Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T01:07:41.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

T

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 521 - 552
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Carriero, J. (2005). Spinoza on final causality. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 2, 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1999). Teleological explanation in Spinoza and early modern philosophy. In Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists (pp. 310–35). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2018). Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2018). Spinoza’s unorthodox theory of the will. In Rocca, M. Della (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 343–69). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, M. (2006). Teleology and human action in Spinoza. Philosophical Review, 115(3), 317–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, R. (2002). Spinoza, thoughtful teleology, and the causal significance of content. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 182–209). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2011). Spinoza on human purposiveness and mental causation. History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis, 14, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Kisner, M. J. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge University Press. Chapter 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press. Chapter 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (1994). Spinoza, l’expérience et l’éternité. PUF. Part 2, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear Cambridge University Press. Chapter 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Israel, J. (2001). Radical Enlightenment. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y., and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.). (2010). Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2011). A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2003). Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise: Exploring ‘the Will of God’. Ashgate.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, M.. Zone.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2015). Spinoza’s Cartesian dualism in the Korte Verhandeling. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making, 121–32. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2017). The indiscernibility of identicals and the transitivity of identity in Spinoza’s logic of the attributes. In Garrett, , Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 263–92). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1974). Hegel’s Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F.. Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2021). Spinoza on the limits of explanation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 103, 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joachim, H. (1901). A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. (1940). Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2014). Descartes’ dualism and its relation to Spinoza’s metaphysics. In Cunning, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations (pp. 277–98). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shein, N. (2009). The false dichotomy between subjective and objective interpretations of Spinoza’s theory of attributes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17, 505–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, H. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning. 2 vols. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Donagan, A. (1973). Spinoza’s proof of immortality. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 241–58). Anchor.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2005). ‘A free man thinks of nothing less than death’: Spinoza on the eternity of the mind. In Mercer, C. and O’Neill, E. (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics (pp. 103–18). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2009). Spinoza on the essence of body and the part of the mind that is eternal. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 284–302). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1973). Spinoza’s Letter on the Infinite. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 182–212). Anchor.Google Scholar
Kneale, M. (1973). Eternity and sempiternity. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 227–40). Anchor.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2006). Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelorentzos, Y. (1996). Temps, durée et éternité dans les Principes de la philosophie de Descartes. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. M. (2015). Spinoza on eternity and duration: The 1663 connection. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 105–20). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, H. A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning. 2 vols. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (2017). From Augustine to Locke and Spinoza: Answering the Christian case against religious liberty. In Speight, C. A. and Zank, M. (eds.), Politics, Religion and Political Theology (pp. 19–37). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, J. (1997). The intellectual debate about toleration in the Dutch Republic. In Berkvens-Stevelinck, C., Israel, J., and Posthumus Meyjes, G. H. M. (eds.), The Emergence of Tolerance in the Dutch Republic (pp. 3–36). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theological-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2018). Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2001). Tolerance as a virtue in Spinoza’s Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 34(4), 535–57.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2003). Spinoza’s republican argument for tolerance. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), 320–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2010). Spinoza’s curious defense of toleration. In Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.), The Cambridge Critical Guide to Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise (pp. 210–30). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zagorin, P. (2013). How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Garrett, D. (2018). Truth and ideas of imagination in the Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione. In Garrett, , Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 151–75). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015). On the significance of formal causes in Spinoza’s philosophy. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 97(2), 196–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joachim, H. (1940). Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1994). Aporias and the origins of Spinoza’s theory of adequate ideas. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind (pp. 129–58). Brill.Google Scholar
Mignini, F. (1979). Per la datazione e l’interpretzione del Tractatus de intellectus emendatione di B. Spinoza. La Cultura, 17, 87–160.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2015). The problem of true ideas in Spinoza’s Treatise. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 52–65). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shein, N. (2018). The road to finite modes in Spinoza’s Ethics. In Nachtomy, O. and Winegar, R. (eds.), Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 97–114). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Fraenkel, C. (2018). Spinoza’s philosophy of religion. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 377–407). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2022). Spinoza’s philosophical religion. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 335–53). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagrée, J. (1991). La raison ardente: Religion naturelle et raison au XVIIe siècle. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (2011). Philosophie et religion chez Spinoza. In Matheron, , Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’âge Classique (pp. 389–406). ENS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2011). A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Curley, E. (1994). Spinoza on truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1990). Truth, method, and correspondence in Spinoza and Leibniz. Studia Spinozana, 6, 13–43. Repr. in 2018 in Garrett, Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 176–98). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. (1901). A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2016). Early modern theories of truth. In Glanzberg, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Truth (pp. 75–92). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perler, D. (2018). Spinoza on skepticism. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 220–39). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (1985). Spinoza and the coherence theory of truth. Mind, 94(373), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Kulstad, M. (2002). Leibniz, Spinoza and Tschirnhaus: Metaphysics à trois, 1675–76. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 221–40). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2011). A conjecture about a textual mystery: Leibniz, Tschirnhaus and Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling. Leibniz Review, 20, 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pätzold, D. (1999). Ist Tschirnhaus’ Medicina mentis ein Ableger von Spinozas Methodologie? In Nauta, L. and Vanderjagt, A. (eds.), Between Demonstration and Imagination: Essays in the History of Science and Philosophy Presented to John D. North (pp. 339–64). Brill.Google Scholar
van Peursen, C. A. (1993). E. W. von Tschirnhaus and the Ars inveniendi. Journal of the History of Ideas, 54(3), 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurtz, J.-P. (1981). Tschirnhaus und die Spinozismusbeschuldigung: Die Polemik mit Christian Thomasius. Studia Leibnitiana, 13(1), 61–75.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • T
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • T
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • T
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×