Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T21:00:45.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1.35 - Sahul and Near Oceania in the Pleistocene

from IV. - The Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Peter White
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Colin Renfrew
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Sahul is the name given to a continent that, until ten thousand years ago, encompassed the modern islands of New Guinea, Australia and Tasmania and various much smaller islands, which were then hills. Fifty thousand years ago, which is about the time humans arrived, it stretched from the Equator to the Roaring Forties (43° S) (http://sahultime.monash.edu.au). Off its shores to the east of New Guinea were the large high tropical islands of Near Oceania: the Bismarck Archipelago and the Solomons. All these lands could be reached only by sea voyages, the first of which, to Sahul, included crossings of more than 20 km. This “colonisation – is itself evidence for the existence of complex information exchange systems, planning depth and symbolic conceptualization” (Balme et al. 2009: 59). In other words, the organisation of building a boat and voyaging between islands is a clear hallmark of a modern human culture.

Although precise links have not yet been made, there is little doubt that people arrived by travelling through the Indonesian chain of islands, which were never all joined together by a land-bridge. These islands are generally called Wallacea, the area where both Southeast Asian and Sahulian animals and plants are found, forming a gradational link between the two areas. In this region, we have to assume boats of some kind were used, probably as part of peoples’ day-to-day existence. What these boats might have been has been the subject of considerable speculation, with bamboo rafts, perhaps with a simple sail, being among the favourites. With many of the islands intervisible, and sea crossings shorter than today’s because of lower sea levels, the arrival in Sahul of some Homo sapiens used to exploiting coastal and littoral resources seems almost inevitable.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, H. & Holdaway, S. 2009. The archaeology of Mungo and the Willandra Lakes: looking back, looking forward. Archaeology in Oceania 44: 96–106.Google Scholar
Allen, H., Holdaway, S., Fanning, P. & Littleton, J. 2008. Footprints in the sand: appraising the archaeology of the Willandra Lakes, western New South Wales, Australia. Antiquity 82: 11–24.Google Scholar
Allen, J. and O’Connell, J. 2003. The long and short of it: archaeological approaches to determining when humans first colonised Australia and New Guinea. Australian Archaeology 57: 5–19.Google Scholar
Balme, J. 1995. 30,000 years of fishery in western New South Wales. Archaeology in Oceania 30: 1–21.Google Scholar
Balme, J., Davidson, I., McDonald, J., Stern, N. & Veth, P. 2009. Symbolic behaviour and the peopling of the southern arc route to Australia. Quaternary International 202: 59–68.Google Scholar
Birdsell, J. B. 1953. Some environmental and cultural factors influencing the structuring of Australian Aboriginal populations. American Naturalist 87: 171–207.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C., Smith, B. & Taçon, P. S. C. 2000. Visions of dynamic power: archaic rock-paintings, altered states of consciousness and “Clever Men” in western Arnhem Land (NT), Australia. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 10: 63–101.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, R. 1999. Forty-two degrees south: the archaeology of Late Pleistocene Tasmania. Journal of World Prehistory 13: 357–402.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, R. & Allen, J. 2001. Prey choice and hunting strategies in the Late Pleistocene: evidence from Southwest Tasmania, pp. 397–430 in (Anderson, A., Lilley, I. & O’Connor, S., eds.) Histories of Old Ages. Pandanus Books, Australian National University: Canberra.
Denham, T., Fullagar, R. & Head, L. 2009. Plant exploitation on Sahul: from colonization to the emergence of regional specialization during the Holocene. Quaternary International 202: 29–40.Google Scholar
Field, J., Fullagar, R., & Lord, G. 2001. A large area archaeological excavation at Cuddie Springs. Antiquity 75: 696–702.Google Scholar
Fullagar, R., Field, J. & Kealhofer, L. 2008. Grinding stones and seeds of change: starch and phytoliths as evidence for plant food processing, pp. 159–72 in (Rowan, Y. M. & Ebeling, J. R., eds.) New Approaches to Old Stones. Equinox: London.
