Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:42:59.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - The International Geophysical Year and the Antarctic Treaty System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2023

By
Klaus Dodds
Edited by
Adrian Howkins  and
Peder Roberts
Adrian Howkins
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Peder Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Stavanger
Get access

Summary

During the Cold War, at about the time Ian Fleming was penning From Russia with Love (1957), the Soviet Union stunned the world with a successful launch of an artificial satellite, Sputnik. While Western and Soviet spies, real and fictional, were hatching plans to acquire field and signals intelligence, the world’s scientific community helped to create their own daring initiative. The International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957–58 was audacious in scope and scale – scientists around the world were going to explore and interrogate outer space, the polar regions, and the oceans, and share the ensuing data for the sake of global knowledge generation.

Keywords

AntarcticasovereigntygeopoliticsAntarctic TreatyInternational Geophysical Yearimperialismscience
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of the Polar Regions , pp. 536 - 562
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agar, Jon, Science in the Twentieth Century and Beyond (Cambridge/Malden, MA: Polity, 2012).Google Scholar
Althoff, William, Drift Station: Arctic Outposts of Superpower Science (Washington, DC: Potomac, 2007).Google Scholar
American Geophysical Union, Antarctica in the International Geophysical Year (Washington, DC: AGU, 1956).Google Scholar
Antonello, Alessandro, “Australia, the International Geophysical Year and the 1959 Antarctic Treaty”, Australian Journal of Politics and History 59 (2013): 532–546.Google Scholar
Antonello, Alessandro, “Life, Ice and Ocean: Contemporary Antarctic Spaces”, in Dodds, K., Hemmings, A., and Roberts, P, eds., Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017), pp. 167–182.Google Scholar
Antonello, Alessandro, The Greening of Antarctica: Assembling an International Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronova, Elena, Baker, Karen, and Oreskes, Naomi, “Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long-term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957–Present”, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40 (2010): 183–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Peter, The International Politics of Antarctica (New York: Macmillan, 1986).Google Scholar
Beck, Peter, “Preparatory Meetings for the Antarctic Treaty, 1958–59”, Polar Record 22 (1985): 653–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belanger, Diane, Deep Freeze: The United States, the International Geophysical Year and the Origins of Antarctica’s Age of Science (Boulder: University of Colorado Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bentley, Charles, “Interview with Will Thomas, 6 August 2008”, American Institute of Physics Oral History Interviews, www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral-histories/33888-1.Google Scholar
Berkman, Paul, Science Diplomacy: Antarctica, Science, and the Governance of International Spaces (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Scholarly Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Biermann, Frank, Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene (Boston: MIT Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocking, Stephen, and Heidt, Daniel, eds., Cold Science: Environmental Knowledge in the North American Arctic During the Cold War (London, New York: Routledge, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Peter, Laboratory at the Bottom of the World (New York: McKay, 1970).Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Mark, Red Moon Rising (New York: Times Books, 2007).Google Scholar
Bullis, Harold, The Political Legacy of the International Geophysical Year (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1973).Google Scholar
Chapman, Sydney, IGY: Year of Discovery (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Chapman, Sydney, “The International Geophysical Year 1957–58”, Nature 172 (1953): 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, E. W. Hunter, The Antarctic Problem (London: George Unwin, 1951).Google Scholar
Cloud, John, “Crossing the Olentangy River: The Figure of the Earth and the Military-Industrial-Academic-Complex, 1947–1972”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 31 (2000): 371–404.Google Scholar
Collis, Christy, “Critical Legal Geographies of Possession: Antarctica and the International Geophysical Year 1957–1958”, GeoJournal 75 (2009): 387–395.Google Scholar
Collis, Christy, and Dodds, Klaus, “Assault on the Unknown: The Historical and Political Geographies of the International Geophysical Year (1957–8)”, Journal of Historical Geography 34 (2008): 555–575.Google Scholar
Collis, Christy, and Stevens, Quentin, “Cold Colonies: Antarctic Spatialities at Mawson and McMurdo Stations”, Cultural Geographies 14 (2007): 234–254.Google Scholar
Della Dora, Veronica, The Mantle of the Earth (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021).Google Scholar
