Amossy, Ruth. 1989. “Types ou stéréotypes? Les ‘Physiologies’ et la littérature industrielle” [Types or Stereotypes? The “Physiologies” and Industrial Literature], Romantisme, No. 64: 113–23.Google Scholar

Annenkov, P. V. 1983. “Pis’ma iz-za granitsy” [Letters from Abroad]. In Parizhskie pis’ma [Parisian Letters], ed. Konobeevskaia, I. N. . Nauka, 5–83.Google Scholar

Anon. 1843 .“Literaturnaia letopis’” [Literary Chronicle]. Biblioteka dlia chteniia [Library for Reading], no. 57, Мarch-April, Section VI, p. 16.Google Scholar

Avermaete, Tom, Karakayali, Serhat, and von Osten, Marion, eds. 2010. Black Dog Publishing.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1975. “Epos i roman: O metodologii issledovaniia romana” [Epic and Novel: On the Methodology of Researching the Novel]. Voprosy literatury i èstetiki: Issledovaniia raznykh let [Questions of Literature and Aesthetics: Investigations from Various Years]. Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 447–83.Google Scholar

Balzac, Honoré de. 1938. “Physiologie gastronomique” [Gastronomical Physiology]. In Oeuvres complètes [Complete Works], Vol. 39 . Conard.Google Scholar

Balzac, Honoré de 1840. “Avant-propos à la Comédie humaine” [Foreword to the Human Comedy]. In La Comédie humaine [The Human Comedy]. Vol. I. Gallimard.Google Scholar

Bater, James H. 1984. “The Soviet City: Continuity and Change in Privilege and Place.” In The City in Cultural Context, ed. Agnew, John, Mercer, John, and Sopher, David. Allen and Unwin, 134–62.Google Scholar

Batiushkov, Konstantin. 1934. “Progulka po Moskve.” In Sochineniia. Academia, 297–309.Google Scholar

Batiushkov, Konstantin. 1977. “Progulka v Akademiiu khudozhestv.” In Opyty v stikhakh i proze. Nauka, 71–94.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, Charles. 1976. Oeuvres complètes [Complete Works]. Vol. II. Gallimard.Google Scholar

Belinskii, Vissarion. 1953–59. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Collected Works]. 13 vols. Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. 1986 “Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth Century.” In Reflections. Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, trans. Edmund Jephcott, ed. Demetz, Peter. Schocken Books, 146–62.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. 2002. “Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth Century.” In The Arcades Project, trans. Eiland, Howard and McLaughlin, Kevin. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 3–26.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. 2003. “The Paris of the Second Empire in Baudelaire.” In Selected Writings, Vol. IV: 1938–1940, ed. Eiland, Howard and Michael, W. Jennings. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 3–92.Google Scholar

Bogomolov, Igor’. 1963. Armeniia v tvorchestve Iakova Polonskogo [Armenia in the Work of Iakov Polonskii]. Izdatel’stvo AN Armianskoi SSR.Google Scholar

Bogomolov, Igor’ 1966. Polonskii v Gruzii [Polonskii in Georgia]. Literatura da khelovneba.Google Scholar

Bogomolov, Igor’ 1983. “Russkie pisateli v Gruzii v pervoi polovine XIX veka” [Russian Writers in Georgia in the First Half of the 19th Century]. In Russkie pisateli v Gruzii [Russian Writers in Georgia]. Merani, n.p.Google Scholar

Bogomolov, Igor’ 2002. Gruziia stala traditsiei dlia vsei russkoi poezii [Georgia Has Become a Tradition for All Russian Poetry]. Izdatel’stvo Tbilisskogo universiteta,Google Scholar

Bowman, Herbert. 1954. Vissarion Belinski 1811–1848: A Study in the Origins of Social Criticism in Russia. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brower, Daniel R. 1990. The Russian City between Tradition and Modernity, 1850–1900. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckler, Julie. 2007. Mapping St. Petersburg: Imperial Text and Cityscape. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bulgarin, F. V. 1841. “Peterburgskie tipy” [Petersburg Types]. Severnaia pchela [Northern Bee], No. 22: 87–88.Google Scholar

Bulgarin, F. V. 2010a. Peterburgskie ocherki F.V. Bulgarina [The Petersburg Sketches of F. V. Bulgarin].Petropolis.Google Scholar

Bulgarin, F. V. 2010b. “Progulka po trotuaru Nevskogo prospekta.” In Peterburgskie ocherki F. V. Bulgarina [The Petersburg Sketches of F. V. Bulgarin]. Petropolis, 43–81.Google Scholar

Burton, Richard D. E. 1994. The Flâneur and His City: Patterns of Daily Life in Paris 1815–1851. University of Durham.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig, ed. 1992. Habermas and the Public Sphere. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Casanova, Pascale. 1999. La République mondiale des lettres [The World Republic of Letters]. Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Cheah, Pheng. 2014. “World Against Globe: Towards a Normative Conception of World Literature.” New Literary History, Vol. 45, No. 3 (Summer): 303–29.Google Scholar

Clark, T. J. 1984. The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and His Followers. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Margaret. 1996. “Panoramic Literature and the Invention of Everyday Genres.” In Cinema and the Invention of Modern Life, ed. Charney, Leo and Schwartz, Vanessa R.. University of California Press, 227–52.Google Scholar

Curmer, L., ed. 1841–42. Les Français peints par eux-mêmes: Encyclopédie morale du XIX-e siècle [The French Painted by Themselves: A Moral Encyclopedia of the 19th Century]. 8 vols. L. Curmer.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2003. What Is World Literature? Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

D’haen, Theo. 2012. “Mapping World Literature.” In The Routledge Companion to World Literature, ed. D’haen, Theo, Damrosch, David, and Kadir, Djelal. Routledge, 413–22.Google Scholar