Fullagar, R. & Jones, R. 2004. Usewear and residue analysis of stone artifacts from the Enclosed Chamber, Rocky Cape, Tasmania. Archaeology in Oceania 39: 79–93.Google Scholar
Gilligan, I. 2007. Resisting the cold in Ice Age Tasmania: thermal environment and settlement strategies. Antiquity 81: 555–68.Google Scholar
Gilligan, I. & Bulbeck, D. 2007. Environment and morphology in Australian Aborigines: a re-analysis of the Birdsell database. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 134: 75–91.Google Scholar
Golson, J. 2001. New Guinea, Australia and the Sahul Connection, pp. 185–210 in (Anderson, A., Lilley, I. & O’Connor, S., eds.) Histories of Old Ages. Pandanus Books, Australian National University: Canberra.
Griffiths, T. 1996. Hunters and Collectors. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Hapgood, P. J. & Franklin, N. R. 2008. A revolution that didn’t arrive: a review of Pleistocene Sahul. Journal of Human Evolution 55: 187–222.Google Scholar
Hiscock, P. 2008. Archaeology of Ancient Australia. Routledge: London.
Hope, G. 2009. Environmental change and fire in the Own Stanley Ranges, Papua New Guinea. Quaternary Science Reviews 8: 2261–2276.Google Scholar
Hughes, I. 1978. Good money and bad: inflation and devaluation in the colonial process. Mankind 11: 308–18.Google Scholar
Lourandos, H. 1997. Continent of Hunter-Gatherers. Cambridge University Press: Melbourne.
Mulvaney, D. J. 1990. Prehistory and Heritage: The Writings of John Mulvaney. Occasional Papers in Prehistory 17. Department of Prehistory, Australian National University: Canberra.
Mulvaney, D. J. & Joyce, E. B. 1965. Archaeological and geomorphological invistigations on Mt. Moffatt Station, Queensland, Australia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 31: 147–212.Google Scholar
O’Connell, J. & Allen, J. 2007. Pre-LGM Sahul (Pleistocene Australia–New Guinea) and the Archaeology of Early Modern Humans, pp. 395–410 in (Mellars, P., Boyle, K., Bar-Yosef, O. & Stringer, C., eds.) Rethinking the Human Revolution. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Pardoe, C. 2006. Becoming Australian: evolutionary processes and biological variation from ancient to modern times. Before Farming. Available at .
Robertson, G., Attenbrow, V. & Hiscock, P. 2009. Multiple uses for Australian backed artefacts. Antiquity 83: 296–308.Google Scholar
Summerhayes, G. R., Leavesley, M., Fairbairn, A., Mandui, H., Field, J., Ford, A. & Fullagar, R. 2010. Human adaptation and plant use in highland New Guinea 49,000 to 44,000 years ago. Science 330: 78–81.Google Scholar
Torrence, R. & Barton, H. 2006. Ancient Starch Research. Left Coast Press: Walnut Creek, CA.
White, J. P. 2004. Where the wild things are: prehistoric animal transportation in the Circum New Guinea Archipelago, pp. 147–66 in (Fitzpatrick, S. M., ed.) Voyages of Discovery. The Archaeology of Islands. Praeger: Westport, CT.
Wroe, S. & Field, J. 2006. A review of the evidence for a human role in the extinction of Australian megafauna and an alternative explanation. Quaternary Science Reviews 25: 2692–2703.Google Scholar
Wroe, S., Field, J., Fullagar, R. & Jermin, L. S. 2004. Megafaunal extinctions in the Late Quaternary and the global overkill hypothesis. Alcheringa 28: 291–331.Google Scholar
Yen, D. E. 1996. Melanesian arboriculture: historical perspectives with emphasis on the genus Canarium, pp. 36–44 in (Stevens, M. L., Bourke, R. M. & Evans, B. R., eds.) South Pacific Indigenous Nuts. Australian Centre for Indigenous Agricultural Research: Canberra.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×