Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Series Foreword
- Preface to Cancer of the Ovary
- 1 Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer
- 2 The Pathological Features of Ovarian Neoplasia
- 3 Ovarian Cancer Screening
- 4 Surgical Management of Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- 5 Medical Treatment of Ovarian Carcinoma
- 6 Ultrasound in Ovarian Carcinoma
- 7 MR Imaging in Ovarian Cancer
- 8 CT in Carcinoma of the Ovary
- 9 PET and PET/CT in Ovarian Cancer
- Index
- Plate section
- References
6 - Ultrasound in Ovarian Carcinoma
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Series Foreword
- Preface to Cancer of the Ovary
- 1 Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer
- 2 The Pathological Features of Ovarian Neoplasia
- 3 Ovarian Cancer Screening
- 4 Surgical Management of Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- 5 Medical Treatment of Ovarian Carcinoma
- 6 Ultrasound in Ovarian Carcinoma
- 7 MR Imaging in Ovarian Cancer
- 8 CT in Carcinoma of the Ovary
- 9 PET and PET/CT in Ovarian Cancer
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
Ultrasound is the first imaging test used in most patients with an adnexal mass, and the great majority of adnexal masses are benign. Ultrasound has been shown to have a high sensitivity for detecting malignancy, but this is countered by a much lower specificity. In this chapter the ultrasonic features which suggest a malignant diagnosis and the wide differential diagnosis which often has to be considered are summarised. The performance of ultrasound in detecting malignancy in adnexal masses and its role in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer are then discussed.
Ultrasonic Technique
The patient's clinical presentation, age, menstrual status and CA125 level are all important factors influencing the differential diagnosis when the ultrasonic assessment is made.
Morphological Assessment
Most adnexal masses are assessed transvaginally because the resolution which can be obtained with high frequency transvaginal transducers (6–10 MHz) is superior to that obtained transabdominally, scanning at frequencies of 3–5 MHz. Transvaginal ultrasound is limited by a maximum depth of view of 5–6 cm and this makes it unsuitable for full examination of larger masses which have to be evaluated transabdominally. However, even when the mass is large, it is often worth doing a transvaginal examination because this allows high resolution visualisation of the inferior part of the mass and because it may be the only way to identify normal pelvic structures displaced by a large mass.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cancer of the Ovary , pp. 94 - 111Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
- 2
- Cited by