Dostoevsky, Fedor. 1845. “Zuboskal” [The Banterer]. Otechestvennye zapiski [Notes of the Fatherland], No. 43: 43–48.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel, Schluchter, Wolfgang, and Wittrock, Björn, eds. 2001. Public Spheres and Collective Identities. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Ely, Christopher. 2002. This Meager Nature: Landscape and National Identity in Imperial Russia. Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Priscilla Parkhurst. 1994. “The Flâneur: The City and Its Discontents.” In Paris as Revolution: Writing the Nineteenth-Century City, University of California Press, 80–114.Google Scholar

Fusso, Susanne. 1993. Designing Dead Souls: An Anatomy of Disorder in Gogol’. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gilpin, William. 1792. Three Essays: On Picturesque Beauty, on Picturesque Travel; and on Sketching Landscape, to Which is Added a Poem, on Landscape Painting. Printed for R. Blamire.Google Scholar

Grigorovich, D. 1987. Literaturnye vospominaniia [Literary Reminiscences]. Khudozhestvennaia literature.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hale, Dorothy J., ed. 2006. The Novel: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1900–2000. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harootunian, Harry. 2000. History’s Disquiet: Modernity, Cultural Practice, and the Question of Everyday Life. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Harootunian, Harry. 2005. “Some Thoughts on Comparability and the Space-Time Problem.” boundary 2, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Summer): 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, David. 1985. “Paris, 1850–1870.” In Consciousness and the Urban Experience. Johns Hopkins University Press, 63–220.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 2001. Philosophy of Right. Trans. S. W. Dyde. Batoche Books Limited.Google Scholar

Hetzel, Pierre-Jules, ed. 1845–46. Le Diable à Paris. Paris et les Parisiens. Moeurs et coutumes, caractères et portraits des habitants de Paris, tableau complet de leur vie privée, publique, politique, artistique, littéraire, industrielle [The Devil in Paris. Paris and the Parisians. Ways and Customs, Characters and Portraits of the Residents of Paris, Complete Picture of Their Private, Public, Political, Artistic, Literary, and Industrial Life]. 2 vols. Typographie Lacrampe et Comp.Google Scholar

Holland, Kate. 2017. “Narrative Tradition on the Border: Alexander Veselovsky and Narrative Hybridity in the Age of World Literature.” Poetics Today, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sept.): 429–52.Google Scholar

Hölscher, Lucian. 1978. “Öffentlichkeit” [Public Sphere]. In Geschichtiliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland [Fundamental Concepts of History: A Historical Lexicon to the Political and Social Language in Germany], ed. Bruner, Otto, Conze, Werner and Koselleck, Reinhart. Vol. IV. Klett-Cotta, 413–67.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Terrence K., and Wallerstein, Immanuel, et al. eds. 1982. World-Systems Analysis. Theory and Methodology. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Huart, Louis. 1841. Physiologie du flâneur [Physiology of the Flâneur]. Illust. Marie-Alexandre Alophe, Honoré Daumier, and Théodore Maurisset. Aubert-Lavigne.Google Scholar

Iakimovich, T. 1963. Frantsuzskii realisticheskii ocherk, 1830–1848gg. [The French Realist Sketch, 1830–1848]. Izdatel’stvo akademii nauk.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. 2002. A Singular Modernity. Essay on the Ontology of the Present. Verso.Google Scholar

Jersild, Austin. 2002. Orientalism and Empire: North Caucasus Mountain Peoples and the Georgian Frontier, 1845–1917. McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Jersild, Austin, and Melkadze, Nineli. 2002. “The Dilemmas of Enlightenment in the Eastern Borderlands: The Theater and Library in Tbilisi.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Winter): 27–49.Google Scholar

Keats, John. 1899. The Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats. The Cambridge Edition. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar

Kliger, Ilya. 2017. “Historical Poetics between Russia and the West: Towards a Nonlinear Model of Literary History and Social Ontology.” Poetics Today, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sept.): 453–84.Google Scholar

Kliger, Ilya. 2018. “Scenarios of Power in Turgenev’s First Love: Russian Realism and the Allegory of the State.” Comparative Literature, Vol. 70, No. 1: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kliger, Ilya, and Maslov, Boris, guest eds. 2017 . “Special Section: Historical Poetics in Theory.” Poetics Today, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sept.): 417–548.Google Scholar

Komarovich, V. L. 1924. “Idei frantsuzskix sotsial’nykh utopii v mirovozzrenii Belinskogo” [The Ideas of French Social Utopias in Belinskii’s Worldview]. In Venok Belinskomu [A Wreath for Belinskii], ed. Piksanov, N. K.. Novaia Moskva, 243–72.Google Scholar

Konechnyi, Al’bin. 2010. “Bulgarin bytopisatel’ i Peterburg v ego ocherkakh.” In Peterburgskie ocherki F.V. Bulgarina. Petropolis, 5–42.Google Scholar

Kuleshov, V. I. 1958.“Otechestvennye zapiski” i literatura 40-kh godov XIX veka [“Notes of the Fatherland” and the Literature of the 1840s]. Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar

Kuleshov, V. I. ed. 1991. Fiziologiia Peterburga [Physiology of Petersburg]. Nauka.Google Scholar

Lacroix, Auguste de. 1841–42. “Le flâneur.” In Les Français peints par eux-mêmes: Encyclopédie morale du XIX-e siècle. 9 vols. L. Curmer, Vol. III, 65–72.Google Scholar

Larousse, Pierre, ed. 1874. Grand dictionnaire universel du XIX siècle [Great Universal Dictionary of the 19th Century]. Vol. 12 . Administration du grand dictionnaire universel.Google Scholar

Lauster, Martina. 2007a. Sketches of the Nineteenth Century: European Journalism and its Physiologies, 1830–1850. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lauster, Martina. 2007b. “Walter Benjamin’s Myth of the Flâneur.” Modern Language Review, Vol. 102, No. 1 (January): 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavater, Johann Kaspar. 1775–78. Physiognomische Fragmente zur Beförderung der Menschenkenntnis und Menschenliebe [Physiognomic Fragments for the Advancement of Human Understanding and Human Love]. 4 vols. Heinrich Steiner und Companie.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Henri. 1986. La Production de l’éspace [The Production of Space]. 3rd ed. Éditions Anthropos.Google Scholar

