Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:27:06.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - HENRY OF GHENT: Is a Subject Bound to Obey a Statute When It Is Not Evident that It Promotes the Common Utility?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Arthur Stephen McGrade
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
John Kilcullen
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney
Matthew Kempshall
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

(For information on Henry of Ghent's life and writings, see the introduction to Translation 5.)

Thirteenth-century scholastic political and ethical thought stands in a direct and continuous line of tradition with the moral and pastoral theology of the twelfth-century schools. The academic milieu which had inspired the decrees of the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215 also provided the training and the personnel which subsequently put its reforms into practice. From Robert Grosseteste onwards, there was thus an intimate connection between the teaching of Aristotle's Ethics in Paris and the provision of effective pastoral care through sermons and confession. The effects of such a direct engagement with pressing social, ecclesiological, and political concerns can be traced throughout the quodlibetic questions determined by Parisian masters. Two issues stand out as having a particular relevance to political thought: first, the longstanding tension between secular clergy (that is, clergy who did not belong to a religious order) and the mendicant orders (that is, Dominicans and Franciscans); second, the imposition of taxes by the Capetian kings of France and by successive popes in Rome.

Hostility between secular and mendicant masters within the University at Paris was the source of acrimonious controversies in the 1250s and 1270s. In 1281, Martin IV issued Ad fructus uberes, a bull which granted privileges to mendicant friars and, in the process, appeared to dispense them from the statutes passed by the Fourth Lateran Council.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×