Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:04:49.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Intravital Microscopy to Visualize Invasion and Metastasis

from MODELS AND TOOLS FOR METASTASIS STUDIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Cristina Hidalgo-Carcedo  and
Erik Sahai
Edited by
David Lyden ,
Danny R. Welch  and
Bethan Psaila
Cristina Hidalgo-Carcedo
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, United Kingdom
Erik Sahai
Affiliation:
UK London Research Institute, United Kingdom
David Lyden
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Danny R. Welch
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Bethan Psaila
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Metastasis is a complex process involving the acquisition of cell motility, intravasation into blood and lymphatic vessels, survival in the vasculature, extravasation, and proliferation in the new tissue (Chambers et al. 2002). The study of metastasis has been hampered by several factors, however. In most studies, metastasis is evaluated by the presence of large metastases in fixed material. Although this is a reliable measure of the overall process, however, it provides little information about the various steps of the metastatic process.

Furthermore, metastasis usually happens in anatomical locations that are difficult to access, which makes observation of the various steps in the process difficult. This problem is compounded by the fact that relatively few cells from a primary tumor will form metastases. A typical metastatic primary tumor will contain tens of millions of cells but give rise to a much smaller number of metastases. Therefore, finding the small numbers of cells actually involved in the process of metastasizing is not straightforward. One approach to overcoming these problems is to perform high-resolution optical imaging of live tissue containing metastatic cancer cells, a technique called intravital imaging (Condeelis and Segall 2003; Sahai 2007).

This chapter describes how intravital imaging has contributed to our understanding of metastasis. The intravital imaging techniques that can be used to visualize events within tumors are introduced, followed by a discussion of the ways in which these techniques have provided new insights into the process of metastasis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cancer Metastasis
Biologic Basis and Therapeutics
 , pp. 40 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelkarim, M, Guenin, E et al. (2009) New symmetrically esterified m-bromobenzyl non-aminobisphosphonates inhibited breast cancer growth and metastases. PLoS ONE. 4(3): e4685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguirre-Ghiso, JA (2007) Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy. Nat Rev Cancer. 7(11): 834–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, F, Wyckoff, J et al. (2002) GFP expression in the mammary gland for imaging of mammary tumor cells in transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 62(24): 7166–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Al-Mehdi, AB, Tozawa, K et al. (2000) Intravascular origin of metastasis from the proliferation of endothelium-attached tumor cells: a new model for metastasis. Nat Med. 6(1): 100–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhowmick, NA, Neilson, EG et al. (2004) Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature. 432(7015): 332–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjerkvig, R, Tysnes, BB et al. (2005) Opinion: the origin of the cancer stem cell: current controversies and new insights. Nat Rev Cancer. 5(11): 899–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissonnas, A, Fetler, L et al. (2007) In vivo imaging of cytotoxic T cell infiltration and elimination of a solid tumor. J Exp Med. 204(2): 345–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouvet, M, Tsuji, K et al. (2006) In vivo color-coded imaging of the interaction of colon cancer cells and splenocytes in the formation of liver metastases. Cancer Res. 66(23): 11293–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouvet, M, Wang, J et al. (2002) Real-time optical imaging of primary tumor growth and multiple metastatic events in a pancreatic cancer orthotopic model. Cancer Res. 62(5): 1534–40.Google Scholar
Brown, E, McKee, T et al. (2003) Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation. Nat Med. 9(6): 796–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerer, E, Qazi, AA et al. (2004) Platelets, protease-activated receptors, and fibrinogen in hematogenous metastasis. Blood. 104(2): 397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, AF, Groom, AC et al. (2002) Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer. 2(8): 563–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, AF, MacDonald, IC et al. (1995) Steps in tumor metastasis: new concepts from intravital videomicroscopy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 14(4): 279–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, YS, di Tomaso, E et al. (2000) Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97(26): 14608–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condeelis, J, Pollard, JW (2006) Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. 124(2): 263–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condeelis, J, Segall, JE (2003) Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 3(12): 921–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Contag, CH, Jenkins, D et al. (2000) Use of reporter genes for optical measurements of neoplastic disease in vivo. Neoplasia. 2(1–2): 41–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coussens, LM, Fingleton, B et al. (2002) Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and cancer: trials and tribulations. Science 295(5564): 2387–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dadiani, M, Kalchenko, V et al. (2006) Real-time imaging of lymphogenic metastasis in orthotopic human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 66(16): 8037–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis MS, Jin et al. (2007) Imaging tumors with an albumin-binding Fab, a novel tumor-targeting agent. Cancer Res. 67(1): 254–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