Le Men, Ségolène. 1993. “Peints par eux-mêmes … ” [Painted by Themselves …]. In Les Français peints par eux-mêmes: Panorama social du XIXe siècle [The French, Painted by Themselves: A Social Panorama of the 19th Century], ed. Le Men, Ségolène and Abélès, Luce. Éditions de la Réunion des musées nationaux, 4–46.Google Scholar

Lukács, György (Georg). 1964. “The International Significance of Russian Democratic Literary Criticism.” In Studies in European Realism, Grosset and Dunlap, 97–126.Google Scholar

Lukács, György 1977. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of the Great Epic Literature. Trans. Anna Bostock. 3rd ed. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Makharadze, N. A. 1984. Russkaia gazeta na Kavkaze v 40–50-e gody XIX veka (Zakavkazskii vestnik i Kavkaz v 1845–1856 gg.) [The Russian Newspaper in the Caucasus in the 1840s and 50s: The Transcaucasian Herald and Caucasus, 1845–1856]. Izdatel’stvo Tbilisskogo universiteta.Google Scholar

Malia, Martin. 1961. Alexander Herzen and the Birth of Russian Socialism, 1812–1855. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Malinova, Ol’ga Iu. 2012. “Obshchestvo, publika, obshchestvennost’ v Rossii serediny XIX – nachala XX veka: Otrazhenie v poniiatiiakh praktik publichnoj kommunikatsii i obshchestvennoi samodeiatel’nosti” [Society, Public, Sociality in Mid-19th – Early 20th-Century Russia: Their Reflection in Terms of Practices of Public Communication and Independent Social Activity]. In Poniatiia o Rossii: K istoricheskoi semantike imperskogo perioda [Understandings of Russia: Toward a Historical Semantics of the Imperial Period]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 428–63.Google Scholar

Marullo, Thomas Gaiton. 2009. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Petersburg: The Physiology of a City, ed. Nekrasov, Nikolai, trans. Thomas Gaiton Marullo, Northwestern University Press, xix–xci.Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael. 2000. Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meilakh, B. S. 1973. “Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie zhanra povesti natural’noi shkoly” [The Theoretical Foundation of the Natural School’s Narrative Genre]. Russkaia povest’ XIX veka [Russian Narrative of the 19th Century]. Nauka, 247–58.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. 2000. New Left Review, No. 1 (Jan./Feb.): 54–68.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. 2003. “More Conjectures.” New Left Review, No. 20 (March/April): 73–81.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. 2011. “World-Systems Analysis, Evolutionary Theory, Weltliteratur.” In Immanuel Wallerstein and the Problem of the World: System, Scale, Culture, ed. Palumbo-Liu, David, Robbins, Bruce, and Tanoukhi, Nirvana. Duke University Press, 67–77.Google Scholar

Morozova, S. N. 2010. “Kavkazskie motivy v tvorchestve Ia. Polonskogo. Sbornik ‘Sazandar’” [Caucasian Motifs in the Work of Ia. Polonskii: The Collection Sazandar]. Izvestiia Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Proceedings of Volgograd State Pedagogical University], Vol. 46, No. 2: 139–41.Google Scholar

Nechaeva, V. S. 1967. V. G. Belinskii. Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo, 1842–1848 [V. G. Belinskii: Life and Work, 1842–1848]. Nauka, 102–37.Google Scholar

Nekrasov, Nikolai. 1843. “Ocherki russkikh nravov, ili litsevaia storona i iznanka roda chelovecheskogo. Sochinenia Faddeia Bulgarina” [Sketches of Russian Morals, or the Outer and Inner Sides of the Human Race. Works of Faddei Bulgarin.] Otechestvennye zapiski [Notes of the Fatherland], No. 5, section VI, 25–29.Google Scholar

Nekrasov, Nikolai. 1967. “Fiziologiia Peterburga. Chast’ pervaia” (1845). In Sobranie sochinenii v vos’mi tomakh. Vol. VII. Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 96–97.Google Scholar

Oldenburg, Veena Talwar. 1984. The Making of Colonial Lucknow, 1856–1877. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Orlov, P. 1961. Ia. P. Polonskii. Riazanskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar

Orsini, Francesca. 2015. “The Multilingual Local in World Literature.” Comparative Literature, Vol. 67, No. 4: 345–74.Google Scholar

Paris, ou le livre des Cent-et-un [Paris, or the Book of the One Hundred and One]. 1831–34. 15 vols. Ladvocat.Google Scholar

Parry, Benita. 2009. “Aspects of Peripheral Modernisms.” Ariel: A Historical Review of English International Literature, Vol. 40, No. 1: 27–55.Google Scholar

Physiologie des physiologies [Physiology of Physiologies]. 1841. Desloges Éditeur.Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1846a “Kratkii ocherk nekotorykh gorodov Kavkaza i Zakavkazskogo kraia” [Brief Survey of Some Cities of the Caucusus and the Transcaucasian Region]. In Kavkazskii kalendar’ na 1847 g. [Caucasian Almanac for the Year 1847]. Tipografiia Kantseliarii Namestnika Kavkazskogo, 53–113.Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1846b. “Statisticheskii ocherk Tiflisa” [Statistical Survey of Tiflis]. In Kavkazskii kalendar’ na 1847 g., 147–73.Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1847. “Pis’mo v Moskvu” [A letter to Moscow]. Zakavkazskii vestnik [Transcaucasian Herald], No. 6 (February 27): 47–48.Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1849. Sazandar. Tiflis.Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1850. “Tiflis na litso i naiznanku” [Tiflis Outside and In]. Zakavkazskii vestnik [Transcaucasian Herald], Nos. 7, 8, 10, 11, 15.Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1851. “Saiat Nova.” Kavkaz [Caucasus], Nos. 1–2 (January).Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1933a. Ia. P. Polonskii, Stikhotvoreniia i poèmy [Ia. P. Polonskii, Lyrics and Long Poems]. Ed. and intro. Eikhenbaum, B. M.. Sovetskii pisatel’.Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1933b.“A Stroll through Tiflis” [Progulka po Tiflisu]. In Stikhotvoreniia i poèmy, ed. Eikhenbaum, B. M.. Sovetskii pisatel’.Google Scholar

