Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Preface
- 1 What We Are Studying, Why, and How
- 2 Roots of the Current Diversity Debates
- 3 Our Conjoint Experiments
- 4 What Students Think: Results across All Students
- 5 How Attitudes Differ across Groups
- 6 How Preferences Differ by Political Beliefs
- 7 What about When All Else Is Not Equal?
- 8 How Student Attitudes Differ from Faculty Attitudes
- 9 Evidence from Other Cases
- 10 What Do the Results Mean?
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - Our Conjoint Experiments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2019
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Preface
- 1 What We Are Studying, Why, and How
- 2 Roots of the Current Diversity Debates
- 3 Our Conjoint Experiments
- 4 What Students Think: Results across All Students
- 5 How Attitudes Differ across Groups
- 6 How Preferences Differ by Political Beliefs
- 7 What about When All Else Is Not Equal?
- 8 How Student Attitudes Differ from Faculty Attitudes
- 9 Evidence from Other Cases
- 10 What Do the Results Mean?
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Fully randomized conjoint analysis can mitigate many of the shortcomings of traditional survey methods in estimating attitudes on controversial topics. This chapter explains how we applied conjoint analysis at seven universities and describes the population of participants in our experiments.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Campus DiversityThe Hidden Consensus, pp. 45 - 67Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019