di Tomaso, E, Capen, D et al. (2005) Mosaic tumor vessels: cellular basis and ultrastructure of focal regions lacking endothelial cell markers. Cancer Res. 65(13): 5740–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egeblad, M, Ewald, AJ et al. (2008) Visualizing stromal cell dynamics in different tumor microenvironments by spinning disk confocal microscopy. Dis Model Mech. 1(2–3): 155–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farina, KL, Wyckoff, JB et al. (1998) Cell motility of tumor cells visualized in living intact primary tumors using green fluorescent protein. Cancer Res. 58(12): 2528–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Folkman, J (2007) Angiogenesis: an organizing principle for drug discovery?Nat Rev Drug Discov. 6(4): 273–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukumura, D, Kashiwagi, S et al. (2006) The role of nitric oxide in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 6(7): 521–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukumura, D, Xavier, R et al. (1998) Tumor induction of VEGF promoter activity in stromal cells. Cell. 94(6): 715–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaggioli, C, Hooper, S et al. (2007) Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat Cell Biol. 9(12): 1392–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goswami, S, Sahai, E et al. (2005) Macrophages promote the invasion of breast carcinoma cells via a colony-stimulating factor-1/epidermal growth factor paracrine loop. Cancer Res. 65(12): 5278–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, GP, Nguyen, DX et al. (2007) Mediators of vascular remodelling co-opted for sequential steps in lung metastasis. Nature. 446(7137): 765–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, RM (2005) Advantages of multi-color fluorescent proteins for whole-body and in vivo cellular imaging. J Biomed Opt. 10(4): 41202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoshida, T, Isaka, N et al. (2006) Imaging steps of lymphatic metastasis reveals that vascular endothelial growth factor-C increases metastasis by increasing delivery of cancer cells to lymph nodes: therapeutic implications. Cancer Res. 66(16): 8065–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, JN, Muller, WJ (2000) Transgenic mouse models of human breast cancer. Oncogene. 19(53): 6130–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Im JH, Fu W et al. (2004). Coagulation facilitates tumor cell spreading in the pulmonary vasculature during early metastatic colony formation. Cancer Res. 64(23): 8613–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, S, Nakanishi, H et al. (2001) Real-time observation of micrometastasis formation in the living mouse liver using a green fluorescent protein gene-tagged rat tongue carcinoma cell line. Int J Cancer. 93(2): 212–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Y, He, W et al. (2005) Breast cancer bone metastasis mediated by the Smad tumor suppressor pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102(39): 13909–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Y, Siegel, PM et al. (2003) A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell. 3(6): 537–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, RN, Riba, RD et al. (2005) VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature. 438(7069): 820–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kedrin, D, Gligorijevic, B et al. (2008) Intravital imaging of metastatic behavior through a mammary imaging window. Nat Methods. 5(12): 1019–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, JW, Wong, CW et al. (2004) Rapid apoptosis in the pulmonary vasculature distinguishes non-metastatic from metastatic melanoma cells. Cancer Lett. 213(2): 203–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, EY, Nguyen, AV et al. (2001) Colony-stimulating factor 1 promotes progression of mammary tumors to malignancy. J Exp Med. 193(6): 727–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makale, M (2007) Intravital imaging and cell invasion. Methods Enzymol. 426: 375–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mancuso, M, Gallo, D et al. (2009) Modulation of basal and squamous cell carcinoma by endogenous estrogen in mouse models of skin cancer. Carcinogenesis. 30(2): 340–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElroy, M, Kaushal, S et al. (2008) Color-coded imaging of splenocyte-pancreatic cancer cell interactions in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Cycle. 7(18): 2916–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montet, X, Ntziachristos, V et al. (2005) Tomographic fluorescence mapping of tumor targets. Cancer Res. 65(14): 6330–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mrass, P, Takano, H et al. (2006) Random migration precedes stable target cell interactions of tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Exp Med. 203(12): 2749–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naumov, GN, Folkman, J et al. (2008) Tumor-vascular interactions and tumor dormancy. APMIS 116(7–8): 569–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naumov, GN, MacDonald, IC et al. (2002) Persistence of solitary mammary carcinoma cells in a secondary site: a possible contributor to dormancy. Cancer Res. 62(7): 2162–8.Google Scholar