Polonskii, Iakov. 1988. Ia. P. Polonskii. Proza [Prose.] Sovetskaia Rossiia.Google Scholar

Preiss(-Basset), Nathalie. 1999. Les Physiologies en France au XIXe siècle: étude historique, littéraire et stylistique [Physiologies in France in the 19th Century: A Historical, Literary, and Stylistic Study]. Éditions Inter-Universitaires.Google Scholar

Punter, David. 1994. “The Picturesque and the Sublime: Two Worldscapes.” In The Politics of the Picturesque: Literature, landscape, and aesthetics since 1770, ed. Copley, Stephen and Garside, Peter. Cambridge University Press, 220–39.Google Scholar

Ram, Harsha. 2016. “The Scale of Global Modernisms: Imperial, National, Regional, Local.” PMLA, Vol. 131, No. 5 (October): 1372–85.Google Scholar

Reeve, Helen. 1959. “Utopian Socialism in Russian Literature, 1840–1860s.” American Slavic and East European Review, No. 18: 374–93.Google Scholar

Rhinelander, L. H. 1996.“Viceroy Vorontsov’sAdministration of the Caucasus.” In Transcaucasia, Nationalism and Social Change: Essays in the History of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, ed. Suny, Ronald Grigor. University of Michigan Press, 87–104.Google Scholar

Romanenko, Svetlana M. 2006. “Kavkazskii mif v russkom romantizme i ego evoliutsiia v tvorchestve Ia. P. Polonskogo” [The Caucasian Myth in Russian Romanticism and its Evolution in the Work of Ia. P. Polonskii]. Ph.D. dissertation in Philological Sciences, Tomsk State University.Google Scholar

Sieburth, Richard. 1985. “Une idéologie du lisible: le phénomène des Physiologies” [An Ideology of the Legible: The Phenomenon of the Physiologies]. Romantisme, No. 47: 39–60.Google Scholar

Terras, Victor. 1974. Belinskij and Russian Literary Criticism: The Heritage of Organic Aesthetics. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Tester, Keith, ed. 1994. The Flâneur. Routledge.Google Scholar

Texier, Edmond. 1851. Histoire des Journaux: Biographie des journalistes contenant l’histoire politique, littéraire, industrielle, pittoresque et anecdotique de chaque journal publié à Paris et la biographie de ses rédacteurs [History of Journals: Biography of Journalists, Containing the Political, Literary, Industrial, Picturesque and Anecdotal Story of Each Journal Published in Paris and the Biography of its Editors]. Pagnerre.Google Scholar

Tseitlin, A. G. 1965. Stanovlenie russkogo realizma (Russkii fiziologicheskii ocherk) [The Making of Russian Realism: The Russian Physiological Sketch]. Nauka.Google Scholar

Тurgenev, Ivan. 1852. Zapiski okhotnika [A Hunter’s Notebook]. Peter Lang.Google Scholar

van Biesbrock, Hans-Rüdiger. 1978. Die literarische Mode der Physiologien in Frankreich (1840–1842) [The Literary Mode of the Physiologies in France, 1840–1842]. Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World Economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Harry B. 1971. “Belinskij and the Aesthetics of Utopian Socialism.” SEEJ, No. 15: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

WreC (Warwick Research Collective). 2015. Combined and Uneven Development. Towards a New Theory of World-Literature. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Z.Z. 1843. “Russkaia literatura” [Russian Literature].Severnaia pchela [Northern Bee], No. 81: 322–23.Google Scholar

Abdel-Malek, Anour. 1963. “Orientalism in Crisis,” Diogenes (Dec.) https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216301104407.Google Scholar

Ahmad, Muhammad. 2008. “The Notions of Dar Al-Harb and Dar Al-Islam in Islamic Jurisprudence with Special Reference to the Hanafi School.” Islamic Studies, Vol. 47, No. 1: 5-37. SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2238446.Google Scholar

al-Ḥillī, Ṣafī al-Dīn. [1982] 1992. Sharḥ al-kāfiyya al-badī‘iyyah fī ‘ulūm al-balāghah [The Explication of the Sufficient Badī‘iyyah Ode in Rhetorical Sciences and Adornments in Innovativeness]. Ed. Nasīb Nashāwī. Dār Ṣādir.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. 2nd ed. Verso.Google Scholar

Antrim, Zayde. 2012. Routes and Realms, the Power of Place in the Early Islamic World. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Morag, Butlin, Robin, and Heffernan, Michael. 1995. Geography and Imperialism, 1820–1920. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Bencheneb, Mohamed. 1936. “Ibn al-Wardī”, The Encyclopedia of Islām. Vol. III. E. J. Brill ltd.Google Scholar

Blunt, A., and Wills, J., eds. 2000. Dissident Geographies: An introduction to Radical Ideas and Practice. Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

Bonebakker, S. A. 1990. “Adab and the Concept of Belles-Lettres.” In Belles-Lettres, ‘Abbāsid (The Cambridge History of Arabic Literature), ed. Ashtiany, Julia et al. Cambridge University Press, 16–30.Google Scholar

Brosseau, M. 1995. “The City in Textual Form: Manhattan Transfer’s New York.” Acumene, Vol. 2: 89–114.Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika . 2003. “Metanarrative and Metafictional Commentary: From Metadiscursivity to Metanarration and Metafiction.” Poetica, Vol. 35, Nos. 1–2: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1971. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

al-Ḥamawī, Yāqūt ibn-ᶜAbdullah al-Rūmī. N.d. Muʻjam al-buldān. Dār Ṣādir.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, W. 1995. “The Classification of the Sciences and the Consolidation of Philology in Classical Islam.” In Centres of Learning: Learning and Location in Pre-Modern Europe and the Near East, ed. Drijvers, J. W. and MacDonald, A. A.. Brill, 119–20.Google Scholar

