Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Editors’ introduction
- Part I The changing fortunes of liberal democracy
- Part II Varieties of Marxism
- 10 The Second International: socialism and social democracy
- 11 The Russian Revolution: an ideology in power
- 12 Asian communism
- 13 Western Marxism
- 14 French Marxism – existentialism to structuralism
- Part III Science, modernism and politics
- Part IV New social movements and the politics of difference
- Part V Beyond Western political thought
- Biographies
- Bibliography
- Subject index
- Name index
- References
11 - The Russian Revolution: an ideology in power
from Part II - Varieties of Marxism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
- Frontmatter
- Editors’ introduction
- Part I The changing fortunes of liberal democracy
- Part II Varieties of Marxism
- 10 The Second International: socialism and social democracy
- 11 The Russian Revolution: an ideology in power
- 12 Asian communism
- 13 Western Marxism
- 14 French Marxism – existentialism to structuralism
- Part III Science, modernism and politics
- Part IV New social movements and the politics of difference
- Part V Beyond Western political thought
- Biographies
- Bibliography
- Subject index
- Name index
- References
Summary
The Bolshevik Revolution of October 1917 marked the beginning of the global conflict between communism and capitalism that was to dominate the politics of the twentieth century and redraw the map of modern ideologies. On the mainstream left a bitter schism developed between gradualist ‘Western’ social democracy and revolutionary ‘Eastern’ communism. On the peripheries a host of splinter groupings emerged whose identities revolved around their conflicting interpretations of the Soviet experience. Socialism was, hereafter, organisationally and ideologically fractured: at war with itself.
The revolution and the Soviet experience also became, of course, the Other for many ideologies of the right and a cautionary tale for their seminal thinkers. The lapse into authoritarian or totalitarian practices was variously attributed to the pretensions of socialist states to eliminate the free market economy (Hayek 1976), their contempt for the civilising restraints of the rule of law (Friedrich 1954; Schapiro 1972) or their reckless pursuit of messianic patterns of thought that lie deep within the Western intellectual tradition (Talmon 1961; Popper 1980; Walicki, 1995).
It is clear that for both left and right the fate of revolutionary Marxism and that of the Russian Revolution were closely entwined. This chapter concerns itself with the manner in which the Bolsheviks redefined revolutionary Marxism in the twentieth century. It examines some of the disputations that surrounded the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917 and the theories that were developed to justify the state-building process that then ensued.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought , pp. 239 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
- 1
- Cited by