de Solla Price, Derek, Little Science, Big Science (New York, London: Columbia University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus, “The Antarctic Treaty, Territorial Claims and a Continent for Science”, in Nuttall, M., Christensen, T, and Siegert, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of the Polar Regions (London: Routledge, 2018), pp. 265–274.Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus, “Awkward Antarctic Nationalism: Bodies, Ice Cores and Gateways in and beyond Australian Antarctic Territory/East Antarctica”, Polar Record 53 (2017): 16–30.Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus, “Filming and Formatting the Explorer Hero: Captain Scott and Ealing Studios’ Scott of the Antarctic (1948)”, in Freeman, Thomas and Smith, David, eds., Biography and History in Film (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019), pp. 257–275.Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus, “The Great Game: Britain and the 1959 Antarctic Treaty”, Contemporary British History 22 (2008): 43–66.Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus, Pink Ice: Britain and the South Atlantic Empire (London: I B Tauris, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, Klaus, “Reflecting on the 60th Anniversary of the Antarctic Treaty”, Polar Record 55 (2019): 311–316.Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus, Hemmings, Alan, and Roberts, Peder, eds., Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).Google Scholar
Doel, Ronald, “Constituting the Post-war Earth Sciences: The Military’s Influence on the Environmental Sciences in the USA after 1945”, Social Studies in Science 33 (2003): 635–666.Google Scholar
Doel, Ronald, Friedman, Robert, Lajus, Julia, Sorlin, Sverker, and Wrakberg, Urban, “Strategic Arctic Science: National Interests in Building Natural Knowledge – Interwar Era through the Cold War”, Journal of Historical Geography 44 (2014): 66–80.Google Scholar
Drivenes, Einar-A, and Jølle, Harald, eds., Into the Ice: The History of Norway and the Polar Regions (Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk, 2006).Google Scholar
Elzinga, Aant, “Antarctica: The Construction of a Continent by and for Science”, in Crawford, Elisabeth, Shinn, Terry, and Sörlin, Sverker, eds., Denationalizing Science (Berlin: Springer, 1993), pp. 73–106.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Whaling and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Fleming, Ian, From Russia with Love (London: Jonathan Cape, 1957).Google Scholar
Fogg, Charles, A History of Antarctic Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Fraser, Ronald, Once Around the Sun: The Story of the I.G.Y. (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1957).Google Scholar
Fuchs, Vivian, Of Ice and Men (Shrewsbury: Anthony Nelson, 1982).Google Scholar
Gan, Irina, “Soviet Antarctic Plans After the International Geophysical Year: Changes in Policy”, Polar Record 46 (2010): 244–256.Google Scholar
Gan, Irina, “Will the Russians Abandon Mirny to the Penguins after 1959 … Or Will They Stay?”, Polar Record 45 (2009): 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giaever, John, The White Desert: The Official Account of the Norwegian British Swedish Antarctic Expedition (London: Chatto and Windus, 1954).Google Scholar
Gould, Laurence, “Antarctica: The World’s Greatest Laboratory”, The American Scholar 40 (1971): 402–415.Google Scholar
Gould, Laurence, “The Polar Regions and Their Relations to Human Affairs”. Bowman Memorial Lectures Series 4 (New York: AGS, 1958).Google Scholar
Greenaway, Frank, Science International (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Haddelsey, Stephen, and Carroll, Alan, Operation Tabarin: Britain’s Secret Wartime Expedition to Antarctica 1944–46 (Stroud: History Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hamblin, Jacob, Oceanographers and the Cold War (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hayton, Richard, “The ‘American’ Antarctic”, American Journal of International Law 50 (1956): 583–610.Google Scholar
Heavens, Steve, and Roberts, June, Penguin Diplomacy. Brian Roberts: Polar Explorer, Treaty Maker and Conservationist (Cirencester: Mereo, 2020).Google Scholar
Hemmings, A., “The Hollowing of Antarctic Governance”, in Goel, Prem, Ravindra, Rasik, and Chattopadhyay, Sulagna, eds., Science and Geopolitics of the White World (Cham: Springer, 2017), pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
Herzberg, Julia, Kehrt, Christian, and Torma, Franziska, eds., Ice and Snow in the Cold War: Histories of Extreme Climatic Environments (New York, Oxford: Bergbahn, 2019).Google Scholar
Howkins, Adrian, “Defending Polar Empire: Opposition to India’s Proposal to Raise the ‘Antarctic Question’ at the United Nations in 1956”, Polar Record 44 (2008): 35–44.Google Scholar
Howkins, Adrian, Frozen Empires: An Environmental History of the Antarctic Peninsula (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Howkins, Adrian, “Melting Empires? Climate Change and Politics in Antarctica Since the International Geophysical Year”, Osiris 26 (2011): 180–197.Google Scholar
Jackson, Andrew, “Antarctica Without Borders”, Australian Antarctic Magazine 22 (2012). www.antarctica.gov.au/magazine/issue-22-2012/antarctic-treaty/antarctica-without-borders/Google Scholar
Kaiser, David, “The Physics of Spin: Sputnik Policies and American Physicists in the 1950s”, Social Research 73 (2006): 1225–1255.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Joseph, “The International Geophysical Year”, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 68 (October 1956): 381–404.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Joseph, “The Scientific Program of the International Geophysical Year”, Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences 40 (1954): 926–931.Google Scholar
Kistiakowsky, George, “Science and Foreign Affairs”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 16 (April 1960): 115.Google Scholar