Ibn al-Athīr, Ḍiyāʾal-Dīn. N.d. Al-Washy al-marqūm. Ed. Saʻīd, Jamīl. BaghdadGoogle Scholar

Al-Jāḥiẓ, ʻAmro, Baḥr, ibn. 2012. The Book of Insight Into Commerce (Kitab al-Tabassur bi al-Tijarah). Trans. Adi Setia. IBFIM.Google Scholar

Wadie, Jwaideh. ed. [1959] 1987. The Introductory Chapters of Yāqūt’s Muʻjam Al-Buldān. E. J. Brill.Google Scholar

Krachkovski, KratIgnati Iulianovich. 1963–65. Istoria Arabskoi Geograficheskoi Literatury. Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī; in Arabic: Tārikh Al-Adab al-jughrāfi al-Arabī.Trans. Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn ᶜUthmān Hāshim, 1987.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Henri. 1984. The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Levi, Scott C., and Sela, Ron, eds. 2009. Islamic Central Asia: An Anthology of Historical Sources. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Livingstone, David N. 1992. The Geographical Tradition: Episodes in the History of a Contested Enterprise. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Makdisi, George. 1990. The Rise of Humanism. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Muhanna, Elias. 2018. The World in a Book. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Al-Muqaddasī, , N.d. “Aḥsan al-taqāsīm fī maʿrifat al-aqālīm by al-Muqaddasī.” https://brill.com/view/title/24570.Google Scholar

al-Musawi, Muhsin. 1981. Scheherazade in England. Three Continents.Google Scholar

al-Musawi, Muhsin. 2015. The Medieval Islamic Republic of Letters: Arabic Knowledge Construction.University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

al-Musawi, Muhsin. 2018. “Postcolonial Theory in Modern Arab Culture,” Interventions, International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2: 174–91. www.tandfonline.com/eprint/5pgNA74NQNjkJBkZgPWF.Google Scholar

al-Nuwayrī, Aḥmad. 2016. “Preface.” In The Ultimate Ambition in the Arts of Erudition, ed. and trans. Muhanna, Elias. Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Prince, Gerald. 2003. Dictionary of Narratology. Rev. ed. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Said, Edward. 1977. “Imaginative Geography and its Representations: Orientalizing the Orient,” The Georgia Review, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Spring): 162–206.Google Scholar

Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Sanudo Torsello, Marino. 2011. The Book of the Secrets of the Faithful of the Cross (Liber Secretorum Fidelium Crucis). Trans. Peter Lock. Ashgate.Google Scholar

Sarton, George. 1947–48. Introduction to the History of Science. Vol. I. Carnegie Institute of Washington/ Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar

Sayyid, Ayman Fuad. 2011. “The Unpublished Works of Arabic Geography: An Overview and a Classification,” from “The Earth and its Sciences in Islamic Manuscripts.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation, 175–219. www.muslimheritage.com/article/unpublished-works-of-arabic-geography.Google Scholar

Schwab, Raymond. 1984. Oriental Renaissance: Europe’s Rediscovery of India and the East, 1680–1880. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Sezgin, Fuat. 1987. The Contribution of Arab and Muslim Geographers in the Creation of the World Map. Institut für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität.Google Scholar

Sharp, J. 2000. “Toward a Critical Analysis of Fictive Geographies.” Area, Vol. 32: 327–34.Google Scholar

Tavares, David, and Le Bel, Pierre-Mathieu. 2008. “Forcing the Boundaries of Genre: The Imaginative Geography of South America in Luis Sepulveda’s ‘Patagonia Express’.” Area, Vol. 40, No. 1 (March): 45–54.Google Scholar

Toomer, G. J. 1996. Eastern Wisedome and Learning: The Study of Arabic in Seventeenth-Century England. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Al-Waṭwāṭ, Jamāl al-Dīn Muḥammad al-Kutubī. 2000. Mabāhij al-Fikar wa Manāhij al-ᶜIbar. Dār al-ᶜArabiyah lil-Mawsūʻāt.Google Scholar

Zadeh, Traves. 2017. Mapping Frontiers across Medieval Islam: Geography, Translation, and the ‘Abbasid Empire. I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H., and Greenblatt, Stephen, eds. 2003. Norton Anthology of English Literature. 7th ed. W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar

Agamben, Georgio. 1999. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Apter, Emily. 2013. Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. Verso.Google Scholar

Arrival. 2016. Directed by Denis Villeneuve. 21 Laps Entertainment.Google Scholar

Benedict, Barbara M. 2003. “The Paradox of the Anthology: Collecting and Différance in Eighteenth-Century Britain.” New Literary History, Vol. 35, No. 2 (Spring): 231–56.Google Scholar

Borges, Jorge Luis. 1998. The Aleph. Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Chaney, Christine. 2001. “Editor’s Introduction.” Pedagogy, Vol. 1, No. 1: 191–94.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2001. “The Mirror and the Window: Reflections on Anthology Construction.” Pedagogy, Vol. 1, No. 1: 207–13.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2003. What Is World Literature? Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2009a. How to Read World Literature. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. ed. 2009b. Teaching World Literature. Modern Language Association.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2014. “Review of Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability by Emily Apter.” Comparative Literature Studies, Vol. 51, No. 3: 504–8.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David, and Pike, David L., eds. 2009. The Longman Anthology of World Literature. 2nd ed. 6 vols. Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

“Damrosch World.” Pearson. www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/series/Damrosch-World/4211082.html.Google Scholar

Doherty, Brian. 2014. “The Center Cannot Hold: The Development of World Literature Anthologies.” Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics, Vol. 34: 100–24.Google Scholar

