Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T01:06:07.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 105 - 132
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Blom, H. (1995). Morality and Causality in Politics: The Rise of Naturalism in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Political Thought. CIP Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (2019). The rise of democratic republicanism. In Israel, , The Enlightenment that Failed: Ideas, Revolution, and Democratic Defeat. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weststeijn, A. (2012). Commercial Republicanism in the Dutch Golden Age: The Political Thought of Johan and Pieter de la Court. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical Philosophy, trans. R. Hurley. City Lights.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. M. Joughin. Zone.Google Scholar
Gatens, M. (1996). Through a Spinozist lens: Ethology, difference, power. In Patton, P. (ed.), Deleuze: A Critical Reader (pp. 162–87). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Macherey, P. (1996). The encounter with Spinoza. In Patton, P. (ed.), Deleuze: A Critical Reader (pp. 139–61). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sauvagnargues, A., and Sévérac, P. (eds.). (2016). Spinoza-Deleuze: Lectures croisées. ENS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Balibar, E. (1998). Spinoza and Politics. Verso.Google Scholar
Blom, H. W. (1995). Morality and Causality in Politics: The Rise of Naturalism in Dutch Seventeenth-Century Political Thought. CIP Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek.Google Scholar
Feuer, L. (1987). Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism. New edn. Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Prokhovnik, R. (1997). From democracy to aristocracy: Spinoza, reason and politics. History of European Ideas, 23(2–4), 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugnier-Pollet, L. (1976). La philosophie politique de Spinoza. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1997). The theoretical function of democracy in Spinoza and Hobbes. In Montag, W. and Stolze, T. (eds.), The New Spinoza (pp. 171–207). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sacksteder, W. (2001). Communal orders in Spinoza. In Lloyd, G. (ed.), Spinoza: Critical Assessments (pp. 20–38). Routledge.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Baier, A. (2014). The Meditations and Descartes’ considered conception of God. In Cunning, D. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations (pp. 299–305). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, A. (1997). Descartes’s ontology of thought. Topoi, 16, 163–78.Google Scholar
Nelson, A.(2014). Descartes’ dualism and its relation to Spinoza’s metaphysics. In Cunning, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations (pp. 277–98). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shein, N. (2020). Spinning strands into aspects: Realism, idealism, and finite modes in Spinoza. European Journal of Philosophy, 28, 323–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1978). Descartes. Routledge.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bolton, M. Brandt. (1985). Spinoza on Cartesian doubt. Noûs, 19, 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1977). Spinoza as expositor of Descartes. In Hessing, S. (ed.), Speculum Spinozanum: 1677–1977 (pp. 133–42). Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gilson, E. (1923). Spinoza interprète de Descartes. Chronicon Spinozanum, 3, 68–87.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1960). Le cogito et l’ordre des axioms métaphysiques dans le Principia philosophiæ cartesianæ de Spinoza. Archives de Philosophie, 23, 171–85.Google Scholar
Hubbeling, H. G. (1980). Spinoza comme précurseur du reconstructivisme logique dans son livre sur Descartes. Studia Liebnitiana, 12, 88–95.Google Scholar
Lécrivain, A. (1978). Spinoza et la physique cartésienne. Cahiers Spinoza, 2, 93–206.Google Scholar
Sibilia, G. (2014). El itinerario de Spinoza en 1663: Algunos problemas relativos a la temporalidad en Los principios de filosofía de Descartes, Los pensamientos metafísicos, y la ‘Carta sobre el infinito’. Praxis filosofíco, 38, 27–51.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

LeBuffe, M. (2009). The anatomy of the passions. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 188–222). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (1998). Explaining the passions: Passions, desires, and the explanation of action. In Gaukroger, S. (ed.), The Soft Underbelly of Reason: The Passions in the Seventeenth Century. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kisner, M. (2010). Perfection and desire: Spinoza on the good. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2016). Affect, desire, and judgement in Spinoza’s account of motivation. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2007). Spinoza’s theory of motivation. Pacific PhilosophicalQuarterly, 88, 375–90.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Gabbey, A. (1980). Force and inertia in the seventeenth century: Descartes and Newton. In Gaukroger, S. (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics (pp. 230–320). Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012). ‘Omnis determinatio est negatio’: Determination, negation, and self-negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel.” In Förster, E. & Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 175–96). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2015). The ontology of determination, from Descartes to Spinoza. Science in Context, 28(4), 515–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shein, N. (2018). Not wholly finite: The dual aspects of modes in Spinoza. Philosophia, 46(2), 433–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carlisle, C. (2021). Spinoza’s Religion: A New Reading of the Ethics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2003). Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise: Exploring ‘the Will of God’. Routledge.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. M. (1973). Spinoza’s moral philosophy. In Greene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 354–76). University Of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2018). Spinoza on Reason. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2012). Spinoza and natural law. In Jacobs, J. A. (ed.), Reason, Religion and Natural Law (pp. 201–21). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2018). Reconceiving Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. (2008). Spinoza and the dictates of reason. Inquiry, 51(4), 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2014). “Following a recta ratio vivendi.” In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 178–96). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Diderot, D. (1751–65). “Droit naturel” and “Spinosiste.” In Diderot, D. and d’Alembert, J. (eds.), Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers (vols. v, xv). 17 vols. Briasson.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (2011). Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, D. L. (2015). Spinoza and the general will. In Farr, J. and Williams, D. L. (eds.), The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept (pp. 115–46). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. T. (2014). Epigenesis and/as Spinozism in Diderot’s biological project. In Nachtomy, O. and Smith, J. (eds.), The Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 181–201). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

van Bunge, W. (2001). From Stevin to Spinoza: An Essay on Philosophy in the Seventeenth-Century Dutch Republic. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. X. (2015). Spinoza and Dutch Cartesianism: Philosophy and Theology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. M. (2017). Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strazzoni, A. (2018). Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science: From Regius to ‘s Gravesande. De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, T. (1992). Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesian Philosophy, 1637–1650. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Verbeek, T. (1999). Spinoza and Cartesianism. In Coudert, A. P., Hutton, S., Popkin, R. H., and Weiner, G. M. (eds.), Judaeo-Christian Intellectual Culture in the Seventeenth Century: A Celebration of the Library of Narcissus Marsh (1638–1713) (pp. 173–84). Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2003). Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise: Exploring “The Will of God.” Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • D
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • D
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • D
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×