Korsmo, Fae, “The Genesis of the International Geophysical Year”, Physics Today (July 2007): 38–43.Google Scholar
Korsmo, Fae, “Shaping Up Planet Earth: The International Geophysical Year (1957–8) and Communicating Science through the Print and Film Media”, Science Communication 26 (2004): 162–187.Google Scholar
John, Krige, and Barth, Kai-Henrik, eds., Global Power Knowledge: Science and Technology in International Affairs (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Lajus, Julia, and Sörlin, Sverker, “Melting the Glacial Curtain: The Politics of Scandinavia-Soviet Networks in the Geophysical Field Sciences between Two Polar Years, 1932/33–1957/58,” Journal of Historical Geography 44 (April 2014): 44–59.Google Scholar
Launius, Roger, Fleming, James Rodger, and DeVorkin, David H., eds., Globalising Polar Science: Reconsidering the International Polar and Geophysical Years (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Launius, Roger, Logsdon, John, and Smith, Roger, eds., Reconsidering Sputnik: Forty Years Since the Soviet Satellite (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000).Google Scholar
Leane, Elle, and McGee, Jeffrey, eds., Anthropocene Antarctica (London: Routledge, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, Jessica, “Making an Anthropocene Ocean: Synoptic Geographies of the International Geophysical Year 1957–8”, Annals of the American Association of Geographers online (16 September 2019).Google Scholar
Leslie, Stuart, The Cold War and American Science (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Library of Congress, “Antarctica Exploration and Claims, as of 1 February 1956” (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1956).Google Scholar
Maclellan, Nic, Grappling with the Bomb: Britain’s Pacific H-Bomb Tests (Canberra: Australia National University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
McDougall, William, The Heavens and Earth (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
McNeill, John, and Engel, Peter, The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene Since 1945 (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Meyer, K., and Brysac, S, Tournament of Shadows: The Great Game and the Race for Empire in Central Asia (New York: Basic, 2006).Google Scholar
Naylor, Simon, and Ryan, James, eds., New Spaces of Exploration: Geographies of Discovery in the Twentieth Century (London: I B Tauris, 2009).Google Scholar
Naylor, Simon, Dean, Katrina, and Siegert, Martin, “The IGY and the Ice Sheet: Surveying Antarctica”, Journal of Historical Geography 34 (2008): 574–595.Google Scholar
Needell, Allan A., Science, Cold War and the American State (London: Routledge, 2001), 325–355.Google Scholar
Odishaw, Hugh, “International Geophysical Year”, Science (2 January 1959): 4–25.Google Scholar
Odishaw, Hugh, “International Geophysical Year Symbol,” Science (27 April 1956): 722.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Jessica, The Technocratic Antarctic: An Ethnography of Scientific Expertise and Environmental Governance (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, “Introduction”, in Oreskes, Naomi and Krige, John, eds., Science and Technology in the Global Cold War (London, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Owens, Susan, Knowledge, Policy and Expertise (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Pender, Kieran, “Red Scare on Ice: Antarctica, Australian-Soviet Relations and the International Geophysical Year”, History Australia 14 (2017): 645–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Richard, “Science, Sovereignty and Nation: Canada and the Legacy of the International Geophysical Year, 1957–1958”, Journal of Historical Geography 34 (2008): 618–638.Google Scholar
Quartermain, Lawrence, and Markham, George, “New Zealanders in the Antarctic”, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 5 (1962): 673–680.Google Scholar
Roberts, Peder, The European Antarctic: Science and Strategy in Scandinavia and the British Empire (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar
Roberts, Peder, van der Watt, Lize-Marié, and Howkins, Adrian, eds., Antarctica and the Humanities (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar
Rose, Lisle, Assault on Eternity; Richard E. Byrd and the Exploration of Antarctica, 1946–47 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Ross, Frank, Partners in Science: The Story of the International Geophysical Year (New York: Lothrop, Lee and Shepard, 1961).Google Scholar
Scott, Shirley, “Ingenious and Innocuous? Article IV of the Antarctic Treaty as Imperialism”, Polar Journal 1 (2011): 51–62.Google Scholar
Scott, Shirley, “Universalism and Title to Territory in Antarctica”, Nordic Journal of International Law 66 (1997): 33–53.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Walter, Assault on the Unknown: The International Geophysical Year (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961).Google Scholar
Toma, Peter, “The Soviet Attitude Towards the Acquisition of Territorial Sovereignty in the Antarctic”, American Journal of International Law 50 (1956): 611–626.Google Scholar
Turchetti, Simone, and Roberts, Peder, eds., The Surveillance Imperative: Geosciences During the Cold War and Beyond (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Turney, Chris, and Fogwill, Chris, “The Implications of the Recently Recognised Mid-20th Century Shift in the Earth System”, Anthropocene Review online (24 February 2021).Google Scholar
Westad, Odd Arne, The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Wilson, Joseph, IGY: The Year of the New Moons (New York: Knopf, 1961).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×