Donoghue, Denis. 1988. We Irish: Essays on Irish Literature and Society. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Finneran, Richard J., ed. 1983. The Poems of W. B. Yeats: A New Edition. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gregson, Davis. 2011. “Introduction.” In Virgil’s Eclogues, ed. Krisak, Len, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Guillory, John. 1993. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Harris, Wendell V. 1991. “Canonicity.” PMLA, Vol. 106, No. 1: 110–21.Google Scholar

Heise, Ursula. 2008. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Kadir, Djelal. 2010. Memos from the Beseiged City. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Kelleher, Margaret. 2011. “The Anthology and the Duanaire.” In The Oxford History of the Irish Book. Vol. IV. Oxford University Press, 448–60.Google Scholar

Kermode, Frank. 1979. “Institutional Control of Interpretation.” Salmagundi, Vol. 43: 72–86.Google Scholar

Kermode, Frank. 1973. Oxford Anthology of English Literature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kipling, Rudyard. 1987. Kim. Ed. Sandison, Alan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kopper, John. 2010. “Review.” Comparative Literature Studies, Vol. 47, No. 3: 399–408.Google Scholar

Lawall, Sarah. 2010. “Introduction: Reading World Literature.” In Reading World Literature: Theory, History, Practice, ed. Lawall, Sarah. University of Texas Press, 1–64.Google Scholar

“Longman Anthology of World Literature, Volume F, The: The Twentieth Century, 2nd Edition.” Pearson. www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Damrosch-Longman-Anthology-of-World-Literature-Volume-F-The-The-Twentieth-Century-2nd-Edition/PGM212509.html.Google Scholar

McKinsey, Martin. 2002. “Classicism and Colonial Retrenchment in W. B. Yeats’s ‘No Second Troy.’” Twentieth Century Literature, Vol. 48, No. 2 (Summer): 174–90.Google Scholar

Paulson, William. 2001. Literary Culture in a World Transformed: A Future for the Humanities. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Pevear, Richard, and Volokhonsky, Larissa, trans. 2007. War and Peace. By Leo Tolstoy. Knopf.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, Rudolph. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Pizer, John. 2006. The Idea of World Literature: History and Pedagogical Practice. Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Leah. 2003. The Anthology and the Rise of the Novel: From Richardson to George Eliot Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ronsard, Pierre. 2010. Sonnets pour Hélène. Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar

Said, Edward. 1994. Culture and Imperialism. Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Saussy, Haun, ed. 2006. Comparative Literature in the Age of Globalization. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Showalter, Elaine. 2002. Teaching Literature. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Smith, Karen R. 2011. “What Good Is World Literature? World Literature Pedagogy and the Rhetoric of Moral Crisis.” College English, Vol. 73, No. 6: 585–603.Google Scholar

Tolkien, J. R. R. 2005. The Lord of the Rings. HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Thomsen, Mads Rosendahl. 2008. Mapping World Literature. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Vendler, Helen. 2008. Our Secret Discipline: Yeats and Lyric Form. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Yeats, W. B. [1889] 1892. The Wanderings of Oisin. T. F. Unwin.Google Scholar

Yeats, W. B. 1912. The Green Helmet and Other Poems. Macmillan and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar

Yeats, W. B. 1962. Explorations. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Zeitchik, Steven. 2016. “Decoding the Linguistic Geekiness behind Arrival’s Sci-fi Sheen.” Los Angeles Times, Nov. 25. www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-arrival-movie-linguist-20161125-story.html.Google Scholar

Allington, Daniel, Brouillette, Sarah, and Golumbia, David. 2016. “Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities.” LA Review of Books, May 1. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/neoliberal-tools-archives-political-history-digital-humanities/#!Google Scholar

Ballantyne, Tony. 2003. “Rereading the Archive and Opening up the Nation-State: Colonial Knowledge in South Asia (and Beyond).” In After the Imperial Turn: Thinking With and Through the Nation, ed. Burton, Antoinette. Durham University Press, 102–21.Google Scholar

Bammam, David, Underwood, Ted, and Smith, Noah A.. 2014. “A Bayesian Mixed Effects Model of Literary Character.” In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Baltimore, Maryland, USA, June 23–25, 2014). Association for Computational Linguistics, 370–79. http://acl2014.org/acl2014/P14-1/pdf/P14-1035.pdf.Google Scholar

Bergenmar, Jenny, and Leppanen, Katarina. 2017. “Gender and Vernaculars in Digital Humanities and World Literature.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, Vol. 25, No. 4: 232–46.Google Scholar

Bianco, Jamie “Skye.” 2015. “This Digital Humanities Which Is Not One.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. Gold, Matthew K.. University of Minnesota Press, 98–112. Minnesota Scholarship Online, doi: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0012.Google Scholar

Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. N.d. www.cervantesvirtual.com/.Google Scholar

Bode, Katherine. 2012. Reading by Numbers: Recalibrating the Literary Field. Anthem Press.Google Scholar

Bode, Katherine. 2017a. “The Equivalence of ‘Close’ and ‘Distant’ Reading; Or, Toward a New Object for Data-Rich Literary History.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 1: 77–106. doi: 10.1215/00267929-3699787.Google Scholar

Bode, Katherine. 2017b. “Fictional Systems: Mass-Digitisation, Network Analysis, and Nineteenth-Century Australian Newspapers.” Victorian Periodicals Review, Vol. 50, No. 1: 100–38. doi: 10/1353/vpr.2017.0005.Google Scholar

Bode, Katherine. 2018. A World of Fiction: Digital Collections and the Future of Literary History. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bode, Katherine, and Hetherington, Carol, eds. N.d. To Be Continued: The Australian Newspaper Fiction Database. http://cdhrdatasys.anu.edu.au/tobecontinued/.Google Scholar

Lab, Bodmer. N.d. A Digital World Literature. University of Genève and Martin Bodmer Foundatin. http://bodmerlab.unige.ch/en/.Google Scholar

British Library and findmypast. N.d. British Newspaper Archive. www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/Google Scholar

