Book contents
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Genealogies
- Part II Thinking the World
- 9 Does Poetry Make Worlds?
- 10 Ecosystems of World Literature
- 11 From World Literature to World Philosophy and Back Again
- 12 Saving Europe through Weltliteratur: The Case of Victor Klemperer
- 13 Viśvasāhitya: Rabindranath Tagore’s Idea of World Literature
- Part III Transregional Worlding
- Part IV Cartographic Shifts
- Part V World Literature and Translation
- Part VI Poetics, Genre, Intermediality
- Part VII Scales, Polysystems, Canons
- Part VIII Modes of Reading and Circulation
- Part IX The Worldly and the Planetary
- Index
- References
9 - Does Poetry Make Worlds?
from Part II - Thinking the World
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2021
By
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Genealogies
- Part II Thinking the World
- 9 Does Poetry Make Worlds?
- 10 Ecosystems of World Literature
- 11 From World Literature to World Philosophy and Back Again
- 12 Saving Europe through Weltliteratur: The Case of Victor Klemperer
- 13 Viśvasāhitya: Rabindranath Tagore’s Idea of World Literature
- Part III Transregional Worlding
- Part IV Cartographic Shifts
- Part V World Literature and Translation
- Part VI Poetics, Genre, Intermediality
- Part VII Scales, Polysystems, Canons
- Part VIII Modes of Reading and Circulation
- Part IX The Worldly and the Planetary
- Index
- References
Summary
The debates about world literature tend to focus on the way literature moves in the world, the way it interacts with a world that is already “out there” relative to the actual content of the literary work. I focus here instead on the way that literature makes worlds, and on the ways that these processes of world-making point us towards a way of thinking about “world” literature that sees the latter term as an active participant in the construction of the former—or rather, in the construction of many types of the former term. The particular test case for investigation is the Chinese poetic genre known as the fu.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of World Literature , pp. 201 - 214Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Aristotle, . 1984. The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts and Ingram Bywater. Modern Library.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 2006. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd ed. Trans. George A. Kennedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cai, Zong-qi, ed. 2007. How to Read Chinese Poetry: A Guided Anthology. Bilingual, ed. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Ming Dong. 1997. “‘Fu-Bi-Xing’: A Metatheory of Poetry-Making.” Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR), 19: 1–22.Google Scholar
Knechtges, David R. 2008. The Han Rhapsody: A Study of the Fu of Yang Hsiung. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. 1971. “Narrate or Describe? A Preliminary Discussion of Naturalism and Formalism.” In Writer & Critic and Other Essays, ed. and trans. Kahn, Arthur D.. Grosset & Dunlap, 110–48.Google Scholar
Metz, Christian. 1990. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. Trans. Michael Taylor. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Hellmut. 1967. “The Scholar’s Frustration: Notes on a Type of Fu.” In Chinese Thought and Institutions, ed. Fairbank, John King. University of Chicago Press, 310–19.Google Scholar
Yu, Pauline. 1987. The Reading of Imagery in the Chinese Poetic Tradition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar