Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- General Introduction
- 1 ALBERT THE GREAT: Questions on Book X of the Ethics
- 2 BONAVENTURE: Conscience and Synderesis
- 3 GILES OF ROME: On the Rule of Princes (selections)
- 4 PETER OF AUVERGNE: Commentary and Questions on Book III of Aristotle's Politics (selections)
- 5 HENRY OF GHENT: Is It Rational for Someone without Hope of a Future Life to Choose to Die for the Commonwealth?
- 6 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Does a Human Being Following the Dictates of Natural Reason Have to Judge that He Ought to Love God More than Himself?
- 7 JAMES OF VITERBO: Does a Human Being Have a Greater Natural Love for God than for Himself, or Vice Versa?
- 8 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Reply to James of Viterbo on Love of God and Self
- 9 HENRY OF GHENT: Is a Subject Bound to Obey a Statute When It Is Not Evident that It Promotes the Common Utility?
- 10 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Are Subjects Bound to Pay a Tax When the Need for It Is Not Evident?
- 11 JAMES OF VITERBO: Is It Better to Be Ruled by the Best Man than by the Best Laws?
- 12 JOHN OF NAPLES: Should a Christian King Use Unbelievers to Defend His Kingdom?
- 13 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: Using and Enjoying
- 14 AUGUSTINE OF ANCONA: Summa on Ecclesiastical Power (selections)
- 15 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: Is an Errant Individual Bound to Recant at the Rebuke of a Superior?
- 16 JEAN BURIDAN: Questions on Book X of the Ethics
- 17 JOHN WYCLIF: On Civil Lordship (selections)
- Index
5 - HENRY OF GHENT: Is It Rational for Someone without Hope of a Future Life to Choose to Die for the Commonwealth?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- General Introduction
- 1 ALBERT THE GREAT: Questions on Book X of the Ethics
- 2 BONAVENTURE: Conscience and Synderesis
- 3 GILES OF ROME: On the Rule of Princes (selections)
- 4 PETER OF AUVERGNE: Commentary and Questions on Book III of Aristotle's Politics (selections)
- 5 HENRY OF GHENT: Is It Rational for Someone without Hope of a Future Life to Choose to Die for the Commonwealth?
- 6 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Does a Human Being Following the Dictates of Natural Reason Have to Judge that He Ought to Love God More than Himself?
- 7 JAMES OF VITERBO: Does a Human Being Have a Greater Natural Love for God than for Himself, or Vice Versa?
- 8 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Reply to James of Viterbo on Love of God and Self
- 9 HENRY OF GHENT: Is a Subject Bound to Obey a Statute When It Is Not Evident that It Promotes the Common Utility?
- 10 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Are Subjects Bound to Pay a Tax When the Need for It Is Not Evident?
- 11 JAMES OF VITERBO: Is It Better to Be Ruled by the Best Man than by the Best Laws?
- 12 JOHN OF NAPLES: Should a Christian King Use Unbelievers to Defend His Kingdom?
- 13 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: Using and Enjoying
- 14 AUGUSTINE OF ANCONA: Summa on Ecclesiastical Power (selections)
- 15 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: Is an Errant Individual Bound to Recant at the Rebuke of a Superior?
- 16 JEAN BURIDAN: Questions on Book X of the Ethics
- 17 JOHN WYCLIF: On Civil Lordship (selections)
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Henry of Ghent was born around 1217. He taught at Paris as a secular master in the Faculty of Theology from 1276 until his death in 1293. As a member of Stephen Tempier's commission of inquiry, he helped determine the 219 articles in theology and natural philosophy which were censured by the bishop in 1277. Henry's own particular fusion of Augustinian metaphysics and Aristotelian epistemology has left modern commentators both intrigued and perturbed by the tensions which such a combination produced. The core of Henry's teaching has been preserved in two major works, the Summa quaestionum ordinarium and a collection of fifteen Quaestiones quodlibetales. The quodlibet is the genre of academic inquiry which offers perhaps the most direct insight both into issues of contemporary intellectual concern and into a regent master's own opinions. Originally a penitential exercise at Easter and Christmas each year, it required a master to respond to a question on ‘any’ subject (de quolibet) and was often used to put him on the spot. Quodlibets can thus provide an index of those contentious issues which were dividing theologians at any given moment. In Henry's case, for example, this form of disputation provided the forum for his exchanges with Giles of Rome and Godfrey of Fontaines over the nature of the distinction between essence and existence. Henry's quodlibets also provide a commentary on issues of directly political and ethical import, such as the debate over the privileges of the mendicant orders, opposition to royal taxation, the connection between the moral and theological virtues, and the relationship between the individual good and the common good.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts , pp. 257 - 270Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000