Brown, Susan, Clements, Patricia, and Grundy, Isobel, directors. N.d. The Orlando Project: Feminist Literary History and Digital Humanities. www.artsrn.ualberta.ca/orlando/.Google Scholar

Burrows, John F. 1987. Computation into Criticism: A Study of Jane Austen’s Novels and an Experiment in Method. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Cordell, Ryan. 2017. “‘Q i-tjb the Raven’: Taking Dirty OCR Seriously.” Book History, Vol. 20: 188–225, doi: 10.1353/bh.2017.0006.Google Scholar

Cordell, Ryan, and Smith, David, eds. 2017. Viral Texts: Mapping Networks of Reprinting in 19th-Century Newspapers and Magazines, http://viraltexts.org/.Google Scholar

Crane, Gregory R., editor in chief. N.d. Perseus Digital Library. www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2003. What Is World Literature? Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2004. “World Literature in a Postcanonical, Hypercanonical Age.” In Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, ed. Saussy., Haun Johns Hopkins University Press, 43–53.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2013. “World Literature in a Postliterary Age.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2: 151–70. doi: 10.1215/00267929-2072971.Google Scholar

Dimock, Wai Chee. 2006. Through Other Continents: American Literature across Deep Time. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Eaves, Morris, Essick, Robert, and Viscomi, Joseph, eds. 2020. William Blake Archive. www.blakearchive.org/.Google Scholar

Erlin, Matt, and Tatlock, Lynne, eds. 2014. Distant Readings: Topologies of German Culture in the Long Nineteenth Century. NED – New ed. Boydell and Brewer. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.7722/j.ctt5vj848.Google Scholar

Europeana. N.d. Europeana Collections. .www.europeana.eu/.Google Scholar

Folsom, Ed., and Price, Kenneth M., eds. N.d.The Walt Whitman Archive. http://whitmanarchive.org/.Google Scholar

Fyfe, Paul. 2016. “An Archaeology of Victorian Newspapers.” Victorian Periodicals Review, Vol. 49, No. 4: 546–77, doi: 10.1353/vpr.2016.0039.Google Scholar

Gallica, . N.d. Gallica. https://gallica.bnf.fr/accueil/.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Jonathan, and Holbo, John, eds. 2011. Reading Graphs, Maps, Trees: Critical Responses to Franco Moretti. Parlor Press.Google Scholar

Greene, Roland. 2004. “Not Works But Networks: Colonial Worlds in Comparative Literature.” In Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, ed. Saussy, Haun. Johns Hopkins University Press, 212–23.Google Scholar

Google Books. Google Books. www.books.google.com/Google Scholar

HathiTrust. N.d. HathiTrust Digital Library. www.hathitrust.org/Google Scholar

He, Chengzhou. 2017. “World Literature as Event: Isben and Modern Chinese Fiction.” Comparative Literature Studies, Vol. 54, No. 1: 141–60. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325.complitstudies.54.1.0141.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Brett, and Craig, Hugh, eds. 2014. Digital Shakespeares: Innovations, Interventions, Mediations. Special issue of The Shakespearean International Yearbook 14. Ashgate.Google Scholar

Jeanneney, Jean-Noël. 2006. Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge: A View from Europe. University of Chicago Press. .Google Scholar

Jockers, Matthew L. 2013. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Kim, David, Shepard, David, and Wan, Jun, with contributions by Leynov, David and Li, Elaine, and past contributions by Ardeni, Viola, Arevalo, Lourdes, de Carlo, Nickolas, Chykerda, C. Myles, Kurtz, Wendy, Williams, Amber, and Xie, Harry. N.d. WorldLiterature@UCLA: Translation Network Analysis in the Digital Humanities. University of California, Los Angeles, https://worldlit.cdh.ucla.edu/.Google Scholar

Kirsch, Adam. 2014. “Technology is Taking over English Departments: The False Promise of the Digital Humanities.” New Republic, May 3. https://newrepublic.com/article/117428/limits-digital-humanities-adam-kirsch.Google Scholar

Leffler, Yvonne, Arping, Åsa, Bergenmar, Jenny, Hermansson, Gunilla, and Johansson, Birgitta. N.d. Swedish Women Writers on Export in the 19th Century. https://swedishwomenwriters.wordpress.com/Google Scholar

Library of Congress. N.d. Chronicling America. https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/.Google Scholar

Library of Congress. N.d. World Digital Library. www.loc.gov/wdl/.Google Scholar

Liu, Alan. 2004. The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Liu, Alan. 2008. Local Transcendence: Essays on Postmodern Historicism and the Database. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Liu, Alan. 2017a. “Assessing Data Workflows for Common Data ‘Moves’ Across Disciplines.” Alan Liu blog, May 6. doi: 10.21972/G21593.Google Scholar

Liu, Alan. 2017b. “Toward Critical Infrastructure Studies: Digital Humanities, New Media Studies, and the Culture of Infrastructure.” Alan Liu blog, Feb. 23, 2017, http://liu.english.ucsb.edu/toward-critical-infrastructure-studies-u-connecticut/.Google Scholar

Long, Hoyt, and So, Richard Jean. 2016. “Turbulent Flow: A Computational Model of World Literature.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 77, No. 3: 345–67. doi: 10.1215/00267929-3570656.Google Scholar

Mak, Bonnie. 2014. “Archaeology of a Digitization.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 65, No. 8: 1515–26. doi: 10.1002/asi.23061.Google Scholar

Marche, Stephen. 2012. “Literature is Not Data: Against Digital Humanities.” LA Review of Books, Oct. 28. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/literature-is-not-data-against-digital-humanities/#!Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome, ed. 2008. The Complete Writings and Pictures of Dante Gabriel Rossetti. www.rossettiarchive.org/about/index.html.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome, 2014. A New Republic of Letters: Memory and Scholarship in the Age of Digital Reproduction. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ministry of Human Resource Development. N.d. Digital Library of India. https://ndl.iitkgp.ac.in/.Google Scholar

