Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T00:33:40.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

134. - Negation and Privation

from N

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

By
Martin Lenz
Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Negation is often taken as a logical operation in statements. We can negate by stating that something is not the case or that something is not or not thus and so. In various philosophical traditions, however, negation can be seen not only as a logical (or psychological or linguistic) operation, but also as a metaphysical determinant. Spinoza’s understanding of negation invokes all these aspects.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 387 - 388
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Hübner, K. (2015). Spinoza on negation, mind-dependence, and reality of the finite. In Melame, Y. d (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 221–37). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012). ‘Omnis determinatio est negatio’: Determination, negation, and self-negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel. In Förster, E. and Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 175–96). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winkler, S. (2016). The problem of generation and destruction in Spinoza’s system. Journal of Early Modern Philosophy, 5(1), 89–113.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×