The Russian eighteenth-century odists quarreled about virtually every aspect of versification and poetic language, but they were unanimous in their conviction that poetry was a noble endeavor that deserved the attention of a cultivated public. They attempted to codify their views in treatises so that a sufficiently educated individual, by following their clearly defined rules, could become a poet. The greatest impediment to poetry was a lack of knowledge, for nothing of worth could be produced by an unenlightened mind. Such presuppositions ensured that these poets dismissed the Russian folkloric tradition as crude and barbaric. Even the exceptional and eccentric Trediakovsky, who made the exaggerated (and largely inaccurate) claim in a treatise of 1735 that his versification system was based on native folklore, did not dispute these unschooled poets' “lack of skill.” More to the point, his statement was so out of keeping with the general sentiment of the time and provoked such derision among his contemporaries that Trediakovsky himself omitted it when he republished his treatise in a “corrected” version.

Throughout the eighteenth century, then, folklore – to the extent that it attracted attention at all – existed on the periphery of serious poetry.