Montrose, Louis. 1992. “New Historicisms.” In Redrawing the Boundaries: The Transformation of English and American Literary Studies, ed. Greenblatt, Stephen and Gunn, Giles. Modern Language Association, 392–417.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. 2000. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review, Vol. 1: 54–68. https://newleftreview.org/II/1/franco-moretti-conjectures-on-world-literature.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. Verso.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. 2017. “Patterns and Interpretation.” Stanford Literary Lab Pamphlet, Vol. 15 (Sept.). https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet15.pdf.Google Scholar

Morris, Leslie A., general ed. 2012. Emily Dickinson Archive. www.edickinson.org/team.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara, Werstine, Paul, Poston, Michael, and Niles, Rebecca, eds. N.d. Folger Shakespeare Library: Shakespeare’s Plays from Folger Digital Texts. Folger Shakespeare Library. www.folgerdigitaltexts.org.Google Scholar

National Library of Australia. N.d. Trove. https://trove.nla.gov.au/.Google Scholar

Oceanic Exchanges Project Team. 2017. Oceanic Exchanges: Tracing Global Information Networks in Historical Newspaper Repositories, 1840–1914. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WA94S.Google Scholar

Ortega, Élika. 2018. “Archives, Libraries, Collections, and Databases: A First Look at Digital Literary Studies in Mexico.” Hispanic Review, Vol. 86, No. 2: 229–47. Project MUSE, doi: 10.1353/hir.2018.0016.Google Scholar

Partzsch, Henrietta, Lappalainen, Päivi, PoniŽ, Katja Mihurko, Nedregotten Sørbø, Marie, and van Dijk, Suzan. N.d. Travelling Texts 1790–1914: The Transnational Reception of Women’s Writing at the Fringes of Europe, http://travellingtexts.huygens.knaw.nl/.Google Scholar

Piper, Andrew. 2015. “Novel Devotions: Conversional Reading, Computational Modeling, and the Modern Novel.” New Literary History, Vol. 46, No. 1: 63–98. Project MUSE, doi: 10.1353/nlh.2015.0008.Google Scholar

Piper, Andrew. 2018. Enumerations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Plaisant, Catherine, Rose, James, Bei, Yu, Loretta Auvil, Matthew G. Kirshenbaum, Martha Smith, Nell, Clement, Tanya, and Lord, Greg. 2006. “Exploring Erotics in Emily Dickinson’s Correspondence with Text Mining and Visual Interfaces.” In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Association for Computing Machinery, 141–51. www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/trs/2006–01/2006–01.pdf.Google Scholar

Putnam, Lara. 2016. “The Transnational and the Text-Searchable: Digitized Sources and the Shadows They Cast.” American Historical Review, Vol. 121, No. 2 (1 April): 377–402. doi: 10.1093/ahr/121.2.377.Google Scholar

Risam, Roopika. 2015. “Beyond the Margins: Intersectionality and the Digital Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2: 1–33. www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000208/000208.html.Google Scholar

Risam, Roopika. 2017. “Colonial and Postcolonial Digital Humanities Roundtable.” Roopika Risam blog, Oct. 27. http://roopikarisam.com/uncategorized/colonial-and-postcolonial-digital-humanities-roundtable/.Google Scholar

Ross, Shawna. 2018. “Toward a Feminist Modernist Digital Humanities.” Feminist Modernist Studies., Vol. I, No. 3: 211–29. doi: 10.1080/24692921.2018.1505821.Google Scholar

Saussy, Haun. 2004. “Exquisite Cadavers Stitched from Fresh Nightmares: Of Memes, Hives, and Selfish Genes.” Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, edited by Saussy, Haun, Johns Hopkins University Press, 3–42.Google Scholar

Smith, Vanessa. 2016. “Novel Worlds.” Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, Vol. 63, Nos. 2–3: 91–95. doi: 10.1080/20512856.2016.1244906.Google Scholar

So, Richard Jean, and Long, Hoyt. 2013. “Network Analysis and the Sociology of Modernism.” Boundary2, Vol. 40, No. 2: 147–82.Google Scholar

Spivak, Gayatri. 1993. Outside in the Teaching Machine. Routledge.Google Scholar

Spivak, Gayatri. 2003. Death of a Discipline. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

St. Clair, William. 2004. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stanford University. 2008. Mapping the Republic of Letters. http://republicofletters.stanford.edu/.Google Scholar

Trumpener, Katie. 2009. “Critical Response I. Paratext and Genre System: A Response to Franco Moretti.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 36, No. 1: 159–71. JSTOR, ww.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/606126.Google Scholar

Underwood, Ted, and Sellers, Jordan. 2016. “The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 77, No. 3: 321–44. doi: 10,1215.00267929-3570634.Google Scholar

Ungar, Steven. 2004. “Writing in Tongues: Thoughts on the Work of Translation.” Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, ed. Saussy, Haun, Johns Hopkins University Press, 127–38.Google Scholar

University of Chicago. N.d. PhiloLogic: The University of Chicago Full-Text System. www.lib.uchicago.edu/efts/ARTFL/philologic/.Google Scholar

Venuti, Lawrence. 1999. The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. Routledge.Google Scholar

Warren, Christopher N. 2018. “Historiography’s Two Voices: Data Infrastructure and History at Scale in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB).” Journal of Cultural Analytics ( November 22). https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11031.Google Scholar

Wilkens, Matthew. 2013. “The Geographic Imagination of Civil War-Era American Fiction.” American Literary History, Vol. 25, No. 4: 803–40. Project MUSE, muse.jhu.edu/article/527788.Google Scholar

Wilkens, Matthew. 2017. “Genre, Computation, and the Varieties of Twentieth-Century U.S. Fiction.” Journal of Cultural Analytics, Vol. 1, No. 1. https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11065.Google Scholar

Women Writers Project. 1999–2016. Women Writers Project. Northeastern University. www.wwp.northeastern.edu.Google Scholar