Olson, MF, Sahai, E (2009) The actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell motility. Clin Exp Metastasis. 26(4): 273–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palumbo, JS, Kombrinck, KW et al. (2000) Fibrinogen is an important determinant of the metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells. Blood. 96(10): 3302–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Peled, A, Kollet, O et al. (2000) The chemokine SDF-1 activates the integrins LFA-1, VLA-4, and VLA-5 on immature human CD34(+) cells: role in transendothelial/stromal migration and engraftment of NOD/SCID mice. Blood. 95(11): 3289–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Perentes, JY, McKee, TD et al. (2009) In vivo imaging of extracellular matrix remodeling by tumor-associated fibroblasts. Nat Methods. 6(2): 143–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippar, U, Roussos, ET et al. (2008) A Mena invasion isoform potentiates EGF-induced carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis. Dev Cell. 15(6): 813–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provenzano, PP, Eliceiri, KW et al. (2006) Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion. BMC Med. 4(1): 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiu, H, Orr, FW et al. (2003) Arrest of B16 melanoma cells in the mouse pulmonary microcirculation induces endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent nitric oxide release that is cytotoxic to the tumor cells. Am J Pathol. 162(2): 403–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahai, E (2007) Illuminating the metastatic process. Nat Rev Cancer. 7(10): 737–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahai, E, Wyckoff, J et al. (2005) Simultaneous imaging of GFP, CFP and collagen in tumors in vivo using multiphoton microscopy. BMC Biotechnol. 5: 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanz-Moreno, V, Gadea, G et al. (2008) Rac activation and inactivation control plasticity of tumor cell movement. Cell. 135(3): 510–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serrels, A, Timpson, P, et al. (2009) Real-time study of E-cadherin and membrane dynamics in living animals: implications for disease modeling and drug development. Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 1;69(7):2714–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, K, Hingtgen, S et al. (2008). Bimodal viral vectors and in vivo imaging reveal the fate of human neural stem cells in experimental glioma model. J Neurosci. 28(17): 4406–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaner, NC, Steinbach, PA et al. (2005) A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods. 2(12): 905–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sipkins, DA, Wei, X et al. (2005) In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature. 435(7044): 969–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockholm, D, Bartoli, M et al. (2005) Imaging calpain protease activity by multiphoton FRET in living mice. J Mol Biol. 346(1): 215–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuji, K, Yamauchi, K et al. (2006) Dual-color imaging of nuclear-cytoplasmic dynamics, viability, and proliferation of cancer cells in the portal vein area. Cancer Res. 66(1): 303–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varghese, HJ, Mackenzie, LT et al. (2004) In vivo videomicroscopy reveals differential effects of the vascular-targeting agent ZD6126 and the anti-angiogenic agent ZD6474 on vascular function in a liver metastasis model. Angiogenesis. 7(2): 157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H, Fu, W et al. (2004) Tumor cell alpha3beta1 integrin and vascular laminin-5 mediate pulmonary arrest and metastasis. J Cell Biol. 164(6): 935–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W, Mouneimne, G et al. (2006) The activity status of cofilin is directly related to invasion, intravasation, and metastasis of mammary tumors. J Cell Biol. 173(3): 395–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissleder, R, Tung, CH et al. (1999) In vivo imaging of tumors with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes. Nat Biotechnol. 17(4): 375–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, S, Kay, SA (1997) Reporter gene expression for monitoring gene transfer. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 8(5): 617–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, S. (1958) Pathogenesis of metastasis formation observed in vivo in the rabbit ear chamber. AMA Arch Pathol. 66(4): 550–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Wyckoff, J, Wang, W et al. (2004) A paracrine loop between tumor cells and macrophages is required for tumor cell migration in mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 64(19): 7022–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyckoff, JB, Jones, JG et al. (2000) A critical step in metastasis: in vivo analysis of intravasation at the primary tumor. Cancer Res. 60(9): 2504–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Wyckoff, JB, Pinner, SE et al. (2006) ROCK- and myosin-dependent matrix deformation enables protease-independent tumor-cell invasion in vivo. Curr Biol. 16(15): 1515–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyckoff, JB, Wang, Y et al. (2007) Direct visualization of macrophage-assisted tumor cell intravasation in mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 67(6): 2649–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xue, C, Wyckoff, J et al. (2006) Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression results in increased tumor cell motility in vivo coordinately with enhanced intravasation and metastasis. Cancer Res. 66(1): 192–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, M, Baranov, E et al. (2000) Whole-body optical imaging of green fluorescent protein-expressing tumors and metastases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(3): 1206–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, M, Li, L, et al. (2003) Dual-color fluorescence imaging distinguishes tumor cells from induced host angiogenic vessels and stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(24): 14259–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zipfel, WR, Williams, RM et al. (2003) Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat Biotechnol. 21(11): 1369–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×