anticancer agents (drugs or biologics). Clin Cancer Res 14(18):5685–5691, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigmore, SJ, Ross, JA, Falconer, JS, et al. The effect of polyunsaturated fatty acids on the progress of cachexia in patients with pancreatic cancer. Nutrition 12(1 Suppl):S27–S30, 1996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babcock, T, Helton, WS, Espat, NJ. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA): an antiinflammatory omega-3 fat with potential clinical applications. Nutrition 16(11–12):1116–1118, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fearon, KC, Meyenfeldt, MF, Moses, AG, et al. Effect of a protein and energy dense N-3 fatty acid enriched oral supplement on loss of weight and lean tissue in cancer cachexia: a randomised double blind trial. Gut 52(10):1479–1486, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vardy, J, Wefel, JS, Ahles, T, Tannock, IF, Schagen, SB. Cancer and cancer-therapy related cognitive dysfunction: an international perspective from the Venice cognitive workshop. Ann Oncol 19(4):623–629, 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, JP, Schols, AM, Westerterp, KR, ten Velde, GP, Wouters, EF. The use of bioelectrical impedance analysis to predict total body water in patients with cancer cachexia. Am J Clin Nutr 61(4):741–745, 1995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikova, O, Yakimova, R, Bosmans, E, Kenis, G, Maes, M. Increased serum tumor necrosis factor alpha concentrations in major depression and multiple sclerosis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 11(3):203–208, 2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Available from: URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM071975.pdf. Accessed Dec 18, 2009.Google Scholar
Cleeland, CS, Ryan, KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 23(2):129–138, 1994.Google ScholarPubMed
,US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Drugs@FDA: FDA Approved Drug Products. Available from: URL: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/. Accessed Jun 8, 2009.
Rock, EP, Kennedy, DL, Furness, MH, Pierce, WF, Pazdur, R, Burke, LB. Patient-reported outcomes supporting anticancer product approvals. J Clin Oncol 25(32):5094–5099, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,National Institutes of Health, Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives. NIH roadmap for medical research. Available from: URL: www.nihroadmap.nih.gov. Accessed Oct 2, 2009.Google Scholar
Garcia, SF, Cella, D, Clauser, SB, et al. Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. J Clin Oncol 25(32):5106–5112, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,US Food and Drug Administration. New drug application (NDA). Available from: URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/NewDrugApplicationNDA/default.htm. Accessed Oct 19, 2009.
Chow, S-C, Liu, J-P. Designs for clinical trials. In: Chow, S-C, Liu, J-P, eds. Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials: Concepts and Methodologies. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2004:167–214. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.Google Scholar
Chow, S-C, Liu, J-P. Designs for cancer clinical trials. In: Chow, S-C, Liu, J-P, eds. Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials: Concepts and Methodologies. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2004:215–238. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.Google Scholar
Stadler, WM, Rosner, G, Small, E, et al. Successful implementation of the randomized discontinuation trial design: an application to the study of the putative antiangiogenic agent carboxyaminoimidazole in renal cell carcinoma – CALGB 69901. J Clin Oncol 23(16):3726–3732, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidlin, B, Simon, R. Evaluation of randomized discontinuation design. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5094–5098, 2005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaeschke, R, Singer, J, Guyatt, GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10(4):407–415, 1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, GR, Sloan, JA, Wyrwich, KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, RH, Turk, DC, Wyrwich, KW, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 9(2):105–121, 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,National Cancer Institute, Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials. Report of the Clinical Trials Working Group of the National Cancer Advisory Board: restructuring the national cancer clinical trials enterprise. Available from: URL: http://restructuringtrials.cancer.gov/files/ctwg-report.pdf. Accessed Oct 2, 2009.Google Scholar
Minasian, LM, O'Mara, AM, Reeve, BB, et al. Health-related quality of life and symptom management research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol 25(32):5128–5132, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,National Cancer Institute, Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials. Restructuring the clinical trials enterprise: symptom management and health-related quality of life steering committee. Available from: URL: http://restructuringtrials.cancer.gov/steering-committees/symptom-management. Accessed Oct 2, 2009.Google Scholar
Casciato, DA. Cancer chemotherapeutic agents. In: Casciato, DA, ed. Manual of Clinical Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:49–101. Spiral Manual.Google Scholar
Abeloff, MD, Armitage, JO, Niederhuber, JE, Kastan, MB, McKenna, WG. Abeloff's Clinical Oncology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, 2008.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×